Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

1…7980828485…150

Comments

  • #2432
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    I think Fiona O Leary is genuine. She has autism. A lot of her children have autism. Because she doesnt agree with anti vax sh ite and "treating" autism with bleach she has been disgustingly harassed, bullied and threatened by Gemma and Gemmas supporters.

    Gemmas supporters are absolute crazed lunatics.

    Lets face it - Gemmas rhetoric could potentially end up with seeing an Irish incident like Utoya, Christchurch or Batley and Spen.

    People talk about ISIS and Muslim rasicalising. The cold hard truth is that Gemma and her ilk are radicalising people too.
    The people who are targeting Fiona as a result of Gemma's rhetoric have some utterly warped views on autism btw.


  • #2433
    For Forks Sake
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,877 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Fieldog wrote: »
    The Kilkenny journal is written by this mad scone btw :

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/druid-accused-of-disorderly-acts-1.105454

    .

    I wouldn't normally use an phoblacht as a source, but they have a good rundown of his several decades of nonsense;

    https://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/26034


  • #2434
    musiknonstop
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 289 ✭✭musiknonstop


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    You think Fiona O Leary is normal .

    Considerably more normal than the twisted nasty creature that Gemma had become. Has she overcome her fear of unicorns yet?


  • #2435
    Riesen_Meal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,580 ✭✭✭✭Riesen_Meal


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    I wouldn't normally use an phoblacht as a source, but they have a good rundown of his several decades of nonsense;

    https://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/26034

    Excellent,

    I'll allow this one For Forks Sake - sure one of the other posters is trying to use KK journal as gospel so An Phoblacht probably isn't that bad in hindsight...

    This lad is as mad as a box of frog's...


  • #2436
    humberklog
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    Well, Sligo's fukced. Apparently.


    Gemma's had a breeze about the town and doesn't like what she sees. She gave a, not uncharacteristically, long winded shrill rant on a beach about the demise of rural Ireland and Sligo ain't fitting in with her Retro-topian view of how things should be. Far too many Burqas and buildings going on for her liking.

    A marxist globalist cabal is planning on concreting over the Wild Atlantic Way too.

    And Drew Harris is a bollox.


  • Advertisement
  • #2437
    jeremyj1968
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    Gemma is saying today that Emmet Malone's phone was seized by the Gardai. Can't find any mention of this anywhere else?

    (He was the journalist who reported on the evictions in Strokestown).


  • #2438
    For Forks Sake
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,877 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    jeremyj1968 wrote: »
    Gemma is saying today that Emmet Malone's phone was seized by the Gardai. Can't find any mention of this anywhere else?

    (He was the journalist who reported on the evictions in Strokestown).

    Much like our friend in Kilkenny, he's about as much a journalist as I am an astronaut.


  • #2439
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    I think Fiona O Leary is genuine. She has autism. A lot of her children have autism. Because she doesnt agree with anti vax sh ite and "treating" autism with bleach she has been disgustingly harassed, bullied and threatened by Gemma and Gemmas supporters.

    Gemmas supporters are absolute crazed lunatics.

    Lets face it - Gemmas rhetoric could potentially end up with seeing an Irish incident like Utoya, Christchurch or Batley and Spen.

    People talk about ISIS and Muslim rasicalising. The cold hard truth is that Gemma and her ilk are radicalising people too.




    Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

    There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

    We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

    Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

    The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.




  • #2440
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

    There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

    We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

    Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

    The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.



    As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

    If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

    The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

    There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.


  • #2441
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

    If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

    The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

    There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.




    Can you imagine the out cry there would be if a group of "far right" thugs attacked the leader of legitimate political party ? we would rightly never hear the end of it. But when its far left thugs there is a deafening silence from the establishment.


  • Advertisement
  • #2442
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

    If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

    The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

    There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.
    Not sure what you mean by 'low status'... My job is unlikely to be taken off of me any time soon unless I choose to leave so not very worried about what reads like a pretty disturbed rant.

    Anyway, where do you stand on white supremacy? Similarly to Dr Brown?


  • #2443
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

    There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

    We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

    Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

    The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.

    Thats more bullsh it bingo deflection phrases for you to add Bannasidhe

    *But "left wing" fascists
    *But AFA
    *But free speech
    *But left violence
    *But the kilkenny journal
    *But but but Mary Boyle

    Gemma is now beyond defensible and it really is about scrabbling around to find any old sh ite to deflect.

    I mean this kind of deflection wants to deny that Gemma is radicalising people to make death threats against Angela Merkel and Fiona O'Leary, to deny the vast similarities between what Gemma says and the Christchurch manifesto.

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force Dr Brown?
    Why are you ok with Fiona O'Leary being harassed and bullied and threatened Dr Brown?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #2444
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    batgoat wrote: »
    Not sure what you mean by 'low status'... My job is unlikely to be taken off of me any time soon unless I choose to leave so not very worried about what reads like a pretty disturbed rant.

    Anyway, where do you stand on white supremacy? Similarly to Dr Brown?

    People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

    You sell these people the "it's not your fault, its men/heterosexuals/whites/the patriarchy/this evil system" and these people will be unbelievably loyal to you, because its all they have.

    Most people are apolitical and don't give a fùck about politics left/right, unless they're fired from their job. Or can't afford a house.

    The people who are genuinely interested in politics are outliers, for various reasons.

    I think white supremacy is bullshìt and evil. And I think it's easy to refute.

    Whites invented nuclear bombs and destroyed millions of lives by acting like cùnts in the banking sector. Blacks and muslims didn't do that. Whites also were great at killing each other in droves in two big 20th Century wars. Some master race you have there.

    Some groups are better at some things than others. Depends on your metric.


    Mod-Banned


  • #2445
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

    You sell these people the "it's not your fault, its men/heterosexuals/whites/the patriarchy/this evil system" and these people will be unbelievably loyal to you, because its all they have.

    Most people are apolitical and don't give a fùck about politics left/right, unless they're fired from their job. Or can't afford a house.

    The people who are genuinely interested in politics are outliers, for various reasons.

    I think white supremacy is bullshìt and evil. And I think it's easy to refute.

    Whites invented nuclear bombs and destroyed millions of lives by acting like cùnts in the banking sector. Blacks and muslims didn't do that. Whites also were great at killing each other in droves in two big 20th Century wars. Some master race you have there.

    Some groups are better at some things than others. Depends on your metric.

    Okay, so your views are effectively that of Nazi Germany based on your low status definition. Thanks for clearing that up.


  • #2446
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Thats more bullsh it bingo deflection phrases for you to add Bannasidhe

    *But "left wing" fascists
    *But AFA
    *But free speech
    *But left violence
    *But the kilkenny journal
    *But but but Mary Boyle

    Gemma is now beyond defensible and it really is about scrabbling around to find any old sh ite to deflect.

    I mean this kind of deflection wants to deny that Gemma is radicalising people to make death threats against Angela Merkel and Fiona O'Leary, to deny the vast similarities between what Gemma says and the Christchurch manifesto.

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force Dr Brown?
    Why are you ok with Fiona O'Leary being harassed and bullied and threatened Dr Brown?




    I don't know how you can say Gemma is "far right" when she has defended the "rights" of asylum seekers.


    I don't agree with anyone being harassed or bullied including Gemma.


    Do you condemn the attack on the leader of Identity Ireland or was that ok because he was "far right" ?


  • #2447
    pjohnson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,327 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

    Well this thread just keeps giving :pac:


  • #2448
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    I don't know how you can say Gemma is "far right" when she has defended the "rights" of asylum seekers.


    I don't agree with anyone being harassed or bullied including Gemma.


    Do you condemn the attack on the leader of Identity Ireland or was that ok because he was "far right" ?

    Yes of course

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #2449
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Yes of course

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?




    I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.


  • #2450
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Well this thread just keeps giving :pac:

    I'm beginning to think some were dropped to many times when still babies, either that or its a case of daddy didn't love me and mammy didn't breast feed me.


  • #2451
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • #2452
    pjohnson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,327 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

    Rambling about supermosques and #goodbyeIreland doesnt seem very supportive?

    Or a you stuck in a timewarp again?


  • #2453
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

    Doubt he'd admit that he himself is far right...


  • #2454
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?


    Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


    That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.


  • #2455
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


    That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

    Why are you trying to deny that Gemma O'Doherty is a far right radicalising force?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #2456
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


    That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

    Ah so not as racist as yourself so not good enough to be included as far as your concerned gotcha clear now cheers


  • #2457
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


    That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

    She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..


  • #2458
    Dr Brown
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    batgoat wrote: »
    She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..




    She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.


  • #2459
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.

    Why do you try to deny she is a far right radicalising force? Why do you defend her all the time? Why do you try to minimise everything far right that she says?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #2460
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Dr Brown wrote: »

    There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)
    batgoat wrote: »
    Doubt he'd admit that he himself is far right...

    Oh, I dunno.

    I thought that was a very telling statement.

    According to the Dr those seen as 'far right' are actually the normal people.

    Drawing the line of normality that far right is certainly an indication of where his political beliefs lie.

    That and his constant use of the oxymoron lefty fascists. He understands 'fascists' are bad m'kay but the right aren't bad because they are just Mr Normal Concerned Citizen and absolutely not fascists even though fascists are by definition on the right not the left but but but National Socialism so they were really LEFTIES! .... or something.... free speech.


  • Advertisement
  • #2461
    Odhinn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Dr Brown wrote: »
    Can you imagine the out cry there would be if a group of "far right" thugs attacked the leader of legitimate political party ? we would rightly never hear the end of it. But when its far left thugs there is a deafening silence from the establishment.




    The "national party" are not registered as a political party, fyi.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement