Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk XI: Team of nervoUS MOD warning Post 1

12324262829203

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    POM has that thing whiff of cordite used to talk about: Good face theory that US scouts talk of. He looks mean. Look at Jordi the guy reeks of Blackrock, you'd never have the causal person back him. Showed somebody non rugby the tweets of the airport and they saw him and they immediately did that roysh thing.

    I'd actually supposition that Jordi is the better player but doesn't project the same level of Munster anger and heart. POM is a great talker, pulls a few faces, a few jerseys. Make him captain they shout. The Lions realised quite quickly it was mostly chat,and not backed up. As Hickie said in 2007 documentary in the croke park changing room "back up the chat,back it up". POM doesn't do it enough.

    Its not a great backrow imo.

    We also need to look at SOB, and Zeebs obvs. Make it a plus 35 cap thing that u can be considered in isolation.

    Leavy, SOB are so far ahead of VDF, who is a workhorse but not a top class international. But he's the best we have for the moment.

    Sexton will be captain cause he backs up the chat 9 times out of ten.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    POM has that thing whiff of cordite used to talk about: Good face theory that US scouts talk of. He looks mean. Look at Jordi the guy reeks of Blackrock, you'd never have the causal person back him. Showed somebody non rugby the tweets of the airport and they saw him and they immediately did that roysh thing.

    I'd actually supposition that Jordi is the better player buyt doesn't project the same level of Munster anger and heart. POM is a great talker, pulls a few faces, a few jerseys. Make him captain they shout. The Lions realised quite quickly it was mostly chat,and not backed up. As Hickie said in 2007 "back up the chat,back it up". POM doesn't do it enough.

    Its not a great backrow imo.

    We also need to look at SOB, and Zeebs obvs. Make it a plus 35 cap thing that u can be considered in isolation.

    Leavy, SOB are so far ahead of VDF is who is a workhorse but not a top class international. But he's the best we have for the moment.

    Sexton will be captain cause he backs up the chat 9 times out of ten.

    This reads like to was google translated through three or four languages then back to English


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Mr Tickle wrote: »
    This reads like to was google translated through three or four languages then back to English

    lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I’m a huge fan of POM. I’d be surprised if he’s not in the discussion to be captain next year and surprised if he’s not starting in February. Certainly against England or Wales.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Clegg wrote: »
    VdF is the only genuine quality option we have at 7 right now. There's no fit player that's better than him at the moment.

    Even with everyone fit he'd still be right in the mix.

    Maybe Farrell will have a different take but Joe generally preferred VDF over Leavy.

    Personally I'd love to see Leavy given a run at 6.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Ah Pete is of course a likely starter and vice captain. I'm not a fan and have never been ever since i watched him starting out, playing for Cork Con. I was always left wondering what the fuss is...I watched a good few games where a Hugh Hogan or Liam Quill would outshine him.

    We need a good eight to emerge, with CJ moving to 6. Otr at least maybe we need to look at POM at 7 or 8. I will say, maybe if POM had played a jackling nuggety 7, instead of the (non)enforcer/carrier role he could have been a McCaw..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,792 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    POM has that thing whiff of cordite used to talk about: Good face theory that US scouts talk of. He looks mean. Look at Jordi the guy reeks of Blackrock, you'd never have the causal person back him. Showed somebody non rugby the tweets of the airport and they saw him and they immediately did that roysh thing.

    I'd actually supposition that Jordi is the better player but doesn't project the same level of Munster anger and heart. POM is a great talker, pulls a few faces, a few jerseys. Make him captain they shout. The Lions realised quite quickly it was mostly chat,and not backed up. As Hickie said in 2007 documentary in the croke park changing room "back up the chat,back it up". POM doesn't do it enough.

    Its not a great backrow imo.

    We also need to look at SOB, and Zeebs obvs. Make it a plus 35 cap thing that u can be considered in isolation.

    Leavy, SOB are so far ahead of VDF, who is a workhorse but not a top class international. But he's the best we have for the moment.

    Sexton will be captain cause he backs up the chat 9 times out of ten.
    Guessing you haven't seen SOB play rugby in the last couple of years


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    AdamD wrote: »
    Guessing you haven't seen SOB play rugby in the last couple of years

    So far ahead in natural talent, Obrien's been poor (and injured) since the Lions but i'd pick him every time over POM, whom i've never seen reach that level.

    By all accounts SOB is pain free and more mobile after surgery

    For me he's a live option


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    POM has that thing whiff of cordite used to talk about: Good face theory that US scouts talk of. He looks mean. Look at Jordi the guy reeks of Blackrock, you'd never have the causal person back him. Showed somebody non rugby the tweets of the airport and they saw him and they immediately did that roysh thing.

    I'd actually supposition that Jordi is the better player buyt doesn't project the same level of Munster anger and heart. POM is a great talker, pulls a few faces, a few jerseys. Make him captain they shout. The Lions realised quite quickly it was mostly chat,and not backed up. As Hickie said in 2007 "back up the chat,back it up". POM doesn't do it enough.

    Its not a great backrow imo.

    We also need to look at SOB, and Zeebs obvs. Make it a plus 35 cap thing that u can be considered in isolation.

    Leavy, SOB are so far ahead of VDF is who is a workhorse but not a top class international. But he's the best we have for the moment.

    Sexton will be captain cause he backs up the chat 9 times out of ten.

    Why has Leavy never started ahead of VDF at 7 when both were available?

    Whether you think Leavy’s a better player or not whatever, but to suggest Van Der Flier is not a top class international 7 you’re way off.

    To suggest SOB is better than him as well is ridiculous. SOB hasn’t been anywhere near his best in a long time.

    VDF kept both of them out of the Leinster team when all were fit as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Vinnie222


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Ah Pete is of course a likely starter and vice captain. I'm not a fan and have never been ever since i watched him starting out, playing for Cork Con. I was always left wondering what the fuss is...I watched a good few games where a Hugh Hogan or Liam Quill would outshine him.

    We need a good eight to emerge, with CJ moving to 6. Otr at least maybe we need to look at POM at 7 or 8. I will say, maybe if POM had played a jackling nuggety 7, instead of the (non)enforcer/carrier role he could have been a McCaw..
    It's amazing how many coaches that made him captain has got it so wrong


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Why has Leavy never started ahead of VDF at 7 when both were available?

    Whether you think Leavy’s a better player or not whatever, but to suggest Van Der Flier is not a top class international 7 you’re way off.

    To suggest SOB is better than him as well is ridiculous. SOB hasn’t been anywhere near his best in a long time.

    VDF kept both of them out of the Leinster team when all were fit as well.

    You see here we have the problem with the Irish team in a nutshell. Kearney and POM are allowed go to the well of past performances but Seanie is thrown on the scrapheap like some other lads. I can never understand it. Cian Healy fought back, so can SOB.

    Until VDF has a game like SOB did in the Lions or some of the Irish games he has no comparison tests yet. He's a workhorse who on the odd occasion looks class. Again he's got something bubbling underneath. Hopefully he can fully exploit it. Like he needs to carry more, he's got decent power. Does he get enough turnovers? His workrate is unreal. As we have seen with Joe's gameplan...is that enough? and i say no.

    I like him i do. But you'll see him miss those free passes POM gets.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Vinnie222 wrote: »
    It's amazing how many coaches that made him captain has got it so wrong

    Gats made him one and then subbed him about 49 mins in, didn't make the same mistake again.

    I never said he's a bad captain. You can see it in interviews. He has a presence, a voice. He's a rugby players player. But is that good enough for us anymore...

    look maybe it is. Maybe we are all deluding ourselves and are the lads actually as good as we think they are? take somebody like Ringrose, who was class, i love him but is he as good as we think? Ditto the other lads. I dunno i'm genuinely getting worried. But then i remind myself Joe didn't let them play, he didn't let Jordan, or joey, or Garry dance.

    Hopefully Andy can pull it back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,846 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Even with everyone fit he'd still be right in the mix.

    Maybe Farrell will have a different take but Joe generally preferred VDF over Leavy.

    Personally I'd love to see Leavy given a run at 6.

    I've been saying it for ages, Leavy is a six not a seven. He's too slow defensively for seven, but too good to not have in the back row.

    I also think Beirne is due a few more starts at 6. I think he found it hard to fit into the structure and did his best work for Scarlets when he was allowed to roam behind the defensive line looking for turnovers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,846 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    If you had Beirne at 6, CJ at 8 and Leavy at 7 though, you'd probably have a nice turn-over rate


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Gats made him one and then subbed him about 49 mins in, didn't make the same mistake again.

    I never said he's a bad captain. You can see it in interviews. He has a presence, a voice. He's a rugby players player. But is that good enough for us anymore...

    It seemed to be good enough when you said the exact same thing about James Ryan.
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    James Ryan does everything he is instructed to do. He does it at a level above Henderson, POM, Stander. He's the rugby players player.

    The bigger question is, what to you actually even mean when you say that? It just sounds like platitudes to me and doesn't actually mean anything at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    You see here we have the problem with the Irish team in a nutshell. Kearney and POM are allowed go to the well of past performances but Seanie is thrown on the scrapheap like some other lads. I can never understand it. Cian Healy fought back, so can SOB.

    SOB hasn’t been fit for two years. He’s done. He’s gone. Let him enjoy his last pay day.

    Kearney and POM have turned in outstanding performances in that time, in fact they have done in the last 12 months. SOB has been nowhere near that level. He has completely flattered to deceive.
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Until VDF has a game like SOB did in the Lions or some of the Irish games he has no comparison tests yet.

    This is bollocks logic. By the same token Ruddock shouldn’t start ahead of POM yet you’re calling for that?
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    He's a workhorse who on the odd occasion looks class.

    He’s consistently one of the best performers on the pitch for his province and his country.
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Like he needs to carry more, he's got decent power.

    That’s what the 6 is supposed to be doing, and why Leavy is a much better fit at 6 than he is at 7.
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Does he get enough turnovers? His workrate is unreal. As we have seen with Joe's gameplan...is that enough? and i say no.

    He won 4 turnovers in the World Cup and saved plenty of tries. One against Scotland, 2 against Japan and 2 against the ABs off the top of my head
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    I like him i do. But you'll see him miss those free passes POM gets.

    Because he’s done nothing to warrant the quote frankly nonsense criticism you’re throwing at him.

    It is truly bizarre that you are going on this tirade with just plenty of anecdotes. You’ve literally nothing to back it up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    aloooof wrote: »
    It seemed to be good enough when you said the exact same thing about James Ryan.



    The bigger question is, what to you actually even mean when you say that? It just sounds like platitudes to me and doesn't actually mean anything at all.

    James Ryan is on a different level to POM. Please lets be reasonable...

    Thats part of my meaning, for me with POM it is all platitudes. Lenihan breathlessly waffling on at medicore O'Mahoney play. Once every 5 matches. Then it goes down as lore. Some of this does feed into the squad on a real tangible level. He seems a great guy, no question and on many teams at different levels in rugby the captain isn't necessarily the best player...maybe he's just a gentleman and a scholar, a great guy. Thats where i'm coming from. We know Best wasn't the best hooker. All through his teams i'd reckon that was the case. A rugby captain is so different to other sports. Its a spiritual leader, a leading from the front, a talker, a totem pole, in the old days in rugby, even the coach etc.

    Maybe he talks best, maybe he leads training best, maybe he runs lineouts best. I dunno i know from low level and AIL the different types of captains and such. Like i'm not arguing he's a bad player. He does his job. The players obviously feed into him and he's important. Thats sort of what im getting at. I dont't know maybe you've been on different teams than me.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Faugheen wrote: »
    SOB hasn’t been fit for two years. He’s done. He’s gone. Let him enjoy his last pay day.

    Kearney and POM have turned in outstanding performances in that time, in fact they have done in the last 12 months. SOB has been nowhere near that level. He has completely flattered to deceive.



    This is bollocks logic. By the same token Ruddock shouldn’t start ahead of POM yet you’re calling for that?



    He’s consistently one of the best performers on the pitch for his province and his country.



    That’s what the 6 is supposed to be doing, and why Leavy is a much better fit at 6 than he is at 7.



    He won 4 turnovers in the World Cup and saved plenty of tries. One against Scotland, 2 against Japan and 2 against the ABs off the top of my head



    Because he’s done nothing to warrant the quote frankly nonsense criticism you’re throwing at him.

    It is truly bizarre that you are going on this tirade with just plenty of anecdotes. You’ve literally nothing to back it up.

    Kearney and POM getting passes again. Sure if its not week in week out who cares right. We always had "fill in past glories here" and on we go. Yet others get ripped asunder.

    Our we talking about VDF here? Yeah i like him he had a great World Cup.

    So we've had two of the best carriers in world rugby for the past two decades at 7 which you ignore and you say my post is bizarre? I'm fully aware of what the 7's role is...we don't play that way. If we continue on that path he needs to carry more cause he's a good carrier, better than POM at least.

    There's plenty to back it up, chiefly the last 12 months.

    Ruddock has had some great games. He hasn't been rewarded. Again Ruddock's a decent operator. If Gats was picking the Lions in the morning he wouldn't be near it. And you can dismiss that all you want, our aim in Irish rugby like any other professional entity is to be the best of the best, World Class. Its a standard to be measured against.

    So we need to have some honest conversations. On the truly global stage we have failed badly. We need to be honest here.

    SOB for me is an option. We aren't good enough to be jettisoning international class players.

    Anyway Penny will outstrip all these lads and form a unreal backrow with Leavy and possibly Deegan hopefully in the next 12 months.

    Kearney is finished, absolutely done.

    He had a very good 2018 at times, and fair play to him for hanging on.

    https://www.rugbypass.com/six-nations/teams/ireland/players/peter-omahony/statistics/ - some incredible numbers there for POM against NZ.

    https://www.rugbypass.com/internationals/teams/ireland/players/james-ryan/statistics -

    a senior potential captain should be embarrassed by those numbers in comparison to a 23 year old. Maybe those one or two moments give him enough of a pass, but then its no wonder we lose to Japan and have **** World Cups. People want him to be captain so those numbers can't be dismissed.

    Even over on Munsterfans they aren't as pro POm as some of you guys. Ditto on babbling brook for Kearney. Its genuinely mystifying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Someone posted on PR the starting teams of the 5 games we lost this year (Wales, Eng x2, Japan, NZ) and it was basically the exact same starting XV for all of them, with the odd injury/Jean Kleyn thrown in. That was Schmidt's team and he was sticking to it, didn't matter how badly they played or how many games they lost.

    Edit, here it is.

    bHUD26t.png

    Wait, what?

    Only 8 players are unchanged across those 5 games.

    How on Earth is that "basically the same XV"?

    You have literally just demonstrated that nearly half of the team was rotates across those fixtures.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Jesus clutching at straws...

    If anything it goes to show how haphazard the thinking was regarding Toner, Bryne/Carty, in hindsight a woeful decision

    All the key positions - Scrumhalf, 14, 12, Fullback, hooker, 6, IH - all fails in the end through bad selection and not trusting trying options or reverting to the wrong player, out of form.

    Its all there in green and white.

    Also how knackered some of those constant starters looked.

    Thanks for sharing IO...its pretty stark


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    He rotates nearly half the team across a selection of games including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his inflexibility. Extraordinary.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    He rotates nearly half the team across a selection of games including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his inflexibility. Extraordinary.

    If you say so...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    He rotates nearly half the team across a selection of games including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his inflexibility. Extraordinary.

    It’s also the 5 lost games so it’s not like it’s 5 in a row with minimal changes anyway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    He rotates nearly half the team, except for key positions with other players in form, across a selection of hammerings including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his infallibility. Extraordinary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    He rotates nearly half the team, except for key positions with other players in form, across a selection of hammerings including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his infallibility. Extraordinary.

    No it’s not your making that up, no one has said he’s infallible or anything like it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    He rotates nearly half the team, except for key positions with other players in form, across a selection of hammerings including Wales, England and New Zealand, and it's used as evidence of his infallibility. Extraordinary.

    Yeah.... as soon as someone actually makes that point, I encourage you to address it. But for now it lives entirely in your head.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Its the gist of it. Your argument is along the lines of selection wasn't an issue, he tried a number of guys, form doesn't mean squat, ergo everythings rosy, Kearney looking great. POM should be captain.

    Its like we've gone back in time.

    people are refusing to be honest about this whole endeavor. Was the same with the secret moves and how we actually played the game.

    All bull**** in the end, and yet we have the Gerry T's shooting the messengers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,783 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Why has Leavy never started ahead of VDF at 7 when both were available?

    Whether you think Leavy’s a better player or not whatever, but to suggest Van Der Flier is not a top class international 7 you’re way off.

    To suggest SOB is better than him as well is ridiculous. SOB hasn’t been anywhere near his best in a long time.

    VDF kept both of them out of the Leinster team when all were fit as well.

    Leavy was picked ahead of a fit VDF against NZ last autumn but pulled out the day of the game because of injury.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Its the gist of it. Selection wasn't an issue, he tried a number of guys, form doesn't mean squat, everythings rosy, Kearney looking great. POM should be captain.

    Its like we've gone back in time.

    Or at least people are refusing to be honest about this whole endeavor. Was the same with the secret moves and how we actually played the game.

    All bull**** in the end, and yet we have the Gerry T's shooting the messengers.

    Time for your nap, I feel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Its the gist of it. Your argument is along the lines of selection wasn't an issue, he tried a number of guys, form doesn't mean squat, ergo everythings rosy, Kearney looking great. POM should be captain.

    Its like we've gone back in time.

    people are refusing to be honest about this whole endeavor. Was the same with the secret moves and how we actually played the game.

    All bull**** in the end, and yet we have the Gerry T's shooting the messengers.
    Who is that directed at? Your just posting nonsense now.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    sure lads, sure.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    Time for your nap, I feel.

    yeah funnily enough you are putting me to sleep with the usual arguments from yourself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    sure lads, sure.

    Great debating there


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    salmocab wrote: »
    Great debating there

    Ah its all nonsense like you said so i'll just hold my hands up and say you guys are right..

    Everythings great. I hope Kearney is 15, Earls, 14, POM is captain. Sure look who cares about the World Cup. Its only the global stage, the best of the best, and rolls around every 4 years. We lost to Japan, what am i thinking. Have you seen the skills and populations of them. Not a hope for us..little old Ireland ticking along, team of us, no criticism etc. All hail Andy and the lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Ah its all nonsense according to you so i'll just hold my hands up and say you guys won.

    Everythings great. I hope Kearney is 15, Earls, 14, POM is captain. Sure look who cares about the World Cup.

    Has anyone argued for all those things?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    look i'll leave it. who cares.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    look i'll leave it. who cares.


    Finally :P:P:P:P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    look i'll leave it. who cares.

    We all care that’s why we bother here. Your arguing against things that just weren’t said.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Yeah maybe its hard to know where it starts and finishes. Look fair enough that period is over. I'll draw a line under it and it starts in what 14 weeks?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,245 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    Wait, what?

    Only 8 players are unchanged across those 5 games.

    How on Earth is that "basically the same XV"?

    You have literally just demonstrated that nearly half of the team was rotates across those fixtures.

    Henderson was out for the first two six nations games. He said Kearney wasn’t 100% for England match, in fairness that might have just been a nice way of dropping him publicly. Sexton was injured or not 100% for Japan, Aki out with concussion. Sean O’Brien came back and got injured straight away again iirc. Aki was suspended for last game (not saying he would have started). He gave a couple of guys games in warmups alright.

    There can certainly be a debate over whether his approach was right or not but I don’t think there’s much disputing that the first XV was pretty much unchanged for nine months despite a very poor run of form.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    P.Walnuts wrote: »
    Leavy was picked ahead of a fit VDF against NZ last autumn but pulled out the day of the game because of injury.

    This isn’t true. Leavy was never making that game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    ClanofLams wrote: »
    Henderson was out for the first two six nations games. He said Kearney wasn’t 100% for England match, in fairness that might have just been a nice way of dropping him publicly. Sexton was injured or not 100% for Japan, Aki out with concussion. Sean O’Brien came back and got injured straight away again iirc. Aki was suspended for last game (not saying he would have started). He gave a couple of guys games in warmups alright.

    There can certainly be a debate over whether his approach was right or not but I don’t think there’s much disputing that the first XV was pretty much unchanged for nine months despite a very poor run of form.

    Right, but this is a new line of argument. Simply posting the team sheets does not support the inflexibility hypothesis. Understanding why changes were predominantly made (injury) is more telling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Skyfloater wrote: »
    Then there's only two candidates, Ryan and Furlong.

    Furlong missed 3 tackles last week and got obliterated by the Japanese scrum, when even was the last time he did something of note in the loose?
    He's in abysmal form in 2019 and bizarrely seems to have flown under the radar for criticism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Ahh sure Furlong is abysmal now as well.....

    We may give up this rugby stuff!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,783 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Faugheen wrote: »
    This isn’t true. Leavy was never making that game.

    So you are saying Joe named Leavy for the game , knowing he was unfit....just so he could spring VDF on NZ ?

    Come on man, stop your fan boy act.

    Leavy was named starting 7 in the biggest game of the season, it's just fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,783 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Downlinz wrote: »
    Furlong missed 3 tackles last week and got obliterated by the Japanese scrum, when even was the last time he did something of note in the loose?
    He's in abysmal form in 2019 and bizarrely seems to have flown under the radar for criticism.

    Eh breaking three Samoan tackles to score a try maybe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,699 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Our lads were awful. The entire year, they were poor. They looked lethargic, unfit and out of sorts. The match v Russia was incredibly poor. What was Joe thinking? How do we fall so far, so quickly? I don't have the answers, but watching other sides, I did notice that the back rows were vastly better than ours. England have 2 gems and NZ were brilliant. I think our strengths became a weakness. Our pack were poor and Murray and Sexton were awful.
    Why suddenly did the team become the Keystone Kops?
    I say the fault lays with Joe. For numerous reasons, including the one out Carrie's and the blind faith he had in Murray and Sexton.
    Anyway, Joe is gone... hello Andy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    The back row is critical to Ireland. We have always had a strong back row but we have had issues recently with balance.

    Something to consider is who Ireland have lost between the WC cycle.
    Heaslip, SOB, Leavy, Conan, Nordi(who wasn't fit) to name a few. That is some loss of power and experience

    It does give us a chance to rethink the whole back row and how it plays. All of the above would be our big ball carriers! are the players coming up of the same size/strenght? or do we have to be smart?

    Running guys into Billy Vunipola is not going to work.....simple as that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,438 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    The back row is critical to Ireland. We have always had a strong back row but we have had issues recently with balance.

    Something to consider is who Ireland have lost between the WC cycle.
    Heaslip, SOB, Leavy, Conan, Nordi(who wasn't fit) to name a few. That is some loss of power and experience

    It does give us a chance to rethink the whole back row and how it plays. All of the above would be our big ball carriers! are the players coming up of the same size/strenght? or do we have to be smart?

    Running guys into Billy Vunipola is not going to work.....simple as that

    I think the balance thing is right, individuals are all good although some playing below par recently but as a unit it’s not great. Heaslip is a big loss more so than SOB I think.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement