Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What have we come to

18182848687105

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The people voted for change!!!!

    Did they though?

    I hear a lot of talk of SF winning the popular vote

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Irish_general_election

    It is true they won the popular vote as a single party. But when you add up the numbers of the popular vote of those opposed to going to government with SF (FG FF Labour) is nearly double that of SF.

    SF won 535,573 of the popular vote

    FF won 484,315 of the popular vote.

    FG won 455,568 of the popular vote

    Labour won 95,582 of the popular vote

    So total that is 1,035,465 of the popular vote who voted for parties that said they would not go into government with SF prior to the election. To me that is a much more solid base to work with. Add in the Greens 155,695 (of the popular vote). with FF FG and it is a clear majority coalition.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,353 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    No they are in the building phase, noone has the foggiest of what the final cost will be but so far its projected to be running close to 2 billion. Runaway costs no one accountable as always.

    I wonder if it is SF policy to cancel the NCH?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭LoughNeagh2017


    See attached image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    See attached image

    There is a would if difference between the old IRA and the diesel laundering provos


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,383 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    See attached image

    Brillant:D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Can someone tell me what is the difference between FF and FG? Voting for one is voting for the other, considering they will either go into government together or prop the other one up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    See attached image

    A bit of an over simplification -

    Considering in order to enter the dail both CnaG and FF had to take an oath to the British Crown to get in.

    Also this is the same oath SF refused to take both in the early dail until the end of the Saorstait.
    They only agreed to enter the dail lots of hand wringing, and soul searching in the 80's.

    And they could have taken the oath to the crown to enter WM in the thick of Brexit.

    Try explaining that to a foreigner!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    Can someone tell me what is the difference between FF and FG? Voting for one is voting for the other, considering they will either go into government together or prop the other one up.

    https://spunout.ie/life/article/fine-gael-vs-fianna-fail-whats-the-difference

    Not much difference to be honest. But FF used to consider themselves more left of centre, while FG are right of centre.

    MM has recently tried to reclaim some of this left wing vibe.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/election-2020/fianna-fail-is-the-party-of-the-working-classes-micheal-martin-38918150.html

    MM born in a council house etc etc

    Fine Gael is generally considered to be more of a proponent of market liberalism than its traditional rival, Fianna Fáil. FG is also supposed to be the more liberal of the two in general social issues.

    Also as for both parties propping each other up, it is in thier mandate to keep SF out because of moral issues.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,257 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    See attached image

    Better if they could spell Fine Gael correctly. Also, they missed out the part of neither Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael have any association with bombing pubs and killing innocent men, women or children. Just saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    joeguevara wrote: »
    Better if they could spell Fine Gael correctly. Also, they missed out the part of neither Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael have any association with bombing pubs and killing innocent men, women or children. Just saying.

    It would appear that fada is gan ghá freisin.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭theballz


    See attached image

    They spelt Fine Gael incorrectly looooool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Anyone who went to college, has spent a number of years working themselves up to a decent position in a company and earning a decent living would be f**king nuts to vote SF

    All they want is to take money off the people that’s have worked for it and hand to the wasters of Ireland, don’t reward the people who went to college, reward the gobs**t who left school after junior cert and now complains he cant get a good job

    That’s the SF way....

    Think this shows just how out of touch with reality some of you are


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,247 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    See attached image

    yeah.... disarming in the 20s and needing international intervention to disarm in 1998 is a bit of a difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,945 ✭✭✭Feisar


    maccored wrote: »
    Think this shows just how out of touch with reality some of you are

    Explain.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A week after the election 'What have we come to'?;

    FF/FG with the aid of a whipping boy/girl back in government, looks like where we are at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Feisar wrote: »
    Explain.

    Because theres many people with good education and jobs (people i know) who vote sf. To pretend only poor people (and ‘scumbags’) vote sf is a pretty thick assumption to make. Its an assumptiin quite a few seem to make.

    Ever wonder who gave people such a generous social welfare system? Wasnt SF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,638 ✭✭✭votecounts


    maccored wrote: »
    Because theres many people with good education and jobs (people i know) who vote sf. To pretend only poor people (and ‘scumbags’) vote sf is a pretty thick assumption to make. Its an assumptiin quite a few seem to make.

    Ever wonder who gave people such a generous social welfare system? Wasnt SF
    This is the one of the stereotypes that I hate. Plenty of educated, professional and hard working people vote for SF, sure they got 24.5% of the vote. If 24.5% of the country were "layabout scumbags",the country would be fcuked.:D Some people would say it's the stupid ones that keep electing FF and FG and expecting different results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭screamer


    votecounts wrote: »
    This is the one of the stereotypes that I hate. Plenty of educated, professional and hard working people vote for SF, sure they got 24.5% of the vote. If 24.5% of the country were "layabout scumbags", the the country would be fcuked.:D Some people would say it's the stupid ones that keep electing FF and FG and expecting different results.

    Better the dog you know and all that. I know I wouldn’t vote for SF if there was no other choice. My conscience is clear, to grub a few quid for myself putting the political wing of the ira into power..... and their terrorist background. Never ever ever. So they’re worried being called names, LOOK at the deeds of those behind who they voted for..... idiots


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    screamer wrote: »
    Better the dog you know and all that. I know I wouldn’t vote for SF if there was no other choice. My conscience is clear, to grub a few quid for myself putting the political wing of the ira into power..... and their terrorist background. Never ever ever. So they’re worried being called names, LOOK at the deeds of those behind who they voted for..... idiots

    find me anywhere throughout the world that has parties who evolved from conflict (FF, FG and SF in our context), that didnt have horrible pasts? I vote SF quite a bit and I vote for their current TDs and what they might be able to do for us.

    The fact that the horrible treatment to those of different views of the unionist Govn in the 60s caused a conflict in which SF came out of (50 odd years ago) doesnt effect why or who I vote for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    A week after the election 'What have we come to'?;

    FF/FG with the aid of a whipping boy/girl back in government, looks like where we are at.

    They have the mandate - SF don't simple as. Once the grand coalition idea of the left fell on its ass that was it. FG FF and Labour promised pre election they would not go in with SF. Plus fair dues to them they are sticking to it.

    The irony is that SF's lack of openness and honesty, means they are still toxic to the majority of the traditional parties and justifiably so.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    They have the mandate - SF don't simple as. Once the grand coalition idea of the left fell on its ass that was it. FG FF and Labour promised pre election they would not go in with SF. Plus fair dues to them they are sticking to it.

    The irony is that SF's lack of openness and honesty, means they are still toxic to the majority of the traditional parties and justifiably so.

    they were more popular than the other two. they arent 'toxic' - they're too much of a threat and too hard for either to bully.

    The real problem is too many idiots voted for FF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They have the mandate -

    How do they have a 'mandate'?

    Here is what Martin told the electorate in January:
    Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin has said his party will not form a “grand coalition” with Fine Gael after the general election.

    If you confidently say the electorate endorsed his view on not governing with SF are you saying they accepted a nod and a wee wink about going in to government with FG?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,257 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    maccored wrote: »
    they were more popular than the other two. they arent 'toxic' - they're too much of a threat and too hard for either to bully.

    The real problem is too many idiots voted for FF.

    They weren’t more popular than the other two. The other two were more popular than them. That’s the reality no matter what way you cut it up,

    With your last line, is it your contention that democracy is the problem?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    How do they have a 'mandate'?

    Here is what Martin told the electorate in January:


    If you confidently say the electorate endorsed his view on not governing with SF are you saying they accepted a nod and a wee wink about going in to government with FG?

    Well over 1.1m of the popular vote went to parties which said they would not go in government with SF Labour FF.

    Yes, I am saying they had a nod and wink. No other choice other then that besides call a another election. Circumstances dictate it.

    FG and FF are the two most compatible parties throw in the Greens and job done.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,345 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    votecounts wrote: »
    This is the one of the stereotypes that I hate. Plenty of educated, professional and hard working people vote for SF, sure they got 24.5% of the vote. If 24.5% of the country were "layabout scumbags", the the country would be fcuked.:D Some people would say it's the stupid ones that keep electing FF and FG and expecting different results.

    Plenty meaning the odd few here or there. It is no coincidence that Denise Mitchell got 80% of the vote in priorswood in Dublin Bay North. She was barely seen outside her own patch bar a few leaflets from her campaign team.
    She went where she knew she could get the vote beyond the Tonlegee road towards Edenmore.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,353 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    Can someone tell me what is the difference between FF and FG? Voting for one is voting for the other, considering they will either go into government together or prop the other one up.

    I don't buy this whole civil war parties thing. Nobody cares about that these days. It's said about family's being FF or FF voters because that's how their ancestors voted. But it isn't true any more. In contrast though if your family is republican then you vote for SF just as your parents do.

    From a practical perspective, I've seen FF increase public spending massively on wages without delivering remotely anything better in levels of service. Berties placation of the unions being the most obvious but pensions also increased East it of line of inflation since the 90s.

    In contrast, FG have been castigated more recently for massive spending on the NCH and rural broadband. But these are both things that we will have decades from now. Their costs spread over decades is small. Ardnacrusha was one fifth of the countrys budget when it was built.

    FG wanted to implement water charges, FF went the populist route and objected. No matter what your view on Irish water is. The fact that no other party cannot try to implement what every other European country has, makes FG stand out.

    But populism seems to be what you need in this country to get into power and it seems to be FGs job to fix up the mess after, 2011 isn't the first time this has happened.

    The Irish electorate is largely centrist unlike clearer left / right divides in other countries. Both FF and FG are right and left variations of that but not by a swinging margin.

    I'm amused by people talking about the the FFG moniker, why not just lump SF, labour, PBP SOl together as v the SFPBPLABSOL or is it just too many letters for the lazy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,353 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    maccored wrote: »
    Because theres many people with good education and jobs (people i know) who vote sf. To pretend only poor people (and ‘scumbags’) vote sf is a pretty thick assumption to make. Its an assumptiin quite a few seem to make.

    Ever wonder who gave people such a generous social welfare system? Wasnt SF

    I've a sibling who for various reasons is on long term unemployment. But they have now had to go out and get some work because of seetec. I'm glad about this because they needed to her out of the rut they were in for decades.

    But Sinn Fein are promising to get rid of this so that the people can happily stay on welfare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,709 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    A week after the election 'What have we come to'?;

    FF/FG with the aid of a whipping boy/girl back in government, looks like where we are at.

    FF/FG/GP grand coalition looking likely, so same shower of ****es back in, no change

    No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change this World



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    FF/FG/GP grand coalition looking likely, so same shower of ****es back in, no change

    Some keep saying there is no change.

    But it is a fact that house building is ramping up now and there will be much more supply in the next two years.

    Shinner voters seem to think all this happens overnight and that houses just sprout like magic.

    That is not the way the world operates unfortunately.

    It takes time.

    It's only now the results of the previous governments efforts are being seen. I wouldn't want the shinners taking credit for something that had nothing to do with them.

    This country would be broken beyond repair today if we took their advice to "burn the bondholders" in 2010. A busted wreck and for decades to come if we took them up on that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,638 ✭✭✭votecounts


    I've a sibling who for various reasons is on long term unemployment. But they have now had to go out and get some work because of seetec. I'm glad about this because they needed to her out of the rut they were in for decades.

    But Sinn Fein are promising to get rid of this so that the people can happily stay on welfare.
    FF voted also to get rid of this scheme also.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/jobpath-dail-vote-4480186-Feb2019/


Advertisement