Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

NBP: National Broadband Plan Announced

1283284286288289334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,013 ✭✭✭tsue921i8wljb3


    BarryM wrote: »
    I only said she had a theory, I commented on it.

    Why don't you leave this thread, or at least keep your non-relevant comments to yourself.

    Take your own advice there champ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭medoc


    It would have been so much more efficient if Eir had wanted the tender. Extending their rural FTTH network would have quickly and easily got houses connected. Then building out further and further from there. Bit ridiculous to run another 10 or 20 core fibre cable along poles from a town beside Eirs (mostly) under used cables. I’m lucky I’m on the Eir network but family down the road aren’t. Until the contract is signed it’s all just potentially another election promise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    Naughten on Newstalk now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭cregmon


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    Naughten on Newstalk now

    Anyone know what quantum broadband is?

    Update: If its this, then methinks we can safely go ahead with NBP for now
    https://www.wired.com/story/quantum-internet-is-13-years-away-wait-whats-quantum-internet/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,978 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    Naughten on Newstalk now

    I notice he keeps referring to ~€2 bn which is the hoped for cost of the gov subsidy, with the absolute max set at about €0.5 bn higher.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭Orebro


    As far as I can see in this case Robert Watt and his Dept know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

    We voted in the Gov, not the civil servants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    https://twitter.com/john_mcguirk/status/1125851850853507072

    Classic example if this on Newstalk Breakfast this morning with Timmy Dooley, when asked if FF would withdraw support from government over this or if there was an election before the contract signing would they cancel the process, as you would expect he avoided answering the question.

    Can you imagine the field day FG would have if FF withdrew support for the rollout of rural broadband. They are both now locked into this by the rural vote and no politician wants to face the electorate with a further delay on this.

    I met my local FG candidate last week, before the cabinet decision on the NBP, I promised him my No. 1 if this got approved and no vote if it didn't. He said he'd have 24,000 votes if he could sort this out for all those who raised the issue with him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭gnf_ireland


    Orebro wrote: »
    As far as I can see in this case Robert Watt and his Dept know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

    We voted in the Gov, not the civil servants.

    I think there needs to be a little perspective put on this CAPITAL investment, in the context of the overall government spend. 2019 overall government expenditure will be 76.8bn. ~2 billion is pretty small over 25 years in comparison. Servicing the national debt is 5.5bn, Health is 17bn, Education 10.8bn. Hell child benefit (childrens allowance) alone is 2.1bn of a 20.8bn social welfare budget.
    https://whereyourmoneygoes.gov.ie/en/2019/

    While FTTP may be viewed as unnecessary to watch Netflix in 2018, in 2025-2030 will assisted healthcare and education become the new norm? Why should students have to travel to cities to attend lectures each day when they could access education remotely. Same with certain second level subjects and collaboration between schools. Healthcare will become a massive burden with an aging population is likely to require serious technology assistance to make it sustainable via wearable devices and patches etc.

    And this is before we start talking about security and rural crime. Fibre will support ultra high definition cameras enabling much more sophisticated security systems.

    Its a 25 year project with 25 years of costs included. I don't believe for a minute that in 2045 a fully connected fibre network does not generate substantial economic value for the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Ya I must touch base with my FG candidate and give them my full support


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭gnf_ireland


    The Cush wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/john_mcguirk/status/1125851850853507072

    Classic example if this on Newstalk Breakfast this morning with Timmy Dooley, when asked if FF would withdraw support from government over this or if there was an election before the contract signing would they cancel the process, as you would expect he avoided answering the question.

    Can you imagine the field day FG would have if FF withdrew support for the rollout of rural broadband. They are both now locked into this by the rural vote and no politician wants to face the electorate with a further delay on this.

    I met my local FG candidate last week, before the cabinet decision on the NBP, I promised him my No. 1 if this got approved and no vote if it didn't. He said he'd have 24,000 votes if he could sort this out for all those who raised the issue with him.

    Absolutely agree. This is all political posturing from the opposition. They all know this is the only show in town and while they will use it to attack the government, they all will support it in the end. There is simply no alternative other than to abandon the project or remove 20% of houses from the project.
    And before someone mentions low orbit satellites, I am not convinced it would provide anything close to what fibre can offer. I am open to be corrected though based on in-life examples rather than promises from Musk !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    And before someone mentions low orbit satellites, I am not convinced it would provide anything close to what fibre can offer. I am open to be corrected though based on in-life examples rather than promises from Musk !

    It can't, full stop. Nothing beats fibre for rural Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    Naughten on Newstalk now

    Podcast here - https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-the-pat-kenny-show/td-denis-naughten-national-broadband-plan
    if this falters between now and the signing of the contract I don't honestly ever believe we will get high-speed broadband into rural Ireland. I believe for generations to come we'll be talking about hap-hazard services … a band-aid situation ...

    Another good interview with him on with Sean Bolger's lapdog Ivan Yates on the evening of the cabinet announcement - https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-the-hard-shoulder/just-roads-came-electricity-broadband-will-now-delivered-every-townland-ireland-will-leave-lasting-legacy-throughout-country

    Good, knowledgeable, common sense interviews, should still be Communications Minister, if only he'd kept DMcC at arms length.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭Pique


    Timmy Dooley trying to steal the thunder
    Serious risk rural broadband may not happen - Fianna Fáil warn


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭theguzman


    Pique wrote: »

    As if a reason was needed not to vote for the FF Traitor party then it is Timmy Dooley, an incredibly dislikeable character if ever there was. His party looted the Irish treasury to the tune of €200bn and bailed out their corrupt Private Property Developers and lined their own pockets. The Fianna Fail Govt of 2002-2007-2011 should all have been tried for treason after what they did and then this prick tries lecturing the people about wasting money. Obviously Fianna Fail has some corrupt links to WISP and 5G otherwise they wouldn't be so fundamentally opposed to this common sense project. A vote for Fianna Fail is a vote for Corruption, Cronyism and Mass Theft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,094 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    The Cush wrote: »

    Contention on FTTC? Sure I guess we can't expect much better from Naughten.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭Pique


    ED E wrote: »
    Contention on FTTC? Sure I guess we can't expect much better from Naughten.

    I understood that to be if using wireless to connect. Naughton is well clued in on all this and his interviews in the last couple of days have reinforced this IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭celticbhoy27


    theguzman wrote: »
    As if a reason was needed not to vote for the FF Traitor party then it is Timmy Dooley, an incredibly dislikeable character if ever there was. His party looted the Irish treasury to the tune of €200bn and bailed out their corrupt Private Property Developers and lined their own pockets. The Fianna Fail Govt of 2002-2007-2011 should all have been tried for treason after what they did and then this prick tries lecturing the people about wasting money. Obviously Fianna Fail has some corrupt links to WISP and 5G otherwise they wouldn't be so fundamentally opposed to this common sense project. A vote for Fianna Fail is a vote for Corruption, Cronyism and Mass Theft.

    Talks alot but says nothing. He's basically questioning fine gaels intention to deliver but stopping short of saying he would pull the plug on it if empowered to do so. Either way, there'l be no vote for Fianna fail in this house. It's high time rural people were looked after.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Pique wrote: »
    I understood that to be if using wireless to connect. Naughton is well clued in on all this and his interviews in the last couple of days have reinforced this IMO.

    He did make that particular boo-boo alright but overall he's well informed, after so may years dealing with this in the Department.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,094 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    He got half way there with describing the limits of satellite at least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭Persiancowboy


    If the contractor fails to live up to their side, the gov can, at various points in the scheme, step in and take ownership.
    If the contractor works to the end of the 35 years and no longer wishes to continue, the gov have the option to purchase the fibre ... not that it would be worth much to anyone except Openeir IMO.
    If the contractor goes bust during the roll out then what has been done reverts to state ownership.

    In contracts of this nature the successful bidder is always obliged to lodge a very significant bond that can be retained by tenderer in the event of default or whatever. Can't believe NBP contract won't include such a provision.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,003 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    In contracts of this nature the successful bidder is always obliged to lodge a very significant bond that can be retained by tenderer in the event of default or whatever. Can't believe NBP contract won't include such a provision.

    Any examples of such a bond in other Irish infrastructure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    Newstalk are fairly off the ball on technology details...

    They went to the best and worst places for broadband...
    Worst: Longford at 1.6Mbps

    Best: Drimnagh at 72Mbps

    His figure is long out of date for the best speed.



    Yesterday around 5:30 a guy from a company called Host Ireland said that FWA is future proof and that fibre isn't. He said it twice.

    Jess made a polite comment contradicting him but he pretty much got away with it unchallenged.

    Ivan hadn't a breeze and couldn't challenge him either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭Pique


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    Newstalk are fairly off the ball on technology details...

    They went to the best and worst places for broadband...
    Worst: Longford at 1.6Mbps

    Best: Drimnagh at 72Mbps

    He said seventy two megabits per second (this was the reporter Barry White).

    But it is megabit/sec remember.

    Anyway, aside from that, I found the source. and it's from that bastion of technology, joe.ie, in 2016!

    https://twitter.com/JOEdotie/status/798434406339899392


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,332 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Pique wrote: »
    But it is megabit/sec remember.

    Anyway, aside from that, I found the source. and it's from that bastion of technology, joe.ie, in 2016!

    https://twitter.com/JOEdotie/status/798434406339899392

    Or they took it from the source that Joe used for their article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,286 ✭✭✭shanec1928


    listermint wrote: »
    Any examples of such a bond in other Irish infrastructure
    while may not be relevant , Construction bonds. An estate being built near to me has a 5 or 6 figure bond plus bonds on registered trees( or what ever the term is) lodged to the council.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    But it is megabit/sec remember.

    Yes. But 72Mbps is fairly poor for Dublin when Virgin Media are selling 240Mbps and anyone with FTTH is getting minimum 150Mbps.

    The point is he didn't do his research on the max speed which far exceeds 72.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    Newstalk are fairly off the ball on technology details...

    They went to the best and worst places for broadband...
    Worst: Longford at 1.6Mbps

    Best: Drimnagh at 72Mbps

    His figure is long out of date for the best speed.



    Yesterday around 5:30 a guy from a company called Host Ireland said that FWA is future proof and that fibre isn't. He said it twice.

    Jess made a polite comment contradicting him but he pretty much got away with it unchallenged.

    Ivan hadn't a breeze and couldn't challenge him either.

    Newstalks coverage is very biased towards wireless imho, particularly Ivan, and i find it very frustrating hearing himself and PK let commnets away unchallenged on wireless/sattelite etc. They are professional broadcasters, its not much to expect them to be some way knowledgable on the subjects they are discussing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Newstalks coverage is very biased towards wireless imho, particularly Ivan, and i find it very frustrating hearing himself and PK let commnets away unchallenged on wireless/sattelite etc. They are professional broadcasters, its not much to expect them to be some way knowledgable on the subjects they are discussing.

    I find Pat Kenny to be way ahead of Ivan Yates on this, probably his engineering backround, prepared to listen unbiased to the interviewee, mentioned latency when someone texted in earlier in the week about Amazon's low earth orbiting satellites providing broadband as a national solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,978 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    The Cush wrote: »
    I find Pat Kenny to be way ahead of Ivan Yates on this, probably his engineering backround, prepared to listen unbiased to the interviewee, mentioned latency when someone texted in earlier in the week about Amazon's low earth orbiting satellites providing broadband as a national solution.

    Agree ..... now if he would only stop rabbiting on and ask the question and let the interviewee answer, I would find it easier to put up with him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    So current taxpayer exposure is 3 billion, total project cost is 5 Billion.....currently, according to Minister.

    Exclusive of VAT also.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/broadband-cost-set-to-top-5bn-including-private-investment-1.3885560


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement