Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part XI - 2,615 in ROI (46 deaths) 410 in NI (21 deaths)(29/03)*OP upd 28/03*

1234235237239240332

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭munsterlegend


    AdrianG08 wrote: »
    ICU numbers?

    67 in ICU as of midnight Thursday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 smallfryy


    Why are there so many deaths all of a sudden? Is it because hospitals are so busy? Or are we just starting to see the impact now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭brendanwalsh


    Most of these new death spikes are because it has infiltrated nursing homes, and when these patients present to hospital they are not offered ICU care or ventilators.

    The ICU admission criteria for Ireland is very strict unlike other parts of the world.

    Unfortunately they already draw an arbitrary line across people with co-morbidities, this will be further accentuated now due to ventilator supply being very low.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,147 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,120 ✭✭✭This is it


    That's awful. RIP.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    294 new cases
    14 more deaths

    HSE update just now

    Getting away from them now. Predictable given our one step behind the virus policies over the last month.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    smallfryy wrote: »
    Why are there so many deaths all of a sudden? Is it because hospitals are so busy? Or are we just starting to see the impact now?


    Unfortunately I think this is due to the clusters they are referring to hitting the nursing homes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭neonsofa


    smallfryy wrote: »
    Why are there so many deaths all of a sudden? Is it because hospitals are so busy? Or are we just starting to see the impact now?

    Going by the median age, I was assuming it is still deaths associated with the nursing home outbreaks. I could be really wrong though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,364 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    294 new cases and 14 deaths medium age 81. RTE NEWS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭893bet


    Most of these new death spikes are because it has infiltrated nursing homes, and when these patients present to hospital they are not offered ICU care or ventilators.

    The ICU admission criteria for Ireland is very strict unlike other parts of the world.

    Unfortunately they already draw an arbitrary line across people with co-morbidities, this will be further accentuated now due to ventilator supply being very low.

    Where is this detailed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 smallfryy


    Most of these new death spikes are because it has infiltrated nursing homes, and when these patients present to hospital they are not offered ICU care or ventilators.

    So what happens? They're not helped breathe? Do we not even try save them? I can't even imagine any doctor that wouldn't try surely?



    *edit* just to add I wasnt aware it was so bad in a nursing home. How very sad, poor things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,056 ✭✭✭darced


    Feels like its starting to get out of hand.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,069 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    BanditLuke wrote: »
    Getting away from them now. Predictable given our one step behind the virus policies over the last month.

    You have literally no idea if this is true. You are definitely one of the worst offenders on here for trying to find the absolute worst in everything that happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,681 ✭✭✭Talisman


    Bruce Aylward (WHO) dodging questions regarding Taiwan:

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1243865641448169474


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    RIP to the 14 people who passed away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Their society was hierarchical and for far longer. It's why they had brief periods of incredible innovation followed by stagnation. In simple terms, there was no point in coming up with a better mousetrap if you're a pottery maker. You'd be ignored for the most part. Social movement was extremely regimented. Your example of the examinations a good example of that. You mentioned Confucianism, but left out Taoism. That had a huge impact and stymied innovation. Centralised, insular, inward looking and stagnated by monumental bureaucracy. Take printing. They(and the Koreans) came up with it and did little enough with it. It comes to Europe and it changed human civilisation within the span of a human lifetime. Take gunpowder. Ditto. If you took a Chinese peasant from the tenth century and transported him to eighteenth century China he'd see few differences, if you did the same with a European peasant his head would spin.

    So nah overall, I think I'll still take Western culture and politics and philosophies over the Chinese empire's ta very much. Hell, in many ways they themselves do. If you removed western tech and surface culture from modern China, you'd have a very different looking country indeed. And they're pretty good at the oul capitalism, though pretty crap at democracy.

    China was legitamitely way ahead of Europe for a huge part of the history of human civilization. Look at the Mongols, who were the only real far reaching imperialist empire within the Chinese sphere of influence. They steamrolled Eastern Europe in a matter of months with a mere scouting mission, while it took them generations to topple Song China, which was considered a particularly insular and non progressive Chinese Empire. China's lack of international ambition cost them in the early age of globalisation and they had a very bad century and a half of humiliation, colonisation and terrible leadership. Its unfair to look at that brief period and judge their overall culture. They are moving much faster than us in Western Europe now, their major cities could well have a higher standard of living than us in a decade or two.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭shinny


    294 new cases and 14 deaths medium age 81. RTE NEWS

    Ok, sounds like it is the nursing homes again. Awful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 126 ✭✭Un1corn


    Yurt! wrote: »
    The Chinese Communist Party are not our friends. They're red ethno-nationalists who who just before the new year were mounting a propoganda campaign in the west that their network of concentration camps were trade schools.

    If you're impressed by a few consignments of masks and gowns (that we'll be paying for remember) after the sh*tstorm they brought on the world, you're easily bought and impressed indeed.

    It's really fascinating how some people are so succeptible to propaganda.

    And also, FYI, Confucianism isn't a system of government, it's a set of cultural rites and frameworks for society and above all, ethical teachings. It was actually out of favour since the revolution, and has been recently superficially recussitated for nationailist purposes. Mainland China is probably the least Confucian (if that word even makes sense in the 21st century) of the Sino influenced East Asian states.

    Yurt! You are spot in with this post. China is a polluted authoritarian dystopian runescape and we should be distancing ourselves from it. By trading with China we are tolerating one of the most brutal regimes in the world. I worked in China for many years and am married to a Taiwanese woman. I shudder when I see people praising China for it's response. Their intransparent and corrupt dictatorship tried to cover up this mess and it their system of values which landed us here. We should absolutely throw the bucket at them when this is done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    Why are we getting the ICU numbers of 67 up until Thursday night when we were told its 71 last night? Pointless to give an old number I would have thought. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    Most of these new death spikes are because it has infiltrated nursing homes, and when these patients present to hospital they are not offered ICU care or ventilators.

    The ICU admission criteria for Ireland is very strict unlike other parts of the world.

    Unfortunately they already draw an arbitrary line across people with co-morbidities, this will be further accentuated now due to ventilator supply being very low.

    What?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭foxyladyxx


    smallfryy wrote: »
    So what happens? They're not helped breathe? Do we not even try save them? I can't even imagine any doctor that wouldn't try surely?



    *edit* just to add I wasnt aware it was so bad in a nursing home. How very sad, poor things.

    This would only happen with the consent of the next of kin as far as I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,147 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Talisman wrote: »
    Bruce Aylward (WHO) dodging questions regarding Taiwan:

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1243865641448169474

    Taiwan is China, according to China and WHO do what China tells them to do


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Nursing home staff should be working in hazmat suits. If one staff member had covid19 it could be fatal to a large number of patients.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,185 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    67 until Thursday midnight.

    Don't we already know it was 71 as of yesterday?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1243964331622117376?s=19

    For anyone asking about ICU figures. They are the number since the start


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,410 ✭✭✭Westernyelp


    67 as of Thursday.


    Is 67 the number currently in ICU or a total of all treated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭regedit


    This must be a terrifying time for families who have people in nursing homes. A lot of clusters in these institutions. The mean age of those who passed away today [RIP] is 81 so these must be all from nursing homes.
    The virus is obviously there so not sure if anything drastic can be done to cull the numbers rising even more there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    awec wrote: »
    You have literally no idea if this is true. You are definitely one of the worst offenders on here for trying to find the absolute worst in everything that happens.

    Nope I'm a completely realistic poster have been since day one and like I've always said I had hoped I was wrong about everything.

    As a matter of curiosity how do you think we've handled the situation since day one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    Why are we getting the ICU numbers of 67 up until Thursday night when we were told its 71 last night? Pointless to give an old number I would have thought. :confused:

    You might have heard 71 somewhere but the official release said 59 as of midnight wednesday.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    Why are we getting the ICU numbers of 67 up until Thursday night when we were told its 71 last night? Pointless to give an old number I would have thought. :confused:
    As always depends on the source of such numbers. Our rate of increase seems to be down to about 14%.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement