FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:01PM

sm333 wrote: »

If it's helpful to anyone who sat it today, EU is a bitch to study for but undoubtedly one of the easiest in terms of marking. Wouldn't stress if you're not thrilled with some of your answers.

I appreciate the encouragement, kind of you!

JCormac · 13-03-2020 03:18PM

L.E.D wrote: »

Just been told that the law society has said that you can sit the EU and tort exams both now and the summer. So you can resit in summer if you fail.

Was it confirmed for sure that we can sit the Tort exam again in Summer if we fail the sitting on Monday? Thanks!

iamanengine · 13-03-2020 03:18PM

Standard of Care and Duty both up last time, anyone fancy a causation question for this sitting?

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:19PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Standard of Care and Duty both up last time, anyone fancy a causation question for this sitting?

Yeah that’s what I’m betting on

Breacnua · 13-03-2020 03:19PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Standard of Care and Duty both up last time, anyone fancy a causation question for this sitting?

Definitely

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:21PM

Eu was actually a nice paper I had four okish question I git caught up for time so my fifth was just bullet points so hopefully it’ll be enough.

So far I think what came up:
1. Principles
2. Institutions
3. Direct effect
4. Judicial review
5. Goods
6. Worker and citizenship
7. Case
8. Competition

With the judicial review question he only wanted cases from 2009 ?

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:23PM

jewels652 wrote: »

Eu was actually a nice paper I had four okish question I git caught up for time so my fifth was just bullet points so hopefully it’ll be enough.

So far I think what came up:
1. Principles
2. Institutions
3. Direct effect
4. Judicial review
5. Goods
6. Worker and citizenship
7. Case
8. Competition

With the judicial review question he only wanted cases from 2009 ?

I included indirect effect and MSL in my answer for 2. Didn’t learn the years for my cases either haha I just gave him everything I knew on JR for Q4

EAL2019 · 13-03-2020 03:26PM

jewels652 wrote: »

Eu was actually a nice paper I had four okish question I git caught up for time so my fifth was just bullet points so hopefully it’ll be enough.

So far I think what came up:
1. Principles
2. Institutions
3. Direct effect
4. Judicial review
5. Goods
6. Worker and citizenship
7. Case
8. Competition

With the judicial review question he only wanted cases from 2009 ?

Yeah I was kinda thrown by the 2009 thing cause I really hadn’t been paying attention to whether the cases were pre-Lisbon or not.

I did a brief reference to the pre-Lisbon “in substance a decision” thing and then just talked about the cases I had whether they were post-2009 or not

isawitfirst · 13-03-2020 03:26PM

rightytighty wrote: »

I included indirect effect and MSL in my answer for 2. Didn’t learn the years for my cases either haha I just gave him everything I knew on JR for Q4

I only knew one case post Lisbon on JR, with the lower standard so that's all he got lol

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:27PM

isawitfirst wrote: »

I only knew one case post Lisbon on JR, with the lower standard so that's all he got lol

Is Codorniu post?

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:29PM

rightytighty wrote: »

I included indirect effect and MSL in my answer for 2. Didn’t learn the years for my cases either haha I just gave him everything I knew on JR for Q4

I thought question 2 was on the institutions q3 was direct effect

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:29PM

jewels652 wrote: »

I thought question 2 was on the institutions q3 was direct effect

My mistake sorry

isawitfirst · 13-03-2020 03:29PM

I wrote microban anyway

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:31PM

And just to me ame sure free movement of goods was on art 34-36?

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:32PM

jewels652 wrote: »

And just to me ame sure free movement of goods was on art 34-36?

It was indeed

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:32PM

rightytighty wrote: »

My mistake sorry

Haha no worries. We are all very tired at this stage not thinking straight.

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:34PM

rightytighty wrote: »

It was indeed

That’s excellent. Thanks for the confirmation.

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:39PM

jewels652 wrote: »

That’s excellent. Thanks for the confirmation.

I wasn’t really sure on the first bit, both grounds were explicitly allowed under art 36? I just mentioned cases like conegate, henn and Darby, sandoz and said courts deferential to member states on what’s best

Part 2 characteristics, Mars case?

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:42PM

So I sat my last two constitutional and Eu. I am 100 sure I’ll be repeating constitutional. I have mixed feelings with Eu, four good questions and the last one on bullet points. It was a hard few weeks but I am glad is all over for now.

Best of luck to everyone who sat the exams and to those sitting tort on Monday.

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:43PM

rightytighty wrote: »

I wasn’t really sure on the first bit, both grounds were explicitly allowed under art 36? I just mentioned cases like conegate, henn and Darby, sandoz and said courts deferential to member states on what’s best

Part 2 characteristics, Mars case?

Part was on the German issue ? I thought it was Keck ? Selling arrangements ??

L.E.D · 13-03-2020 03:43PM

DUMSURFER wrote: »

Hey everyone, hope EU went great. Any chance one of you lovely people could send on pictures of the paper? It would be greatly appreciated and anyone who does, I’ll pray every night until the results come out that you pass!

Me too please

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:45PM

jewels652 wrote: »

Part was on the German issue ? I thought it was Keck ? Selling arrangements ??

Yeah the German requirement for it to display kilometres and miles I said came under the first part of Keck, the objective characteristics, as opposed to being a selling arrangement

L.E.D · 13-03-2020 03:46PM

JCormac wrote: »

Was it confirmed for sure that we can sit the Tort exam again in Summer if we fail the sitting on Monday? Thanks!

Yes, friend of mine got an email from the law society

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:48PM

rightytighty wrote: »

Yeah the German requirement for it to display kilometres and miles I said came under the first part of Keck, the objective characteristics, as opposed to being a selling arrangement

Oh lord I completely skipped that part off

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:49PM

The objective and characteristics I went straight to selling arrangement.

JCormac · 13-03-2020 03:50PM

DUMSURFER wrote: »

Hey everyone, hope EU went great. Any chance one of you lovely people could send on pictures of the paper? It would be greatly appreciated and anyone who does, I’ll pray every night until the results come out that you pass!

L.E.D wrote: »

Me too please

Me three, please

Sorry, I've just been itching to see the questions on the paper since this morning. Particularly the case-notes

rightytighty · 13-03-2020 03:51PM

jewels652 wrote: »

Oh lord I completely skipped that part off

Wait, was the first part (France) a selling arrangement? I just said they could restrict under Article 36 and used other cases where the courts had considered restrictions. Looks like I’ve messed up part 1

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:51PM

JCormac wrote: »

Me three, please Sorry, I've just been itching to see the questions on the paper since this morning. Particularly the case-notes

Pm with emails and I’ll forward them to ye

JCormac · 13-03-2020 03:51PM

jewels652 wrote: »

Pm with emails and I’ll forward them to ye

Tysm

jewels652 · 13-03-2020 03:53PM

rightytighty wrote: »

Wait, was the first part (France) a selling arrangement? I just said they could restrict under Article 36 and used other cases where the courts had considered restrictions. Looks like I’ve messed up part 1

I mentioned that it could be a selling arrangement too but main issue there was derogations under art 36 so don’t worry

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments