Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

1262263265267268330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,756 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    lufties wrote: »
    Being able to make your own laws and policies and borders, and not be dictated to by unelected dictators who worship marxist ideology.

    Who do you refer to? And what evidence do you have of such marxist ideology?
    lufties wrote: »
    I'm Irish and living in England. Life is better here for me as there is more opportunities, diversity of thought, and salaries are better (in my industry). Ireland is being used as a weapon by the EU, and in my opinion Varadkar couldn't give a monkeys about Ireland. SNIP. No insults please.

    Yes this happens - salaries vary between countries. What's that supposed to be evidence of exactly?
    lufties wrote: »
    The UK has great potential outside the EU, Ireland will be left behind as the EU lap dog. I've lived in Germany, and trust me they are ruthless. Germany is a cold, soulless place where wages are terrible. I've seen co workers search through bins to get plastic bottles to exchange. People are on the bread line there. The elites in Brussels want a new age, sophisticated version of communism. No thanks.

    ?
    lufties wrote: »
    Regarding the border, Estonia and Russia have a flourishing electronic border. In the scheme of things it is a small issue. However, the dictators in Brussels use it for political gain.

    There are a whopping 7 border crossings between Estonia and Russia.

    Can you go into detail as to what aspects of the border are flourishing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,978 ✭✭✭Russman


    lufties wrote: »
    Being able to make your own laws and policies and borders, and not be dictated to by unelected dictators who worship marxist ideology.

    I'm Irish and living in England. Life is better here for me as there is more opportunities, diversity of thought, and salaries are better (in my industry). Ireland is being used as a weapon by the EU, and in my opinion Varadkar couldn't give a monkeys about Ireland. SNIP. No insults please.

    The UK has great potential outside the EU, Ireland will be left behind as the EU lap dog. I've lived in Germany, and trust me they are ruthless. Germany is a cold, soulless place where wages are terrible. I've seen co workers search through bins to get plastic bottles to exchange. People are on the bread line there. The elites in Brussels want a new age, sophisticated version of communism. No thanks.

    Regarding the border, Estonia and Russia have a flourishing electronic border. In the scheme of things it is a small issue. However, the dictators in Brussels use it for political gain.

    So what laws, policies or borders would you change then ?
    Unelected dictators, Marxist ideology, new age communism - seriously ??

    You realise that Ireland isn't being used by the EU, Ireland IS the EU ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Which laws are holding the UK back?

    All the good things in the UK you speak of,despite them being under the yoke of the EU? How did that happen?

    The rest of you post is irrational, lazy racially driven nonsense. Have you been in the Bogside? Parts of Glasgow? Both parts of the UK yet almost destitute in parts. Does that mean the UK is a 3rd world country?


    Trade policies, border laws, fisheries, the money the UK contributes to the EU monstrosity. What started as a trading block is now an abomination. What part exactly of what I said is nonsense? What is nonsense is Ireland sheepishly following what the media a ramming down them.
    What are you on about 3rd world? Your comment is reactionary emotive tripe.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,856 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    lufties wrote: »
    Your comment is reactionary emotive tripe.

    This sort of posting is not acceptable here. No more please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭KildareP


    lufties wrote: »
    Trade policies, border laws, fisheries, the money the UK contributes to the EU monstrosity. What started as a trading block is now an abomination. What part exactly of what I said is nonsense? What is nonsense is Ireland sheepishly following what the media a ramming down them.
    What are you on about 3rd world? Your comment is reactionary emotive tripe.

    An abomination the UK nonetheless wants to keep all the upsides and benefits of, just without any of the downsides or contributions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    Russman wrote: »
    So what laws, policies or borders would you change then ?
    Unelected dictators, Marxist ideology, new age communism - seriously ??

    You realise that Ireland isn't being used by the EU, Ireland IS the EU ?

    Yes marxist ideology. Look up how they worshipped karl Marx last year in Brussels parliament. Also look up Marxism and the Frankfurt school. Educate yourself Ffs, and stop being such a sheep.

    Ireland is being used by the EU dictats in Brussels. But shur arrah arent big Phil et all fighting our cause, lol.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    lufties wrote: »
    I've seen co workers search through bins to get plastic bottles to exchange.

    If I saw colleagues throwing plastic bottles in the general waste and there was a deposit scheme running on them where all it took for sending them to recycling rather than landfill was me digging them out of the bin and adding them to my pile of things I was taking to claim a deposit back on, then I'd do the same regardless of if I needed those extra few cents to buy a tin of beans or not.

    Just because someone chooses to recycle their plastic and claim a deposit back doesn't mean they are on the breadline, maybe they just care about things being recycled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    KildareP wrote: »
    An abomination the UK nonetheless wants to keep all the upsides and benefits of, just without any of the downsides or contributions.

    Enlighten me on what you refer to exactly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,682 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    lufties wrote: »
    Trade policies, border laws, fisheries, the money the UK contributes to the EU monstrosity. What started as a trading block is now an abomination. What part exactly of what I said is nonsense? What is nonsense is Ireland sheepishly following what the media a ramming down them.
    What are you on about 3rd world? Your comment is reactionary emotive tripe.

    And comments such as:

    Varadkar couldn't give a monkeys about Ireland. He is a narcissist that puts EU before everything. Combine this with media brainwashing.
    People are on the bread line there.
    However, the dictators in Brussels use it for political gain

    aren't 'emotive'? :D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,277 ✭✭✭brickster69


    lufties wrote: »
    Trade policies, border laws, fisheries, the money the UK contributes to the EU monstrosity. What started as a trading block is now an abomination. What part exactly of what I said is nonsense? What is nonsense is Ireland sheepishly following what the media a ramming down them.
    What are you on about 3rd world? Your comment is reactionary emotive tripe.

    I know it is not a big one but it actually says that if a MEP is found guilty of a crime he cannot be convicted in the UK.

    Work that one out.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,516 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    lufties wrote: »
    Trade policies, border laws, fisheries, the money the UK contributes to the EU monstrosity.
    Specify; all you've done is list areas. What exactly are wrong with the trade policies, fisheries etc.?
    What started as a trading block is now an abomination.
    It was always more than a trading block from it's inception; that you missed that only shows your lack of knowledge.
    What part exactly of what I said is nonsense?
    You mean the beyond only making emotional non fact based statement without any proof or links to back them up? You know; basic requirements such as actually backing up your stated "facts" with actual factual links as required in a debate even though Brexiteers are notoriously bad at it.
    What is nonsense is Ireland sheepishly following what the media a ramming down them.
    If you said UK it would be true; UK media has a very long and well documented list of blatant lies including your current PM admitting that he made **** up to get people outraged at EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    robinph wrote: »
    If I saw colleagues throwing plastic bottles in the general waste and there was a deposit scheme running on them where all it took for sending them to recycling rather than landfill was me digging them out of the bin and adding them to my pile of things I was taking to claim a deposit back on, then I'd do the same regardless of if I needed those extra few cents to buy a tin of beans or not.

    Just because someone chooses to recycle their plastic and claim a deposit back doesn't mean they are on the breadline, maybe they just care about things being recycled.

    Professionally trained workers rummaging through workplace bins is unacceptable I dont care what you say.

    A couple I lived next door to in Cologne agreed with the anti EU sentiment. Their standard of living has dropped significantly over the last 50 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    And comments such as:








    aren't 'emotive'? :D:D


    No, they are factual comments for people with an ounce of insight and logical thinking.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,983 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Backstop originally was an EU idea for keeping NI in a customs Union. Then it was requested by May to be UK wide as it would break the GFA if Northern Ireland was treated differently.

    Don't hear much about that one do we ?
    I don't believe that is correct.
    The GFA requires that the people and trade in NI can continue to flow as it does now and that there are no restrictions.
    Having NI remain within both the CU and SM means that it can continue on this road.

    However, this meant that NI would be different to Britain which the DUP (who oppose the peace and equality measures within the GFA) were not happy with NI having different (albeit better) trading arrangements to Britain so May sought a whole UK customs union.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,276 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Mod Note

    If you haven't read the charter, please do so now:
    No personal abuse. NEVER attack a poster. Attack the content of their post. (You can tell someone that their opinion is based on incomplete or incorrect information, but do not call them an idiot.)
    No trolling or feeding the trolls. (including no excuses for joining a flaming match)

    Keep your language civil, particularly when referring to other posters and people in the public eye. Using unsavoury language does not add to your argument. Examples would be referring to other people or groups as scumbags, crusties, sheeple, shills, trolls, traitors or saying that recently deceased people should “rot in hell” or similar. Repeated use of terms like that will result in a ban from the forum.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    Water John wrote: »
    I think 9 of the 10 poorest regions of the EU are in the UK.

    This is the nub of the Brexit issue and working class support/vote for Brexit.

    They believe it's the fault of the EU (and nothing to do with the London/SE centric UK government and decades of neglect).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,064 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    A fisheries policy that allows the UK sell the majority of its catch to the EU without tariff? Is that what you have an issue with?

    It perhaps that UK licence holders sold off there access for money to other EU countries. Not forced to. Simply for profit.

    But I am sure you have a list of laws that will make things better.

    What will you be able to do better on 1st November? And before you trot out Trade agreements you first need to show how the current trade agreements has been negative to the UK.

    Can't recall where I read it but it made a lot of sense. The UK has mistaken London, one of the great cities of the world, for the entire UK. There seems to be this belief that everywhere will be like London and since it isn't it must be the fault of the EU.

    But none of it is true. The reason for London dominance is many fold, and partly due to history. But the problems in other areas across the country land squarely at the foot of UK governments. Yet they, mostly Tory but also Labour, gave managed to convince many that it is someone else's fault.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,048 ✭✭✭✭briany



    However, this meant that NI would be different to Britain which the DUP (who oppose the peace and equality measures within the GFA) were not happy with NI having different (albeit better) trading arrangements to Britain so May sought a whole UK customs union.

    In essence what May did was attempt to placate a minority of NI Unionists by p*ssing off a much larger swathe of people.

    I'm not sure what has gone better so far - the Conservatives' approach to Brexit or Homer Simpson's solutions to being stuck in quicksand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    Nody wrote: »
    Specify; all you've done is list areas. What exactly are wrong with the trade policies, fisheries etc.?

    It was always more than a trading block from it's inception; that you missed that only shows your lack of knowledge.

    You mean the beyond only making emotional non fact based statement without any proof or links to back them up? You know; basic requirements such as actually backing up your stated "facts" with actual factual links as required in a debate even though Brexiteers are notoriously bad at it.

    If you said UK it would be true; UK media has a very long and well documented list of blatant lies including your current PM admitting that he made **** up to get people outraged at EU.

    Having control of your own trade policies. Immigration policies (not the mass unfiltered type that you lot love). A system based on merit. Control of fisheries (which is EU controlled). Ultimately to not be dictated to by people from a foreign land.

    The UK media loves the EU, what are you on about? Aswell as RTE, and the rest of the biased media.

    Brexit all the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,277 ✭✭✭brickster69


    The EU and its employees are immune to UK tax laws, that’s article 104

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,973 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    lufties wrote: »
    Having control of your own trade policies. Immigration policies (not the mass unfiltered type that you lot love). A system based on merit. Control of fisheries (which is EU controlled). Ultimately to not be dictated to by people from a foreign land.

    The UK media loves the EU, what are you on about? Aswell as RTE, and the rest of the biased media.

    Brexit all the way.

    Immigration policies ehh? You mean the ones the UK had control over but chose not to enforce?

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/31/britain-take-back-control-immigration-eu-directive-brexit

    Also they had control over the own trade policies by virtue of the fact any one nation can completely veto or stall a trade policy if they have a problem with it while its being negotiated.

    Are you aware of how trade negotiations even work?

    I really enjoy posting this video so ill just do it again to try to help you understand why 60 million from the UK wont make for better trade traties than 500 million in the EU



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭seraphimvc


    lufties wrote: »
    Professionally trained workers rummaging through workplace bins is unacceptable I dont care what you say.

    A couple I lived next door to in Cologne agreed with the anti EU sentiment. Their standard of living has dropped significantly over the last 50 years.

    Solely on that 'recycling practice' you mentioned there: I am not entirely sure about how the regulations work in Cologne but in Berlin region, they have this great incentive for the people to recycle their plastic/glass bottles hence the city is so clean and it is a great habit to have. I have no doubts on many germans would have the same habit around the country - heck, my good german friend is obsessed with this sort of stuffs lol (a bit annoying when we travel with him but hell that is a great habit i must say).

    great incentive ie you can get back 8-25 cents per bottle when you bring it to those supermarket


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,064 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You do control your own trade policies. The UK have a very strong voice in the EU. Since they agreed to the multiple trade deals one must assume they agreed to them. The PMs voted for democratically.

    But ok, what parts of those trade deals would you change?

    Immigration is in the hands of the UK. For you know about Belgium EU policy?

    And that only deals with EU countries. The rest of the world is even more controlled. Yet TM stood atop the wind gate Scandal.

    Fisheries. What would you change? You got access to massive continental markets . The UK has recently signed a trade deal with Faroe Islands allowing them access to UK waters. Not exactly a promising start.

    UK media? So I take it the Telegraph, Sun, Express etc. are no classified as foreign media or something.

    These generalities are great for throwing around in a pub debate, but 3 years after the vote this is all you've got? Nothing of substance or even based on reality.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,856 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: Do not just paste links here please. This is a discussion forum not a link repository. A post has been deleted.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭ambro25


    The EU and its employees are immune to UK tax laws, that’s article 104
    Article 104 of which piece of legislation? (Now I know *exactly* which piece of legislation is relevant for this income tax issue you raised, so fair warning that (i) no, this is not a trap (since you have fair warning) and (ii) no bulls*** answer acceptable).

    The EU is an international organisation and its employees pay a Community income tax (progressive, 8% to 45%) and social solidarity contributions ("levy") of 6% to 7%.

    Did you know that the UN, NATO, the WTO, as international organisations (of which the UK is *also* a full member), are *also* immune to UK tax laws, as are their employees?

    Many more international organisations (of which the UK is *also* a full member) available to list, where these very few notable ones came from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    seraphimvc wrote: »
    Solely on that 'recycling practice' you mentioned there: I am not entirely sure about how the regulations work in Cologne but in Berlin region, they have this great incentive for the people to recycle their plastic/glass bottles hence the city is so clean and it is a great habit to have. I have no doubts on many germans would have the same habit around the country - heck, my good german friend is obsessed with this sort of stuffs lol (a bit annoying when we travel with him but hell that is a great habit i must say).



    great incentive ie you can get back 8-25 cents per bottle when you bring it to those supermarket

    Recycling personal plastic is different to rummaging through workplace bins furiously every day to make a few cents.

    I worked in Germany, taxes are higher than anywhere I've worked. Salaries are lower than anywhere I've worked. Go figure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,426 ✭✭✭✭gimli2112


    DOCARCH wrote: »
    This is the nub of the Brexit issue and working class support/vote for Brexit.

    They believe it's the fault of the EU (and nothing to do with the London/SE centric UK government and decades of neglect).



    The problem is if things get worse after a crash out which let's face it they will, it will be the EU's fault for causing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Dominic Grieve attacking Boris's chief advisor today and threatening a government of national unity involving members of Labour and the Lib Dems in the case of a no-confidence motion succeeding against Johnson. Interesting times ahead for sure.

    https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-attacks-boris-johnsons-top-adviser-dominic-cummings-over-no-deal-brexit-threat-11778499


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,973 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    lufties wrote: »
    I worked in Germany, taxes are higher than anywhere I've worked.


    Yes and they receive far higher range and standard of services because of it and thus have to pay out of pocket for less of these services than for example those of us in the UK or Ireland do


    lufties wrote: »
    Salaries are lower than anywhere I've worked. Go figure.


    In your job specifically, across the board this is simply untrue they are around the EU average in net take home pay so this is subjectively a completely incorrect statement


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    So we go on WTO terms, the same way as the USA and China deal with the EU. It's not ideal but if it comes to tariffs then the UK Government will receive a lot more revenue than the EU and can use it to shield its businesses.


    I don't know how many more times this has to be explained. The Single Market is NOT JUST ABOUT TARIFFS. It is about allowing fast moving supply chains that build specialisation and reduce costs.

    The EU's trade with China and the US is one way - goods arrive in one or the other and are consumed there.

    The EU's trade within itself involves goods crossing between member countries for processing, packaging, distribution and eventual consumption across the whole EU market. It is about efficiencies, not customs revenue.

    When the UK leaves the Single Market it will exclude itself from both sales opportunities and the cost benefits that accrue from being part of these efficiencies. The damage will be immeasurable.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement