Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Brexit discussion thread X (Please read OP before posting)

1268269271273274316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,370 ✭✭✭Ardent


    The UK independent are laying into him as well. Someone's been a bad boy and is in big trouble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭Popeleo


    bilston wrote: »
    Brexiteers (well some) remind me a bit of the guy at the end of Dr Strangelove riding the nuclear bomb and seemingly loving every minute of it.

    Great movie, great role. And the name of the actor aptly describes the UK economy post no-deal: Slim Pickens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Popeleo wrote: »
    Great movie, great role. And the name of the actor aptly describes the UK economy post no-deal: Slim Pickens.

    Slim had a brother, also an actor, who went by the name of Easy Pickens. This would describe what the Brexiteers promised the British people if they voted for Brexit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭pauldla


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    I guess it also answers who benefits from the hedge fund gamble...

    The Byline Times (who I'll admit, I'd never heard of before) have an article on that...

    BREXIT DISASTER CAPITALISM £8 Billion Bet on No Deal Crash-Out by Boris Johnson's Leave Backers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,692 ✭✭✭Infini


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Are the DUP that bloody petty that they'll risk hurting the NI economy and the people in it just because of the "precious union" ?

    I refer to them as the Dumbass Unionist Party for a reason: They're that thick, stupid and incompetent and would wreck NI purely out of spiteful idiocy. The only thing is that they don't speak for the significant majority of NI and honestly should not be given any time so long as they remain in the land of incoherent fantasies and unicorns. They only even got a disproportionate amount of importance and power because they propped up the PseudoTories though they've now outlived their usefulness you can certainly hear Boris in the big red bus being certainly backed up on them as we type! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Are the DUP that bloody petty that they'll risk hurting the NI economy and the people in it just because of the "precious union" ?

    The DUP could not give a dam about the Union, their objective is to maintain the status quo in NI and that requires the GFA to be torn up and this is there best chance of doing that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Lucy8080


    Ever hear that song , "The orange and the green"?

    That's Britain right now.

    "Oh it is the biggest mix-up that you have ever seen
    My Father he was British and my Mother European".

    That is U.K. politics right now. Delivering unto themselves a division they sowed across their Colonies/Empire. That same Elite are now playing the game on their own Island.For their own narrow gain.

    I feel sorry for their people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭AngryHippie


    But democracy has suffered in the UK if they end up revoking A50 or rerunning the referendum. All we can really say is that it is a price worth paying.

    I think that suffering has already been done.

    The strike was asking a stupid vague question with deep reaching consequences to an ill-informed electorate awash with false information and with numpties like Farage running around making false flag accusations and claims.

    The wound has been the split within the tory party (and labour party) and 3 years of total stagnation while the rest of the world revolves away from the UK in frustration.

    The Festering has been the rise of BJ, JRM and Cummings.

    The clean sweep should be the supreme court injunction forcing parliament to reconvene for a NCM of BJ, triggering a general election.

    Request to EU for deadline extension for a GE would naturally be accommodated.

    GE at this point could go either way depending on whose polls you believe.
    Government mandate should be based solely on Brexit closure.
    1. Hard brexit
    2. extension and backstop brexit
    3. Revoke, finish term in government adressing the structural and administrative issues for brexit (borders, customs, etc.) the re-enact A50
    4. Withdraw A50 and watch the economy and society in general bounce back

    To be honest, I'm of the opinion 3 or 4 are pretty likely at this point.
    Farage and all his mates have dipped the economy, gotten in low and are well positioned for the rebound. JRM and co likewise. They will simply sit back and let some hero take over and take the blame for it all good or bad and cash out when it looks like peaking again.
    Its a shock doctrine classic and It is the only thing that possibly looks like a coherent plan. They can't have been collectively incompetent enough to go this far for this long without having a golden parachute and a platinum reserve.
    Think about who you are dealing with and what their real agenda is.

    GREED.

    people who voted for Brexit are just sheep being chased around the paddock for some other creep's payday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    This is the cover of the Mirror. It's quite striking.

    https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1171901664883814403

    I think I need a lie down.

    The brother deserting him makes even more sense now - one.pariah in the family is enough I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Are the DUP that bloody petty that they'll risk hurting the NI economy and the people in it just because of the "precious union" ?
    I don't think the economy is the issue, it's their identity that they believe is in danger. But before we condemn the DUP, it might be useful to look back to the origins of our own state back in the early 1920s.
    When we 'Irexited' the union of Great Britain and Ireland, we did so at great economic cost to the average person. My grandfather, who lived during those times, often horrified us with stories of the near-famine and dire poverty that occurred during the 1920s, particularly in rural Ireland. We endured many years of mass unemployment, mass emigration and general economic stagnation. Our population declined to less than 3 million by the 1960s. Despite all this there was never any clamour to rejoin the 'British Union'. We valued our independence and separate identity above any economic consideration.
    It's the same with the DUP and the other Brexiteers. The economy is not the main issue. The DUP are no different from the 'Old IRA' of 1920s Ireland. They are just the other side of the same coin.
    Also, until recently, Sinn Fein opposed Ireland joining the Common Market and have opposed every EU treaty since for the very same reasons that the Brexiteers oppose the EU. The only reason they oppose Brexit is because the DUP were for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    I don't think the economy is the issue, it's their identity that they believe is in danger. But before we condemn the DUP, it might be useful to look back to the origins of our own state back in the early 1920s.
    When we 'Irexited' the union of Great Britain and Ireland, we did so at great economic cost to the average person. My grandfather, who lived during those times, often horrified us with stories of the near-famine and dire poverty that occurred during the 1920s, particularly in rural Ireland. We endured many years of mass unemployment, mass emigration and general economic stagnation. Our population declined to less than 3 million by the 1960s. Despite all this there was never any clamour to rejoin the 'British Union'. We valued our independence and separate identity above any economic consideration.
    It's the same with the DUP and the other Brexiteers. The economy is not the main issue. The DUP are no different from the 'Old IRA' of 1920s Ireland. They are just the other side of the same coin.
    Also, until recently, Sinn Fein opposed Ireland joining the Common Market and have opposed every EU treaty since for the very same reasons that the Brexiteers oppose the EU. The only reason they oppose Brexit is because the DUP were for it.


    This is very true.

    SF are by far the most eurosceptic party in the republic but have changed their tune for now because it suits their border poll narrative.

    Another reason to totally distrust them.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    [/b]

    This is very true.

    SF are by far the most eurosceptic party in the republic but have changed their tune for now because it suits their border poll narrative.

    Another reason to totally distrust them.
    Mod: folks let's not make this a SF bashing thread and stay on topic, thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    The DUP could not give a dam about the Union, their objective is to maintain the status quo in NI and that requires the GFA to be torn up and this is there best chance of doing that.

    How is completely changing the status quo maintaining it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭IAmTheReign


    woohoo!!! wrote: »
    I don't see why posters are giving dublinjock a hard time. All these self confirmed experts on the EU, how it works, more than likely wouldn't have had a clue 3 years ago. I just see a poster trying to make sense of the mess who says he voted Brexit, presumably being one of many who fell for the lies of the leave campaign.

    Or precisely the type of Brexit voter who could change their mind.

    Presumably he's being given a hard time because despite claiming to be informed he didn't even know Nicola Sturgeon was an MSP and thinks the EU has a president despite repeatedly being told it doesn't.

    And as for these 'self confirmed experts', at least they bothered to inform themselves. Dublinjock, despite voting for leave, still doesn't understand the basics of how the EU functions after 3 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭IAmTheReign


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    This the most fascinating finding for me:

    Screenshot-20190911-203748-Samsung-Internet.jpg

    Unionists have a death wish seemingly.

    That graph is wrong btw. The colour on the total columns was mixed up. It should say 38% to leave on the 31st with or without a deal, not 10%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    Presumably he's being given a hard time because despite claiming to be informed he didn't even know Nicola Sturgeon was an MSP and thinks the EU has a president despite repeatedly being told it doesn't.

    And as for these 'self confirmed experts', at least they bothered to inform themselves. Dublinjock, despite voting for leave, still doesn't understand the basics of how the EU functions after 3 years.




    Please show me the quote where i have stated im an expert?
    In fact i will show you quote where i have stated im not an expert and only within the last few years understanding the EU


    What is it when someone dont agree people have to be condescending, im im a free democracy where currently im allowed my views and beliefs.
    No i dont have any idea how the EU worjks how it gets it powers and who its accountable to. But i do know one thing i have totally no say in the matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    dublinjock wrote: »
    Presumably he's being given a hard time because despite claiming to be informed he didn't even know Nicola Sturgeon was an MSP and thinks the EU has a president despite repeatedly being told it doesn't.

    And as for these 'self confirmed experts', at least they bothered to inform themselves. Dublinjock, despite voting for leave, still doesn't understand the basics of how the EU functions after 3 years.




    Please show me the quote where i have stated im an expert?
    In fact i will show you quote where i have stated im not an expert and only within the last few years understanding the EU


    What is it when someone dont agree people have to be condescending, im im a free democracy where currently im allowed my views and beliefs.
    No i dont have any idea how the EU worjks how it gets it powers and who its accountable to. But i do know one thing i have totally no say in the matter.

    You actually have a disproportionately high say in the matter. You have more say than, for example, a single French citizen.

    You're well within your rights to hold your beliefs, that's certainly a hugely positive aspect of our society. The counterpoint to that is that being free to hold your beliefs without punishment doesn't give you freedom to hold your beliefs without others challenging them.

    Perhaps as someone with such strong anti-EU beliefs, it may be worth reading up on how the EU works, where each part derives it's power from, and most importantly, what is within the EUs remit and what remains totally within the remit of national governments. It really isn't particularly complex, and given that you're clearly capable of discussing the matter in a legivle manner, it's certainly not going to be beyond your grasp, despite many painting it as incomprehensibly complex (often to avoid a modicum of research).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    Presumably he's being given a hard time because despite claiming to be informed he didn't even know Nicola Sturgeon was an MSP and thinks the EU has a president despite repeatedly being told it doesn't.

    And as for these 'self confirmed experts', at least they bothered to inform themselves. Dublinjock, despite voting for leave, still doesn't understand the basics of how the EU functions after 3 years.




    I did know Nicola Sturgeon was a Glasgow MSP yesterday in haste i was trying to answer to many people at once. I accept what i said was unacceptable. But let him or her in life cast the first stone. If im judged by that one statement then to me that would be unacceptable.
    Aain im no expert im only learning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,740 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    That graph is wrong btw. The colour on the total columns was mixed up. It should say 38% to leave on the 31st with or without a deal, not 10%.


    I found that a confusing graph.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭darem93


    https://twitter.com/Jack_Blanchard_/status/1172015270589870081

    The right wing media are now trying to find dirt on the Scottish judges who made the ruling yesterday. One of them 'likes France' and the other 'likes jazz and thinks Brexit is going to be difficult'. It would be laughable if it wasn't so worrying.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    You actually have a disproportionately high say in the matter. You have more say than, for example, a single French citizen.

    You're well within your rights to hold your beliefs, that's certainly a hugely positive aspect of our society. The counterpoint to that is that being free to hold your beliefs without punishment doesn't give you freedom to hold your beliefs without others challenging them.

    Perhaps as someone with such strong anti-EU beliefs, it may be worth reading up on how the EU works, where each part derives it's power from, and most importantly, what is within the EUs remit and what remains totally within the remit of national governments. It really isn't particularly complex, and given that you're clearly capable of discussing the matter in a legivle manner, it's certainly not going to be beyond your grasp, despite many painting it as incomprehensibly complex (often to avoid a modicum of research).


    Thank you nice post.
    Yes i am allowed my view my beliefs and i would fight to my last breath to keep this.
    It does appear im having a big say on this thread because so many people are asking me questions and im doing my best to answer each of them as best i can.
    But now words are being put in my mouth that im stated imm a self claimed expert, which i have never claimed.A lot of people dont like my view fair enough.


    I dont think the EU is Democratic the path its on its gonna get more powers and that frightens me.You might not like my view you might not accept my view but please let me have this and dont try to put words in my mouth. Im not saying you did but one poster already did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭IAmTheReign


    dublinjock wrote: »
    Please show me the quote where i have stated im an expert?
    In fact i will show you quote where i have stated im not an expert and only within the last few years understanding the EU


    What is it when someone dont agree people have to be condescending, im im a free democracy where currently im allowed my views and beliefs.
    No i dont have any idea how the EU worjks how it gets it powers and who its accountable to. But i do know one thing i have totally no say in the matter.

    I never said you claimed to be an expert, the 'self confirmed experts' came from the poster I was quoting, not you. You have repeatedly claimed to be informed though, while at the same time asking very basic questions about how the EU functions. The one thing you claim you do know, that you have no say, is demonstrably false. The European Parliament is directly elected by all citizens of the EU, and the Council is appointed by each member state government, which are also elected by the citizens of the respective countries.

    You are fully entitled to your views and beliefs btw but when those views and beliefs contradict facts you should expect to be called out on it. People aren't being condescending by telling you the truth, you just don't want to hear it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    I never said you claimed to be an expert, the 'self confirmed experts' came from the poster I was quoting, not you. You have repeatedly claimed to be informed though, while at the same time asking very basic questions about how the EU functions. The one thing you claim you do know, that you have no say, is demonstrably false. The European Parliament is directly elected by all citizens of the EU, and the Council is appointed by each member state government, which are also elected by the citizens of the respective countries.

    You are fully entitled to your views and beliefs btw but when those views and beliefs contradict facts you should expect to be called out on it. People aren't being condescending by telling you the truth, you just don't want to hear it.


    I dont want to shackled to the EU i dont want be shackled to the UK i would like to see a free and independant Scotalnd free to make its own laws . Is this so bad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    dublinjock wrote: »
    Please show me the quote where i have stated im an expert?
    In fact i will show you quote where i have stated im not an expert and only within the last few years understanding the EU
    He didn't say that. At least not about you. Did you not see the quotation marks?
    dublinjock wrote: »
    What is it when someone dont agree people have to be condescending, im im a free democracy where currently im allowed my views and beliefs.
    No i dont have any idea how the EU worjks how it gets it powers and who its accountable to. But i do know one thing i have totally no say in the matter.
    You can't have 'beliefs' about facts. This is the crux of brexit tbh. People were told (and are continuing to be told) to believe. When facts are readily available, people who fall back on belief are actively fooling themselves. If you don't know enough about something, you have a responsibility to educate yourself. You wouldn't buy a car without some research, you should apply at least the same level of scrutiny to a life-changing decision in a referendum.

    As for having no say. You are now living in a country where EU treaties are adopted by constitutional referendum. On top of which you can vote for MEPs, the governing political party or coalition who's leader will sit in and have an equal vote at the European Council: the decision making body of the EU. That's more say than in the country you left where the head of state role is inherited, the electoral system returns one third of MPs without any meaningful vote and the PM can shut down parliament when they don't want to answer to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Its probably and indication of the state of play that the government were relieved the Food and Medicine shortages made sure the "Boris Lies To Queen "Headline stayed off most of the front pages


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    dublinjock wrote: »
    I dont want to shackled to the EU i dont want be shackled to the UK i would like to see a free and independant Scotalnd free to make its own laws . Is this so bad?
    The 'free and independent' Scotland wants to join the EU if the UK leaves. That's a fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    He didn't say that. At least not about you. Did you not see the quotation marks?


    You can't have 'beliefs' about facts. This is the crux of brexit tbh. People were told (and are continuing to be told) to believe. When facts are readily available, people who fall back on belief are actively fooling themselves. If you don't know enough about something, you have a responsibility to educate yourself. You wouldn't buy a car without some research, you should apply at least the same level of scrutiny to a life-changing decision in a referendum.

    As for having no say. You are now living in a country where EU treaties are adopted by constitutional referendum. On top of which you can vote for MEPs, the governing political party or coalition who's leader will sit in and have an equal vote at the European Council: the decision making body of the EU. That's more say than in the country you left where the head of state role is inherited, the electoral system returns one third of MPs without any meaningful vote and the PM can shut down parliament when they don't want to answer to it.




    I am educating myself about the EU and to me if we are not careful this EU could and properly will become a monster.


    Im currently living in a country that has a common travel area with the UK. This nothing to do with the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I guess I am surprised there was no enemies of people headlines yet. These brexiter revolutionaries want to tear the whole system down and replace it with a Russian style dystopian oligarchy, where the people are silenced altogether.

    It will come when the Supreme Court rules the prorogation as illegal, if not they will not bother about it. Funny that some of the newspapers decided yesterday was the day that people are tired of Brexit and it is time to focus on stories elsewhere.

    https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/1172047865344139264?s=20

    dublinjock wrote: »
    I dont want to shackled to the EU i dont want be shackled to the UK i would like to see a free and independant Scotalnd free to make its own laws . Is this so bad?


    Okay, what laws that is forced on you in Scotland from the EU is so bad that you want to leave? Please be specific as you can.

    Also, if the UK as an independent nation free from the EU with its 65 million people and 5/6/7th biggest economy is predicted to face severe economic hardship from leaving the EU without a deal, why do you think an independent Scotland would be a good idea?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭dublinjock


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    The 'free and independent' Scotland wants to join the EU if the UK leaves. That's a fact.


    The free independent Scotland i dreamed about voted to remain in the UK that is a fact that was proven. And i was not happy believe me.


    Scotalnd did not vote to leave the EU, first we must vote to leave the UK then we can rejoin or decide not to join the EU, But first we must leave the UK. W


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Bambi wrote: »
    Its probably and indication of the state of play that the government were relieved the Food and Medicine shortages made sure the "Boris Lies To Queen "Headline stayed off most of the front pages


    It is more an indication of the owners of the newspapers and their aims than the news of medicine shortages keeping it off the headlines. If it was the case we would have seen the story about food shortages on the Sun and Daily Mail and Telegraph, but seeing as they didn't even cover them on the front pages it is clear they really don't want those stories to reach their readers and they want to keep them uninformed.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement