Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Unionists and a United Ireland.

  • 14-12-2019 9:06pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,261 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Following the recent Northern Ireland elections and the huge Conservative poll in mainland Britain would Unionists now be better off in a United Ireland if Britain leaves the European Union?


«1345

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Following the recent Northern Ireland elections and the huge Conservative poll in mainland Britain would Unionists now be better off in a United Ireland if Britain leaves the European Union?


    What do you think yourself or do you not have an opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,261 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    What do you think yourself or do you not have an opinion.

    I don’t know if they would be better off or not. That’s why I’m asking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Abel Ruiz


    What do you think yourself or do you not have an opinion.

    What's your opinion???????


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The English government have shown the unionists what they think of NI unionists by throwing the DUP under a bus at the earliest opportunity.
    At the same time, the Irish government stood firm with the EU in ensuring that the wishes of the NI electorate were listened to and that trade for NI remained as it had been with no barriers to the EU.
    If the unionists cannot see the wood for the trees now then they never will!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    The fact that the EU have said a reunification vote will see NI immediately return to the EU, and not have to face any sort of waiting period, is a huge boost for the pro-unity argument if Brexit goes badly.

    Add in the potential for Scotland to vote for independence within the next 5 years and that would also make the case even more compelling. I can't see English people, who are increasingly asserting their identity, being willing to wrap themselves in the Union flag if the Scots tell them cheerio. And Sturgeon has made clear she wants an independent Scotland to be part of the EU as soon as possible.

    Imagine then a situation in 10 years' time where the ROI and Scotland are part of the EU, enjoying the benefits of membership, while NI's economy is struggling as a distant satellite to an England and Wales that is looking increasingly inward and treating the place as a total afterthought (more even than now).

    I think in that scenario plenty of unionists will say to themselves, maybe it's worth exploring whether there is a better alternative.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The English government have shown the unionists what they think of NI unionists by throwing the DUP under a bus at the earliest opportunity.
    At the same time, the Irish government stood firm with the EU in ensuring that the wishes of the NI electorate were listened to and that trade for NI remained as it had been with no barriers to the EU.
    If the unionists cannot see the wood for the trees now then they never will!

    the English Parliament ceased to exist in 1707. I would have thought a politics mod would have known that.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Aegir wrote: »
    the English Parliament ceased to exist in 1707. I would have thought a politics mod would have known that.

    Mod Note

    No need to be a smart alek. Lots of people conflate English and British. Everyone knows what he means.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Aegir wrote: »
    the English Parliament ceased to exist in 1707. I would have thought a politics mod would have known that.

    95% (345/365) of Conservative MPs were elected in English constituencies. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/2019UKElectionMap.svg

    There are more English Conservative MPs (345) than there are MPs for all the other parties (285) put together.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Unionists know that since the GFA Britain has tacitly withdrawn, it will not put up a fight for them in the event of a poll, they will remain neutral at best on the matter as a government.
    They also know and fear (the belligerent ones anyhow) that a UI is happening by osmosis since the GFA too and that Brexit will hasten that process.
    I think that explains the weird strategy that they adopted with Brexit, they hoped to shock the whole process and create borders and put insurmountable pressures on the GFA.
    I don't think they bargained on Dublin outmanouvering them.

    What they have done is cause the entire Unionist population to assess their future now in a very realistic way, as an afterthought at best in Westminster and fodder at worst to be sarcrificed in the interests of England. Scotland are facing up to the same reality.


  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Noa Plain Store


    It has finally dawned on the DUP that Westminster wants rid of the North.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It has finally dawned on the DUP that Westminster wants rid of the North.

    The reason the DUP hated the GFA so vociferously is because they knew that was what the GFA was - Westminster more or less saying they were happy out.

    They never admitted it publicly, but now because they forced the British to drop them so publicly you have the likes of Bryson openly discussing and admitting it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,222 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It has finally dawned on the DUP that Westminster wants rid of the North.

    The penny hasn't dropped that slowly since Francis Rossi of Status Quo sported a ponytail for 30 years before finally deciding it looked naff and cut it off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Jonathan Powell, former chief of staff to Tony Blair and a respected commentator on Brexit, has said he reckons Irish unity could be on the way in ten years:
    "Once you put a border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland’s going to be part of a united Ireland for economic purposes," he told the BBC.

    "That will increase the tendency toward a united Ireland for political reasons, too.

    "I think there is a good chance there will be a united Ireland within 10 years."

    https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2019/12/17/news/brexit-could-lead-to-united-ireland-in-a-decade--1792498

    There was a very interesting discussion on this afternoon's Talkback show on BBC NI radio discussing those comments, and whether Brexit has made reunification more likely. Begins from 9:00 on:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000cb0s

    Emma Little-Pengelly, who lost her South Belfast seat, was on, as was the commentator Brian Feeney,and a few others. Interesting moment where reporter Hugh Jordan said he was told by a well-placed source that at a meeting in Dublin, a senior DUP politician said the Union was finished within 15 years.

    Surprising number of unionist callers who said they were now willing to support reunification based on the manner in which the DUP handled Brexit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    The most important aspect of any discussion on a united Ireland is who leads it - ironically, Stephen Donnelly may have helped today by calling on the Government to lay out its own unity plans, as taking the focus away from Sinn Féin makes it far more likely that the centre ground in NI will engage in the debate. Better still, perhaps a cross-Border forum like the Citizens Assembly, but involving business, religious, sporting, cultural groups etc, might be best placed to work through the various issues as they arise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    Though it's a bit of a running joke from Star Trek there's a few bets reunification could happen in 2024 in an eeriely similar way to how the Simpsons predicted a Trump Presidency (though different means of course)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    Old unionists and old republicans are dying out fast.
    Young people can see the bigger picture and will not be tied in to outdated bigoted religious beliefs........expect big changes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Feisar


    So a border poll will happen sooner or later and sooner or later will return a yes vote.

    Will the Republic vote to take them?

    I wouldn’t think so, a lot of people view “nordies” as a breed apart and once it would effect their pockets would quickly loose any misty eyed notions.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,806 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    It’s going to happen within 20 years. Unionists way better off of it happens. One of the many terrible effects of the IRA was they delayed unification and the impact is still being felt, unionists still reflexively opposed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The most important aspect of any discussion on a united Ireland is who leads it - ironically, Stephen Donnelly may have helped today by calling on the Government to lay out its own unity plans, as taking the focus away from Sinn Féin makes it far more likely that the centre ground in NI will engage in the debate. Better still, perhaps a cross-Border forum like the Citizens Assembly, but involving business, religious, sporting, cultural groups etc, might be best placed to work through the various issues as they arise.

    The all party committee with the input of some unionists too have done some work on it already.
    I agree it has to be led by the government of the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    It won't happen anytime soon and a border poll would only serve to drive people more into their respective laagers. Young people this, young people that is just simplistic bs. Even the moderate Republicans that I associate with aren't prepared to 'give an inch' on simple things like the flag and anthem so what are the hardliners likely to offer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,993 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    As much as I would love to see a UI in the next decade or 15 years, I think that's a bit optimistic.

    Some of the things which will delay it?

    - people say older bigoted people are dying off. I see plenty of examples of bigoted youngsters. Just look at all the bonfires every July.

    - it's assumed all Catholics in the north are in favour of a UI. I think it's safe to assume plenty would vote to remain part of UK in the case of a border poll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Feisar wrote: »
    So a border poll will happen sooner or later and sooner or later will return a yes vote.

    Will the Republic vote to take them?

    I wouldn’t think so, a lot of people view “nordies” as a breed apart and once it would effect their pockets would quickly loose any misty eyed notions.

    This is an assumption often thrown out with little evidence to back it up. An RTE/TG4 poll from this summer showed 65% in favour, 19% against. When undecideds were excluded, it was 77% in favour.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/fresh-plea-for-border-poll-as-survey-shows-65-back-united-ireland-1.3905167

    Many have friends and even family north of the border. We cheer on sportsmen and women from the north when they represent us. That stuff matters and resonates.

    The lesson from the equal marriage and abortion referendums is that personal stories connect with people. I find it hard to believe that when the likes of former president Mary McAleese, sports stars from the world of rugby & GAA etc. and other notable personalities throw their weight behind unity that the majority in the south will pull up the drawbridge and say 'nah, we prefer to be divided'. That's not the country I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This is an assumption often thrown out with little evidence to back it up. An RTE/TG4 poll from this summer showed 65% in favour, 19% against. When undecideds were excluded, it was 77% in favour.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/fresh-plea-for-border-poll-as-survey-shows-65-back-united-ireland-1.3905167

    Many have friends and even family north of the border. We cheer on sportsmen and women from the north when they represent us. That stuff matters and resonates.

    The lesson from the equal marriage and abortion referendums is that personal stories connect with people. I find it hard to believe that when the likes of former president Mary McAleese, sports stars from the world of rugby & GAA etc. and other notable personalities throw their weight behind unity that the majority in the south will pull up the drawbridge and say 'nah, we prefer to be divided'. That's not the country I know.

    There isn't a political party willing to represent partitionists either and there won't be, because those who turn a blind eye are a tiny minority.
    They will have to get behind loudmouths of journalism like Eoghan Harris and Ruth Dudley Edwards. Oh and John Bruton probably. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Feisar wrote: »
    So a border poll will happen sooner or later and sooner or later will return a yes vote.

    Will the Republic vote to take them?

    I wouldn’t think so, a lot of people view “nordies” as a breed apart and once it would effect their pockets would quickly loose any misty eyed notions.

    They had no problem having Mary McAleese as president for 14 years. A lot of people in the 26 counties would relate to Naomi Long (say) before the likes of the Healy-Rae tribe.

    People in the 26 counties will grumble about unity before and afterwards, and will throw a party and fly the (new) flag at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Feisar


    This is an assumption often thrown out with little evidence to back it up. An RTE/TG4 poll from this summer showed 65% in favour, 19% against. When undecideds were excluded, it was 77% in favour.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/fresh-plea-for-border-poll-as-survey-shows-65-back-united-ireland-1.3905167

    Many have friends and even family north of the border. We cheer on sportsmen and women from the north when they represent us. That stuff matters and resonates.

    The lesson from the equal marriage and abortion referendums is that personal stories connect with people. I find it hard to believe that when the likes of former president Mary McAleese, sports stars from the world of rugby & GAA etc. and other notable personalities throw their weight behind unity that the majority in the south will pull up the drawbridge and say 'nah, we prefer to be divided'. That's not the country I know.

    Points taken, I work with a load of lads from Northern Ireland and get on great with them so a non issue for me however the question is not clear cut.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    A UI will look very different from how people imagine it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    A UI will look very different from how people imagine it.

    You got the DeLorean working then mark!


    Why would your 'imagining'(which is what it is, unless you really do have time travelling abilities) be any more reliable than anybody else's?


  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Maewyn Succat


    Unionists are a funny bunch so it's hard to know how they think. They cling on to the whole union thing as if it's the most precious part of their existence. The UK government couldn't care less about them and most people in England see them as just as Irish as Michael D Higgins or Conor McGregor.
    There's no point thinking about a border poll until the dust settles on Brexit and it's effects are seen by the people of Northern Ireland but the tide does seem to be turning.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    This is an assumption often thrown out with little evidence to back it up. An RTE/TG4 poll from this summer showed 65% in favour, 19% against. When undecideds were excluded, it was 77% in favour.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/fresh-plea-for-border-poll-as-survey-shows-65-back-united-ireland-1.3905167

    When people are asked if they want a United Ireland in principle, there is usually support. However, it becomes far less certain when the costs are factored in.

    With regard to the original question, unionists are a bit of a political oddity in that they prize nationalism above all else. Everything I've read about unionist sentiment up north is that a significant number of them would still prefer to maintain the union, even if it meant they were worse off. Now, having said that, maybe the realities of Brexit could alter that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    When people are asked if they want a United Ireland in principle, there is usually support. However, it becomes far less certain when the costs are factored in.

    With regard to the original question, unionists are a bit of a political oddity in that they prize nationalism above all else. Everything I've read about unionist sentiment up north is that a significant number of them would still prefer to maintain the union, even if it meant they were worse off. Now, having said that, maybe the realities of Brexit could alter that.

    The thing about these polls on cost is that the 9/10/11/12/ billion figure is based on Britain leaving tomorrow and us continuing to run NI as is.

    It is not how anyone sensible is proposing how it will happen.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    I doubt the folks up North would appreciate having the taps turned off overnight. In fact, given their previous form, the parties up there would probably demand more money, not less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I doubt the folks up North would appreciate having the taps turned off overnight. In fact, given their previous form, the parties up there would probably demand more money, not less.

    Nobody is talking about 'turning taps off' either.

    A UI, to be sustainable (and it is in everyone's interests that it is sustainable and successful) will be a negotiated, agreed and gradual process, supported by all the signatories and guarantors of the GFA. That work has been done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,222 ✭✭✭✭briany


    BENDYBINN wrote: »
    Old unionists and old republicans are dying out fast.
    Young people can see the bigger picture and will not be tied in to outdated bigoted religious beliefs........expect big changes

    "Funny, how you get more right wing as you get older."

    Even back in the days of the worst of the Troubles, back when the Stiff Little Fingers were writing songs about what was going on around them, there were young folk up there who professed to be anti-sectarian, or just a-sectarian. In fact, the SLF themselves were a cross-community band. They represented, in a way, what we hoped the future of Northern Ireland would look like.

    But even though we've seen 400 years of roughly the same cycle in that troubled province, the belief that the old guard will die off, leaving the new guard to have a fresh, more positive perspective, has clung on. This has never really manifested itself, though, and it makes it hard to discern if the current (relative) peace the North has enjoyed for the last 20 or so years is merely an ebb rather than a confident march towards a new NI society.

    And it's one of the odd things about war, which is that as the memories of horror abates, what's left is the legends and the stories, and young people seem attracted to this - it seems to be a progression almost as old as man himself. And the young people then think they'd like to get involved in this war business and make a name for themselves, to take up a cause of their people, to get a bit of glory. And that's a danger I think remains in Northern Ireland where you have these young lads identifying strongly with one side or the other and wishing to take up for their side, not knowing that it's not just a game.

    So, let's not be complacent in saying the younger generation will be better. It's been said before, I think. There is work yet to be done, and let's see it continue to be done, and be ever vigilant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    Following the recent Northern Ireland elections and the huge Conservative poll in mainland Britain would Unionists now be better off in a United Ireland if Britain leaves the European Union?

    If I was a Unionist I'd say no - they'd get walked all over in a 32 county Ireland. Like it or lump it would be the attitude.

    Those in favour of a UI (self included) would be far better to concentrate on demonstrating actively to Unionists that they'd be respected and welcomed etc etc.

    Personally I wouldn't vote for in the Republic unless there was a good 80% of NI voters in favour. Otherwise just trouble for us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭pablo128


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    If I was a Unionist I'd say no - they'd get walked all over in a 32 county Ireland. Like it or lump it would be the attitude.

    Those in favour of a UI (self included) would be far better to concentrate on demonstrating actively to Unionists that they'd be respected and welcomed etc etc.

    Personally I wouldn't vote for in the Republic unless there was a good 80% of NI voters in favour. Otherwise just trouble for us.
    Would you get to fcuk. Unionists ran riot for years over Catholics in the north. And now we have to appease them?

    How about they get treated as equally as everyone else for once?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    If I was a Unionist I'd say no - they'd get walked all over in a 32 county Ireland. Like it or lump it would be the attitude.

    Those in favour of a UI (self included) would be far better to concentrate on demonstrating actively to Unionists that they'd be respected and welcomed etc etc.

    Personally I wouldn't vote for in the Republic unless there was a good 80% of NI voters in favour. Otherwise just trouble for us.
    Well, they certainly have your number don't they?
    Just threaten a little Loyalist trouble and Irish turn tail is it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    pablo128 wrote: »
    Would you get to fcuk. Unionists ran riot for years over Catholics in the north. And now we have to appease them?

    How about they get treated as equally as everyone else for once?
    BluePlanet wrote: »
    Well, they certainly have your number don't they?
    Just threaten a little Loyalist trouble and Irish turn tail is it?

    See what I mean.......................... a UI is a long, long, long way off with people of your view. And there's plenty out there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭pablo128


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    See what I mean.......................... a UI is a long, long, long way off with people of your view. And there's plenty out there.

    Why? Because I don't see why anyone has to bend over backwards for unionists? Why would you treat them any differently to Catholics, Muslims, Sikhs, lgbts, or any other group you can think of? You are the one who mentioned unionists. Did you not consider the implications of a UI for any other citizens of NI other than unionists?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,222 ✭✭✭✭briany


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    See what I mean.......................... a UI is a long, long, long way off with people of your view. And there's plenty out there.

    Yeah, the problem would be the potential for latent bigotry against the British Unionists, and a new Ireland could be rife with it. Largely unspoken, but self-justified in the belief that it's payback time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,965 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    briany wrote: »
    Yeah, the problem would be the potential for latent bigotry against the British Unionists, and a new Ireland could be rife with it. Largely unspoken, but self-justified in the belief that it's payback time.

    The point is there would be no veto for anybody in a UI. A nation of equals. And a government overseeing a constitution that would have a veto over bigoted treatment of any one based on their religion or identity. The very thing that caused NI to fail.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭dvdman1


    Unionists sitting in the dail may provide a good alternative right wing party to the left wing monopoly we currently have going on.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    That's all very well, but I can't see anyone in the North voting for wholesale absorption. I think both the Unionists and Nationalists will insist on some sort of powersharing arrangement, where they have guaranteed representation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    They will have guaranteed representation the same as any other party.. win a seat in the election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,203 ✭✭✭partyguinness


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    If I was a Unionist I'd say no - they'd get walked all over in a 32 county Ireland. Like it or lump it would be the attitude.

    Those in favour of a UI (self included) would be far better to concentrate on demonstrating actively to Unionists that they'd be respected and welcomed etc etc.

    Personally I wouldn't vote for in the Republic unless there was a good 80% of NI voters in favour. Otherwise just trouble for us.

    I would say it would be quite the opposite. The rest of the country bending over backward to demonstrate no hard feelings- it would be overkill and OTT with all the kindness and goodwill.

    A common goal should be to get London out of all Ireland for good and let us all get on with it. London sure as hell does not give a flying fcuk about NI- that has been obvious for decades. Unrequited love if ever.

    Anyway, who exactly would walk all over them?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    ELM327 wrote: »
    They will have guaranteed representation the same as any other party.. win a seat in the election.

    Have you seen Stormont? This is not how Northern Irish politics works.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    briany wrote: »
    Yeah, the problem would be the potential for latent bigotry against the British Unionists, and a new Ireland could be rife with it. Largely unspoken, but self-justified in the belief that it's payback time.

    How? Do you think they'll be denied equal rights or a vote?
    Likely they'll do alright. They'll still hold sway over their own districts and have a say nationally. I picture a Healy-Rae set up of some sort.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    pablo128 wrote: »
    Why? Because I don't see why anyone has to bend over backwards for unionists? Why would you treat them any differently to Catholics, Muslims, Sikhs, lgbts, or any other group you can think of? You are the one who mentioned unionists. Did you not consider the implications of a UI for any other citizens of NI other than unionists?

    You know the old saying 'there are none as blind as those that cannot see' - well that applies here. There are many aspects of the Irish Republic as it stands that are vested in the concept of a 'holy Roman Catholic Ireland'. That's the legacy of the decades following independence. The Unionists had a slogan 'Home Rule is Rome Rule' and they were right although in a partly self fulfilling way as they opted out and left the Republic to Rome.

    If we aspire to treat Unionists, Catholics, Muslims, Sikhs, lgbts, or any other group you can think of in an equal and fair way, well that's going to need a whole lot of work down south here.

    I'd love to vote for a UI tomorrow but I see no justification at all for it at present. Big changes needed. Start by divesting our entire educational and health system of religious influence, then our legal and political systems, readdress symbols and culture - things like a new anthem & flag & constitution etec etc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭pablo128


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    You know the old saying 'there are none as blind as those that cannot see' - well that applies here. There are many aspects of the Irish Republic as it stands that are vested in the concept of a 'holy Roman Catholic Ireland'. That's the legacy of the decades following independence. The Unionists had a slogan 'Home Rule is Rome Rule' and they were right although in a partly self fulfilling way as they opted out and left the Republic to Rome.

    If we aspire to treat Unionists, Catholics, Muslims, Sikhs, lgbts, or any other group you can think of in an equal and fair way, well that's going to need a whole lot of work down south here.

    I'd love to vote for a UI tomorrow but I see no justification at all for it at present. Big changes needed. Start by divesting our entire educational and health system of religious influence, then our legal and political systems, readdress symbols and culture - things like a new anthem & flag & constitution etec etc

    I want to school in Clondalkin and had a Protestant classmate back in the 80s. Not one single person ever mentioned it to him. The only difference was he didn't have to do any of the religious classes which he was happy enough with.

    Why on earth would we have to change our flag when it already contains the colour orange?

    Do you see Muslims losing their sh1t over a holy Cross in a hospital they are attending? Why would Unionists/loyalists/Protestants be any different?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    We need our Protestant brethren to achieve a totally secular republic; fully integrated into the European Union.
    UI and the likely expected constitutional changes makes this possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭circadian


    If Boris gets his deal and NI remains in the CU and SM then there is a solid platform to grow the economy in NI. For me, as a northerner this allows NI the best of both worlds and acts as a springboard to a border poll.

    An economically stable Northern Ireland would be much less of a financial burden and a much more appealing inheritance for the rest of Ireland.

    It's up to the electorate in the North to ensure they start to return leaders that are focused and capable of making use of this strategic position as opposed to focusing on the Union/United Ireland, as counter intuitive as that sounds when discussing Unionists in a United Ireland.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement