Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

HGV overtaking on motorway

  • 21-11-2019 9:06am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭


    I was on the N2 this morning and doing 100kmph with cruise control keeping it there. It was raining and traffic was decent and moving well. I seen lights as someone in the overtaking lane was passing me. Couldn’t believe it was a HGV. He seemed to be fine passing by as in he wasn’t struggling to pass me. He then returned to the inside lane in front of me but only for about 30 seconds as he then decided to over take the car he’d gone in behind. I was able to keep my 100kmph cruising speed throughout but I was a bit taken aback by this guy. It was a northern reg.

    Is there not supposed to be speed restricters on these vehicles and does anyone know have they a different speed limit because of their size and weight? He had to be doing 120 to overtake me doing 100. If he’d lost control it would have been absolute carnage.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Limit is 90 on motorways, and they aren't allowed in the outside lane in motorways either. Limiter has to be there at 90 on Irish registered vehicles and 56mph which is much the same on UK ones.

    UK drivers will feign ignorance of the outside lane rules but that doesn't absolve them!


  • Registered Users Posts: 22 sandrat


    I thought it was a bad idea to use cruise control in the rain?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭Infernal Racket


    sandrat wrote: »
    I thought it was a bad idea to use cruise control in the rain?

    It is. If he lost control it would be absolute cornage


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    Gerry G wrote: »
    It is. If he lost control it would be absolute cornage

    It is - on very old tech vehicles where the cruise setup is basic, nothing to worry about with a modern car that has tcs and such


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    anyone who believes any of those limiters is remotely accurate is kidding themselves IMO


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    L1011 wrote: »
    Limit is 90 on motorways, and they aren't allowed in the outside lane in motorways either. Limiter has to be there at 90 on Irish registered vehicles and 56mph which is much the same on UK ones.

    UK drivers will feign ignorance of the outside lane rules but that doesn't absolve them!
    He doesn't say he was in the outermost lane , just the overtaking lane.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,184 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i assume he was on a two lane stretch; the M2 is two lanes for the considerable majority of the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    i assume he was on a two lane stretch; the M2 is two lanes for the considerable majority of the road.
    In which case , is he not allowed to use the overtaking lane?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    In which case , is not allowed to use the overtaking lane?

    no


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    L1011 wrote: »
    Limit is 90 on motorways, and they aren't allowed in the outside lane in motorways either. Limiter has to be there at 90 on Irish registered vehicles and 56mph which is much the same on UK ones.

    UK drivers will feign ignorance of the outside lane rules but that doesn't absolve them!
    Quite a few of the overtaking trucks I see on the M1 are northern reg. They are usually the primary cause of sudden brake light tailbacks and I can't say they are anywhere near 90kph.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,655 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    N2 or M2?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,531 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    no

    What? So no HGV can ever overtake another slower vehicle? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    What? So no HGV can ever overtake another slower vehicle? :confused:

    That is correct, vehicles limited to 90km/h or less are not permitted to enter the right most lane of a motorway except in an emergency or obstruction.

    See the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) Regulations 1997 S33 (1)(d) as amended by the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) (Amendment) Regulations 2012:-
    Rules for Traffic on Motorways

    33 (1) A driver on a motorway shall not—

    (d) drive a vehicle of a class for which an ordinary speed limit of not more than 90 kilometres per hour is prescribed by regulations under section 3 and 4 of the Road Traffic Act, 2004in the traffic lane nearest the right hand edge of a carriageway having more than one traffic lane except where it is necessary to proceed in that lane due to an obstruction or because another lane or lanes is or are for the time being closed to traffic.

    And no, slow moving traffic is not an obstruction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    no
    You got in before I could edit,Cookie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭eusap


    which also means on a 3 lane road they can use lane 1 & 2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,531 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    GM228 wrote: »
    That is correct, vehicles limited to 90km/h or less are not permitted to enter the right most lane of a motorway except in an emergency or obstruction.

    See the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) Regulations 1997 S33 (1)(d) as amended by the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) (Amendment) Regulations 2012:-



    And no, slow moving traffic is not an obstruction.


    Well, I stand corrected, thank you!

    Always thought that applied to three lane carriageways, but not two.

    That's motorways, though, does the same apply on non-motorways?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    HeidiHeidi wrote: »
    Well, I stand corrected, thank you!

    Always thought that applied to three lane carriageways, but not two.

    That's motorways, though, does the same apply on non-motorways?

    Only applies to the right most lane of motorways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,531 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    eusap wrote: »
    which also means on a 3 lane road they can use lane 1 & 2
    I realise now I had it backwards in my head. More coffee required.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    GM228 wrote: »
    That is correct, vehicles limited to 90km/h or less are not permitted to enter the right most lane of a motorway except in an emergency or obstruction.

    See the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) Regulations 1997 S33 (1)(d) as amended by the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) (Amendment) Regulations 2012:-



    And no, slow moving traffic is not an obstruction.

    The OP said N2 thought so the HGV can use the overtaking lane.

    Why do motorists think that cyclists and tractors, slow moving traffic, are an obstruction that can be passed on continuous white lines yet slow moving vehicles aren't on a motorway aren't when trucks when to overtake?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,184 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    ted1 wrote: »
    N2 or M2?
    yeah, this can be confusing - leaving the M50 nortbound on this road, it's the N2 for the first roughly 4km, then turns into the M2 for the next 12km or so, before reverting to the N2 just north of Ashbourne. for most of that first 4km of it being the N2, it's 3 lanes, but drops to two when it becomes the M2.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭jarvis


    Sorry guys it was the M2 not the N2. It was two lane stretch not 3 and it’s not an old basic cruise control system. I was driving extremely carefully 😂🀣😂🀣


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭McCrack


    Op if your speedometer was reading 100 you were likely doing 92/93 in real terms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    McCrack wrote: »
    Op if your speedometer was reading 100 you were likely doing 92/93 in real terms

    Only on a needle speedo. Digital ones are going to be 98/99.

    And anyway, all are above the 90km/h the truck should be limited to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,353 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Gerry G wrote: »
    It is. If he lost control it would be absolute cornage

    D4 carnage?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    GM228 wrote: »
    Only applies to the right most lane of motorways.
    ....and only where the speed limit of the motorway is above 80km/h. Otherwise they may use any lane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 592 ✭✭✭JC01


    Your indicated 100k in your car is probably actually 85--95k in reality.

    The HGV has a calibrated tachometer that accurately limits him. That discrepancy in displayed vs actual speed is the reason he could overtake you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    JC01 wrote: »
    Your indicated 100k in your car is probably actually 85--95k in reality.

    85 would be illegally out of spec and 95 would be a bad needle speedo.

    100 on a digital, which most cars with cruise have, is 98-100


    The truck was breaking the law in the outer lane and almost certainly speeding also - your scenario is implausible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    my car with digital speedo is 4% out. thus 100km/h is 104 on the dash.(or thereabouts)

    10% out is implausible on a modern vehicle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    ....and only where the speed limit of the motorway is above 80km/h. Otherwise they may use any lane.

    No they can't, the prohibition is not subject to a minimum motorway speed limit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    GM228 wrote: »
    No they can't, the prohibition is not subject to a minimum motorway speed limit.
    There are some sections where a truck must be in the rightmost lane - hence the reason why it doesn't apply to motorways where the limit is 80km/h or less.

    I'd be interested in how you would bring a truck to Dublin Airport from the M1 southbound without using the right lane as one must enter the motorway on the right lane on the section towards the airport.

    Further southbound, a truck entering the DPT make legally access it on the rightmost lane. Similarly, a truck may legally exit the DPT heading north on the rightmost lane.

    Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why you think the prohibition is not subject to speed limits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭highdef


    L1011 wrote: »
    Only on a needle speedo. Digital ones are going to be 98/99.

    And anyway, all are above the 90km/h the truck should be limited to.

    Not true. Have tested the hubbys electric car with digital Speedo and it is 10% over at all speeds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭highdef


    GM228 wrote: »
    Only applies to the right most lane of motorways.

    So if a HGV gets stuck behind a tractor that is doing (and can only do) 60 km/h on the M4 at Leixlip, the hgv driver will have to wait till near Mullingar to overtake, where the motorway loses its motorway status.... Assuming the tractor is driving that far, which it is perfectly entitled to do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    He must have the magnet out of its hiding place in the cab


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    highdef wrote: »
    So if a HGV gets stuck behind a tractor that is doing (and can only do) 60 km/h on the M4 at Leixlip, the hgv driver will have to wait till near Mullingar to overtake, where the motorway loses its motorway status.... Assuming the tractor is driving that far, which it is perfectly entitled to do.

    Legally he's supposed to stay behind the tractor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,459 ✭✭✭zubair


    jarvis wrote: »
    He had to be doing 120 to overtake me doing 100. If he’d lost control it would have been absolute carnage.

    Pretty sure 101 would have done it :-)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭disposableFish


    He must have the magnet out of its hiding place in the cab
    Bingo, this the answer to this whole thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    highdef wrote: »
    So if a HGV gets stuck behind a tractor that is doing (and can only do) 60 km/h on the M4 at Leixlip, the hgv driver will have to wait till near Mullingar to overtake, where the motorway loses its motorway status.... Assuming the tractor is driving that far, which it is perfectly entitled to do.
    Yes.

    The driver is free to chose an alternative route if he/she isn't happy with the motorway regulations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭highdef


    Yes.

    The driver is free to chose an alternative route if he/she isn't happy with the motorway regulations.

    So there is the very literal possibility (assuming all hgv drivers follow the rules of the road) that on the approach to Mullingar there could be dozens upon dozens of HGV's queing up behind the tractor, way behind schedule, leading to late deliveries to a consortium of places simply because the delivery drivers were unable to pass by a slow moving vehicle (tractor, in this case). There would be other knock on effects because dozens of HGV'S in a queue would most likely lead to a brake light backlog or phantom slow down type situation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    Yep, another great idea caused by photocopying legislation from the uk, you can be punished but its very unlikely so most drivers overtake when able


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,459 ✭✭✭zubair


    Yep, another great idea caused by photocopying legislation from the uk, you can be punished but its very unlikely so most drivers overtake when able

    Honestly I didn't even know this was a rule until I was in court one day and there was a hgv driver up for exactly this. I imagine he was taking the pizz to get done for it though and then decided to fight it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Surely tractors are not allowed on motorways

    Must have another look at the forbidden vehicles for motorways, I was always fairly sure farm vehicles including tractors are forbidden

    But I stand to be corrected


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Surely tractors are not allowed on motorways

    Must have another look at the forbidden vehicles for motorways, I was always fairly sure farm vehicles including tractors are forbidden

    But I stand to be corrected

    once they are capable of 50km/h its fine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    There are some sections where a truck must be in the rightmost lane - hence the reason why it doesn't apply to motorways where the limit is 80km/h or less.
    where and why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭osheen


    As already pointed out, when entering the m50 from the m1 south bound and again if exiting the m50 heading for clarehall


  • Registered Users Posts: 217 ✭✭Count Down


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Surely tractors are not allowed on motorways

    Must have another look at the forbidden vehicles for motorways, I was always fairly sure farm vehicles including tractors are forbidden

    But I stand to be corrected

    As long as the vehicle is capable of attaining a speed of 50km per hour.
    Stupid rule, because unlike the UK, there's nothing to stop the driver of say. a tractor or JCB from dawdling along at 40km per hour or less holding up an entire lane (I've seen it happen).
    It seems that once a vehicle is on the motorway it can travel at any speed the driver likes, as long as it's capable of at least 50km per hour.:confused:
    Imagine being a truck driver in a hurry.....:mad:


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,302 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Count Down wrote: »
    As long as the vehicle is capable of attaining a speed of 50km per hour.
    Stupid rule, because unlike the UK, there's nothing to stop the driver of say. a tractor or JCB from dawdling along at 40km per hour or less holding up an entire lane (I've seen it happen).
    It seems that once a vehicle is on the motorway it can travel at any speed the driver likes, as long as it's capable of at least 50km per hour.:confused:
    Imagine being a truck driver in a hurry.....:mad:
    You mean like cars do on the M50 and other motorways every day?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    There are some sections where a truck must be in the rightmost lane - hence the reason why it doesn't apply to motorways where the limit is 80km/h or less.

    Legislation does not support what your claiming, it does not specify a minimum speed at which the prohibition kicks in.


    I'd be interested in how you would bring a truck to Dublin Airport from the M1 southbound without using the right lane as one must enter the motorway on the right lane on the section towards the airport.

    A truck must be in the right most lane when entering the airport from the M1 Southbound? At J2 I assume you mean? Since when must a truck be in the right lane for the airport there?

    Yes, there are locations where a truck must be in the right most lane to take a particular destination, however often they are not "traffic lanes" for the purposes of road traffic legislation which legally is not the same as the common understanding of a lane. This is where you get technical in applying the law, but nevertheless an important aspect when interpreting the law.

    That aside yes there are places where the roads have been screwed up somewhat and not technically in compliance with the traffic legislation, an example of this being on the M50 Northbound heading for Malahide at J1, but there are other instances where the layout of the roads is not compatible with road traffic law.


    Further southbound, a truck entering the DPT make legally access it on the rightmost lane. Similarly, a truck may legally exit the DPT heading north on the rightmost lane.

    No they can't, they can not be in the right lane in the DPT or when entering or exiting the DPT.


    Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why you think the prohibition is not subject to speed limits.

    Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why you think it is, afterall you maid the claim.

    I have shown the legislation in force, it is not qualified by a minimum speed, that is a fact, you can't read in qualifying criteria into legislation to fit the agenda (and neither can a court), you simply can not put an applicable speed when one does not exist for the purposes of statutory interpretation, that is not how the law works.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    Yep, another great idea caused by photocopying legislation from the uk, you can be punished but its very unlikely so most drivers overtake when able

    Ireland and the UK introduced the ban around the same time in 1983.

    It is enforced and there has been a big crack down on it in recent years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    GM228 wrote: »
    Ireland and the UK introduced the ban around the same time in 1983.

    It is enforced and there has been a big crack down on it in recent years.

    Ive many miles covered all over Ireland in artic and rigid and have only ever heard of a dew lads being done, ive overtaken and been overtaken in hgvs and never had a problem, just lucky so far i suppose


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    GM228 wrote: »
    Legislation does not support what your claiming......





    .......Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why you think it is, afterall you maid the claim.....
    It's not easy to find as the principal act has been ammended so many times - see part highlighted in red.

    (b) in article 33(1), by inserting after paragraph (d) (inserted by the Road Traffic (Traffic and Parking) Regulations 2005 ( S.I. No. 11 of 2005 )) the following:

    “(e) Paragraph (d) does not apply where -

    (i) a special speed limit of not more than 80 kilometres per hour applies under a special speed limit bye-law, or

    (ii) a speed limit of not more than 80 kilometres per hour applies under a road works speed limit order.”.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement