Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid19 Part XV - 15,251 in ROI (610 deaths) 2,645 in NI (194 deaths) (19/04) Read OP

1133134136138139319

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,695 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    If sporting events are allowed later in the year they will be behind closed doors as Germany is now considering. That kinda goes without saying.

    Audiences wont be allowed any where in Europe any time soon.

    That makes sense and in all honesty will probably last for the remainder of this year.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    WHO said today that sporting events and concerts were unlikely for 18 months.

    Where did they say this ? Said the opposite on radio 1 this morning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,695 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The government have said that they are making decisions based on the CMO recommendations so you're getting it from the horses mouth.

    And that's my main gripe with it. He should only be part of the discussion, not the decision maker. Last time I checked he was an unelected individual.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,353 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    JRant wrote: »
    Very sad to hear of another 41 deaths today.

    Listening to the CMO I thought he overstepped the mark when asked about sporting events. He was very unequivocal that nine would be taking place until a vaccine was readily available. Now that may well be his opinion but it's up to the government to make these decisions, not the CMO.

    Sport well be the last thing to come back. It's a purely pleasure pursuit which has people congregating.

    From a virus containment and economic point of view it ticks all the wrong boxes. You might not have liked what he said, but he was being honest.


  • Posts: 1,817 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Horrific to think. Very strange. Might go some way in explaining the high viral load affect. If viral load great enough to overcome tcells then downward trajectory. The reactivation stuff in Korea might be so far fetched either. That’s one nasty spike protein.

    “The gene behind the fusion function in Sars-CoV-2 was not found in other coronaviruses in human or animals.”

    What sort of mess has China left the world with.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,822 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    froog wrote: »

    It's always seemed odd to me that Trump is constantly tweeting things like this, it comes off as very childish and I'm amazed it hasn't been nipped in the bud by somebody in the White House at this stage


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭Rvsmmnps


    https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/coronavirus/testing.html#test-centre

    Does anyone know what the procedure is like,has anyone been tested?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭beerguts


    Would any poster be able to post a histogram of all deaths that have occurred in Ireland from Covid 19. The daily HSE reporting do give the mean and median age of death, but for me I'd like to see the actual distribution over the age ranges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Mervyn Skidmore


    JRant wrote: »
    And that's my main gripe with it. He should only be part of the discussion, not the decision maker. Last time I checked he was an unelected individual.

    That can work both ways though. Look at Trump and Fauci for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭shocksy


    JRant wrote: »
    Now that may well be his opinion but it's up to the government to make these decisions, not the CMO.

    Technically it is his decision to make, along with his team.

    They report to the government with their opinion.

    The government don't have to follow their instructions but they most likely always will. It would be very silly for a government to do the opposite of what they say. If things got crazy bad for not following their guidelines they would never live it down.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,048 ✭✭✭✭blade1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    NDWC wrote: »
    It's always seemed odd to me that Trump is constantly tweeting things like this, it comes off as very childish and I'm amazed it hasn't been nipped in the bud by somebody in the White House at this stage

    he surrounds himself with yes men. anyone who doesn't fawn over him with praise constantly is immediately fired. he runs the white house exactly like he runs his company.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭Rvsmmnps


    froog wrote: »
    he surrounds himself with yes men. anyone who doesn't fawn over him with praise constantly is immediately fired. he runs the white house exactly like he runs his company.

    I think the root of the gripe between them was the issue with the "5 ventilators" in the nyc hospital. Thats what the mayor claimed,yet there were 100s of ventilators in storage.So they were trying to make out it was a lack of care from the president above.The mayor was questioned on it.


  • Posts: 1,817 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Very interesting. Here is the corresponding paper in nature for those interested.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0424-9

    So does this mean we could have a highly infectious HIV like illness on our hands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭Coyote


    Rvsmmnps wrote: »
    https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/coronavirus/testing.html#test-centre

    Does anyone know what the procedure is like,has anyone been tested?

    Hi Rvsmmnps

    what questions do you have?
    they have given a good guide to what happens, the first part will be when you get there just window down the windows 1"they will tell you a spot to part, it was not busy when i did mine a few weeks ago just after the updated guidelines. then someone will come out and give you some stuff and ask some questions then 10-15 min later they take the sample.
    then then follow whats given below, they ask you to do your best to not cough when they take the throat swab as they need to be right in front of your face.
    the nose swab is not nice but it's OK, it feels like it's gone too far but that's normal, I would make sure to have cleaned your nose beforehand make life easier

    Coyote
    1. Park and remain in your car.
    2. A healthcare worker will approach you.
    3. You'll be given a mask to put on, they will explain to you what will happen, ask you some questions and you'll be taken into the test centre.
    4. You'll be asked to wash your hands properly.
    5. Healthcare staff will take some personal details from you including your phone number. This is so you can be contacted with your results.
    6. You'll be asked to blow your nose into a tissue and bin it in a secure bin.
    7. A healthcare worker will take a sample from inside your mouth and nose using a swab. This will be sent to a lab for testing.
    8. You will then need to drive home and remain in self-isolation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,056 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    https://twitter.com/datavizireland/status/1250114533697490946?s=19

    https://twitter.com/datavizireland/status/1250114268835577857?s=19

    Both good stats again. People need to look beyond the case numbers and actually look at the statistics behind the figures.
    "actually look at the statistics behind the figures"...


    Well, there certainly is a positive slant, so to speak, to those graphs.. In actual numbers (taken with thanks from Coyote's spreadsheet), so that the increases aren't being obfuscated in percentages growth on previous days' numbers:



    People newly admitted to hospital each day:
    Mar 24 31
    Mar 25 35
    Mar 26 40
    Mar 27 45
    Mar 28 44
    Mar 29 30
    Mar 30 44
    Mar 31 49
    Apr 1 33
    Apr 2 61
    Apr 3 63
    Apr 4 50
    Apr 5 59
    Apr 6 55
    Apr 7 52
    Apr 8 55
    Apr 9 75
    Apr 10 225
    Apr 11 126
    Apr 12 109
    Apr 13 149
    Apr 14 123


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,450 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    niallo27 wrote: »
    How long before we become completed decentized to the numbers dead. For me its just a number I wait to check every day. Crazy the way it ****s with your head.


    https://twitter.com/BBCPM/status/1248649465201819649?s=19

    I know what you mean. This might help with that - remembering the dead as more than just statistics. Found it quite moving. Apologies if posted earlier, haven't had time to read through all the posts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Ficheall wrote: »
    "actually look at the statistics behind the figures"...


    Well, there certainly is a positive slant, so to speak, to those graphs.. In actual numbers (taken with thanks from Coyote's spreadsheet), so that the increases aren't being obfuscated in percentages growth on previous days' numbers:



    People newly admitted to hospital each day:
    Mar 24 31
    Mar 25 35
    Mar 26 40
    Mar 27 45
    Mar 28 44
    Mar 29 30
    Mar 30 44
    Mar 31 49
    Apr 1 33
    Apr 2 61
    Apr 3 63
    Apr 4 50
    Apr 5 59
    Apr 6 55
    Apr 7 52
    Apr 8 55
    Apr 9 75
    Apr 10 225
    Apr 11 126
    Apr 12 109
    Apr 13 149
    Apr 14 123

    Thats the point though the numbers are quite steady especially in ICU. As has been said the lower the percentage increase the more the curve is flattening so its not a positive slant, it is a postive.

    Our hosptial system could have been overrun by now, its not.

    The point is people are reading way too much into the new case numbers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    beerguts wrote: »
    Would any poster be able to post a histogram of all deaths that have occurred in Ireland from Covid 19. The daily HSE reporting do give the mean and median age of death, but for me I'd like to see the actual distribution over the age ranges.

    Here's the data. Not possible to do median or mean as it is bucketed.
    But histogram possible.

    509590.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,056 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Thats the point though the numbers are quite steady especially in ICU.
    The point is people are reading way too much into the new case numbers.
    They are increasing quite steadily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 946 ✭✭✭JPCN1


    Singapore reports 334 new cases and 1 new death.

    It still surprises because everyone was use to Singapore having this completely under control and just like that...

    I gather primarily Bangladeshi construction workers who live in cramped dormitories. Poor folk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Ficheall wrote: »
    They are increasing quite steadily.

    Do you actually understand how the curve flattens ??

    Of course there increasing, the whole point of flattening the curve is that it's not a sudden increase and the cases are pushed out over time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭RebelButtMunch


    JPCN1 wrote: »
    I gather primarily Bangladeshi construction workers who live in cramped dormitories. Poor folk.

    They depend so much on immigrant labour there. I wonder what the repercussions of this will be


  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As expected, with the addition of the German figures, we past 10k yesterday. Today an additional 832 were added for a total of 11,479 with 406 deaths (now included in the chart below).

    509581.png

    The r value is not truly reflective of the current rate of infection due to the German figures, but I decided to leave them in rather than try to figure some way of including them but not disrupting the main model.

    509582.png

    Also, its difficult now to project correctly where we'll be given the disruption of the German figures to the model. I was going to track these separately to preserve the model, but it'll balance out in a few days once the last of those are accounted for. They need to be included in the overall figures anyway, so it makes more sense to just add them to the regular daily totals.

    With that in mind, the projections below should be taken with a grain of salt.

    509583.png

    The same caveat applies to the projections for the daily reported cases below

    509584.png

    Finally, I spent a bit more time on the national, county-by-county breakdown, so that is detailed below. The blue bars represent the total cases for each county, with the orange line representing the rate per 10k population. Its also divided by province for whoever it was that mentioned that (sorry, the name escapes me).

    509585.png

    We are now at 90k tests and according to report, the backlog should be cleared by the weekend meaning we are very close to a 24 hr turnaround for test results. That will be a big step towards easing the lockdown. The big risk will be in easing the lockdown too early. Right now Austria & Denmark are gradually lifting their lockdown's and to be honest, I think its still too early.

    In my opinion, in order to return to normality, the following will be needed
    • A max of a 24 hr turnaround for test results. Same-day would be better.
    • Wide scale testing where clustering is difficult or unavoidable e.g. schools
    • Masks to become a requirement
    • Social distancing remains
    • Large scale events still on hold
    • A general acceptance among the population that in order to return to normality, some people are going to die who otherwise would not have if we remained in lockdown.

    The easing of restrictions will come sooner or later, but personally I would not like to see it happening until we are comfortably below an r value of 0.95, at least 0.9 but I don't know how feasible that is.

    Next update Friday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,056 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Do you actually understand how the curve flattens ??

    Of course there increasing, the whole point of flattening the curve is that it's not a sudden increase and the cases are pushed out over time.
    I do, yes, thanks. My issue is that visually the graph suggests things are improving much more quickly than they are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Thats the point though the numbers are quite steady especially in ICU. As has been said the lower the percentage increase the more the curve is flattening so its not a positive slant, it is a postive.

    Our hosptial system could have been overrun by now, its not.

    The point is people are reading way too much into the new case numbers.

    Yeah but we are supposed to be flattening the curve. Its going up to the right, it doesn't look very flat. Taking the derivative and saying it's decreasing is the same as say the car is still accelerating but not as quickly as it was accelerating. It is still going faster however?

    The positive spin is approaching religious fanaticism. I've no doubt it will slow. I'm just not going to say it is until it has.


    509592.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    As expected, with the addition of the German figures, we past 10k yesterday. Today an additional 832 were added for a total of 11,479 with 406 deaths (now included in the chart below).

    509581.png

    The r value is not truly reflective of the current rate of infection due to the German figures, but I decided to leave them in rather than try to figure some way of including them but not disrupting the main model.

    509582.png

    Also, its difficult now to project correctly where we'll be given the disruption of the German figures to the model. I was going to track these separately to preserve the model, but it'll balance out in a few days once the last of those are accounted for. They need to be included in the overall figures anyway, so it makes more sense to just add them to the regular daily totals.

    With that in mind, the projections below should be taken with a grain of salt.

    509583.png

    The same caveat applies to the projections for the daily reported cases below

    509584.png

    Finally, I spent a bit more time on the national, county-by-county breakdown, so that is detailed below. The blue bars represent the total cases for each county, with the orange line representing the rate per 10k population. Its also divided by province for whoever it was that mentioned that (sorry, the name escapes me).

    509585.png

    We are now at 90k tests and according to report, the backlog should be cleared by the weekend meaning we are very close to a 24 hr turnaround for test results. That will be a big step towards easing the lockdown. The big risk will be in easing the lockdown too early. Right now Austria & Denmark are gradually lifting their lockdown's and to be honest, I think its still too early.

    In my opinion, in order to return to normality, the following will be needed
    • A max of a 24 hr turnaround for test results. Same-day would be better.
    • Wide scale testing where clustering is difficult or unavoidable e.g. schools
    • Masks to become a requirement
    • Social distancing remains
    • Large scale events still on hold
    • A general acceptance among the population that in order to return to normality, some people are going to die who otherwise would not have if we remained in lockdown.

    The easing of restrictions will come sooner or later, but personally I would not like to see it happening until we are comfortably below an r value of 0.95, at least 0.9 but I don't know how feasible that is.

    Next update Friday

    Excellent graphs thanks for that.

    With the R value personally I would like to see that lower, potentially 0.6 - 0.7 if that was at all possible. 0.6 is the R value in Denmark today when they reopened some shops etc. But if it got to .9 that would be great too given where we started


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    So does this mean we could have a highly infectious HIV like illness on our hands.

    I don't know.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_that_I_know_nothing


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 946 ✭✭✭JPCN1


    They depend so much on immigrant labour there. I wonder what the repercussions of this will be

    They have way better pay over the poor sods in Qatar at least. FIFA just another discredited world body.

    By the same token in the 50's in Kilburn a lot of Irish labourers suffered the same conditions and were/are largely forgotten now... those that still live


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement