Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid-XIX Part VI - 90 cases ROI (1 death) 29 in NI (as of 13 March) *Read OP*

1183184186188189332

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    The UK are saying they are making decisions based on medical and expert advice. There is a logic to what they are saying and what they are doing. That’s not to say I necessarily agree with it but Boris Johnson is better informed on the subject than me or you.

    It’s impossible for most of us here to make an informed judgement because we aren’t experts. History will judge whether the UK has done a good job on this.

    Seems like they are OK with a lot of people dying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,260 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    The UK are saying they are making decisions based on medical and expert advice. There is a logic to what they are saying and what they are doing. That’s not to say I necessarily agree with it but Boris Johnson is better informed on the subject than me or you.

    It’s impossible for most of us here to make an informed judgement because we aren’t experts. History will judge whether the UK has done a good job on this.

    Agreed. I am skeptical of their approach but Boris is been advised by the finest medical minds of the UK. I wouldn't dare say I'd know more than these guys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 793 ✭✭✭Kunkka


    DeanAustin wrote: »
    The UK are saying they are making decisions based on medical and expert advice. There is a logic to what they are saying and what they are doing. That’s not to say I necessarily agree with it but Boris Johnson is better informed on the subject than me or you.

    It’s impossible for most of us here to make an informed judgement because we aren’t experts. History will judge whether the UK has done a good job on this.

    You're right and I'd rather nothing more than being wrong on this point, but that press conferences felt like one to just play down fears and to protect their economy, while accepting there will be huge losses.

    I'd take the Irish approach all day tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,818 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    murpho999 wrote: »
    Of course it does as the millions who remained are not spreading it further. China is the place to look at and how their lock down is now working.

    Is it really though? Hard to trust any 'reports' coming out of that country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 659 ✭✭✭KevinK


    Scarinae wrote: »
    Ice hockey has just been suspended in North America as well

    https://twitter.com/NHL/status/1238156904473530368?s=20

    First NBA, now this, I wouldn't be surprised if NFL is next.

    NFL doesn’t start for another few months,August or ?September I think


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Seems like they are OK with a lot of people dying.

    Boris didn't flee his post


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Graham wrote: »
    Reports by who? Where?

    Journal.ie

    'No need for panic buying': Supermarkets warn consumers following 'high demand' over coronavirus

    Today’s news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    My local library has been closed until the end of the month


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    otnomart wrote: »
    I don't think so.
    Lockdown does work,

    we just don't see the effects overnight

    I have anecdotal evidence from friends in Northern Italy that in the small town they're in (Romano), it seems to be widespread. Many of them believe they've had or have it now.
    A number of deaths in the town already, including one of their parents.

    I think the lockdown will work, but I fear Italy are quite a bit further into this than China were.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    New Home wrote: »
    Italy: Of the total people dead, 98% were over 68 years of age (so much for this being something that affects mostly old people), and 67% had pre-existing conditions (so much for this being something that affects mostly frail people).

    This all seems to back up the bolded (emphasis mine) assertions. The preexisting conditions percentage is lower but combined with the 68+ figures, it seems to be about right. Immune systems become less effective with every passing decade.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,715 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I think BoJo strikes the right note, candid about the bad news but optimistic about our ability to manage this crisis. The worst thing you can do is play down the danger like Trump does. That deeply undermines confidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Reckless Abandonment


    Italian numbers worse again nearly 200 died and 2650 new cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Now consider this,

    Italian hospitals are accepting only younger than 65 and with no per-existing life treatening health issues and only if they have critical symptoms
    Hospitals are full

    Yes exactly - Italian figures are not an accurate representation of the distribution of fatalities across different groups in ideal conditions.

    Since some groups have to be designated as not being eligible for care, these groups' death rates will be disproportionally high vs what would happen if hospitals could provide care to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    The President of Brazil has tested positive for coronavirus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭Vivienne23


    gabeeg wrote: »
    I think the lockdown will work, but I fear Italy are quite a bit further into this than China were.

    Agreed also i dunno if I read this right but has Italy a different strain of the virus ?

    Someone might correct me if I’m wrong I have read so much now it’s getting a bit jumbled


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭d51984


    The video is on FB. Its deffo the hotel in Clonshaugh as the camera zooms out and you can see the signs and the hotel. A girl called Deborah Lynch on facebook has it up if that helps.

    Its a disgrace Joe!



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 78,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    what?

    What do you need me to clarify?

    Of of all the people that have died of Covid in Italy (1016), 98% were over 68 years of age (996 or thereabouts).

    Of of all the people that have died of Covid in Italy (1016), "only" 67% had pre-existing conditions (680 or thereabouts).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭otnomart


    Macron speaking today at 20.00
    Given that yesterday a French Gov spoke person said that the Italian (and therefore the Chinese) measures were non effective, it's anyone"s guess what he is about to announce.


    Not border closures, as he is dead against it.


    Either a Merkel style speech (60-70% of population will get this, keep calm and carry on) or my guess is that he will stop the intercity passenger circulation inside France: both TGV trains and flights.
    Meaning that people will still be able to get to work.
    Will found out in one hour or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭cloudatlas


    Kunkka wrote: »
    Trying to just have a different opinion to the many people furious about the UK approach?

    There is no such thing as a premature lockdown with this. There is just a lockdown until things settle over the course of a few months. See Wuhan where things are slowly getting better.

    How can allowing mass public gathering and creating more cases help the UK in the long term? If anything it will cause the pressure on the NHS to be even greater and longer.

    Let me ask you this.

    If Italy could go back in time do you not think they'd have gone into lockdown sooner? I don't think they'd say "Na, we don't want to do it too early".

    They are being advised by this group of experts, they don’t seem to be going against their advice. https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage I heard a doctor say that the virus doesn’t survive that long outside.


  • Site Banned Posts: 33 Doctor Shipman


    d51984 wrote: »
    The video is on FB. Its deffo the hotel in Clonshaugh as the camera zooms out and you can see the signs and the hotel. A girl called Deborah Lynch on facebook has it up if that helps.

    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2531783647149464&id=100009535609179


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,109 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    otnomart wrote: »
    Macron speaking today at 20.00
    Given that yesterday a French Gov spoke person said that the Italian (and therefore the Chinese) measures were non effective, it's anyone"s guess what he is about to announce.


    Not border closures, as he is dead against it.


    Either a Merkel style speech (60-70% of population will get this, keep calm and carry on) or my guess is that he will stop the intercity passenger circulation inside France: both TGV trains and flights.
    Meaning that people will still be able to get to work.
    Will found out in one hour or so.

    "We surrender"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    otnomart wrote: »
    I don't think so.
    Lockdown does work,

    we just don't see the effects overnight

    I would fully expect that what's been done in Italy will reduce transmission. People are going to be coming into contact with far few others over the next while, and that has got to result in a reduction in new infections.

    In Wuhan, a lot of people observing from afar didn't believe the lockdown would work because that kind of thing had never been done in living memory, and people outside China couldn't really see what was going on there.

    If the figures keep rising in Italy over the next few days, at least we know now not to rush to judgement.

    The real question to my mind is how to return to something looking like normal life while not allowing the infection rate to come right back up again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,715 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    One of the biggest problems will be to decide who gets the ventilators. Italian doctors are already having to make these stark choices.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    UK Economy must have been in the absolute gutter pre pandemic.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 81,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sephiroth_dude



    Get prepared now if it’s not too late already.

    Christ on a bike :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    A second death in Ireland. RIP

    'The man, who was in his 70s, was from Cork and had recently suffered from a serious illness.

    Another man in his 50s, who the deceased was in recent contact with, is currently being monitored for the virus.'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Kunkka wrote: »
    You're right and I'd rather nothing more than being wrong on this point, but that press conferences felt like one to just play down fears and to protect their economy, while accepting there will be huge losses.

    I'd take the Irish approach all day tbh.

    That could be the motivation and these things are seldom black and white. They may tell themselves they are doing it for the right reasons but in reality they’re driven by an unconscious bias to protect the economy. I don’t believe anyone is willingly choosing to endanger public health for the sake of the economy. However, hindsight sometimes reveals motivation behind these decisions and if that’s what’s revealed here, history will judge Johnson and his government very, very harshly.

    But I can’t read his mind/his ministers’ minds so I’ll take them at face value. I hope their approach works because this is a very, very dangerous and scary reality for a lot of people who are relying on the government getting this right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 793 ✭✭✭Kunkka


    cloudatlas wrote: »
    They are being advised by this group of experts, they don’t seem to be going against their advice. https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage I heard a doctor say that the virus doesn’t survive that long outside.

    Advised yes, but they then weigh it up against the impact on society and the economy. In this case, I really feel Boris has choosen protecting the economy over saving lives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭whiskeyman


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Seems like they are OK with a lot of people dying.

    They've accepted a lot of people will die.
    Everyone has to at this stage but it's too hard for many to comprehend.

    It's all down to how big that figure will be and giving the health system the best chance to try and help as many people as possible.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,554 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    New Home wrote: »
    What do you need me to clarify?

    Of of all the people that have died of Covid in Italy (1016), 98% were over 68 years of age (996 or thereabouts).

    Of of all the people that have died of Covid in Italy (1016), "only" 67% had pre-existing conditions (680 or thereabouts).

    That supports the previous evidence that most fatalities are old and/or have comorbidities.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement