Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Non book readers" - Season 8 Episode 6 "The Iron Throne" - Spoilers post 2 forw

17810121324

Comments

  • Posts: 21,679 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm torn. It's so hard for me to be subjective because I love the show so much. Bran as king is ok but it's how it came to be that disappoints me. I had hoped Jon's truth would have been revealed to all and the throne offered to him. When Tyrion was brought before the rulers I really really thought he was going to suggest Jon as king.

    Yes he was imprisoned but surely Sansa and the others would have demanded his release. Or I don't know. I don't know how that would have played out. Just that he should have had the opportunity to say no. Also Bran's remark to Tyrion about why he came this far. It was odd. He actually wanted to rule all along? Or did he mean something else.

    Sansa is exactly where she should be. As is Arya. Brienne writing Jaime's history was very sad I thought. She loved him so much. Tyrion was amazing. I was delighted when he threw his 'Hand' pin on the ground. It was a real 'fùck you' to Danaerys.

    She reminded me of Hitler when addressing her army. The hypocrisy of her words when looking at her actions showed have far she had gone. I mean saying that she liberated a city from a tyrant? Eh what?? How can you want to create a free world if you burn all of the inhabitants. That's not a criticism of the writing more an observation of who she is.

    I will go back to the beginning I think just to experience it all again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    I'm speculating but I think there was always intention for 'magic' to disappear from Westeros. Children of Forest are gone, Whitewalkers gone, dragons gone and the end to Targaryen dynasty. It's the end of an era and Jon ending on the throne would be wrong for me.

    Anyway I'm glad Dany didn't land on the throne. Even if she didn't go nuts anyone who thinks they have divine right to rule should never rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Also Bran's remark to Tyrion about why he came this far. It was odd. He actually wanted to rule all along? Or did he mean something else. .

    Maybe a sly reference to him knowing everything that's going to happen in advance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Hercule Poirot


    My biggest criticism of this season has been that it was handled so badly that when Dany died it was very meh

    She had built herself up from nothing, from being her brother's pawn to being within touching distance of the throne - but due to a combination of piss poor pacing and clueless writing she ends up a nothing character. Maybe nothing character seems a bit harsh but her death was breezed over and made to feel irrelevant when she deserved so much more

    GoT will remain one of the best shows I've ever seen with some characters that will live long in the memory: Joffrey, Ramsay, Theon, Davos and Jaime to name a few; but in the end it was rather like a firework - started with great tension and suspense and exploded into brilliance before petering out and fading away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,659 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    everlast75 wrote: »
    I will go back to the beginning I think just to experience it all again.

    My plan was always to go back and watch from the start again as soon as it was finished but now I plan to finish at the end of Season 6. Dany crosses the narrow sea with the Dothraki & Unsullied and lives happily ever after in Westeros with all three dragons, the end.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    On case it hasn't been posted, Tyrion's joke at the end (from reddit):

    "I once brought a jackass and a honeycomb into a brothel....”

    Madame: What can we do for you? Tyrion: I need a woman to lay with, for mine has left me. Madame: Whatever for? And what's with the honeycomb and the mule? Tyrion: My woman found a genie in a bottle, and he granted her three wishes. The first was for a house fit for a queen, so he gave her this damn honeycomb. The second wish was that she have the nicest ass in all the land, so he gave her this damn donkey... Madame: And what about the third wish? Tyrion: Well... she asked the genie to make my cock hang down past my knee. Madame: Well that one's not so bad eh? Tyrion: Not so bad!? I used to be six foot three!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I'm torn. It's so hard for me to be subjective because I love the show so much. Bran as king is ok but it's how it came to be that disappoints me. I had hoped Jon's truth would have been revealed to all and the throne offered to him. When Tyrion was brought before the rulers I really really thought he was going to suggest Jon as king.

    Yes he was imprisoned but surely Sansa and the others would have demanded his release. Or I don't know. I don't know how that would have played out. Just that he should have had the opportunity to say no. Also Bran's remark to Tyrion about why he came this far. It was odd. He actually wanted to rule all along? Or did he mean something else.

    If they wanted to go the route of no longer having a King/Queen by blood, instead through the Houses voting, then it would make no sense to offer it to Jon (being the 'rightful' king through blood). However, how they wrote Tyrion's speech only throws that in as an afterthought due to trying to build up the suspense of 'who has the best story'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    I’ve defended this Season and still think a huge, unthinking bandwagon has formed against it, but there was so much nonsense in that finale. Worse, it fell flat and failed to move me.

    Tyrion was the son of arguably the most influential person in Westeros and infamously murdered him. He was Hand to one Queen and Two Kings. He was Master of Coin and commanded the defense of King’s Landing against Stannis’ assault. He survived two high profile trials by combat. He was roundly blamed for the murder of King Joffrey. He married Sansa Stark. He was at least present for and often a cog in most of the key episodes of Westero’s recent history. To think he would not feature in a book of that history is absurd, the thought that Sam is lying to preserve his feelings in the expectation that Tyrion, an obsessive reader and student of history, will not read the book is equally absurd.

    The whole joke/contrivance made no sense.

    Nor does presumably Tyrion making Bronn, one of the most overtly greedy and corrupted people in the story, Master of Coin. He is likely illiterate with zero experience of administration. I’m fine with him blagging his way into the Small Council (Master of War seems a better fit) and even the overlordship of The Reach but to have him as Master of Coin was lazy.

    Davos, Sam (if we assume the Night’s Watch is defunct and Jon is heading North to reestablish it) and Brienne work well as Council members.

    The reaction of the respawning Unsullied and Dothraki to Dany’s murder was far fetched. Why should Grey Worm care enough to help the Westerosi fix their continent? He was devoted only to Dany. A more logical ending would be him and the remainder of Dany’s foreign loyalists having a bitter battle with their former Westerosi allies led by Jon for KL after the death of Dany.

    No way would they just meekly climb on ships and politely sail away after that betrayal. The Dothraki at the very least would have taken the opportunity to rampage through a weakened and hated country had they stayed true to character.

    Instead, Grey Worm lets both Tyrion and Jon escape with a few harsh words and hard stares. The guy that was earlier murdering defenseless captives for doing their duty and resisting his Queen.

    It was cool to see the Council reintroduce some long absent characters. But why did it allow itself to be led by Tyrion, a man viewed as treacherous by much of the Seven Kingdoms, dirty, in chains and pleading his own incompetence?

    They all agreed on Bran readily, why? He has zero claim and few of them know anything about him. Jon has the strongest claim and is one of the most respected and popular figures in Westeros, and the only person capable of keeping the North in the Seven Kingdoms, but is not mooted as a possibility. Why do they want to avoid upsetting the remaining Targ forces so much? If it was felt Grey Worm held too much leverage to be defied (in fairness, he did have Jon in custody, KL occupied and, by some miracle, a strong force left) Gendry seems a much more logical compromise choice, having a claim and displaying good character.

    Dany’s death just seemed sterile and inevitable to me, I felt nothing. Compared to other deaths in the series it was of low impact. Remember how gut wrenching it was to see Ned, Cat, Robb and others go?

    Also, KL in generally seemed far too bustling and intact after The Bells, and the Red Keep in particular looked far healthier than the scenes of the last episode should have allowed.

    Sansa’s ending was satisfying, Jon’s was nice but unsatisfying, Arya’s mildly silly.

    In all a damp squib. It went out with a whimper. A timid, emotionless ending.

    Still a magnificent series, taken as a whole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Lionbacker


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Sad but it was a demise of her own making. She went from nothing to ruling Slavers Bay in Essos and, despite what her advisers told her, that wasn't enough for her, she wanted what she believed she was entitled to in Westeros.

    I don't think she cared all that much for Slavers Bay. She always wanted to get back to Westeros and to be honest, she was quite entitled to claim the throne seeing as her father was King before meeting his end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭Petyr Baelish


    Very disappointing ending to a great show. It looks like they are laying the ground for a follow up some years down the road.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,473 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    the last ep of season was always a come down


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    My plan was always to go back and watch from the start again as soon as it was finished but now I plan to finish at the end of Season 6. Dany crosses the narrow sea with the Dothraki & Unsullied and lives happily ever after in Westeros with all three dragons, the end.

    Someone will take the footage of S6 and S7 and turn it into a new show. Many will do it, one will win out, and then I'll rewatch it all and erase the last three years from my memory.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Twenty Grand


    If only Jamie and Cersei has stood on the other side of that room they'd be fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,473 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    drogon should have roasted jon


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    IMDB (From Reddit)

    683mjwgvpbz21.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


    IMDB (From Reddit)

    683mjwgvpbz21.jpg

    The episode that saw Ramsey rape Sansa viewed through Theon's eyes got an 8.1. The episodes revolving around the capture the wight plan? 9.0 and 9.1. :confused:

    I don't think that graphic proves what you think it does. If anything, it says that GoT fans moan a lot in the early stages of an episode being released but generally come around and like it. Episode 1 of this season was better than last week? Please.


  • Posts: 21,679 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    If they wanted to go the route of no longer having a King/Queen by blood, instead through the Houses voting, then it would make no sense to offer it to Jon (being the 'rightful' king through blood). However, how they wrote Tyrion's speech only throws that in as an afterthought due to trying to build up the suspense of 'who has the best story'.

    Yes but what if Jon's refusal was what brought them to that decision?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Went for a walk to collect kids from school and started to sink in. I’m really gonna miss this show.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    Arya "Columbus" Stark: weak end to such a badass character. Did nothing all season. Totally pointless.
    She killed the Night King!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 736 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    In fairness to Emilia Clarke, she can definitely deliver a rousing speech in a fictional language.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    Drogon melting the throne was bizarre to say the least, it's always been assumed the dragons had some level of intelligence but that was crap - maybe it knew what Jon was going to do but I don't see how it would lay there and let it happen?
    aPYVdLV_460swp.webp


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    Actors were on x per episode so instead of 10 40 minute episodes we git the same 400 minutes over 6 episodes saving a huge amount. HBO will have sold it and its ad revenue for the same amount.
    Episodes have always been an hour long. It's pretty much accepted that D&D wanted to wrap it up and move on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Wtf why did Jon Snow get totally shafted? I mean he basically saved the world. And he was the rightful king. Seems a bit ridiculous
    I think he got a good ending. He might be the rightful heir to the throne but he has no desire to rule and like Ned is completely out of his debt in court politics. I like that he's gone north to live with the Wildlings. He is respected by them and feels at home but doesn't have any pressure of ruling. Bran did him a favour sending him there. There really was no other place for him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Ultimately he was a poor character. Far too much overactive conscience and conflict and not enough decision making in anything.
    He was a moody teen but becoming the Lord Commander's steward started shaping him into a decent man. He went to save Wildlings and brought them south, knowing it would p!ss off a lot of people but he knew it was better to have them south than in the NK's army. He took back Winterfell (albeit with the Knight's of the Vale) but overall I liked him up until he bent the knee to Dany. Then he basically became her whipping boy and it was disappointing to watch him defend her sh!tty actions and lose the respect of the people in the North.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    dsmythy wrote: »
    My favourite part was the Lords laughing at the idea of everyone voting. I would have been sick at the idea of a kingdom switching that quickly to democracy.
    That was how democracy started in real life. People got sick of the absolute power of Kings and the nobles demanded they be allowed vote and created parliaments etc. Eventually the middle classes said we want the vote too, just because we're not noble doesn't mean we don't count. Then the poor demanded the vote. And finally the women. It was a long process.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    I think that the Jon/Dany love story was supposed to be central to the ending/story. They were supposed to be properly in love.
    Jon being a Targaryen and having a claim was supposed to sort of tear them apart.
    Dany was supposed to be broken hearted that Jon no longer wanted her and turned mad queen.
    Jon was probably supposed to be devastated about having to kill her.
    I think thats kind of what they were going for.
    Jon and Ygritte felt real and when he betrayed her for the Night's Watch you knew it broke both of them. I never felt any chemistry between Jon and Dany. At the beginning of season 8 when they were all sickly sweet smiles and dragon rides by moonlight it felt like they were forcing something that simply wasn't there. Jon and Ygritte are married in real life so their chemistry was 100% real.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 359 ✭✭NeonWolf


    So let me get this straight

    The people who won the game of thrones are a cripple, a ginger bird, a midget, a fat kunt and Liam Cunningham.


    Political correctness has gone too far by infiltrating fantasy tv.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Keyzer


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    I think he got a good ending. He might be the rightful heir to the throne but he has no desire to rule and like Ned is completely out of his debt in court politics. I like that he's gone north to live with the Wildlings. He is respected by them and feels at home but doesn't have any pressure of ruling. Bran did him a favour sending him there. There really was no other place for him.

    No.

    No he didn't.

    He got an shambolicly bad ending for his character arc (and its inferred and ultimately subverted trajectory).

    He did practically nothing in Season 8 of note.

    How these two sh1theads (D&D) put this crap together and thought it was good is beyond me..,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,198 ✭✭✭PressRun


    That was very, very poor. Just absolutely terrible storytelling.
    I didn't see anything redeeming about it.

    -The person sitting on the throne is someone who is indifferent to the trials and tribulations of humanity. Does he even identify as human? And all the other lords are totally fine with this? Robin has nothing to say? The scene where they choose Bran was actually comical, and not in a good way.

    -And what about Jon? A revelation 10 years in the making, a secret Ned Stark took to the grave, a secret that was supposed to change everything and be one of the most compelling parts of the story...ends up being a catalyst to drive Daenerys mad and is otherwise utterly meaningless. Nobody even mentions it after Daenerys is killed...what a complete waste.

    -I wasn't displeased to see Sansa become Queen in the North, but what is the poignancy of a Stark ruling Winterfell when her family is scattered to the wind? What was the point of Arya kind of reclaiming her identity when she just jumps on the first boat out of there?

    And then other issues within the episode itself:
    Drogon burning the throne - Such fan fiction stuff. How does he even understand that the pursuit of the throne is the reason Daenerys is dead? And then flying off with her body - to where?
    Greyworm - suddenly he's very invested in what happens in King's Landing and is calling the shots, yet also gets his sailing off into the sunset moment despite being a war criminal, while Jon is banished to the wall (despite there being no real need for that anymore).
    Bronn becoming Master of Coin and ruling High Garden - wtf. Does anyone in the reach even know who the **** he is??


    - Ultimately, what are we supposed to take from all this? That everything is meaningless? That people aren't capable of really changing? That we all become our parents eventually? What?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭lawlolawl


    The gosh darn patriarchy couldn't handle the prospect of a strong woman on the throne!


    Seriosuly though, that wasn't very good.


    Arya and Jon went off to be lumberjacks, Sansa's character doesn't make any sense and Bran not really seeming to care about being king makes him a terrible choice.


    Bonus points for everyone accepting an imprisoned traitors plan on how to clear everything up.


Advertisement