Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVI- 21,983 in ROI (1,339 deaths) 3,881 in NI (404 deaths)(05/05)Read OP

1163164166168169323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-prisons-testing-in/in-four-u-s-state-prisons-nearly-3300-inmates-test-positive-for-coronavirus-96-without-symptoms-idUSKCN2270RX

    Is there any Chance that this could be good news with regards to asymptotic spread. Possibly too opTimistic to think 96% of cases probably are not being detected but as thought, the amount of people infected is most likely a lot higher then we think. This is good when working out the amount of people who die or get very ill as it lowers the percentage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭laurah591


    CNN doing a piece on Japan right now. Seems the Japs are in a spot of bother going by this report.

    Can you link it for me by any chance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭ek motor


    Drumpot wrote: »
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-prisons-testing-in/in-four-u-s-state-prisons-nearly-3300-inmates-test-positive-for-coronavirus-96-without-symptoms-idUSKCN2270RX

    Is there any Chance that this could be good news with regards to asymptotic spread. Possibly too opTimistic to think 96% of cases probably are not being detected but as thought, the amount of people infected is most likely a lot higher then we think. This is good when working out the amount of people who die or get very ill as it lowers the percentage.

    That is very good news. Highlights how important mass testing will be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    I have some questions... perhaps some of the more 'connected' here could provide some answers.

    I know that this is a new virus and that there are a lot of unknowns, so it is inevitable that mistakes have been made in the public health response of the crisis looking retrospectively. But that does not excuse the 'powers that be' from veering away from what is international best practice now.

    There appear to be many decision making bodies in Ireland dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic NPHET, HSE, DOH, CMO and the politicians. The latter 4 usually say that their decisions are based on advice from one of the other bodies. It's a kind of civil service round robin, so that no one can be readily identified as the one who actually made the decision.

    I am still very unclear as to who has the final decision making power...

    (1) Where does the buck stop ?

    (2) Who is to be held accountable for some of the more questionable decisions ?

    In my opinion the buck stops with the Taoiseach, everyone else is an adviser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Hopefully other countries are learning from this approach

    https://twitter.com/AndyBiotech/status/1254220044592205827


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭ek motor


    wadacrack wrote: »
    Hopefully other countries are learning from this approach

    https://twitter.com/AndyBiotech/status/1254220044592205827

    South Korea have done a phenomonal job to stop the spread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭laurah591


    polesheep wrote: »
    In my opinion the buck stops with the Taoiseach, everyone else is an adviser.

    perhaps spread to the cabinet. Does the Taoiseach make unilateral decisions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    bilston wrote: »
    Rather than seeing it as a competition surely it is more likely they want to be able to compare themselves to other countries so they can figure out what works in some countries and what doesn't in others?

    The UK get a lot of stick on this MB for only counting hospital deaths. What do the majority of other countries do? Not a loaded question, I genuinely don't know the answer. I know Ireland counts all deaths, but it might be harder to collate all those stats in a bigger country on a daily basis?

    The ECDC and UN have asked countries to count all deaths including probables. Hopefully this will happen. Ireland are doing that and then getting hammered by some for our high death rate v other countries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    polesheep wrote: »
    In my opinion the buck stops with the Taoiseach, everyone else is an adviser.

    We operate under cabinet collective responsibility in this country


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    jackboy wrote: »
    Do you think there is a good chance some of these may be useful?

    I know the FDA are desperate to get at least one of these on the market and are working with the companies to fast track the approval process. The FDA may approve one of these over the summer.

    I just had a look as I don’t think the Abbott test was given FDA - EAU (Emergency Use Authorisation) and I was correct it hasn’t been reviewed.

    https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/product-and-innovation/abbott-launches-covid-19-antibody-test.html


    But I seen there been 3 new tests approved on Friday


    24/04/2020 DiaSorin has IgG Sero for the Liaison-EUA

    24/04/2020 Ortho-clinical (Johnson & Johnson) has IgG Sero for Vitros EUA

    24/04/2020 Autobio - Total Antibody serology Rapid test has been given EUA.

    https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/emergency-situations-medical-devices/emergency-use-authorizations


    And as expected Roche are seeking the same

    https://www.medicaldevice-network.com/news/roche-serology-test-covid-19-antibodies/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Iran is reporting big decrease in number of daily deaths. Have they got a handle on it? Who knows! Thats what is being reported anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    joe_99 wrote: »
    The ECDC and UN have asked countries to count all deaths including probables. Hopefully this will happen. Ireland are doing that and then getting hammered by some for our high death rate v other countries.

    We certainly don't have low numbers!

    And with the factors that were in our favour from the outset of this... we really should have expected to have low numbers. (Island on the edge of europe / low pop density / young population / advanced warning etc etc)

    Our response to this crisis has been poor. And in fact, continues to be sub par.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭Gynoid


    wadacrack wrote: »
    Hopefully other countries are learning from this approach

    https://twitter.com/AndyBiotech/status/1254220044592205827

    Something I see re South Korea. They have done about 600,000 tests. They are famed for their test, trace, isolate efficiency. I have read they have one of the world's biggest testing programs. They have found 1.8% of those tested had covid. About 11000 cases. And of their identified positive cases the death rate is 2.2%.

    While they are doing great, perhaps those who say the covid CFR is about the same as the flu (0.1%) or just double, maybe 5 times at most (0.2 - 0.5%) should look a bit closer at South Korea's experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    laurah591 wrote: »
    perhaps spread to the cabinet. Does the Taoiseach make unilateral decisions?

    And I’d also be interested to know how much he followed guidelines from health and other authories, if he was poorly advised what exactly was he supposed to do? If our government was following the authority’s to the letter then it wouldn’t of mattered who (government/Taoiseach) was in charge , they would be following the same authorities advice.

    I think at some point we need to stop thinking that blaming and replacing governments is the changes we need, maybe we need to look outside the box on that sort of thinking. Perhaps there are societal and Cultural issues (certainly within public services that all governments rely on) much deeper then the government that we should focus on..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,517 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    ek motor wrote: »
    South Korea have done a phenomonal job to stop the spread.

    Remember when we were pretending to follow the same model?

    That went out the window pretty rapid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    laurah591 wrote: »
    perhaps spread to the cabinet. Does the Taoiseach make unilateral decisions?

    He appoints the cabinet. BTW I'm referring to the post of Taoiseach and not the person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭ek motor


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Iran is reporting big decrease in number of daily deaths. Have they got a handle on it? Who knows! Thats what is being reported anyway.

    I'd take Iran's figures with a pinch of salt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Deaths down to 288 in spain today. Going the right direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    ek motor wrote: »
    I'd take Iran's figures with a pinch of salt.

    How anyone is taking any countries reporting seriously is beyond me, most countries are massaging the figures, and to believe dictatorships like Iran or China are being truthful is beyond naive, even Britains reporting of deaths leads to serious questions the British media don't seem inclined to ask, china could have deaths in the 100s of 1000s and they won't reveal the true numbers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Gynoid wrote: »
    Something I see re South Korea. They have done about 600,000 tests. They are famed for their test, trace, isolate efficiency. I have read they have one of the world's biggest testing programs. They have found 1.8% of those tested had covid. About 11000 cases. And of their identified positive cases the death rate is 2.2%.

    While they are doing great, perhaps those who say the covid CFR is about the same as the flu (0.1%) or just double, maybe 5 times at most (0.2 - 0.5%) should look a bit closer at South Korea's experience.

    If you also look at Germany, UAE, NZ and Australia they have all been consistently doing high level of testing from the start and they all have low death rates.

    The key there is they are doing testing and having a result within 12-48hrs, this helps significantly with contact tracing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Deaths down to 288 in spain today. Going the right direction.

    It’s only 11.50 am


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    bilston wrote: »
    Rather than seeing it as a competition surely it is more likely they want to be able to compare themselves to other countries so they can figure out what works in some countries and what doesn't in others?

    The UK get a lot of stick on this MB for only counting hospital deaths. What do the majority of other countries do? Not a loaded question, I genuinely don't know the answer. I know Ireland counts all deaths, but it might be harder to collate all those stats in a bigger country on a daily basis?

    There's a comparison here in the IT by Professor Tomlinson at Queens University Belfast on why the RoI's death rate is 66% that of NI. From the article:


    The main differences between the North and the Republic emerged in the first three weeks of March as the British and Irish governments took different approaches to the cancellation of mass gatherings, the closure of schools and universities, and other lockdown measures.

    The differences, particularly over school closures, caused political friction in the North but the key policy difference was revealed on March 12th when the British announced the “contain phase” was over and that testing for the Covid-19 infection would henceforth be largely confined to hospital admissions. Contact tracing ceased. Policy became focused almost entirely on managing hospital and intensive care unit capacity.

    Meanwhile the Irish Government moved in the opposite direction. From early March testing and contact tracing were expanded through dozens of community-based facilities and by the end of March the Republic was testing at more than twice the British rate. Chief Medical Officer Dr Holohan repeatedly emphasised the priority of saving lives.

    And:

    The graphs show death rates per million of population for the North and the Republic and also hospital-based deaths. In both examples the Republic’s death rate is two-thirds that in the North.

    This is the clearest evidence we have that the different approaches to tackling the Covid-19 outbreak are resulting in different outcomes. This may change as the pandemic progresses but for now it is reasonable to assume that the North’s higher death rates result from lower rates of testing, the lack of contact tracing and the slower application of lockdown measures compared with the Republic.



    There is an old saying: All comparisons are invidious. However, in order to truly assess how well the Irish government, the public service and the HSE are and have been responding to this pandemic, we must contrast and compare. When we do, by all metrics, Ireland has responded well by comparison with our closest neighbour. It can be argued that their response was abysmal but nevertheless it would appear that the response was imperfect but good Especially as reporting of statistics was a clear and fact-based as possible.

    What reassures me that Ireland's response has been relatively good is that three front line hospital doctors have posted on Boards during this pandemic and all three have highly praised the HSE's response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭frillyleaf


    wadacrack wrote: »
    If they learned any lessons, we wont be opening up on May 5th. It hasn't been handled well, we were too slow to react.

    I agree we were too slow but do you not think it has been handled well over the last few weeks hence lifting some restrictions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Allinall wrote: »
    It’s only 11.50 am

    No its 11.56 AM.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    ek motor wrote: »
    I'd take Iran's figures with a pinch of salt.

    That's all some of you people ever say... like a broken record.

    Apparently every other country worldwide, has unreliable numbers... (Especially the ones that are reporting better figures than Ireland of course) :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,848 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    We certainly don't have low numbers!

    And with the factors that were in our favour from the outset of this... we really should have expected to have low numbers. (Island on the edge of europe / low pop density / young population / advanced warning etc etc)

    Our response to this crisis has been poor. And in fact, continues to be sub par.

    100%..all of the above was stacked in our favor, we were holding all the cards but.... I think anyone has only had to take a look out their window for 5 minutes and witness some of the complete disregard some people have had for what’s going on, the great potential for loss of life , serious illness and misery and some people are just waffling on about mental health and ‘having’ to go visit someone. See how your mental health is when you can’t get to the graveside of a friend or family member and are instead sat back at home, wondering if you might have played a part.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,758 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal



    And the number of deaths increased yesterday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭crossman47


    I have some questions... perhaps some of the more 'connected' here could provide some answers.

    I know that this is a new virus and that there are a lot of unknowns, so it is inevitable that mistakes have been made in the public health response of the crisis looking retrospectively. But that does not excuse the 'powers that be' from veering away from what is international best practice now.

    There appear to be many decision making bodies in Ireland dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic NPHET, HSE, DOH, CMO and the politicians. The latter 4 usually say that their decisions are based on advice from one of the other bodies. It's a kind of civil service round robin, so that no one can be readily identified as the one who actually made the decision.

    I am still very unclear as to who has the final decision making power...

    (1) Where does the buck stop ?

    (2) Who is to be held accountable for some of the more questionable decisions ?

    The point is NPHET brings together a range of experts, including from HSE and Dept. It is chaired by the CMO. Their recommendations are brought to government who can decide to act/not act on them. So far they appear to have acted on all of them. This may change as economic factors come into play.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭crossman47


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    And the number of deaths increased yesterday.

    The number of reported deaths increased


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement