Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"Non book readers" - Season 8 Episode 3 "The Long Night" - Spoilers post 2 forwa

1313234363751

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭NuMarvel


    paulbok wrote: »
    If half the white walkers went with the NK and the rest fought Jamie, Brienne etc, killing one or two, one or two WW died with their wights dropping giving a brief respite to the living only to be swamped again, it would have satisfied a lot of the complaints about the battle. Less WW in the Godswood would also have made it more plausible that Arya could sneak past them too.

    game-of-thrones-stannis-fewer.gif

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    NuMarvel wrote: »

    Fewer

    :D


    I'd watch GOT just for this recurring joke, excellent gag


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭paulbok


    NuMarvel wrote: »
    game-of-thrones-stannis-fewer.gif

    :D

    Well played. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Keyzer


    fash wrote: »
    For that matter, they could have had Arya die killing the night king. What use is she moving forward?

    Thinking about what I would expect for the night king (and borrowing some ideas from people above)- some form of mental communion between Bran and the night king - a psychic battle which distracts him - followed by an attack by perhaps Jon/Jaime - perhaps Jaime dying, sneak attack by Arya, Arya kills him but dies doing so.

    A good use of valaryan steel, there is a narrative cost to killing the night king and you avoid the cliche of Jon killing him.

    Edit: I'm narratively satisfied with Arya killing him - but without the silly retconning of Melisandre telling her "I knew all the time- even when I said it was the bears, I knew it was you" and a reasonable distraction and death toll allows a more realistic sneak attack.

    My thoughts precisely... a psychic battle which distracts him for even a few seconds.

    Arya sneaks in during this time.

    Arya kills NK but Bran's brain is fried...

    Arya kills NK but dies in the process...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,894 ✭✭✭Triceratops Ballet


    Because bad writing :pac: or a lack of screen time, which is a choice. What happens if the NK comes south any other year in the last 10000?

    Exactly they made a choice about how important he was as a character/threat in the show and wrote accordingly. I don't understand how it can be argued that a fictional character has more to him than the things that are written about him.

    Like obviously if we were talking about a real historical figure and the writers had just ignored things and conveniently told a specific story they wanted to tell then that's one thing, but this is not that!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,903 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    I'm afraid it's true. They were dead.


    (I havent read the last 30 pages but assume this is about Lost)

    they were dead in the last episode....their "souls" linked etc etc

    they were not dead on the island to begin with!!

    anyways


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,211 ✭✭✭PressRun


    Happens to encounter a dragon? I dare say the timing of the NK march south was near perfect. The Dragon was key to the march of the dead in order to destroy the wall. The NK waited until magic returned to the world before launching his attack. The fist of the first men occurs after the dragons are hatched. He's still in the land of Always Winter in S4E4. In Hardhome he recruits a mass amount of Wildlings to his cause as there are trapped by the sea. The scenario in S7E6 was a complete trap to lure Dany and her dragons into the field and in which he took one down.

    It was also period where the 7 kingdoms were after a major war. Entire houses gone (Tyrell, Bolton, Baratheon, Frey, Tarly) and the Night watch almost non-existent, so decimated Kingdom is easier to destroy.


    Kind of a shame after all that that he didn't even make it south. Would Cersei and friends even believe he ever existed? Didn't Danerys also have a vision of the throne covered in ice? I guess that doesn't really mean anything now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,253 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Like most GOT fans i'm delighted that Jon, Danny, Arya, Sansa, Tyrion and Jamie are still alive as we have some amazing conversations to look forward to. The Tyrion/Jamie/Cersei relationship is the best sibling rivalry in television history, can wait to see how it ends. Yes Ned starks death was brilliant for GOT but at the time Ned as a character had fully served his purpose.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Exactly they made a choice about how important he was as a character/threat in the show and wrote accordingly. I don't understand how it can be argued that a fictional character has more to him than the things that are written about him.

    Like obviously if we were talking about a real historical figure and the writers had just ignored things and conveniently told a specific story they wanted to tell then that's one thing, but this is not that!
    Because it can happen inadvertently through bad writing, which I've given you an example of many times and you keep ignoring. If the NK isn't intelligent and capable of planning and possessed with foresight how does he keep getting everything perfectly timed?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,899 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    My observation with GOT is that they ran out of time, it could easily have lasted another 2 series to tell the full story as well and coherent as it started. Not possible to keep the cast and people working on the show long enough to achieve it though.

    I think some of the jumps were required due to the time left to finish the story.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 382 ✭✭Santan


    I'm pretty annoyed that I've been conditioned to not care about what happens with the Iron Throne because the war against the Night King was supposedly all that mattered. Now that he's been taken care of in a few hours it looks like we're back to fighting for the Iron Throne, which the show itself has deemed to be trivial.


    This sums it up for me, since the very first episode until the last one, we are fully led tho believe that the fight for the iron throne was insignificant, that the WW are the biggest threat to life as a whole, led to believe the power of the NK is bigger than so much of what the living can face and fight against. In the end they don't even give us one fight scene. I feel very underwhelmed, I enjoyed the episode, not bothered by who killed the NK, just how it happened, no real effort just a quick stabbing, so after 8 seasons we can look back and say the biggest threat to man kind was just a really good javelin thrower. Just leaves me a bit deflated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,961 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    Ayra was never going to snuff it. Sure isn't she carrying the true heir in her belly?

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Site Banned Posts: 328 ✭✭ogsjw


    Been conditioned? The Iron Throne has always been presented as a relic, and the scrambling for it ill-advised or pathetic, while the real fight gets ignored; it's commentary on the real world really. Hell look at Irish politicians; they achieve very little that needs achieving once they're salaried.

    The throne was shown in ruin all the way back in Season 2, the fact this was the plan all along, for both the books and the show, and a central theme to the story should not be a surprise to anyone...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,231 ✭✭✭podgemonster


    PressRun wrote: »
    Kind of a shame after all that that he didn't even make it south. Would Cersei and friends even believe he ever existed? Didn't Danerys also have a vision of the throne covered in ice? I guess that doesn't really mean anything now?

    :D:D Are you rooting for the undead just to prove a point to Cersei?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,211 ✭✭✭PressRun


    This bit depends ,

    Iv a feeling they mite play Danny as power mad, make her seem happy they have won no matter the cost , If she shows no feelings over the loss of thousands men and the Dothraki Jon may start to doubt her agenda ,

    Remember Jon has show no interest in the Throne, He may not want to send his people into another war so soon ,

    Next episode will set that all up one way or another,
    [/QUOTE]

    Will there be time for this? As far as I can see, the next plot point is taking care of Cersei, and I think the last episodes will focus purely on defeating her. I don't think there is enough time to deal with the Cersei problem and Danerys, unless they do it in a kind of rushed way. Cersei is already doing the Mad Queen routine anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 Lor11


    Forgive me if I'm incorrect here but we have being watching a show has two major plotlines. The Great War between the living and died and the fight for the Iron Throne. I'm my mind the iron throne plot has always being the primary objective of the show. That's my opinion.
    If the night king had survived the battle of Winterfell, Westeros would have being destroyed in a matter of days and the fight for the iron throne would be pointless He always had to die in this battle and I feel that writers did it in a way that no-one predicted (at least from anything I have read in the days leading up to this episode) All the major characters survived because they are still needed. I am not saying the episode was perfect, they were plenty wtf moments. But me thinks they're are some on here being overly negative because it's not what they envisaged or predicted and don't like to give the writers any credit for the master stroke that was Arya.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,110 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    The two supposed leaders (Dany and Jon) were abject and may have spent both their military and leadership capital. Who would march with them now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,464 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    "Plot armour" and "retconning"...do people actually use these terms in real life conversations?! Seems like a good way of making yourself sound like a complete twat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,110 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    "Plot armour" and "retconning"...do people actually use these terms in real life conversations?! Seems like a good way of making yourself sound like a complete twat.

    Never heard such terms in any sphere of life myself


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "Plot armour" and "retconning"...do people actually use these terms in real life conversations?! Seems like a good way of making yourself sound like a complete twat.

    Reported


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭ASOT


    Reported

    He has forum armour he'll be grand


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ASOT wrote: »
    He has forum armour he'll be grand

    You wouldn't be allowed directly call someone here a twat, so why allow it indirectly? The thread is divisive enough as it is anyway, no need for wums


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,408 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    "Plot armour" and "retconning"...do people actually use these terms in real life conversations?! Seems like a good way of making yourself sound like a complete twat.

    Plot armour, fan service, deus ex machina, retconning, Mary Sue etc...

    tenor.gif

    Give me strength.


  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Everyone is a twat but me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭NuMarvel


    "Plot armour" and "retconning"...do people actually use these terms in real life conversations?!

    No, but they might use them in discussions about fiction, which is what we're doing here.

    If we were to restrict our posts to vocabulary used in real life, then we'd never be able to talk about dragons, wights, warging, or even Westeros itself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,545 ✭✭✭tunguska


    I'll admit to not really buying into GOT when a friend loaned me the season 1 box set all those years ago. I thought the scenes went on way too long and the characters talked way too much about stuff that didnt "seem" to matter. But for what ever reasons I stuck with it and watched season 2. Thought it was better than season one, still didnt know what most of the characters were on about half of the time though. After that I thought it got better and better until it got to the point where I'd finish an episode with my jaw on the ground every time. "Hold the door" was the moment I realised that all those waffling scenes in the first season actually meant something(I was just too ignorant at the time to know it).
    And then along comes "The long night".........That was better than 99% of films Ive seen in the cinema this last year. Id even say it was better than Avengers Endgame which I only saw at the weekend. It was perfect, in every way(well maybe the lighting couldve been a tad brighter). Jaw was well and truly dropped.
    The only question Im left with is this: Is the night king really dead? I mean theres a few episodes left, whats gonna happen?


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've talked about "plot armour" in real life about this very show, with a friend who had a similar passion for it.

    Not much wrong with being well into something. It'll never make me sound like a twat, cause I wouldn't use it with many people; Just people into it.

    Like us, here, in the Game of Thrones forum on a discussion website. Twats? Fuk off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    J. Marston wrote: »
    Plot armour, fan service, deus ex machina, retconning, Mary Sue etc...



    Give me strength.

    Get back in yer "Everything is awesome" bubble already :pac:


  • Posts: 7,713 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GOT could probably spend the first half hour next week with the camera taking a time lapse of a bucket of sh1t in a barn somewhere, and you'd have lads on here defending it, saying it was intergral to the plot, and harkening back to a similar bucket of sh1t that appeared briefly in a scene in episode 3..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,408 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    nix wrote: »
    Get back in yer "Everything is awesome" bubble already :pac:

    I never left it! Everything is awesome.

    Except Sam. Sam can piss off at this stage.


Advertisement
Advertisement