Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid19 Part XV - 15,251 in ROI (610 deaths) 2,645 in NI (194 deaths) (19/04) Read OP

1177178180182183319

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    fritzelly wrote: »
    The flu FFS - what's that got to do with anything right now
    It's like they try and come up with the dumbest questions

    There's a conspiracy theory going around for ages that because there was a bad flu in October it was really covid 19 and we didn't spot it.

    The journalist was trying to ask that without saying it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    Can any nurses/doctors please explain why the uptake of the annual flu shot has been poor in your professions?

    Wrong trend


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,282 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Call me Al wrote: »
    I know. Its repetitive..
    False negatives are a legitimate question. But not those indeterminate results that were incorrectly reported back to the individual, and explained yesterday.

    Someone else will probably ask about it again tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,749 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I'm now looking at RTÉ.ie at 6pm to see the daily update and I'm not sitting and watching the briefings. Not because I don't think they don't have important information, but it's the repetitiveness of the questions. Provided they are answered correctly once they shouldn't need to be asked again and again. I also turn off George lee whenever I might see him. He's the guy when the numbers from Germany were finally included he tweeted in part "oh brilliant!" which nobody should be saying in relation to this crisis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 454 ✭✭Mwengwe


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm seeing these posts every day for the last three weeks.


    We don't have to wait for a vaccine to get back to normal. We need a medicine that prevents the symptoms from getting out of hand. A vaccine will take until mid to late 2021 at the earliest, a medicine could be available by June.

    That may be so but there will still be new cases regardless even with that theoretical medicine, which is what the poster was asking. Hopefully it will be an acceptable level of cases/deaths a la the flu.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Was it not the whole point of social distancing to not peak?
    There will always be a peak but they want to make sure it is as low and as long as possible so that the system doesn't collapse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,583 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    There's a conspiracy theory going around for ages that because there was a bad flu in October it was really covid 19 and we didn't spot it.

    The journalist was trying to ask that without saying it.

    No, it was all about the flu season coming back in October


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,040 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    Was it not the whole point of social distancing to not peak?

    No the point of social distancing is to help flatten the curve,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Because I read the HSE's own reports.

    Just wondering how it is relevent to Covid19?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    There's a conspiracy theory going around for ages that because there was a bad flu in October it was really covid 19 and we didn't spot it.

    The journalist was trying to ask that without saying it.

    No he wasn't. FFS


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,770 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    growleaves wrote: »
    The mortality rate is unknown, it is only projections which put it in worst-pandemic territory, and the predictions of millions of deaths from the models by Fauci and the ICL have been revised downwards to tens of thousands.

    60,000 deaths in the US is Fauci's upper estimate. That's less than a particularly bad flu season (68,000 dead in one year).

    Let me just repeat that, and try to let it sink in for a moment:

    Dr. Anthony Fauci is predicting that covid-19 in the US will be less deadly than a harsh flu season.

    Fauci: US death toll 'looks more like 60,000' than 100-200K estimate

    Minimise it all you want and, hopefully, you're correct and it'll all be grand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    khalessi wrote: »
    Just wondering how it is relevent to Covid19?

    the press briefing was just discussing the next flu season and the need to make sure the uptake of the vaccine is much better than last season including front line workers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Because I read the HSE's own reports.
    The CMO also hinted at it and he expects far more to get flu jabs next winter as a result of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 689 ✭✭✭rm212


    Both statements can be true.

    They are literally contradictory ideals, you cannot peddle both of them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Can any nurses/doctors please explain why the uptake of the annual flu shot has been poor in your professions?

    I know some of my friends and families do not get it anymore as they felt they got worse sick after they got it so maybe why low intake of getting the yearly seasonal winter flu jab


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 119 ✭✭Brianmwalker


    Tony EH wrote: »
    Minimise it all you want and, hopefully, you're correct and it'll all be grand.

    In all likelihood the US is already at 60k covid deaths...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    Tune out if the reality of the situation isn't palatable for you. Tony deserves immense credit so far.

    He also deserves a fair amount of criticism too, for his inept handling of many aspects of this crisis.

    The fact we are only NOW coming up with some kind of concrete plan to protect the nursing / care homes to limit spread, is unbelievable really. Especially when we were warned by the Italians well in advance, about this thing hitting their nursing homes hard - and then out into the surrounding community too!

    More than half our total deaths are from nursing & care homes. Yet we did very little to protect them. It's criminal how slow we've been to react to this and other aspects. We're just nowhere near proactive enough. It has cost us so many lives! :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,811 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    https://twitter.com/GavinColl/status/1250478497925128195

    Don't forget we also have the Easter Bank Holiday premium for all those who bent the rules to come through in the next couple of weeks as well...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Tony EH wrote: »
    In terms or spread RATE and mortality RATE, Covid-19 has been worse than the 57-58 flu. This may get better as we tackle the virus and we might not see deaths in the millions. Hopefully that's the case.

    However, as an example, in the course of over 2 years H2N2 killed just under 30,000 people in Britain. In the three months since Covid-19 hit UK shores, it has killed nearly 13,000.


    Your mistake is that you're simply looking at the final death toll of something that was in effect in one form or another for years and failing to take into account other contexts.

    We may turn a corner and get this thing under control in the next few months and minimise its effects and if that's the case, we can all be thankful. But right now, it's being rightfully compared to the pandemic that occurred at the end of WWI, because not taking it that seriously is a bad idea indeed.

    Also, all of those 13,000 deaths were inside a 5 week period. Britain had a small number of cases 3 months ago , but there was no epidemic . The 13k figure also does not take into account deaths at home or nursing homes, which will increase that total by 20-40%

    This is definitely not the Spanish flu, but there is absolutely nothing comparable to it since the Spanish flu


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 689 ✭✭✭rm212



    Scary how closely we’re following Spain’s trend...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭uncleoswald


    growleaves wrote: »
    The mortality rate is unknown, it is only projections which put it in worst-pandemic territory, and the predictions of millions of deaths from the models by Fauci and the ICL have been revised downwards to tens of thousands.

    60,000 deaths in the US is Fauci's upper estimate. That's less than a particularly bad flu season (68,000 dead in one year).

    Let me just repeat that, and try to let it sink in for a moment:

    Dr. Anthony Fauci is predicting that covid-19 in the US will be less deadly than a harsh flu season.

    Fauci: US death toll 'looks more like 60,000' than 100-200K estimate
    But that number will only be achieved because of the unprecedented lockdown. What would the figure be without a lockdown?

    What point are you even trying to make?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭paddythere


    Fair play to ze German for helping us out. They really have their **** together regarding this whole thing. It will probably be them who develop the vaccine too. A lot to be learned from them about how to run a country properly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Traveller funerals are now an issue, 150 people at one funeral.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Minimise it all you want and, hopefully, you're correct and it'll all be grand.

    The huge worldwide reaction to this pandemic stemmed from taking the models of Dr. Fauci and Dr. Ferguson (of Imperial College London) as normative.

    So if Dr. Fauci is now revising his figures downwards - what does that tell us?

    Is he minimising the concerns that he himself raised ?

    I get that people don't want to gamble lives away but its seriously time to wise up. The medical experts who predicted that this would be a deadly catastrophe of once-in-a-century significance have already walked back those predictions and revised their models downwards. All that's left of those initial predictions are the emotional investment that people have in them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    marno21 wrote: »
    Tony H said there that there has been an increase in testing. That's some of the reason behind the increased cases.

    Those who are concerned about the death rate increasing, please take the time to research the lag between infection, onset of symptoms and death. It has been repeated many times on this thread.
    Why should that assuage their concerns? That just means with the increased number of confirmed cases, the number of deaths will also rise significantly in coming days.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 875 ✭✭✭mean gene


    paddythere wrote: »
    Fair play to ze German for helping us out. They really have their **** together regarding this whole thing. It will probably be them who develop the vaccine too. A lot to be learned from them about how to run a country properly

    absolutely bailing out the banana republic here again as usual


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    growleaves wrote: »
    The huge worldwide reaction to this pandemic stemmed from taking the models of Dr. Fauci and Dr. Ferguson (of Imperial College London) as normative.

    So if Dr. Fauci is now revising his figures downwards - what does that tell us?

    Is he minimising the concerns that he himself raised ?

    I get that people don't want to gamble lives away but its seriously time to wise up. The medical experts who predicted that this would be a deadly catastrophe of once-in-a-century significance have already walked back those predictions and revised their models downwards. All that's left of those initial predictions are the emotional investment that people have in them.

    Do you know that 0.11% of the population of Lombardy has already died from this virus inside the last month? And that figure is excluding the unknown thousands of deaths in nursing homes and at home.The revised upper estimate of death toll for the USA is because of the lockdown curbing the death toll, not because the virus was found to be less dangerous than initially thought


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,811 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    growleaves wrote: »
    The huge worldwide reaction to this pandemic stemmed from taking the models of Dr. Fauci and Dr. Ferguson (of Imperial College London) as normative.

    So if Dr. Fauci is now revising his figures downwards - what does that tell us?

    Is he minimising the concerns that he himself raised ?

    I get that people don't want to gamble lives away but its seriously time to wise up. The medical experts who predicted that this would be a deadly catastrophe of once-in-a-century significance have already walked back those predictions and revised their models downwards. All that's left of those initial predictions are the emotional investment that people have in them.

    The problem with your analysis is when you remove counter measures such as the mitigation policies.

    It's had an enormous impact on restricting and delaying spread and Fauci stresses at every opportunity.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,341 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    growleaves wrote: »
    The huge worldwide reaction to this pandemic stemmed from taking the models of Dr. Fauci and Dr. Ferguson (of Imperial College London) as normative.

    So if Dr. Fauci is now revising his figures downwards - what does that tell us?

    Is he minimising the concerns that he himself raised ?.
    .
    But that number will only be achieved because of the unprecedented lockdown. What would the figure be without a lockdown?

    What point are you even trying to make?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement