Silence of the Wolves - A Game of Werewolf GAME THREAD

Pter wrote: »

I'm not inclined to believe strawbs is a wolf but I want to verify if there is a link between them or not. Could end up important.

Lynch me then.

But when i flip village, my will & testiment is that pter is the next lynch.

6 pages in 17 to go. This is a labour indeed but I'm warming to skeith now

Ectoplasm wrote: »

My notes. I'll say this, I understand why pocketing works because I feel quite bad posting this as sKeith has been so adamant that I am village (which I am) but I can't return the favour.

sKeith, can you read my notes on you and convince me I'm wrong?


sKeith | Voted kitten Lynch 1, CTK Lynch 2. Aggressive play - taking on leader role yet not munched - double/triple bluff? Not convinced he's village but not convinced he's wolf. Neutral for now. Leaning wolfier Can't warm to style this game. Always annoys me when other people think how they play is how everyone should play though so keep this in mind. Interactions with G n R and safelisting of same are interesting. Consistent and paying attention. Still neutral. Scares me a little this one. Moved onto kitten when Strawbs moves off and effectively ensures a kitten lynch BUT then Trit is munched. First thoughts are that he must be good. Tunnel alert here!Second thought has me conjuring a plot wherein by effectively 'clearing' me, he becomes cleared. Closer look needed when other reads are done. Strawbs effectively clears him for this - does she also clear me for same? Yes but with reservations. Skeith = Village for now. Finding a wolf would help me a lot. | Has been loud and cage-rattling. Moving onto Kitten at the last minute confirmed her death and then munching into those three voters DOES seem unlikely. Essentially I'm clearing him for the same reason he is clearing me. That said, he is a good player who may be using the very unlikely nature of that action to hide. Also, shouldn't I look more suspicious at this stage? If I was another player I'd probably be more suss of me. Could this be an attempt to pocket? His play continues to bother me. GnR accuses Strawbs 13:22. Skeith posts response at 14:25 after GnR requests one #1304. Somewhat wishy -washy, essentially asks for more evidence. Notes that Digi wagon is leading shortly after. Says he's fence sitting re Strawbs. Is the one to ask Strawbs who to run against her. Accuses Pter of trying to kill the conversation around Strawbs v Kolido when Pter raises the plan to look at low posters again - while being aware that low-poster wolf Digi is in trouble. The timing of declaring a vote for fixxer yesterday came after 3 declared Strawbs. Has avoided answering direct questions a fair bit.

so, i've to read this and convince you you're?


>voted kitten,
you're right
>voted ctk,

i did
> agressive play,

thats just an opinion.
>taking on leader role

you're wrong, i don't lead.
>yet...
>not munched,
correct.


>double/triple bluff?

I'm villager


>Not convinced he's village but not convinced he's wolf.
What you are saying is i'm null. Even i showed you the logic of why i see you as village. Am i wrong about you?



>Neutral for now. Leaning wolfier

why?

>Can't warm to style this game.
i dont care what you think of my gamestyle, but does my gamestyle make me a wolf?

>Always annoys me when other people think how they play is how everyone should play though so keep this in mind.

Who are you talking about here and why is this even in notes about me.

>Interactions with G n R and safelisting of same are interesting.
I allowed myself to be pocketed by GnR early on, I was open about it, and I added the addendum that barney should alert me if i'm overlooking something there. Now with barney dead, I have gotten out of gnrs pocket.
>Consistent and paying attention.
spot on.
>Still neutral.
fine.
>Scares me a little this one.
what exactly scares you?
>Moved onto kitten when Strawbs moves off and effectively ensures a kitten lynch BUT then Trit is munched
explain reason for this already. i on fixxxer (1) trit ecto and straw on kiten (3) @20:25 or so i say at 20:30 i'm getting off fixxxer, my top wolf as nobody else is joining me onto kitten wagon, wagons are good, outlier votes not.
strawbs says stay there, i may join fixxer, i let 20:30 pass without joining the kittten wagon, i want off the outlier and onto my 2nd best wolf. straw @ 20:40 move from kitten (2) to kolido (1). i see she did not vote fixxxer, bit annoyed by strawbs, but immediatly bring kitten back up to (3).
It was my best play, i posted my read all the time, people were complaining, but that was me being an open book, it shouldnt surprise anybody that i moved from my #1 wolf fixxer (1) to my #2 wolf kitten (2) to make them (3). That she flipped village does not make me a wolf. that i openly shared my reads and did exactly what i should have done based on the reads does not make me a wolf.


>First thoughts are that he must be good. Tunnel alert here!Second thought has me conjuring a plot wherein by effectively 'clearing' me, he becomes cleared.
dont over think it. I could do the same for you, but for now, i'll leave you as villager.


> Closer look needed when other reads are done. Strawbs effectively clears him for this - does she also clear me for same? Yes but with reservations. Skeith = Village for now. Finding a wolf would help me a lot
Why are you asking me to convince you that you are wrong? You are right.






okay, now to the other box....


>Has been loud and cage-rattling.

I've being playing the game in my own way to get the most info that i am able to use to sort people. other people dont inderstand the way i use responses and reactions to stuff to sort players and what they dont understand becomes wolfie. its not, its just what i need to see to get a proper read on people.


>Moving onto Kitten at the last minute confirmed her death and then munching into those three voters DOES seem unlikely. Essentially I'm clearing him for the same reason he is clearing me.
ditto


>That said, he is a good player who may be using the very unlikely nature of that action to hide. Also, shouldn't I look more suspicious at this stage? If I was another player I'd probably be more suss of me.
You've been logic cleared same way as i have. let me put it in anoter way, 100% is seer checked. we are not 100% but we are a damn sight closer that most of the others in this game, we are clearer that the 5 on digi last night due to the wolves not munching into that wagon.


>Could this be an attempt to pocket?
See above.


>His play continues to bother me.
I'm not gonna read into this.


> GnR accuses Strawbs 13:22. Skeith posts response at 14:25 after GnR requests one #1304. Somewhat wishy -washy, essentially asks for more evidence. Notes that Digi wagon is leading shortly after. Says he's fence sitting re Strawbs. Is the one to ask Strawbs who to run against her. Accuses Pter of trying to kill the conversation around Strawbs v Kolido when Pter raises the plan to look at low posters again - .



i think you are wrong about wishy washy,

as for asking for more evidence, i was in work and couldnt do it myself at that moment in time.

pter did quell that conversation, potential spew was being laid on thread and pter effectively stopped it.


>while being aware that low-poster wolf Digi is in trouble
I'm a villager, i don't know who the wolves are until try flip. I only can make educated guesses. a low poster pressure vote is normally removed when that low poster starts posting, otherwise its not a low poster pressure vote, its something else. Let me remind you that up until that point, the evidence against digi was "first", yes, thats it. I'm very suss of the people who stayed on digi and i am open about it.



>The timing of declaring a vote for fixxer yesterday came after 3 declared Strawbs.



07:13 Kolido says he’ll probably vote strawberry1
15:48 fixxxer votes strawberry2
15:55 bounty says he voted for strawberry the last time he posted reads
16:25 Keith votes fixxxer


Voting fixxxer is here is wolfie?
check out post #987 and read onwards.
fixxxer is wolfie as hell, and i have strawbs as villager, its all open and out on thread, again i am not hiding anything.
my village read is in danger, i want my wolf read lynched.



>Has avoided answering direct questions a fair bit.

What were the questions? Some times I dont engage in pointless NAI crap.

Pter wrote: »

Hold on. SKeith wants fixxxer dead. I want fixxxer dead. Does anyone not want fixxxer dead.

I'd move off you onto fixxxer if it becomes viable.


I've being trying to lynch fixxer since day 1.

*fixxxer" opps, i know he gets touchy over the missing x.

Dublinandy2 wrote: »

Sorry I'm on page 8 of your posts and you've mentioned him once so far and it was speaking to him not accusing him.

page 8, i dont think you are even on day 1 yet, day 1 is the 7th&8th.