When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I think Fiona O Leary is genuine. She has autism. A lot of her children have autism. Because she doesnt agree with anti vax sh ite and "treating" autism with bleach she has been disgustingly harassed, bullied and threatened by Gemma and Gemmas supporters.

Gemmas supporters are absolute crazed lunatics.

Lets face it - Gemmas rhetoric could potentially end up with seeing an Irish incident like Utoya, Christchurch or Batley and Spen.

People talk about ISIS and Muslim rasicalising. The cold hard truth is that Gemma and her ilk are radicalising people too.

The people who are targeting Fiona as a result of Gemma's rhetoric have some utterly warped views on autism btw.

For Forks Sake

Fieldog wrote: »

The Kilkenny journal is written by this mad scone btw :

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/druid-accused-of-disorderly-acts-1.105454

.

I wouldn't normally use an phoblacht as a source, but they have a good rundown of his several decades of nonsense;

https://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/26034

musiknonstop

rgossip30 wrote: »

You think Fiona O Leary is normal .

Considerably more normal than the twisted nasty creature that Gemma had become. Has she overcome her fear of unicorns yet?

[Deleted User]

For Forks Sake wrote: »

I wouldn't normally use an phoblacht as a source, but they have a good rundown of his several decades of nonsense;

https://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/26034

Excellent,

I'll allow this one For Forks Sake - sure one of the other posters is trying to use KK journal as gospel so An Phoblacht probably isn't that bad in hindsight...

This lad is as mad as a box of frog's...

humberklog

Well, Sligo's fukced. Apparently.

Gemma's had a breeze about the town and doesn't like what she sees. She gave a, not uncharacteristically, long winded shrill rant on a beach about the demise of rural Ireland and Sligo ain't fitting in with her Retro-topian view of how things should be. Far too many Burqas and buildings going on for her liking.

A marxist globalist cabal is planning on concreting over the Wild Atlantic Way too.

And Drew Harris is a bollox.

jeremyj1968

Gemma is saying today that Emmet Malone's phone was seized by the Gardai. Can't find any mention of this anywhere else?

(He was the journalist who reported on the evictions in Strokestown).

For Forks Sake

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

Gemma is saying today that Emmet Malone's phone was seized by the Gardai. Can't find any mention of this anywhere else?

(He was the journalist who reported on the evictions in Strokestown).

Much like our friend in Kilkenny, he's about as much a journalist as I am an astronaut.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I think Fiona O Leary is genuine. She has autism. A lot of her children have autism. Because she doesnt agree with anti vax sh ite and "treating" autism with bleach she has been disgustingly harassed, bullied and threatened by Gemma and Gemmas supporters.

Gemmas supporters are absolute crazed lunatics.

Lets face it - Gemmas rhetoric could potentially end up with seeing an Irish incident like Utoya, Christchurch or Batley and Spen.

People talk about ISIS and Muslim rasicalising. The cold hard truth is that Gemma and her ilk are radicalising people too.

Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.

pumpkin4life

Dr Brown wrote: »

Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.

As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.

pumpkin4life wrote: »

As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.

Can you imagine the out cry there would be if a group of "far right" thugs attacked the leader of legitimate political party ? we would rightly never hear the end of it. But when its far left thugs there is a deafening silence from the establishment.

pumpkin4life wrote: »

As I said before, the left (fanatic left, not normal lad, low information left) is made up of low status people who have been given an artificially high level of status, as a result of living in a progressive, liberal society.

If there is a right wing insurgence in a country, then these low status people will lose their money, their jobs and their social standing. They will do anything to hold on to this, and this includes violence, clamping down on freedom of speech, etc.

The Irish Times will be promoting clamping down on freedom of speech and censoring the internet, if they haven't done so already, in the near future.

There are more low status people on the left willing to go nuts than right. So the violence will come from that side more.

Not sure what you mean by 'low status'... My job is unlikely to be taken off of me any time soon unless I choose to leave so not very worried about what reads like a pretty disturbed rant.

Anyway, where do you stand on white supremacy? Similarly to Dr Brown?

Dr Brown wrote: »

Nonsense Gemma's followers are not going around getting legitimate public meetings shut down.

There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

We have already seen AFA far left thugs here beat up the leader of legitimate political party.

Yet there wasn't a whiff of condemnation from the left when this appalling attack happened.

The Gardas need to watch these people they pose a clear and present danger to democracy and will end up killing someone if they are not stopped.

Thats more bullsh it bingo deflection phrases for you to add Bannasidhe

*But "left wing" fascists
*But AFA
*But free speech
*But left violence
*But the kilkenny journal
*But but but Mary Boyle

Gemma is now beyond defensible and it really is about scrabbling around to find any old sh ite to deflect.

I mean this kind of deflection wants to deny that Gemma is radicalising people to make death threats against Angela Merkel and Fiona O'Leary, to deny the vast similarities between what Gemma says and the Christchurch manifesto.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force Dr Brown?
Why are you ok with Fiona O'Leary being harassed and bullied and threatened Dr Brown?

pumpkin4life

batgoat wrote: »

Not sure what you mean by 'low status'... My job is unlikely to be taken off of me any time soon unless I choose to leave so not very worried about what reads like a pretty disturbed rant.

Anyway, where do you stand on white supremacy? Similarly to Dr Brown?

People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

You sell these people the "it's not your fault, its men/heterosexuals/whites/the patriarchy/this evil system" and these people will be unbelievably loyal to you, because its all they have.

Most people are apolitical and don't give a fùck about politics left/right, unless they're fired from their job. Or can't afford a house.

The people who are genuinely interested in politics are outliers, for various reasons.

I think white supremacy is bullshìt and evil. And I think it's easy to refute.

Whites invented nuclear bombs and destroyed millions of lives by acting like cùnts in the banking sector. Blacks and muslims didn't do that. Whites also were great at killing each other in droves in two big 20th Century wars. Some master race you have there.

Some groups are better at some things than others. Depends on your metric.

Mod-Banned

pumpkin4life wrote: »

People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

You sell these people the "it's not your fault, its men/heterosexuals/whites/the patriarchy/this evil system" and these people will be unbelievably loyal to you, because its all they have.

Most people are apolitical and don't give a fùck about politics left/right, unless they're fired from their job. Or can't afford a house.

The people who are genuinely interested in politics are outliers, for various reasons.

I think white supremacy is bullshìt and evil. And I think it's easy to refute.

Whites invented nuclear bombs and destroyed millions of lives by acting like cùnts in the banking sector. Blacks and muslims didn't do that. Whites also were great at killing each other in droves in two big 20th Century wars. Some master race you have there.

Some groups are better at some things than others. Depends on your metric.

Okay, so your views are effectively that of Nazi Germany based on your low status definition. Thanks for clearing that up.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Thats more bullsh it bingo deflection phrases for you to add Bannasidhe

*But "left wing" fascists
*But AFA
*But free speech
*But left violence
*But the kilkenny journal
*But but but Mary Boyle

Gemma is now beyond defensible and it really is about scrabbling around to find any old sh ite to deflect.

I mean this kind of deflection wants to deny that Gemma is radicalising people to make death threats against Angela Merkel and Fiona O'Leary, to deny the vast similarities between what Gemma says and the Christchurch manifesto.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force Dr Brown?
Why are you ok with Fiona O'Leary being harassed and bullied and threatened Dr Brown?

I don't know how you can say Gemma is "far right" when she has defended the "rights" of asylum seekers.

I don't agree with anyone being harassed or bullied including Gemma.

Do you condemn the attack on the leader of Identity Ireland or was that ok because he was "far right" ?

pjohnson

pumpkin4life wrote: »

People who are dumb, unattractive, poor, lack of social skills, homosexuals, minorities in terms of race, highly intelligent autists, mentally ill. Outsiders in general.

Well this thread just keeps giving :pac:

Dr Brown wrote: »

I don't know how you can say Gemma is "far right" when she has defended the "rights" of asylum seekers.

I don't agree with anyone being harassed or bullied including Gemma.

Do you condemn the attack on the leader of Identity Ireland or was that ok because he was "far right" ?

Yes of course

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Yes of course

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

[Deleted User]

pjohnson wrote: »

Well this thread just keeps giving :pac:

I'm beginning to think some were dropped to many times when still babies, either that or its a case of daddy didn't love me and mammy didn't breast feed me.

Dr Brown wrote: »

I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

pjohnson

Dr Brown wrote: »

I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

Rambling about supermosques and #goodbyeIreland doesnt seem very supportive?

Or a you stuck in a timewarp again?

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

Doubt he'd admit that he himself is far right...

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.

That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.

That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma O'Doherty is a far right radicalising force?

[Deleted User]

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.

That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Ah so not as racist as yourself so not good enough to be included as far as your concerned gotcha clear now cheers

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.

That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..

batgoat wrote: »

She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..

She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.