Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dublin Airport New Runway/Infrastructure.

Options
1151152154156157290

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,880 ✭✭✭trellheim


    OK some good explanations, thanks.

    However, this doesnt change the fact that the earlies are not unknown that they will in fact be early, so why then dont equipment and stands get allocated accordingly on a flexible basis , its not a surprise what order and when theyre arriving in so why arent things better ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    markc91 wrote: »
    Talk of a tunnel over to the west apron as the electric tractors cant turn off the beacon to go on the peri road

    Plan is a runway crossing point with a permanent placement of an ops vehicle to escort across...how soon or how long they will do that for is anyone's guess....

    There is definitely verification on an aircraft waiting 1hr 45 mins for a stand......but didn't say it was Zurich


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    markc91 wrote: »
    Talk of a tunnel over to the west apron as the electric tractors cant turn off the beacon to go on the peri road

    They have to be joking! That sounds to me like a third world problem of the worst sort.

    Harsh reality is that unless things have changed dramatically, most electric tractors would struggle to get to the west apron and back when unloaded, let alone with a load on, as they spend so little time being charged between flights, and the thought of having to drive a high loader around the peri track doesn't bear thinking about, it was bad enough back in the day bringing one down from the A pier to the fuel tanks (by Cargo ramp) to top up the diesel (there wasn't a refueller bowser in those days), the thought of going round via Swords is just not worth thinking about.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    Just to point out again that there is a disparity between the scheduled times and the estimated/actual times on FR24.

    The scheduled time is the time that doors are scheduled to open on stand while the estimated/actual times quoted by FR24 are landing times on the runway - there is a difference which at some airports depending on taxiing distance can be quite significant.

    And just to point out that the flight is still 1hr 47mins early at the moment, even with a estimated landing time and taxiing time with a doors open time. It is still going to be significantly more than an hour early.

    I get everyone’s points being made. But airlines need to do their own bit and that does involve not turning up ridiculously early.

    Try rocking up to a very busy restaurant 90-120 mins early and asking to be accommodated. I imagine you’ll be redirected to a bar or told to come back at your scheduled time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,588 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    And just to point out that the flight is still 1hr 47mins early at the moment, even with a estimated landing time and taxiing time with a doors open time. It is still going to be significantly more than an hour early.

    I get everyone’s points being made. But airlines need to do their own bit and that does involve not turning up ridiculously early.

    Try rocking up to a very busy restaurant 90-120 mins early and asking to be accommodated. I imagine you’ll be redirected to a bar or told to come back at your scheduled time.

    Well I was thinking more of the Cathay Pacific flight when I posted that - it struck me as being more or less on time when allowing for taxi time etc.

    But you’re right about the Hainan flight from Shenzhen - on the days that it’s not late,it does seem to arrive significantly ahead of schedule which with an 08:00 scheduled arrival time on stand will always cause problems.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 982 ✭✭✭Stephen Strange


    In fairness, everything fairly smooth this morning. EI got off block in 313L, 313R and 314 on schedule, so not much of a wait for CX to come on stand.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    I’m heading off to Malaga on the half 5 flight on Saturday and want to grab a bit of grub and a pint in the airport. How long would it take to get through security considering the rapid growth of the airport in the last few years and that it’s peak season?


  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭Kev11491


    I’m heading off to Malaga on the half 5 flight on Saturday and want to grab a bit of grub and a pint in the airport. How long would it take to get through security considering the rapid growth of the airport in the last few years and that it’s peak season?

    Did a 6am flight recently through T1 and it took me 10 mins to get through security. Sometimes you're lucky, sometimes you're not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    I’m heading off to Malaga on the half 5 flight on Saturday and want to grab a bit of grub and a pint in the airport. How long would it take to get through security considering the rapid growth of the airport in the last few years and that it’s peak season?

    530pm? I’d say it’ll be quick enough but you never know, allow 20 mins and you should be okay.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    530pm? I’d say it’ll be quick enough but you never know, allow 20 mins and you should be okay.

    Yeah it’s pm that’s take off time though so I’m thinking of being at the airport for around 2 to get through security and have food and such before the gate opens.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 62 ✭✭Rojomur


    Yeah it’s pm that’s take off time though so I’m thinking of being at the airport for around 2 to get through security and have food and such before the gate opens.

    Install the DAA app on your phone...it has live security times on its home screen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,135 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Yeah it’s pm that’s take off time though so I’m thinking of being at the airport for around 2 to get through security and have food and such before the gate opens.

    Arriving at 2 you'll have loads of time, security times rarely ever go above 30-40 minutes, and that's normally in the morning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,880 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Some good news. On recent Newarks ( first flight out of the the CBP flights ) and Philadelphia with American - out about 1030 AM , CBP queing time was < 2/3 min for CBP processing

    Whatever they have done has improved matters. Now if they could only offer decent food . Also very little signage that you can wait upstairs in the closed off area after CBP


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Depends on the day, but I'm glad your experience was positive. DAA need to get their finger out too and sort the air conditioning issues in CBP, like a sweatbox.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,880 ✭✭✭trellheim


    in CBP itself ? or in the waiting area after ? If so head upstairs like I said its much airier but no departure calls


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    trellheim wrote: »
    in CBP itself ? or in the waiting area after ? If so head upstairs like I said its much airier but no departure calls

    Well you don't have much choice but to wait at CBP. They've installed ad-hoc fans but they aren't working.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 68,013 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    As pointed out by a poster on airliners.net - when Norwegian cease to need CBP will they be "encouraged"/booted out of T2 back to T1 to free up T2 gates.


  • Registered Users Posts: 982 ✭✭✭Stephen Strange


    L1011 wrote: »
    As pointed out by a poster on airliners.net - when Norwegian cease to need CBP will they be "encouraged"/booted out of T2 back to T1 to free up T2 gates.

    I would imagine so. Afaik, they're the only ones that Sky Handling look after in t2, so it's a pain for them. Plus, walk out stand would be cheaper.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,682 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    While it makes sense for DY to move back to T1, there will be almost no real gain at T2 apart from there TATL departure times. There European short hauls apart from those in late evening never used the 400 gates (always 300). Moving to T1 and back to 100 won't even deliver anything beneficial.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭Donegal Storm


    My outbound flight was delayed 90 minutes last week, pilot blamed "staffing issues" on the ground, return flight was 2 hours late and again the pilot blamed knock on from congestion on the ground in Dublin

    Seems to be the rule rather than exception at this time of year now..

    Is there any end date to this CAR row? Growth seems to be slowing in recent months but there's still an urgent need for better airside infrastructure all round even with today's traffic numbers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,858 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I know Cork is a bad example as its so small and airlines pad schedules anyway, but the lions share of flights on Cork leave bang on time or with 10 minutes of their 'scheduled' time. They are Green on Flightradar, even in the morning wave. Check out Dublin, most flights early in the morning are Yellow on Flightradar, with a good pushback time but a very long time from there to Departure.

    Having used both frequently, Cork is a godsend, even though the route selection is much smaller.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    I know Cork is a bad example as its so small and airlines pad schedules anyway, but the lions share of flights on Cork leave bang on time or with 10 minutes of their 'scheduled' time. They are Green on Flightradar, even in the morning wave. Check out Dublin, most flights early in the morning are Yellow on Flightradar, with a good pushback time but a very long time from there to Departure.

    Having used both frequently, Cork is a godsend, even though the route selection is much smaller.

    As you pointed out its a bad example. What Cork might handle in a day, could be handled in an hour in Dublin (even more movements in that hr too).


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,158 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I know Cork is a bad example as its so small and airlines pad schedules anyway, but the lions share of flights on Cork leave bang on time or with 10 minutes of their 'scheduled' time. They are Green on Flightradar, even in the morning wave. Check out Dublin, most flights early in the morning are Yellow on Flightradar, with a good pushback time but a very long time from there to Departure.

    Having used both frequently, Cork is a godsend, even though the route selection is much smaller.

    If I’m flying from Dublin now I factor in delays, it’s part of life in Dublin now


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I know Cork is a bad example as its so small and airlines pad schedules anyway, but the lions share of flights on Cork leave bang on time or with 10 minutes of their 'scheduled' time. They are Green on Flightradar, even in the morning wave. Check out Dublin, most flights early in the morning are Yellow on Flightradar, with a good pushback time but a very long time from there to Departure.

    Having used both frequently, Cork is a godsend, even though the route selection is much smaller.

    Yeah sorry that’s a bad example. In the first two hours at Dublin tomorrow 81 movements are handled between arrivals and departures. Where as Cork has 10. It’s not difficult to be on time when you have a movement every 12 minutes. Bare in mind that FR24’s on time display is based on its airborne time not on its pushback time. Which is what airlines base “on time” on.

    There is a lot of padding in flight times these days. Up to 100% is added for flights from Dublin to Heathrow, in an effort to schedule better and sell to their “guests” “on time” performance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭Donegal Storm


    I just booked Heathrow earlier tonight and noticed its scheduled for 90 minutes, even CFN to Dublin is scheduled for an hour when its barely a 35 minute flight


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,158 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I just booked Heathrow earlier tonight and noticed its scheduled for 90 minutes, even CFN to Dublin is scheduled for an hour when its barely a 35 minute flight

    Yeah and it could take that time too! Not necessarily in the air but gate to gate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    Tower Building Time lapse

    https://youtu.be/iJM6cidBaC8


  • Registered Users Posts: 217 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    It’s becoming bit of a Gatwick situation with delays all the time and headaches all round for pilots and controllers alike.


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,258 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That's funny because according to some here Gatwick is the gold standard of how to run a single runway airport!

    So when 10L/28R comes into use, will LHR be the comparator ;)

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 217 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    That's funny because according to some here Gatwick is the gold standard of how to run a single runway airport!

    So when 10L/28R comes into use, will LHR be the comparator ;)

    For runway movements, yes. But they have chronic delays on the ground for taxi and push everyday during the summer much like Dublin.


Advertisement