Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Skyscrapers ASAP.

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭FFVII


    John Doe1 wrote: »

    I come from a working class background but it is ridiculous that the ones who are contributing least to the tax base are the ones who stall all the plans to build upwards.

    What's all this tax base sh1t on here lately??

    Dublin pays more than the rest Yadda

    You earn more so your voice is louder/counts for 2??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    The_Brood wrote: »
    Dublin is easily the most overpopulated city with the least amount of public transportation and non-alcohol related commodities, or commodities open past the time people leave work, I have ever seen. I truly cannot fathom how the government does not see this as a problem.

    Have you been abroad yet? Dublin is not over populated. And the public transport while lacking is not awful for the size of it's population, which is not particularly dense. You'll have to explain what 'commodities' youre talking about, Dublin seems more virbant at nighttime than most European cities I've visited, and I'm not just talking about bars..lots restaurants, cinemas, clubs across the city are buzzing every day of the week. I also believe the government does think the transport and sorting out population/housing in Dublin are a problem, nighttime acitvities for non drinkers are not a pertinent issue on the part of the government I would say, what are thye supposed to do about that? Force private business owners to become 24/7 cafes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Vita nova


    A lot of people over-estimate the efficiency of high-rise. Because of the need for space around towers (e.g. Ballymun), five or six storey terracing like is widespread in Berlin can be just as efficient and arguably much better on a social level.

    On the other hand building skyscrapers while complying with strict daylight design rules creates open spaces in front of the skyscrapers where plazas, restaurant terraces, art installations etc. can be placed and these can give an area a cosmopolitan feel.

    I do however agree with your point that mid-rise apartment blocks can provide a similar density to high-rise buildings in countries where daylight design rules are strict.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 426 ✭✭MrAbyss


    well we once had a highrise development in Ballymun which didnt go particularly well so now we can never ever try again


    Ballymun was a remarkable success and everyone loved living there until the Corporation said 'let them rot'.

    Up until the mid 70s nothing wrong with the place


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 426 ✭✭MrAbyss


    The_Brood wrote: »
    Dublin is easily the most overpopulated city with the least amount of public transportation and non-alcohol related commodities, or commodities open past the time people leave work, I have ever seen. I truly cannot fathom how the government does not see this as a problem.




    I suggest you do some travelling.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Same as happened in Sheffield and it got so bad they had to demolish the high rise blocks. Such intensive occupation concentrates bad elements.
    Hmmmm, I wonder how some of the disreputable areas of Dublin would behave if cooped in a skyscraper? :P


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 426 ✭✭MrAbyss


    Markcheese wrote: »
    I've no major urge to see sky scrapers ,they're seriously expensive to build

    Is it coming out of your pocket money?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 838 ✭✭✭The_Brood


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Have you been abroad yet? Dublin is not over populated. And the public transport while lacking is not awful for the size of it's population, which is not particularly dense. You'll have to explain what 'commodities' youre talking about, Dublin seems more virbant at nighttime than most European cities I've visited, and I'm not just talking about bars..lots restaurants, cinemas, clubs across the city are buzzing every day of the week. I also believe the government does think the transport and sorting out population/housing in Dublin are a problem, nighttime acitvities for non drinkers are not a pertinent issue on the part of the government I would say, what are thye supposed to do about that? Force private business owners to become 24/7 cafes?

    What exactly are the transport options in Dublin? Dublin Bus is atrocious might as well not exist, for many reasons. No underground metro. Luas covers an insanely narrow stretch of land. And the overpopulation is the reason why there is a housing and rental crisis. Not enough places for people to live.

    I have no idea how you have formed these views, but they are precisely the reason the government does nothing and so many of us workers are suffering badly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Vita nova wrote: »
    On the other hand building skyscrapers while complying with strict daylight design rules creates open spaces in front of the skyscrapers where plazas, restaurant terraces, art installations etc. can be placed and these can give an area a cosmopolitan feel.

    I do however agree with your point that mid-rise apartment blocks can provide a similar density to high-rise buildings in countries where daylight design rules are strict.

    And..? Plenty of plazas, terraces,restaurants and art in Paris, Rome, Copenhagen and dozens of other entirely mid rise cities throughout europe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    The_Brood wrote: »
    What exactly are the transport options in Dublin? Dublin Bus is atrocious might as well not exist, for many reasons. No underground metro. Luas covers an insanely narrow stretch of land. And the overpopulation is the reason why there is a housing and rental crisis. Not enough places for people to live.

    I have no idea how you have formed these views, but they are precisely the reason the government does nothing and so many of us workers are suffering badly.

    Well then we have a different experiences of Dublin Bus. I use it daily and the service is fine for me, I live in Dublin 6. It's always on time for me and comes every 15 mins. The Dart, and Green and Red Line Luas cover the majority of the south side of the city and the city centre so can't agree that thats a very narrow part, and other than for an hour or so at rush hour when it gets uncomfortably squishy they are well run services.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 143 ✭✭Ready4Boarding


    Vita nova wrote: »
    On the other hand building skyscrapers while complying with strict daylight design rules creates open spaces in front of the skyscrapers where plazas, restaurant terraces, art installations etc. can be placed and these can give an area a cosmopolitan feel.

    I do however agree with your point that mid-rise apartment blocks can provide a similar density to high-rise buildings in countries where daylight design rules are strict.

    In theory, anyway. They can just as easily be grey, lifeless expanses, especially in financial districts.


  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Same as happened in Sheffield and it got so bad they had to demolish the high rise blocks. Such intensive occupation concentrates bad elements.

    Ahh, well, just because it didn't work before in the UK, then we cannot take the concept and improve on it?

    Modern apartment blocks are a far different thing from the attempts in the Uk which just encouraged Ghettos.

    Consider six towers, each 24 floors, with 6 apartments to a floor. Gardens, fitness area, shops within the boundaries of the wall enclosing the complex. Maintenance crew, cleaners, and security paid from the rents. Police station within walking distance of the complex, along with access to the Luas or whatever rail link is available. A properly planned, and maintained complex.

    It boggles my mind that Asian nations can build and run decent (not perfect nor expensive) apartment towers, but the Irish won't/can't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,541 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    well we once had a highrise development in Ballymun which didnt go particularly well so now we can never ever try again

    Clearly no difference between something like this
    images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQ64BaStY1HzBH0NesN1c0YdBL4TSlcrpcm7a9pNcQ-LXzA6Dnj

    And this

    images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQy3oUdprbKgWqyuCO7VAXpwSO9FOuXgf5un0IzfYoFQxtIMhXa


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    Clearly no difference between something like this
    images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQ64BaStY1HzBH0NesN1c0YdBL4TSlcrpcm7a9pNcQ-LXzA6Dnj

    And this

    images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQy3oUdprbKgWqyuCO7VAXpwSO9FOuXgf5un0IzfYoFQxtIMhXa

    Provide fück all in terms of facilities and maintenance and the outcome of the second building will be the same as the one in the first picture, no matter how fancy it it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    When oh when are we gonna start building Skyscrapers and high rise apartments in Dublin? The City is busting at the seams,.. I think it's a no-brainer. :confused:

    A big part of the problem is that west Brit types can`t stand the thought of demolishing memories of the colonialism. Consequently, we drive for hours each morning and destroy the polar ice caps instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    When oh when are we gonna start building Skyscrapers and high rise apartments in Dublin? The City is busting at the seams,.. I think it's a no-brainer. :confused:

    They'll set aside 3 Billion for the project - to be completed by 2025 ... it won't be completed till 2035 and will cost 30 billion.

    a few years later they'll discover shoddy workmanship and they'll have to be vacated and declared too dangerous for living in.

    Meanwhile the fat cat politicians will be retired raking in 500k in pensions.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 143 ✭✭Ready4Boarding


    A big part of the problem is that west Brit types can`t stand the thought of demolishing memories of the colonialism. Consequently, we drive for hours each morning and destroy the polar ice caps instead.

    Surely - surely - you don’t believe that nostalgia for pre-Independence is causing people to oppose the building of high-rise?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    A big part of the problem is that west Brit types can`t stand the thought of demolishing memories of the colonialism. Consequently, we drive for hours each morning and destroy the polar ice caps instead.

    We drive because we ripped up all the transport infrastructure that... guess who... installed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    It is an exaggeration that we ripped up some amazing transport net work

    It was an (admittedly extensive) system of slow moving trolleys built to support a city with a population of 300k or so.Dublin is what 3 or 4 times larger in size and population now. It would have to have been completely ripped up and modernised regardless in order to move people in and out of the city centre at a speed that we expect today. If it had survived it would just be a tourist attraction like the trolleys in Lisbon and San fransisco completely separate from the actual functioning and effective modern transport network. Most of the old lines left behind by them actually allowed for much quicker and cheaper development of the luas lines and dart. So if the trolleys had survived theyd probably be protected now and we'd have a much worse transport system


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 143 ✭✭Ready4Boarding


    wakka12 wrote: »
    It is an exaggeration that we ripped up some amazing transport net work

    It was an (admittedly extensive) system of slow moving trolleys built to support a city with a population of 300k or so.Dublin is what 3 or 4 times larger in size and population now. It would have to have been completely ripped up and modernised regardless in order to move people in and out of the city centre at a speed that we expect today. If it had survived it would just be a tourist attraction like the trolleys in Lisbon and San fransisco completely separate from the actual functioning and effective modern transport network. Most of the old lines left behind by them actually allowed for much quicker and cheaper development of the luas lines and dart. So if the trolleys had survived theyd probably be protected now and we'd have a much worse transport system

    Yeah, London ripped up its trams too in favour of buses.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,513 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I don't know why we don't have entire neighbourhoods of 10 storey or so flats with green spaces in between and shops and restaurants etc on the ground floor. It works well in Germany and other well run countries.
    People say Irish want semi-ds and gardens, but I've no doubt decent flats would be snapped up too, beggars can't be choosers in the current environment.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 143 ✭✭Ready4Boarding


    I don't know why we don't have entire neighbourhoods of 10 storey or so flats with green spaces in between and shops and restaurants etc on the ground floor. It works well in Germany and other well run countries.
    People say Irish want semi-ds and gardens, but I've no doubt decent flats would be snapped up too, beggars can't be choosers in the current environment.

    Maybe it's my ideological bias, but I instinctively distrust radical plans like that. Too many things are liable to go wrong. We look back at the Ballymun flats with complete clarity that it was doomed from the start; if only they had had our insight at the time of building. But our insight derives from seeing the experience of those flats. At the time, they probably had the same confidence in those towers as you have in yours. Who's to say there isn't some "obvious" lesson to be learnt about the building of ten-storey tower complexes that only hindsight will reveal?

    I acknowledge that that principal could be used to stymie all development, but I think its force increases exponentially with the size and complexity of a proposal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,372 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    I don't think we need them


  • Posts: 11,642 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Keywords highlighted. They first thing needed would be a beefed up “building control” regime.

    Beefed up? Have you seen current building regs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,513 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Maybe it's my ideological bias, but I instinctively distrust radical plans like that. Too many things are liable to go wrong. We look back at the Ballymun flats with complete clarity that it was doomed from the start; if only they had had our insight at the time of building. But our insight derives from seeing the experience of those flats. At the time, they probably had the same confidence in those towers as you have in yours. Who's to say there isn't some "obvious" lesson to be learnt about the building of ten-storey tower complexes that only hindsight will reveal?

    I acknowledge that that principal could be used to stymie all development, but I think its force increases exponentially with the size and complexity of a proposal.

    Dont put any HAP people in them and theyll be fine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,210 ✭✭✭pablo128


    I used to work as a mechanic. Obviously I have a heap of tools of all description, welding plants, trolley jack, pressure washer etc. I do all my own work on our cars. I'd have no issue changing a clutch, for example here at home. As well as that, I have a large amount of camping gear too.

    Where would I put all my stuff in a high rise apartment, and where could I work on my car?


  • Posts: 4,238 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Beefed up? Have you seen current building regs?

    To be honest, I have not, but my point is that no matter how robust/good/comprehensive they are, somebody who knows what they are doing needs to check that the building regs have been complied with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Ireland doesn't need skyscrapers, it needs 8-10 story blocks built and fitted out with high quality materials and maintained to a high level. None of which seems to be within the compass of this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,796 ✭✭✭KungPao


    pablo128 wrote: »
    I used to work as a mechanic. Obviously I have a heap of tools of all description, welding plants, trolley jack, pressure washer etc. I do all my own work on our cars. I'd have no issue changing a clutch, for example here at home. As well as that, I have a large amount of camping gear too.

    Where would I put all my stuff in a high rise apartment, and where could I work on my car?

    Have a lock up like Del Boy. He kept his banger and assorted crap in there as he lived high up in Nelson Mandela house.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Ireland doesn't need skyscrapers, it needs 8-10 story blocks built and fitted out with high quality materials and maintained to a high level. None of which seems to be within the compass of this country.

    It's either semi d's, apartments made of cereal boxes, stunted versions of Manhattan skyscrapers or nothing.


Advertisement
Advertisement