Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

new coronavirus outbreak China, Korea, USA - mod warnings in OP (updated 24/02/20)

1183184186188189331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Using your stats there:

    Flu has an R0 of 1.4 and 1.6.
    Coronavius R0 value is likely to be between 4.7 and 6.6
    (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.07.20021154v1)

    Flu mortality rate: 0.01%
    Coronavirus fatality rate of 2.1% (according to the Chinese)

    So, taking the lower R0 estimate of 4: (and more will get it as we have NO immunity to this yet)

    720,000+ infected.
    15,120+ killed.


    And I dont think society will collapse.I think it will be like the Spanish Flu.
    But its still huge numbers, and heartbreaking.


    I dont think any of us are going to be unaffected by this bug unfortunately.

    This is a big overreaction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage




    Dr. John


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    MD1990 wrote: »
    This is a big overreaction.

    With an R0 value of 4 ,and a hospitalisation/mortality rate of 10% and 2% respectively, its actually not at all and has the potential to be easily the most devastating pandemic since spanish flu. Hence the crazy measures being implemented in Asian countries, quaratine massive urban areas, being arrested for not wearing face masks, travel bans, business and school closures indefinitely, but okay the boards users saying its actually just the flu know best


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    8 new cases in Singapore

    https://m.weibo.cn/status/4471547382826331
    A 1 year old child has recovered from a critically ill condition :) they were the youngest critically ill coronavirus patient so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,536 ✭✭✭auspicious


    Professor David Heymann, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: "What has happened in China is that they have changed the definition of what the disease really is - now they are taking people who have lesser symptoms.

    "The deaths are quite worrisome, there are an increased number of deaths reported, but if you look overall at the total number of deaths and the total number of cases, the fatality ratio is about the same as it has been - but it is still high, as high as the death rate in influenza."

    Only Hubei province - which accounts for more than 80% of overall Chinese infections - is using the new definition to diagnose new cases....
    - BBC


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    1st death in Japan

    Number of cases outside China reaches 500


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think some people need to take a breath on this thread...

    I agree we don’t know enough about this virus yet...
    But let’s put this into prospective...

    Armenia has what a population of 330+ million people..
    This flu session 19+ million people got it...
    180000+ people where hospitalised...
    10000+ people died so far...

    This new world killer virus, which is going to wipe us out..has so far in China ...
    Which has a population of 1.5 billion ...
    Has infected 60k+
    And killed 1100+

    I’m not saying this virus isn’t bad.. but take a breath people

    One thing. You can choose (in this country) to get vaccinated against Influenza, and that should at least give you enough protection that it will not prove fatal or severe to you. Because of a long history of past health issues I get the vaccination, and at worst on the two occasions I have knowingly come in close contact with another with the full blown Influenza (not a coryzal cold) when I was struck within 36 hours by a high fever, muscle pains and cough it has literally been a 36-48 hour illness with a rapid recovery and indeed a sense of “gloating” at how I escaped the full whack of it.

    And I have never confused a bad cold with influenza as I got the real thing 4 tines in my life during past outbreaks, eg 1968 Hong Kong Influenza. I never understand how people can lump them together as the symptoms are so different. During the 1968 outbreak I was 7 and living at hone with my parents as an only child, my brother having died as a 3 week old baby in 1958 during the Asian Influenza outbreak which also killed my mother’s cousin down the road. Indeed that cousin’s mother held my brother as he sorbet his last breath in the house. No phones to summon likes of s a n ambulance. My mother later gave me a vivid description of his illness and death, and it involved a lot of drowning in and expelling fluid in an infant who was born strong and robust. My mother had picked up the influenza in the Rotunda Hospital, when in those days people were routinely kept in a week opposing the birth.

    In 1968 my parents and I got the influenza simultaneously, with my mother having a particular dread and horror of it. She phoned her sister in Bray to let her know, and she came to the outside of our south Dublin on the train and bus, leaving a parcel of food and toiletries in the porch, giving a signal three rings on the doorbell to let my mother know they had been left whilst my aunt retreated back home. Neither she nor her children picked up the virus. No mobile phones then, when she got back to her hone to Bray she phoned to check on us. My mother had managed to come down the stairs on her bum (too dizzy to stand) and retrieved the parcel. At the outset had phoned neighbours to advise them not to call to the front door. She had us all in quarantine for at least two weeks, until we were clear if it. So I could never e we confuse a common cold, however bad and chesty etc, with influenza.

    I reckon too, with CoVid-19, there will be no mistaking it for a cold, and possibly not influenza as headache, prominent in flu, doesn’t seem to be so much the case with CoVid-19. Breathlessness seems to be more of a feature, even in milder cases, than in uncomplicated flu. I guess we all are going to have to get educated pretty damn quick about the differences as it will become important, as most cases will become clinical diagnoses, with the more aware patient contributing to the diagnostic process, especially from a position of self-imposed quarantine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭Ms2011


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    These pulse oximeters are built into a lot of smart phones, if you have a Samsung Galaxy S, for example, there’s a fairly good chance you have one. Probably not as accurate as a stand-alone device.

    Have on one my Smart Watch. Always at 97%.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wakka12 wrote: »
    8 new cases in Singapore

    https://m.weibo.cn/status/4471547382826331
    A 1 year old child has recovered from a critically ill condition :) they were the youngest critically ill coronavirus patient so far.

    Singapore has first class medical care, and health & safety & hygiene is very high on the list of priorities at all times in that small country. It is an immaculate place. The death rate there would be a good indicator of what the best possible outcomes could be with this disease.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Using your stats there:

    Flu has an R0 of 1.4 and 1.6.
    Coronavius R0 value is likely to be between 4.7 and 6.6
    (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.07.20021154v1)

    Flu mortality rate: 0.01%
    Coronavirus fatality rate of 2.1% (according to the Chinese)

    So, taking the lower R0 estimate of 4: (and more will get it as we have NO immunity to this yet)

    720,000+ infected.
    15,120+ killed.


    And I dont think society will collapse.I think it will be like the Spanish Flu.
    But its still huge numbers, and heartbreaking.

    I dont think any of us are going to be unaffected by this bug unfortunately.

    Society will collapse, particularly in a Globalised world. Imagine people in front line services and utilities not turning up to work?

    How long would a Power Grid stay up? How long would water systems still run? How long would food still be delivered to the stores with an infection rate that we are seeing in China?

    Also, consider this.

    China is pretty much a Totalitarian state that is throwing all its resources at this and can't control it. The people there are much more pliant than Western "free" folk so we haven't seen riots or mass panic.

    Can you imagine trying to control this in Western Democracies if the infection rates are close to what we are seeing in China?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    wakka12 wrote: »
    With an R0 value of 4 ,and a hospitalisation/mortality rate of 10% and 2% respectively, its actually not at all and has the potential to be easily the most devastating pandemic since spanish flu. Hence the crazy measures being implemented in Asian countries, quaratine massive urban areas, being arrested for not wearing face masks, travel bans, business and school closures indefinitely, but okay the boards users saying its actually just the flu know best

    in 1918 would have had so many obvious factors which caused it to spread so much more as well as much better medical facilities & ability to avoid spread.

    Common sense would tell you this.

    I suspect we will go into to lockdown but I dont envisage everyone getting the virus as was stated. If that is not a overreaction I dont know what is.

    If we can avoid a major spread until summer we should be ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Zenify


    All over the papers at the moment "EU warns outbreak poses risk to economy". What about the risk to life? What the hell is going on...?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,855 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Zenify wrote: »
    All over the papers at the moment "EU warns outbreak poses risk to economy". What about the risk to life? What the hell is going on...?

    500 deaths wont crush the economy, 500,000 sick could.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    wakka12 wrote: »
    1st death in Japan

    Number of cases outside China reaches 500

    Very worrying, since Japan would have good facilities for dealing with this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 Scrabbles38


    Armenia 330+ million population ???

    divide that by 100 and you;d be closer ...

    What????? America’s population is 330 million


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    What????? America’s population is 330 million

    Yes, you said Armenia which has a population of 3 million.
    Armenia has what a population of 330+ million people..
    This flu session 19+ million people got it...
    180000+ people where hospitalised...
    10000+ people died so far...

    You are confusing everyone and now yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Society will collapse, particularly in a Globalised world. Imagine people in front line services and utilities not turning up to work?

    How long would a Power Grid stay up? How long would water systems still run? How long would food still be delivered to the stores with an infection rate that we are seeing in China?

    Also, consider this.

    China is pretty much a Totalitarian state that is throwing all its resources at this and can't control it. The people there are much more pliant than Western "free" folk so we haven't seen riots or mass panic.

    Can you imagine trying to control this in Western Democracies if the infection rates are close to what we are seeing in China?


    The electricity grid and telco networks would stay up. A lot of monitoring/management can be performed remotely and repairs would usually be in places away from crowds of people.

    Water in would probably also be straightforward to maintain.
    Water out less so, with workers reluctant to repair/maintain in a potentially contaminated environment.

    Hard to know what would happen the health services. But the people working there would be some of the least selfish people in the country and some would see it as their duty to continue working despite the risks.

    And it's only a 2% mortality rate, not 50%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    MD1990 wrote: »
    in 1918 would have had so many obvious factors which caused it to spread so much more as well as much better medical facilities & ability to avoid spread.

    Common sense would tell you this.

    I suspect we will go into to lockdown but I dont envisage everyone getting the virus as was stated. If that is not a overreaction I dont know what is.

    If we can avoid a major spread until summer we should be ok.

    It's not such a simple comparison. Many more people have underlying health conditions today, and there are hundreds of millions more people worldwide over 60 than there were then as well, for example.China is a pretty young country compared to say Japan, which will likely experience a much higher death rate than China due to over 25% of the population being 65+


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    It's very worrying....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Zenify


    500 deaths wont crush the economy, 500,000 sick could.

    My point was that people dying should be more important than somebody's share portfolio.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Zenify wrote: »
    My point was that people dying should be more important than somebody's share portfolio.


    Not as easy in reality to disconnect the economy and health.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Zenify wrote: »
    My point was that people dying should be more important than somebody's share portfolio.

    It's only at a certain point that deaths are considered more important than economics/convenience. Cars kill thousands of people daily but they are not banned because of their huge economic/transport/convenience benefits for everyone else


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    josip wrote: »
    The electricity grid and telco networks would stay up. A lot of monitoring/management can be performed remotely and repairs would usually be in places away from crowds of people.

    Water in would probably also be straightforward to maintain.
    Water out less so, with workers reluctant to repair/maintain in a potentially contaminated environment.

    Hard to know what would happen the health services. But the people working there would be some of the least selfish people in the country and some would see it as their duty to continue working despite the risks.

    And it's only a 2% mortality rate, not 50%.

    It’s not about Mortality but infection rates and the panic it causes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 Scrabbles38


    Yes, you said Armenia which has a population of 3 million.



    You are confusing everyone and now yourself.

    Sorry spelling mistake bent America


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,274 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    My husband and I have been discussing this quite a bit this week as I've been picking up extra items (that we will use regardless) that will see us through isolation if needed. The weekend we'll do the same with medicines (OTC meds, vitamins and inhalers etc.) As he said they won't go off, we'll use them over time better to have them. We are normal folk, we are I would like to think quite sensible, we have two smallies and will do whatever it takes to try keep them safe. They are doing great with extra hand washing, hand sanitizers, keeping nails really short etc. all little things that will hopefully help in general for their immunity. One positive for creche is they are fairly hardy now! Nothing to do with panic, just sensible in my humbler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,855 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Zenify wrote: »
    My point was that people dying should be more important than somebody's share portfolio.


    If the economy collapses many more could die. 500,000 sick could potentially cause food & medicine shortages, health services could slow/stop, no police means social unrest, fire services could see blazes out of control due to lack of able bodies firefighters. Risk to economy doesn't just mean some millionaire loses thos years dividends on their shares.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭bb12


    ok so looking at china's numbers for today 59804 infected.
    so whats the population of china? 1.5 billion?

    59804/1,500,000,000 = current infection rate of 0.004% of total population.

    in terms of irish population that would equate to an infected rate of
    4,500,000 * .004 = 18,000

    15% of those infected would need oxygen = 18000 * .15 = 2700
    Of these 2700 cases up to 5% would need intenstive care = 2700 * .05 = 135


    So these figures represent the full flow of the disease in china at the minute and as its infected figures go up, so would the possible infected figures in ireland...

    but so far they don't look too bad for ireland...definitely not apocalyptic yet anyhow.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is the death in Japan related to the cruise liner passengers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,942 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    bb12 wrote: »
    ok so looking at china's numbers for today 59804 infected.
    so whats the population of china? 1.5 billion?

    59804/1,500,000,000 = current infection rate of 0.004% of total population.

    in terms of irish population that would equate to an infected rate of
    4,500,000 * .004 = 18,000

    15% of those infected would need oxygen = 18000 * .15 = 2700
    Of these 2700 cases up to 5% would need intenstive care = 2700 * .05 = 135


    So these figures represent the full flow of the disease in china at the minute and as its infected figures go up, so would the possible infected figures in ireland...

    but so far they don't look too bad for ireland...definitely not apocalyptic yet anyhow.

    Those numbers are nowhere near correct and neither are the deaths


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement