Eir GoMo - €9.99/month SIM only (unlimited calls, texts and 80GB data, 10Gb EU Roam

PukkaStukka wrote: »

It's a bit tough if you're confronted with ~ 250 pages of posts on a small mobile device. I did try reading some but none I saw answered the specific question I posed. I got the answer I needed and no thanks to you and your self espoused helpfulness.

To be honest, there are dozens of posts in this thread (including the last few pages) directly answering your question about “what the coverage and data speeds are like”. And given the fact that experience will differ hugely depending on time and location, going through the existing posts and seeing what the average experience seems to be would give a much better idea than sticking to the specific experience of the 2 or 3 people who will directly answered a new post with that question.

Just saying ...

Baron Kurtz wrote: »

Wondering if there's a way to check usage? Nothing on the account seems to indicate you can. Maybe after the billing period it'll probably generate one's usage.

It'll probably be available online... Can't your phone do that for you? Pretty sure it can, depending on what phone you have...

The high horse brigade wrote: »

It wasn't a very specific question

More specific that your useless and profoundly unhelpful answer was. Thankfully, you and your ilk are in the minority around here.

99nsr125 wrote: »

Ported this morning

Immediately lost data

Emailed in from support page

Nothing


Had to get a Tesco sim and spend €15

Not happy at all

Check you have an APN setup. It should automatically be there but not always.

The high horse brigade wrote: »

Only unhelpful to those truly lazy enough to not bother to read the last few pages of the thread to see if their general query has been asked and answered, which it has many many times. The coverage is the same as Meteor/Eir and speed is dependant on location, signal and which technology your device connects on. Good for some, poor for others

And your last two sentences instead of a presumptuous expletive blurt that I'm lazy would've been fine.

After getting a message from support yesterday that my port was 'stuck' I checked the website and saw that I need to reschedule. I've done that now so fingers crossed for 9am tomorrow. I've changed my other half's port for the same time in case that was the issue. We're both on the same account at VM but had seceduled different port times.

Tried to port from Tesco at 1500 today, nothing happened. Went online and submitted another port request

The high horse brigade wrote: »

You got called out for being downright lazy and are now just making a show of yourself. Others have thanked my posts. We'll just leave it at that.

No you were presumptuous and no stage did you have the decency to acknowledge what I said about wading through 250 pages of pre-existing posts. It's not that easy on a small screen.

Anyone can like someone else's posts but I see nobody wading inm I've no qualms about calling out a presumptuous smart ass for what they are. Likes or no likes.

And as I said, the last two sentences in your post twice ago would've been fine. But no, your a high horse alright with a name to live up to and you had to add two and two and get five thinking I was lazy. You're not really that helpful, are you? No, you're quite deluded if you think you are.

If I were you I'd stop now before making a show of yourself.

Thread needs a decent mod to shutdown the chatter. This is a BA thread (though you would hardly think it!), take porting issues etc to either Consumer Affairs or Mobile forums, end of!

According to Adrian Weckler in the Indo, he expects the 100,000 subscribers to be hit before Xmas.

I'd be amazed if they pulled/changed it when it gets to 100k.
Why would they turn away more customers?

Aquos76 wrote: »

In fairness, you will need to be more specific, where are you looking to find out about. I’m in Waterford an I’ve excellent coverage and speeds, however I was up in Dublin today and I found certain parts to be very poor and other areas were very good.

Asked on the basis that me porting to virtual operators previously was met with very poor performance, even though the "parent" network itself was very good. I hope VMNO's have improved a lot since!

PukkaStukka wrote: »

No you were presumptuous and no stage did you have the decency to acknowledge what I said about wading through 250 pages of pre-existing posts. It's not that easy on a small screen.

Anyone can like someone else's posts but I see nobody wading inm I've no qualms about calling out a presumptuous smart ass for what they are. Likes or no likes.

And as I said, the last two sentences in your post twice ago would've been fine. But no, your a high horse alright with a name to live up to and you had to add two and two and get five thinking I was lazy. You're not really that helpful, are you? No, you're quite deluded if you think you are.

If I were you I'd stop now before making a show of yourself.

I think you're the one making a show of himself here. You've offered nothing to this thread and now you're clogging it up trying to justify your failure to do the most basic research.