Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

CoVid19 Part XII - 4,604 in ROI (137 deaths) 998 in NI (56 deaths)(04/04) **Read OP**

1198199201203204323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,075 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    A 6 week old baby died in America. A 13 year old died in the UK, a 16 year old died in France. A 42 year old died in Ireland (going by what another poster said here yesterday).

    I think there will be deaths of all ages and not just the old.

    Why are you posting this? Everyone knows this. It is undisputed that there have been and will be deaths of all ages. But the weighting in the various age groupings leans far more to the elderly age cohorts.

    You're just posting hysterics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    The majority of the job losses will be temporary.

    You really think so? A lot of businesses won't reopen after this is all over.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think people are underestimating what testing is telling us.

    Even if our testing looks low we are doing much more targeted testing and are testing similar numbers every day. If our positive tests stay around the same it shows that its not spreading wildly as if the overall number of positives is increasing but the daily numbers are not shooting up then clearly things are being contained.

    As has been pointed out many times, testing is for the benefit of the public health policy setting. People who are sick - whether from Covid19 or other ailments will receive full medical responses.

    Important lessons are being learnt - eg the number of contacts each positive has is reducing from 20 to 5 to 3. Also, the medical staff are getting infected from sources outside work.

    So testing is not for the sole benefit of those being tested.

    If you do not want to be infected - wash you hands properly, stay at home, and keep away from everyone else - they may be infected and so might you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    I think people are underestimating what testing is telling us.

    Even if our testing looks low we are doing much more targeted testing and are testing similar numbers every day. If our positive tests stay around the same it shows that its not spreading wildly as if the overall number of positives is increasing but the daily numbers are not shooting up then clearly things are being contained.

    Nothing to do with current rates of testing. There is increasing evidence that asymptomatic and early onset cases are a significant risk of infecting others.

    It is known that the spread of infection can be reduced by the infected wearing masks However we dont know who those people are.

    As much as hand washing - we need to do start using masks . Now.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 80,632 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    Milton is the job for this type of thing. Especially their sprays and no danger from them like bleach.

    I don't see leaving stuff for 72 hours as practical, we are getting a delivery every 5 to 7 days, we are very low on everything once it arrives and need a lot of the stuff straight away.


    Milton sterilising liquid is bleach (sodium hypochlorite) based. Still, it doesn't kill viruses on contact:
    Virucidal: in 15 minutes NF T72-180. Effective on Rotavirus and Coronavirus.

    As for the disinfectant sprays, I've just looked at their website: it says it's an Antibacterial Surface Spray, it does not kill viruses.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Why are you posting this? Everyone knows this. It is undisputed that there have been and will be deaths of all ages. But the weighting in the various age groupings leans far more to the elderly age cohorts.

    You're just posting hysterics.
    TBF some posters are having a very hard time with this and you might want to consider cutting posts like that some slack. Treat it as one of the many of the posts we read but don't respond to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,766 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    When it comes to cleaning groceries from the shop, what's best to use? We have some Dettol wipes, but have thick bleach also, could use instead. Actually, what is the difference between thick/thin bleach? :confused:
    Should we just use soapy water and a cloth?

    I just use detergent and a sponge and then nuke the sponge in the microwave for 40 seconds. Detergents can neutralize viruses because they break them open by attacking their lipid coats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,891 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    BattleCorp wrote: »
    You really think so? A lot of businesses won't reopen after this is all over.

    Some not alot.

    I do think a credit on public liability insurance should be given.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,138 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Does anyone believe that we will get up to 10000 tests per day by mid April?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,259 ✭✭✭jackboy


    New Home wrote: »
    Milton sterilising liquid is bleach (sodium hypochlorite) based. Still, it doesn't kill viruses on contact:



    As for the disinfectant sprays, I've just looked at their website: it says it's an AntibacterialSurface Spray, it does not kill viruses[/B].

    A bit of washing up liquid in warm water will kill the virus nicely. No need for the fancy stuff.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    walshb wrote: »
    Does anyone believe that we will get up to 10000 tests per day by mid April?
    Mid-April is just two weeks away so no probably not. Once we get past that 7-10 day delay one would assume it will be able to ramp up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,075 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    is_that_so wrote: »
    TBF some posters are having a very hard time with this and you might want to consider cutting posts like that some slack. Treat it as one of the many of the posts we read but don't respond to.

    Others will read it won't they? And it might feed into their sense of unease.. worsening it.

    I think it's appropriate to call out hysterics as such.


  • Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    New Home wrote: »
    Milton sterilising liquid is bleach (sodium hypochlorite) based. Still, it doesn't kill viruses on contact:



    As for the disinfectant sprays, I've just looked at their website: it says it's an Antibacterial Surface Spray, it does not kill viruses.

    I read Milton kills corona so assumed all their products did hence why I have been using the spray (which says bleach free and assumed it was the same stuff as the sterilising fluid).

    I’d assume though that if wiping with simple soap clears it away that wiping with a disinfectant spray would too though despite it not officially killing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,974 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    jackboy wrote: »
    A bit of washing up liquid in warm water will kill the virus nicely. No need for the fancy stuff.
    why soap kills coronavirus
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/12/science-soap-kills-coronavirus-alcohol-based-disinfectants

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,354 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    EUhOZ7aUEAEgw3u.jpg

    And we were thinking of sending student nurses into danger without pay...
    Anyone know how much they are being paid now ?

    As much as we all want to say that FG etc are doing a "good" job with this Corona situation. The above needs to constantly act as a reminder what the situation was before this pandemic hit and how government were of little help and in many cases, an actual hindrance.

    Perhaps this is the sea change that's needed regarding government attitude to front line healthcare staff and their needs.

    I won't hold my breath though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 brwh11


    Here's a Death graph of Ireland and the Scandinavian countries (plus Spain who are on the worst European trajectory)

    what is the source site for this graph?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,098 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    marno21 wrote: »
    Tony H is back at work

    https://twitter.com/sandra_hurley/status/1245640109711486977

    Fantastic news. Great to see him recovered

    Terrible news

    Big figures coming

    Tony doesn't get out of bed for 212 cases :p


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    The majority of the job losses will be temporary.

    Only if the lockdown doesnt last too long. Once we start moving through May and into June, with this level of lockdown I think that 'temporary' will look less and less likely to be the case


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭MOR316




    People who look like that are usually ones out to try and nab your girlfriend/wife


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Pulsating Star


    Gynoid wrote: »
    Funny how this situation can affect the psyche. Usually if I have a bad dream the bad stuff would be fairly dramatic, being chased by unknown evil doers, a rising sea blocking me in, walking on a narrow ledge high up, that kind of thing. Had a bad dream last night. Was just walking down a nondescript street. And people kept passing me by too closely! One even rubbed off of me. Aaaarrgghhhh! :(

    Was quite anxious the first week of the shutdown and remember waking up after bad dreams a number of times, to the realization that the daytime nightmare was so much worse! I found that really freaky at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I don't get all the calls for masks for everyone. Sure if you have to be around other people at work but those of us who are staying at home and not seeing anyone outside the household except when going to the shops, surely the chances of catching it are next to nothing, mask or not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    cnocbui wrote: »
    I just use detergent and a sponge and then nuke the sponge in the microwave for 40 seconds. Detergents can neutralize viruses because they break them open by attacking their lipid coats.


    That's fine but I've read that microwaves aren't enough to kill it. I guess the heat of water vapour if over 60C should kill it though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Terrible news

    Big figures coming

    Tony doesn't get out of bed for 212 cases :p
    Amazing the panic one man down causes!:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Tony EH wrote: »
    As much as we all want to say that FG etc are doing a "good" job with this Corona situation. The above needs to constantly act as a reminder what the situation was before this pandemic hit and how government were of little help and in many cases, an actual hindrance.

    Perhaps this is the sea change that's needed regarding government attitude to front line healthcare staff and their needs.

    I won't hold my breath though.

    The HSE gets 17.5 billion, per year, from the Irish government. Maybe we should look at the HSE and actually see where the spend is being allocated to rather than the same tired lazy political back and forth which has got us nowhere since the establishment of the unified health service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I don't get all the calls for masks for everyone. Sure if you have to be around other people at work but those of us who are staying at home and not seeing anyone outside the household except when going to the shops, surely the chances of catching it are next to nothing, mask or not?

    A mask will probably help to reduce your odds of catching the virus, a mask will definitely reduce your odds of passing on the virus, even if you don't know you have it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,128 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    MadYaker wrote: »
    The UK media in general have been an absolute disgrace throughout this. Both the tabloids and the guardian. Stoking fear and spreading panic. We whinge about RTE (for good reason) but they’ve done ok here getting the info out in a factual manner and not trying to terrify people.

    Then you read these threads and it is all fear and panic

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,974 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr



    Yep he is, hard to ascertain his reasons for this campaign given it's essentially based on firing out fact and proof free statements. Is he still angry at Fine Girl for not prostrating itself and the DCC at the feet of his web summit jamboree?


    In other news Eddie Large is the latest well known (ish) name/face to have been claimed by Covid 19, again old with a poor heart.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,607 ✭✭✭bennyl10



    and we'd people on this thread sharing him like he was any kind of source.

    If you want your wifi fixed, go to PC,
    otherwise he's best ignored


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement