Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

John Waters & Gemma O'Doherty to challenge lockdown in the high Court

1…2627293132…60

Comments

  • #842
    pjohnson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,137 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Long_Wave wrote: »
    The men of 1916 would be absolutely disgusted at the mob of Gemma haters who have taken over this country, brainwashed fools sitting on their hole at home on €350 dole perweek.

    I really wonder how people like this come to exist.


  • #843
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Long_Wave wrote: »
    The men of 1916 would be absolutely disgusted at the mob of Gemma haters who have taken over this country, brainwashed fools sitting on their hole at home on €350 dole perweek.

    How do you know what the men and Women of 1916 think?

    Shows you stupidity that you don’t even know women fought in 1916....


  • #844
    This is it
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,127 ✭✭✭This is it


    I wonder are their minds so warped that they believe they're doing the nation justice, or are they just a pair of attention seeking clowns?


  • #845
    walshb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,643 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    This is it wrote: »
    I wonder are their minds so warped that they believe they're doing the nation justice, or are they just a pair of attention seeking clowns?

    Come on, what do you think?!!

    Utter attention seeking wagons!


  • #846
    This is it
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,127 ✭✭✭This is it


    walshb wrote: »
    Come on, what do you think?!!

    Utter attention seeking wagons!

    Most likely, but the little I've read of Gemma O'Doherty would have me believe that she's a few sandwiches short of a picnic. Maybe a combination of both.


  • Advertisement
  • #847
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is it wrote: »
    I wonder are their minds so warped that they believe they're doing the nation justice, or are they just a pair of attention seeking clowns?

    They are on the outrage threadmill now and need to keep.their actions in line with american conservativism to keep money rolling in through patreon etc



    Though by taking on gaurds/state,they are getting in over their head imo,and gonna lead alot of their followers to jail


  • #848
    pjohnson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,137 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    walshb wrote: »
    Come on, what do you think?!!

    Utter attention seeking wagons!

    I'm still wondering whose work it was she took credit for all those years ago?


  • #849
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    This is it wrote: »
    I wonder are their minds so warped that they believe they're doing the nation justice, or are they just a pair of attention seeking clowns?

    It’s only attention, nobody talk about her and she would be off at some other stupidity


  • #850
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Long_Wave wrote: »
    The men of 1916 would be absolutely disgusted at the mob of Gemma haters who have taken over this country, brainwashed fools sitting on their hole at home on €350 dole perweek.

    They would have most likely taken a pot shot at her and that's coming from someone who actually had relatives take part in the uprising, the war of independence and the Spanish civil war against Franco.

    She and Walters strike me as the types that would be outraged by the uprising if living at the time given the opposition from the church etc to it and the war of independence, informing on anyone taking part, given their (gems, Walters, Barrett etc) wish for a return to good old Catholic Ireland.

    They wouldn't like the fact that some of the uprising leaders were foreigners and homosexuals either.


  • #851
    Skylinehead
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Long_Wave wrote: »
    The men of 1916 would be absolutely disgusted at the mob of Gemma haters who have taken over this country, brainwashed fools sitting on their hole at home on €350 dole perweek.

    The views of men from a hundred years ago are utterly irrelevant tbh. Never got the fetish for bringing them up, nor the founding fathers of America.


  • Advertisement
  • #852
    extra gravy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,265 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    informing on anyone taking part

    You could just imagine her grassing on her neighbours.


  • #853
    DeanAustin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    Calling a woman a C*nt isn't misogynistic anymore?

    Funny because the entire feminist/progressive axis were telling us it was for the past few decades.

    Isn't it hilarious how easily the mask of progressivness slips off and reveals the foaming at the mouth, unstable, highly aggressive character underneath.

    For this alone I commend Gemma.

    She is a c**t. And it has nothing to do with gender. John Waters is a c**t too.

    F**king Gardai trying to do their jobs and having to put up with that pair of clowns on a crusade that 99.99% of the country don't want them on. Yet they claim it's for the people of Ireland. And even if it was, there's no need to be so horrible and disgusting to two people trying to do a job where they are risking their own well being to protect ours.

    There's no misogyny in the post you quoted. Just an opinion the vast majority of people agree with.


  • #854
    dan1895
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Mr.S wrote: »
    **** off

    Seconded


  • #855
    Speakerboxx
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Speakerboxx


    Those guards should have arrested them for not cooperating with the law. Poor guard was far too nice to them.


  • #856
    Arghus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,223 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Personally, I thought the Guard was too meek. Gemma was allowed to say whatever she liked to her and then film her. Pretty sure I wouldn't have got away with it.

    Her attitude is appalling in that video. She's so hateful.


  • #857
    nacho libre
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,622 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    walshb wrote: »
    Come on, what do you think?!!

    Utter attention seeking wagons!


    You're a bollocks, you're a fupping bollocks
    You can Fup off, walshb:D

    https://www.joe.ie/life-style/listen-john-waters-storms-interview-eamon-dunphy-626309


  • #858
    storker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭storker


    Long_Wave wrote: »
    The men of 1916 would be absolutely disgusted at the mob of Gemma haters who have taken over this country, brainwashed fools sitting on their hole at home on €350 dole perweek.

    Pathetic attempt at a dig. Exactly the kind of thing you regularly see O'Doherty's disciples vomit up onto Twitter. I know plenty of people who are still working, either from home or on the front lines interacting with people all day at their own risk, who also think O'Doherty and Waters are idiotic wastes of space.


  • #859
    extra gravy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,265 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Arghus wrote: »
    Personally, I thought the Guard was too meek. Gemma was allowed to say whatever she liked to her and then film her. Pretty sure I wouldn't have got away with it.

    The garda probably knew well who she was and didn't want to give her an excuse. If she'd told her to shut up or tried to take the phone off her, she'd probably have been accused of brutality. She was polite and professional, think that was a better riposte to the rudeness and bad manners.


  • #860
    Arghus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,223 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    extra gravy wrote: »
    The garda probably knew well who she was and didn't want to give her an excuse. If she'd told her to shut up or tried to take the phone off her, she'd probably have been accused of brutality. She was polite and professional, think that was a better riposte to the rudeness and bad manners.

    I suppose that's true. But in fairness I think she overstepped the mark, she was provocative and rude, threatened the guard and filmed her without her consent. It was a bit much. I've seen people arrested for less.

    Gemma seems to get away with a lot when she's speaking to the law, because she takes a good guess that they don't want the hassle. I think it would no harm for someone to soften her cough.


  • #861
    walshb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,643 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Arghus wrote: »
    Personally, I thought the Guard was too meek. Gemma was allowed to say whatever she liked to her and then film her. Pretty sure I wouldn't have got away with it.

    Her attitude is appalling in that video. She's so hateful.

    Spot on.

    And sorry, but as much as I think that woman was in the wrong, and disgusting, she was allowed free reign to do it..

    The camera filming in itself surely should have allowed the Garda to take action?

    I don’t know, I guess ever since all this social media nonsense and the whole water protests where people were making outlandish claims of police brutality, it seems the cops are maybe too damn scared to cross a “line.”

    Anyway, kind of makes me hard to get behind the Garda and respect them when they can allow this type of vile behaviour to go unchallenged..

    Is O’Doherty married, and does she have children? God help them if so...

    Imagine that was your daughter, sister, mother, aunt or relative.... nauseating!


  • Advertisement
  • #862
    Infini
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,654 ✭✭✭Infini


    Believe she does have children and even THEY'RE ashamed of her, nothing but sympathy for them having to deal with an absolute batshìt insane woman.


  • #863
    walshb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,643 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Infini wrote: »
    Believe she does have children and even THEY'RE ashamed of her, nothing but sympathy for them having to deal with an absolute batshìt insane woman.

    Truly bizarre way to behave...and disgusting!


  • #864
    2ndcoming
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    dan1895 wrote: »
    Seconded

    Motion passed.


  • #865
    2ndcoming
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    Arghus wrote: »
    Personally, I thought the Guard was too meek. Gemma was allowed to say whatever she liked to her and then film her. Pretty sure I wouldn't have got away with it.

    Her attitude is appalling in that video. She's so hateful.

    The guard was in a horrible spot. She's exactly the kind of nightmare who would make as big a fuss as possible about any perceived injustice or any mistake the guard made.


  • #866
    FloatingVoter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    She's nothing any front-line worker in a supermarket / civil service /guards doesn't encounter a couple of times a week. As tempting as it may be to chuck them overboard / arrest them / execute them the best solution is to smile and let them blow themselves out. Then promptly put their grievance to the bottom of the pile. Or say it got lost in the logjam.


  • #867
    ricero
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    Shes just a poor mans version of Katie Hopkins


  • #868
    threeball
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,813 ✭✭✭threeball


    walshb wrote: »
    Spot on.

    And sorry, but as much as I think that woman was in the wrong, and disgusting, she was allowed free reign to do it..

    The camera filming in itself surely should have allowed the Garda to take action?

    I don’t know, I guess ever since all this social media nonsense and the whole water protests where people were making outlandish claims of police brutality, it seems the cops are maybe too damn scared to cross a “line.”

    Anyway, kind of makes me hard to get behind the Garda and respect them when they can allow this type of vile behaviour to go unchallenged..

    Is O’Doherty married, and does she have children? God help them if so...

    Imagine that was your daughter, sister, mother, aunt or relative.... nauseating!

    Time they called a halt to this notion that people have that they can shove a cameraphone in anyones face and just film away. Its time there was legislation brought in to outlaw it. Filming people without their consent and putting it on social media should be illegal.


  • #869
    Infini
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,654 ✭✭✭Infini


    threeball wrote: »
    Time they called a halt to this notion that people have that they can shove a cameraphone in anyones face and just film away. Its time there was legislation brought in to outlaw it. Filming people without their consent and putting it on social media should be illegal.

    More to the point they should actually throw libel laws at these feckers who record or stream people with malicious intent to defame. Would shut then up pretty fast if they were on the hook for a nasty legal bill or jail time.


  • #870
    extra gravy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,265 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    threeball wrote: »
    Time they called a halt to this notion that people have that they can shove a cameraphone in anyones face and just film away. Its time there was legislation brought in to outlaw it. Filming people without their consent and putting it on social media should be illegal.

    Totally agree. With data protection being such a big issue now, it beggars belief how this is allowed to continue.


  • Advertisement
  • #871
    owlbethere
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    https://www.change.org/p/irish-court-services-gemma-o-doherty-and-or-john-waters-do-not-speak-for-us


Advertisement