Post pics of your watches ***Please NO QUOTING PHOTOS***

Eoin wrote: »

Mesh can be bit and miss, but if it's like the one I had on a couple of Breitlings before, they are seriously comfortable.

I'd agree for almost any watch except Breitlings for some reason it just works.

Cmar-Ireland wrote: »

Did you get hit for customs?

No, packaging said timing device on label

thomasm wrote: »

No, packaging said timing device on label

in some parts of the world that could be a dodgy description :cool::P:pac:

unkel wrote: »

How come you're putting in offers on that 114270 on adverts then?

Come on, admit it. Your 214270 is too big for your wrists :pac:

The 39mm is the perfect size for my wrist but the dimensions of the actually watch look a bit off. I think 36mm is beautifully proportioned. So I might have both and drastically reduced my collection size.

unkel wrote: »

Wow I don't think many people have both of those watches!

Ya it would be nice

I thought, what with it being the end of the World and all that, I'd break 'er out for the day. May as well die stylish.





(Thanks in advance for embedding image Wibbs)

No worries B :-)

Casio Oceanus



I'm still impressed by the fit and finish on this watch.

unkel wrote: »

For the day? If that was mine it would be my daily wearer

This is my daily wearer (thanks for the embedding again Wibbs)








Am I your bitch? :-D

Birneybau wrote: »

This is my daily wearer

I'd still have the Rolex as my daily wearer :pac:

Finally arrived not as expensive as some of the above but I love it.

etxp wrote: »

Either ye guys get paid loads or are very good with your money :P Two lovely watches.

I'll be honest and paraphrase Fr. Ted. That money was just resting in my account. Can't see a mortgage coming for a long while and whilst I probably won't make profits on either, they won't go down in price too much I reckon. Been saving for years. Always wanted a Speedy, Rolex came at a good price.

TheRepentent wrote: »

Probably both

This forum is great...you'll see a poster wearing a 15k watch but still ohs and ahs over a 400 euro seiko because its a good watch.


But ye lucky ba$tards:pac::pac::pac:

That's what it's all about, isn't it. I really like my Bulova "Moonwatch" and I paid €375 for it new. Has barely lost a second over the time I've had it, amazing.

unkel wrote: »

Now that is a very manly watch. Any details of the model, where did you buy it?

Tudor ranger.

https://www.tudorwatch.com/watches/heritage-ranger/m79910-0011

It's fulfilled my itch for an explorer type watch. Bought from adverts.

dinorebel wrote: »

Finally arrived not as expensive as some of the above but I love it.

SNIP

I had a Mako XL, sold it to one of out fellow parishioners. Quality watches.

Birneybau wrote: »

Aye, I know. Still, a lot of bag for the buck. It's the quartz one alright.

If you want a watch that's in some way related to one that's been on the moon then compared to others like the Omega Speedmaster it is a 'lot of bang for the buck' but if you're not bothered then it isn't. Depends on the outlook of each individual watch owner/buyer. You're obviously very happy with it which is all that matters.

It's a nice looking watch and the pushers are cool. Have you got a photo of yours?