Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Coronavirus Part IV - 19 cases in ROI, 7 in NI (as of 7 March) *Read warnings in OP*

1910121415309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    morebarn wrote: »
    Yes, I found this reinfection scenario worrying also. But have been following the English couple from the cruise ship who are recovering in hospital in Japan. Having survived the virus, pneumonia etc, the main issue is that the keep testing positive, then negative, then positive again!

    As the guy said, the tests are only around 70percent reliable and it’s a case of waiting for the body to completely shed the virus. It’s a slow process.

    But it gives me some hope that’s what’s happening; rather than reinfection.

    It's very likely what is happening. My son had glandular fever in September/October but as of his last blood test still has the virus in his system and if he gets unwell, the virus could resurge and he'd get sick again. Though in the long term, a virus that hangs around like that usually leads to stronger antibodies and a much, much longer period of immunity following the virus completely clearing your system. Covid-19 seems to be like this, so while it hangs around for a long time and during that time you are technically vulnerable to a relapse, once it's gone, you likely have really good immunity for at least the next few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Will large numbers of medical staff and patients have to be isolated now as they have interacted with somebody with the infection?

    I think this business of spending 15 minutes within two yards or something of the infected person would apply. Don't think the whole hospital would have to close down or anything...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thisonedone


    Cupatae wrote: »
    Fill a bucket of water, and leave it outside the door wash ur hands :D:D

    But the virus will then be in the bucket and water. The only solution I can think of are motion activated taps but they are few and far between


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭05eaftqbrs9jlh


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Is it true that one of the ill Clare family was working as a GP last week?
    Irish Times is saying he did an A&E shift.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I think this business of spending 15 minutes within two yards or something of the infected person would apply. Don't think the whole hospital would have to close down or anything...

    15 minutes is a nonsense arbitrary number pulled from God knows where.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?
    You cannot make your hands perfectly sterile. Washed hands aren't sterile.

    This is why doctors scrub their hands to within a inch of their lives, but still put on gloves.

    The aim is to minimise infection. You touch the tap, a tiny amount of potential bacteria are transferred. You wash your hands, clean off a load of stuff, touch the tap again and tiny % of what you previously transferred, is transferred back.

    Your hands are still hundreds of times cleaner than they were before you washed them.

    Same goes for door handles, etc. Unless someone smeared dog **** on the handle, then touching a door handle (or a mobile phone) doesn't suddenly make your hands filthy again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭macwal


    How long do the symptoms take to develop after transmission?

    We've had an employee sent home today with symptoms. He was in Milan a fortnight ago.


    Up to 14 days...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭Level 5 Vegan


    seamus wrote: »
    I'd say A&Es are surprisingly quiet; people avoiding them unless they actually need to. People turning up with a sore finger and their entire extended family have probably dropped away.

    "General Practice" is a discipline in medicine like cardiology or paediatrics.

    Someone who has specialised in General Practice will have a broader but shallower medial knoweledge than, e.g. a cardiologist.

    That doesn't answer your question, but I would expect that A&E doctors would in general be GPs. They have the skills to assess and treat all patients and then move them to a specialist where necessary.

    If he was doing a shift for an out of hours service like Shannon doc he might have been in the A&E.

    My GP sits in the A&E department from 6pm until 10pm Fridays and Saturday evenings of our most local hospital 1 weekend in every 3 or something and then goes home and stays on call from there. That wouldn't be an unusual set up.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The ill Clare family :) Jaysus.

    I believe I can answer your question but I will let it come out in official channels.

    The official channels are telling us diddly squat.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    seeker82 wrote: »
    Two weeks so if he had it he would know by now.
    Not necessarily, in many infected patients symptoms are weak or non existent. This is particularly the case with children. People forget or don't realise that even with influenza(which many on Boards seem to believe is always an horrendous dose) nearly one third present no symptoms, another percentage think they've a bit of a sniffle.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,235 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    mlem123 wrote: »
    Do you not agree that people with symptoms should stay away from Hospitals, unless "toxic"?

    They should but despite the countless requests for people to contact their GP by phone first, idiots will run straight to the ED.

    The hospitals need to set up a security point at each hospital to query every person arriving at the hospital as to their reason for being there and sent away if they suspect they may be suffering from C-19.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,442 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    How long do the symptoms take to develop after transmission?

    We've had an employee sent home today with symptoms. He was in Milan a fortnight ago.

    2 weeks ago.. highly unlikely he has it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 ✭✭✭the butcher


    gabeeg wrote: »
    It's estimated that shutting our borders will cost our economy about 50%

    So it's not "worth a shot". It's not inconceivable that it might happen, but should be a last resort

    Which leads to indirect deaths due to the quick recession....WE CANT WIN...
    BUT worst case scenario of a virus mutating and with us forever seasonally is probably much worse than quick pain economy wise and a chance of eradicating a potential deadly virus....but it won't happen (shutting down borders).

    We will continue on the path present, risk the chances of second/third waves and letting it become part of our cold/flu seasons, reducing our life expectancy, the people in the high risk categories are expendable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    For the people looking for a flight ban from Italy. Do you really think it would stop Irish people from making their way home using other means?


    That's not the point. People who are there will of course come home. However it will do two things

    1) Stop more Irish people traveling there (and later having to return)
    2) It will stop other people (mainly Italians) from making unnecessary trips here.

    In 3-4 weeks there will likely be more new cases of Irish people returning from Italy with the virus. Some of them will be boarding outbound flights this week and next for their planned holiday trip to Milan/Rome. Probably after posting on here about how they think gobshites are over-reacting about a cold


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    How long do the symptoms take to develop after transmission?

    We've had an employee sent home today with symptoms. He was in Milan a fortnight ago.

    WHO is saying typically five days from infection to symptoms. 14 days would be on the longer side which would suggest it's less likely for your colleague.

    That said, if he didn't travel alone his travel companion could have picked it up and then infected him at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    dan786 wrote: »
    Fianna Fáil Leader Micheál Martin has said that his party has been briefed by public health officials on Covid-19.

    Speaking to RTÉ News, Mr Martin said that protecting citizens had to trump all other considerations.

    He said that there would need to be decisions made in the coming days in relation to large gatherings and he said that public health should be the number one priority.

    Mr Martin said that public health officials were working very hard and that the management of the crisis was strong so far, and he said he didn't think Covid-19 should be "an issue of political contention or divide".

    He said that "alongside the actual virus itself, panic can set in" and that this needed to be borne in mind in terms of communication around virus.

    Why is everything 'in the coming days' ?

    Same with Leo and his special cabinet meeting thats happening on Monday.

    I just get a sense those in power and the HSE and DoH are terrified to make decisions and of the consequences

    With regard to people saying why do we need to know infected peoples identity, well we dont

    What we would like is a better idea than a point on a compass.

    Why not patient A, Swords, Dublin or even Dublin but no we get told the East


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Do GPs work shifts in A&E departments?

    Serious question. I have no idea if they do or not.

    I have no idea if GPs work shifts in A & Es within hospitals. But some do work in the doctors' afterhours services and in Clare, one of those afterhours services is located within the grounds of a hospital.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?




    Fair question. You see lots of doctors and nurses touching it with elbows etc. Some taps are designed with no infection control in mind. Gotta be careful?


    On a different note, just logged into boards.ie and got this message that I my browser tried to connect to eu centre for disease control. I only had this window open, I was just logging into boards. Weird. It's probably nothing. :rolleyes:
    504685.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Ninthlife wrote: »
    Why not patient A, Swords, Dublin or even Dublin but no we get told the East
    How would that help?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭05eaftqbrs9jlh


    I think this business of spending 15 minutes within two yards or something of the infected person would apply. Don't think the whole hospital would have to close down or anything...
    Please stop spreading misinformation. You are part of the cohort who is going to end up killing a huge volume of people because you didn't bother to find the most current information in a developing situation.
    Dr Mills said handwashing will mitigate against someone from contaminating a surface but the biggest risk of catching the virus was coming into contact with someone who is infected.

    He said he was surprised by the advice stating that you would need to be sitting beside someone for 15 minutes before you need to become concerned about contracting the virus, adding that "15 minutes is a very arbitrary figure."

    On another note, I've called in sick so I'm safe until Monday. But I don't know what to do from then onwards. I need to protect myself and my vulnerable family members. People need action from the government.

    It's easy to ignore until they're knocking at the door of your home.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 ✭✭✭the butcher




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭Mr Velo


    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?

    Some of the hand washing instructions I've seen says to turn tap off with elbow, not exactly an easy thing to do if it's a twist tap mind you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 ✭✭✭the butcher




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Superb post.

    Two questios I have is, if you think it will be any different in Ireland then can you please give a reason why you have come to this conclusion?

    If you accept there is no reasonable reason why we should accept our country is anymore special then maybe Germany or the UK (equally an island) , should we not respond quicker to the outbreak? So if these countries are a week ahead of us and for example close schools or don’t allow mass gatherings shouldn’t we just take action like that and not just wait until we inevitably have to do it because things have gotten worse?

    It’s the message from WHO that countries who react quicker and more decisively and get their populations on board with what needs to be done stand the best chance of dealing with this the best. So if we actually know what’s coming , by accepting Ireland is not unique and the virus will hit us like everyone else, why don’t we just implement measures countries who are further ahead in trouble are doing? Surely this would potentially reduce the impact on our healthcare services and by extension ourselves. Also means we can get the uncomfortable panic period out of the way in a more controlled fashion.

    I will try to answer your questions as best I can from my own opinion.

    Couples of things here. The first being that the WHO advise, that the majority of the world is following primarily focuses around a reactive approach, meaning when your country hits (x) number of cases or you can prove community spread then you need to implement x or y. What we need is a proactive implementation of procedures.

    Ireland are sitting in a stronger position than many other countries. What I mean by this is that we are one of the later countries in the EU to have a confirmed case which means we have been watching our EU counterparts for some days/weeks. We are seeing today that cases are starting to explode in Germany, Belgium etc. These countries have been following the WHO and it has NOT worked because we are looking at this virus in the wrong way. Its spread characteristics are not like SARS 1, Influenza or MERS. The procedures the WHO want us to follow do not work for Covid 19.

    The damage is being done in the Pre-Symptomatic stage of the virus. What I mean by this is that you become contagious hours after contracting the virus but you yourself may not show any symptoms of illness for days or even a week after exposure. By the time you start to feel ill, you have already been at work for a week, or been out for a meal or a drink in a bar etc. I.E. you have likely been spreading the virus for many many days. With many other viruses, you only become contagious when you show symptoms. This is why Covid 19 is so dangerous and impossible to contain.

    Then we move on to our countries geographical position. We are in a unique position in that we are an island. If we implement stricter measures EARLIER, like cancelling flights to affected countries and cancelling St. Patricks day, then we stand a much better chance of slowing the virus down to a stage where our already stretched health system can somewhat cope.

    If we sit on the fence and wait and do what the WHO are constantly recommending then we risk mass infection and spread within 4 weeks. I understand the job the WHO has is extremely difficult and they want to avoid a pandemic, but in my view we already have community spread in many countries meaning we are already in the early stages of a pandemic.

    If we implement reactive measures we will be fighting this virus on a large scale until a vaccine is ready in about 14 months time. If we are proactive, giving accurate information and inform the public properly, then we stand a good chance at slowing the spread to a manageable pace.

    And we haven't even touched on the new strains of the virus...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thisonedone


    I think this business of spending 15 minutes within two yards or something of the infected person would apply. Don't think the whole hospital would have to close down or anything...

    Plenty of experts have come out and said the 15 min rule being spouted is complete horsesh1t. They say if you are sitting next to someone for 2 seconds and they sneeze or cough in your direction then you are infected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,341 ✭✭✭dan786


    For anyone wondering:

    The four stages of UK's coronavirus response:

    contain the virus
    delay its transmission
    research its origins
    mitigate its impact

    They are on second stage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?

    Clean the tap while you clean your hands


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 78,089 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    iguana wrote: »
    It's very likely what is happening. My son had glandular fever in September/October but as of his last blood test still has the virus in his system and if he gets unwell, the virus could resurge and he'd get sick again. Though in the long term, a virus that hangs around like that usually leads to stronger antibodies and a much, much longer period of immunity following the virus completely clearing your system. Covid-19 seems to be like this, so while it hangs around for a long time and during that time you are technically vulnerable to a relapse, once it's gone, you likely have really good immunity for at least the next few years.

    There have been multiple reports of people falling ill again after having recovered, even young ones, but not all survived. There are also multiple strains of this virus, so catching one doesn't make you immune to the others.

    "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger" is a huge fallacy.
    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?

    How about washing the tap before you finish washing your hands? Or use paper to close it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Stupid question here but what is the point of hand washing? You have the virus on your hands so you go to wash your hands, you touch the tap to turn it on, the virus is now on the tap, you wash your hands, the virus is now removed, now you touch the tap to turn it off and so surely the virus is now back on your hands?


    Easy answer. If it is a concern to you then:

    1) Turn on tap
    2) Use tap water and soap to wash tap handle
    3) Wash hands
    4) Turn off tap using the clean handle

    How can people not think of simple solutions like this? It's hardly rocket science.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    seamus wrote: »
    How would that help?

    Stops speculation thats its Meath, no its wexford etc online.

    We should be afforded the common courtesy to make a decision to avoid a particular area especially if there is an increase in cases


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement