Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

1201202204206207330

Comments

  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So trump is saying negotiations are ongoing for a trade deal with the UK...

    I was under impression no deals can be negotiated until after the UK do actually leave?
    Correct, but nothing stopping them from doing the groundwork first to ensure a rapid agreement process after Brexit, plus the all important "holding pattern" to allow trading on B-day day one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    So trump is saying negotiations are ongoing for a trade deal with the UK...

    I was under impression no deals can be negotiated until after the UK do actually leave?
    I don't know the extent to which trade talks are taking place but I believe the rule is that whereas trade deals can't be concluded while the UK is in the EU, talks can take place in advance of the UK leaving.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,193 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    The Guardian is also reporting that the usual call that takes place when there's a new leader in the UK or Ireland to their counterpart hasn't yet happened after four days...

    Boris Johnson yet to make a phone call to Irish PM Leo Varadkar

    This is very interesting. I presume Leo already made/ attempted to make the call? Because - really - the convention is that leaders ring to congratulate the new leader of an country... They don't wait to receive a call from them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    There's a fairly significant possibility that this could end up as the biggest breakdown in Anglo-Irish relations since the 1920 and 30s. I don't really think we want to, or will be able to, placate this kind of nonsense.

    The sense I'm getting is they're attempting to turn us into the Brexit scapegoat because they're hitting a brick wall by trying to deliver the impossible.

    Strange times and I think they're likely to get stranger yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    There's a fairly significant possibility that this could end up as the biggest breakdown in Anglo-Irish relations since the 1920 and 30s. I don't really think we want to, or will be able to, placate this kind of nonsense.

    The sense I'm getting is they're attempting to turn us into the Brexit scapegoat because they're hitting a brick wall by trying to deliver the impossible.

    Strange times and I think they're likely to get stranger yet.

    We're off the hook. The ERG have said they won't accept the WA never mind the backstop.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    We're off the hook. The ERG have said they won't accept the WA never mind the backstop.

    Even so, it looks to me like the hibernophobia and paddywhackery is stepping up a notch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,241 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Ends Kenny was the very first leader Theresa May contacted when she became PM.

    I have no doubt given the nonsense from Downing Street that it's deliberate.

    To the Boris wing of the party Ireland is not a decision maker and is in UK sphere of influence so they go over the head to Macron and Merkel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Even so, it looks to me like the hibernophobia and paddywhackery is stepping up a notch.

    It will pass. It'll be French next week, the Germans the week after, the Spanish, et cetera ad nauseam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,441 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    This is very interesting. I presume Leo already made/ attempted to make the call? Because - really - the convention is that leaders ring to congratulate the new leader of an country... They don't wait to receive a call from them?

    The problem simply has to be at the UK end. The Taoiseach and his officials are fully aware of the diplomatic protocol, so something has gone wrong cross channel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭Foghladh


    Even so, it looks to me like the hibernophobia and paddywhackery is stepping up a notch.

    How so?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    Foghladh wrote: »
    How so?

    Well so far, beyond the general media examples and snide remarks by several senior political figures, I have avoided speaking about Brexit when in the UK entirely as anytime I've engaged in a discussion I've ended up in a massive argument, usually with someone who's only source of information is tabloid newspapers / stuff they've heard in the pub.

    Basically, on trips to Northern England I now just avoid discussing Brexit or politics at all. It's very much like my approach to visiting Northern Ireland has been for a long time.

    I have literally resorted to "Oh I don't really pay attention to that kind of thing ... "(moving swiftly on).

    It was something you could have a sane discussion about and agree to disagree. That seems to be fading away.

    The general sense I'm getting is that it's going to become very hostile as things inevitably start to become very awkward over the weeks and months ahead.


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It was something you could have a sane discussion about and agree to disagree. That seems to be fading away.

    Yeah, it's becoming a lot more toxic if it's even brought up. I avoid it now with English friends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    I keep coming back to the words Johnson was recorded saying about Trump at a private dinner for the Tories last year:
    “I am increasingly admiring of Donald Trump. I have become more and more convinced that there is method in his madness. Imagine Trump doing Brexit. He’d go in bloody hard … There’d be all sorts of breakdowns, all sorts of chaos. Everyone would think he’d gone mad. But actually you might get somewhere.”

    I think everything Johnson does from here on out has to be seen in the context of the above comments. The idea is to rattle the EU, and particularly ourselves. He's hoping the Irish public, media, parties etc. will lose their minds over the British approach and be begging for a rethink of the current strategy. It's similar to the Nixon 'madman theory': make everyone think you are erratic and unhinged in the hope of gaining concessions.

    Right now keeping our nerve is more important than ever. Politicians should avoid getting into recriminations and any utterances that can be twisted and distorted by mischievous elements across the water. We've already seen how Varadkar's remarks about moderate unionists considering an all-Ireland state have been picked up by right-wing commentators and the DUP. They are going to be in attack mode throughout the coming weeks.

    It's going to be very tempting to want to see our ministers and the EU snipe back but remember that's what they want. We are in full 'blame game' territory now and they should be given no ammunition. The DUP especially will be bricking it in light of the danger to NI's economy. If there's an election in the coming months they would much rather fight it on a British patriotic message to their heartlands: 'vote for us to defend your interests against the bullies in Dublin'. We're already seeing today Paisley - he mustn't be on his holiday break just yet - deriding the "unnecessarily aggressive" language of the Taoiseach.

    I hope we just let all this stuff pass by and keep calm. Repeat the line that we are willing to engage constructively, provided that talks respect the commitments of the previous administration. Let them throw a strop like a spoiled child in front of the sweet aisle if that is what they want to do; meanwhile we will be the adults in the room and wait patiently for them to tire of the tantrum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    Yeah, it's becoming a lot more toxic if it's even brought up. I avoid it now with English friends.

    Me too. Mine are all remainers and hate the Tories (even more than I do), so there's just no point, so it saves us all a load of bother if we just don't discuss it. Oddly enough they'll usually try and bring it up with me and I usually try to shoot them down (if you'll forgive the expression).

    When I'm seeing them I'm on holidays so I don't want to talk about things that get me wound up (and believe me, Brexit and the absolute ****show that is the Conservative party gets me very wound up if I get going on it).

    At the end of the day, just because some in the Tory party want to make the Irish the whipping boy for their sheer failure in this enterprise doesn't mean I need to stoop to that low, my friends are still my friends at the end of the day. Only 37% of the electorate and 25% of the whole UK population voted to leave let's not forget.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,441 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Well so far, beyond the general media examples and snide remarks by several senior political figures, I have avoided speaking about Brexit when in the UK entirely as anytime I've engaged in a discussion I've ended up in a massive argument, usually with someone who's only source of information is tabloid newspapers / stuff they've heard in the pub.

    Basically, on trips to Northern England I now just avoid discussing Brexit or politics at all. It's very much like my approach to visiting Northern Ireland has been for a long time.

    I have literally resorted to "Oh I don't really pay attention to that kind of thing ... "(moving swiftly on).

    It was something you could have a sane discussion about and agree to disagree. That seems to be fading away.

    The general sense I'm getting is that it's going to become very hostile as things inevitably start to become very awkward over the weeks and months ahead.

    Indeed, I get the impression things have really polarised in the last year or so. The rhetoric from Leave voters seems more hawkish than ever (I suspect the rise of the Brexit Party and the ERG is a big factor....they're all over the airwaves and the press spouting their bile).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    I think everything Johnson does from here on out has to be seen in the context of the above comments. The idea is to rattle the EU, and particularly ourselves. He's hoping the Irish public, media, parties etc. will lose their minds over the British approach and be begging for a rethink of the current strategy. It's similar to the Nixon 'madman theory': make everyone think you are erratic and unhinged in the hope of gaining concessions.

    The problem with the strategy is the UK has to do a deal at some point or other(or their economy will tank). So the threat of a no deal doesn't work if the other side aren't threatened by it.

    The issue is that Brexiters still don't understand the power imbalance at play here. The UK while a big economy is this far far smaller than the EU and over half the UKs trade is done either with the EU or through EU trade deals. The UK isn't in a position to threaten the EU economicly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,129 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    This seems to have been pre planned years ago. Yes I know I could be one of those mad conspiracy theorists!

    Austerity introduced. Funding for many things reduced. Population (especially North of Watford Gap) gasping for funds. Food banks everywhere and so on.

    And then comes the Brexit Referendum. Get rid of the EU and we will be great again!

    And so here we are. Johnson spending the billions that could have been spent up to now.

    The mind boggles at it all. But there are things going on behind the scenes that none of us know about, apart from the reality of having to deal with it.

    Just my 2c.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    PeadarCo wrote: »
    The problem with the strategy is the UK has to do a deal at some point or other(or their economy will tank). So the threat of a no deal doesn't work if the other side aren't threatened by it.

    The issue is that Brexiters still don't understand the power imbalance at play here. The UK while a big economy is this far far smaller than the EU and over half the UKs trade is done either with the EU or through EU trade deals. The UK isn't in a position to threaten the EU economicly.

    I heard James O'Brien articulate the flaw of the 'walk away' approach very well a few days ago on his show:
    “It’s only a powerful negotiating position if you walk back to everything you had, before you started negotiating. It’s not a powerful negotiating position if, by abandoning negotiations, you end up with considerably less than you had before.”


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 498 ✭✭BobbyBobberson


    There's a fairly significant possibility that this could end up as the biggest breakdown in Anglo-Irish relations since the 1920 and 30s. I don't really think we want to, or will be able to, placate this kind of nonsense.

    The sense I'm getting is they're attempting to turn us into the Brexit scapegoat because they're hitting a brick wall by trying to deliver the impossible.

    Strange times and I think they're likely to get stranger yet.

    Just on this, if a hard Brexit and border piss the UK off and strain Anglo-Irish relation, just imagine how much worse it gets if the Irish caucus in the US blocks a trade deal. As above, strange times.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Only 37% of the electorate and 25% of the whole UK population voted to leave let's not forget.
    They didn't all vote for

    * hard Brexit
    * blocking EU immigrants only to open up to non-EU immigrants
    * for profit NHS
    * abolishing EU health and welfare legislation
    * continued adversity


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    The biggest issue I'm having is because the issue is so fractious and toxic in the UK, we have been kind of avoiding UK suppliers rather than broaching contingency plans with them, as we've had very mixed reactions varying from being told it'll be "alright and there's nothing to worry about", to people thinking it's the end of days to others being mildly hostile to it being brought up.

    The net result has been a focus on the continent.

    It's very hard to plan around a topic that triggers people, when you need sensible and pragmatic discussion.

    Generally finding NI businesses far more prepared and pragmatic than England based counterparts though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,129 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Johnson knows a No Deal is unsustainable for the UK economy. We only have to look at blogs etc. about their lack of preparedness.

    Anyway, for political anoraks, it's great to be live witnesses to all this. Living through history in the making.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,074 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    And the fact that No Deal isn't an outcome. It is a complete failure. The Tory party, and BP, are now running on the ticket of being unable to achieve something.

    'Vote for me to ensure you get nothing done' is a new type of election slogan.

    What is the plan after No Deal. FTA seems to be the goal but nobody seems to be asking the question why the EU would allow a crash out but then give in afterwards when the damage is done.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,948 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Posts containing insults deleted.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭Borderhopper


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    And the fact that No Deal isn't an outcome. It is a complete failure. The Tory party, and BP, are now running on the ticket of being unable to achieve something.

    'Vote for me to ensure you get nothing done' is a new type of election slogan.

    What is the plan after No Deal. FTA seems to be the goal but nobody seems to be asking the question why the EU would allow a crash out but then give in afterwards when the damage is done.

    This is spot on. There seems to be an air of the end of history about a no deal brexit in the UK. ‘Leave, just leave’. Nothing about the future relationship the UK will need to have with, collectively speaking, its largest trading partner, not to mention close military allies.

    It’s important to remember that what they’re actually losing their minds about is an insurance policy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Leroy42 wrote:
    What is the plan after No Deal. FTA seems to be the goal but nobody seems to be asking the question why the EU would allow a crash out but then give in afterwards when the damage is done.

    I think the issue is that for hard-line Brexiters leaving the EU is the goal. Whatever comes after that doesn't matter because they have achieved their goal. And they are prepared to say/do/promise anything to achieve that goal.

    I don't they care what comes after as long as the UK gets out of the EU.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    This seems to have been pre planned years ago. Yes I know I could be one of those mad conspiracy theorists!

    Austerity introduced. Funding for many things reduced. Population (especially North of Watford Gap) gasping for funds. Food banks everywhere and so on.

    And then comes the Brexit Referendum. Get rid of the EU and we will be great again!

    And so here we are. Johnson spending the billions that could have been spent up to now.

    The mind boggles at it all. But there are things going on behind the scenes that none of us know about, apart from the reality of having to deal with it.

    Just my 2c.

    Johnson's funding for 20,000 extra police brings us right back to 2010 levels when Cameron/Osborne's severe austerity cuts began.

    Agree that something feels very off the way this has played out. To think they've created a monster with austerity and are struggling to contain the fall out - the likes of N. Farage for one.

    “The fact that society believes a man who says he’s a woman, instead of a woman who says he’s not, is proof that society knows exactly who is the man and who is the woman.”

    - Jen Izaakson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    That's because it's a distraction tactic. Better to have people taking about ridiculous Rees Mogg than the real issues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Johnson knows a No Deal is unsustainable for the UK economy. We only have to look at blogs etc. about their lack of preparedness.

    Anyway, for political anoraks, it's great to be live witnesses to all this. Living through history in the making.
    Everyone lives through history, every year, decade, had it's pivotal moments.

    I guess what's rare here is that this is recognized as historic before it's even happened.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement