Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Claire Byrne show. Her name was Clodagh

17810121332

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Marengo


    I'm always inclined to take family viewpoints, for example Clodagh's mam and sister saying he hadn't depression and functioned in society, over an 'expert' categorising, who never even met the individual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,255 ✭✭✭The Bishop Basher


    Just watched it.. Jesus.. Hard watching

    Whatever evil happened that night, there’s probably very little anyone could have done to have stopped him..

    But the way the state has treated them both immediately afterward and in the time since is something we can control and yet we’re adding to their misery in such an inhuman way.

    There’s something very wrong with our society that we accept that.

    Fair play to them for having the guts to speak up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,359 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Marengo wrote: »
    I'm always inclined to take family viewpoints, for example Clodagh's mam and sister saying he hadn't depression and functioned in society, over an 'expert' categorising, who never even met the individual.

    Exactly . Or a random poster on boards who diagnoses without any evidence


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Crazy that the family are left asking questions. Disgraceful.

    Something stinks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    Can’t help but feel like Charles Flanagan was just playing word salad right there and saying a lot without actually saying anything it all. “I’ll look into it and see what can be done”, in other words he’ll kick the can down the road long enough to hope we all forget about it and something else comes along and distracts us. I didn’t feel any sincerity or commitment behind his words.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭MintyMagnum


    It was in Windgap in 2008 where a local man murdered a single mother and her 2 children on Christmas eve, her brother has spoken out a lot in the media about the rights of victims families. The difference being the man who murdered his sister and nieces is still alive and his concerns are around concurrent sentencing and parole.[/quote]

    Concurrent sentencing's a joke. If he killed three people he's only doing one third the time for it. Which two victims aren't getting their justice?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    tretorn wrote: »
    He was a teacher though so basically on his own for most of the day with children.

    There are plenty of really strange teachers who wouldnt be able to function in a normal working environment, they are left in the teaching profession until retirement and given a new class every year so their failure to be able to do their job doesnt cause too much of an impact. Its absolutely impossible to get rid of poorly performing teachers too though this does appear to be changing very slowly.

    Teachers are also drawn to the job because of love and devotion to the GAA, lots of time off to devote to the GAA and being a member of this organisation gives you kudos in small towns and the edge when it comes to promotion, ie how many male teachers are there and how many male principals, very few male teachers but lots of male principals.
    A lot of female teachers don't want management roles.
    A lot of male teachers are expected to take on management roles

    would it make it easier for you to accept if he had been a sociopath working in a rugby school and with a rugby background?
    Or a soccer school. Or a basketball school?

    Where is there evidence he was a failing teacher?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭aloneforever99


    Exactly. If it benefited them and they knew they wouldn't get caught they would do it. So how can you blame him for his personality disorder?

    Because he was still a person with choices. He made a conscious decision to stop attending counselling. If he had continued, there is a good chance this could have been avoided. He could have checked himself into a psychiatric unit. Help is available for people having psychotic thoughts.

    Your position seems to be that because of his (probable) mental illness, these murders were inevitable. They weren't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭tretorn


    If they had been given the suicide note the day of the murders they could have avoided the trauma of the exhumation, Hawe himself wrote that he wanted to be cremated and someone who read that note knew that and still let him be buried with his victims. The note should have been given to the intended recipients and maybe if the contents were known it might have prevented the GAA jumper being placed on Hawes coffin, to think anyone would think this gesture was appropriate.

    I don’t agree with Paul Gillian either re people with mental health difficulties not being dangerous, the incidences of parents taking their children’s lives in increasing, some aren’t as savage as Hawe was but in most cases there was underlying mental illness.

    In the recent past we had two children killed by their mothers, we had three young boys killed by older brothers. We had children killed by their father in Cork and the Chads boys murdered by their father. We had a young woman attacked by a fourteen year old in Dunlaoghaire, she almost lost her life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,152 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    It is too late now, the family is gone sadly.

    But I am very puzzled at the fact that relevant information has been witheld from the family. I just do not understand this. The entire family is gone.

    So who is being protected here I wonder?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,293 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    tretorn wrote: »
    If they had been given the suicide note the day of the murders they could have avoided the trauma of the exhumation, Hawe himself wrote that he wanted to be cremated and someone who read that note knew that and still let him be buried with his victims. The note should have been given to the intended recipients and maybe if the contents were known it might have prevented the GAA jumper being placed on Hawes coffin, to think anyone would think this gesture was appropriate.

    I don’t agree with Paul Gillian either re people with mental health difficulties not being dangerous, the incidences of parents taking their children’s lives in increasing, some aren’t as savage as Hawe was but in most cases there was underlying mental illness.

    In the recent past we had two children killed by their mothers, we had three young boys killed by older brothers. We had children killed by their father in Cork and the Chads boys murdered by their father. We had a young woman attacked by a fourteen year old in Dunlaoghaire, she almost lost her life.

    A suicide note has to be treated as evedience tough. Encase there was another issue involved
    It depends on where you draw the line with mental health issues.
    Do you think that family should be involved in all case when somebody presents themselves to a GP?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    tretorn wrote: »
    If they had been given the suicide note the day of the murders they could have avoided the trauma of the exhumation, Hawe himself wrote that he wanted to be cremated and someone who read that note knew that and still let him be buried with his victims. The note should have been given to the intended recipients and maybe if the contents were known it might have prevented the GAA jumper being placed on Hawes coffin, to think anyone would think this gesture was appropriate.

    I don’t agree with Paul Gillian either re people with mental health difficulties not being dangerous, the incidences of parents taking their children’s lives in increasing, some aren’t as savage as Hawe was but in most cases there was underlying mental illness.

    In the recent past we had two children killed by their mothers, we had three young boys killed by older brothers. We had children killed by their father in Cork and the Chads boys murdered by their father. We had a young woman attacked by a fourteen year old in Dunlaoghaire, she almost lost her life.

    Dangerous line of thought to be taking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    In a way I think the mum and sister have been too polite. Like if my daughter/sister and not one but three grandchildren/nephews were murdered by a teacher in a school (leaving aside the son in law situation) and some issue at school was likely part of the story if not the pivotal factor, I think I'd be down to the school to speak to the principal about what exactly happened. Parents are in to schools every day about far less matters. I don't know how they have restrained themselves from not turning up on the doorstep. Course by rights it should be the school contacting them but failing that get down to them and ask them what's the story. It's ridiculous that they are not fully in the know.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The difference being the man who murdered his sister and nieces is still alive and his concerns are around concurrent sentencing and parole.
    concurrent sentencing's a joke. If he killed three people he's only doing one third the time for it. Which two victims aren't getting their justice?
    Concurrent sentencing for murder is a bit academic, isn't it?

    Murder means life in prison. It doesn't matter how many life sentences he gets, one or two or three, he'll still be eligible for temporary, conditional release after perhaps 12 - 15 years, maybe later.

    The Minister can leave him in there forever, if he likes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,152 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Mrsmum wrote: »
    In a way I think the mum and sister have been too polite. Like if my daughter/sister and not one but three grandchildren/nephews were murdered by a teacher in a school (leaving aside the son in law situation) and some issue at school was likely part of the story if not the pivotal factor, I think I'd be down to the school to speak to the principal about what exactly happened. Parents are in to schools every day about far less matters. I don't know how they have restrained themselves from not turning up on the doorstep. Course by rights it should be the school contacting them but failing that get down to them and ask them what's the story. It's ridiculous that they are not fully in the know.

    Yes it is odd. But I have no way of saying what the surviving family's thinking on confrontation is either.

    Very very sad anyway no matter what.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭tretorn


    Calhoun wrote: »
    Dangerous line of thought to be taking.

    Why do you think it’s a dangerous line of thought.

    How are we ever to know the background to these family animation tragedies if we don’t examine each one individually.

    You are more likely to harm your loved ones and strangers if you suffer from paranoid delusions for example, pretending otherwise is not helpful.

    The Central Mental Hospital is fully occupied at the moment and many in mates there should never be released.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Marengo


    Can’t help but feel like Charles Flanagan was just playing word salad right there and saying a lot without actually saying anything it all. “I’ll look into it and see what can be done”, in other words he’ll kick the can down the road long enough to hope we all forget about it and something else comes along and distracts us. I didn’t feel any sincerity or commitment behind his words.

    He's pure useless all his career.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    tretorn wrote: »
    Why do you think it’s a dangerous line of thought.

    How are we ever to know the background to these family animation tragedies if we don’t examine each one individually.

    You are more likely to harm your loved ones and strangers if you suffer from paranoid delusions for example, pretending otherwise is not helpful.

    The Central Mental Hospital is fully occupied at the moment and many in mates there should never be released.

    Well generally the consensus of late and you can see it in this thread is that people with mental disabilities should be treated as equals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    Yes it is odd. But I have no way of saying what the surviving family's thinking on confrontation is either.

    Very very sad anyway no matter what.


    True and just to say I didn't mean it in any way as a criticism of those two lovely grieving people. It's just I can't understand it really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,152 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Marengo wrote: »
    He's pure useless all his career.

    Ah well, I bet he is glad he is not Minister for Foreign Affairs anymore. With Brexit I mean.

    Over to Coveney and all that.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Marengo


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    Exactly . Or a random poster on boards who diagnoses without any evidence

    A lot of people were entitled to post their opinions on boards today, given the real evidence of last night's interview. The bridesmaid's dress buying incident, his constant presence without saying anything etc.

    Sure random boards posters have plenty of evidence from Clodagh's family and are free to comment without little digs 6 hours after their last post on the subject.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭tretorn


    It’s just nonsense to say that someone with schizophrenia or someone suffering a psychosis is as safe to be around as someone who has good mental health.

    This isn’t discriminating against people with mental illness, it means that professionals dealing with people with mental illness must be aware that they could pose a threat to others.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tretorn wrote: »
    It’s just nonsense to say that someone with schizophrenia or someone suffering a psychosis is as safe to be around as someone who has good mental health.
    On the other hand, people with psychosis are far more likely to be the victims of crime than the perpetrators.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭aloneforever99


    tretorn wrote: »
    It’s just nonsense to say that someone with schizophrenia or someone suffering a psychosis is as safe to be around as someone who has good mental health.

    This isn’t discriminating against people with mental illness, it means that professionals dealing with people with mental illness must be aware that they could pose a threat to others.

    Have you ever been around someone having a psychotic break? There are symptoms. It would be very difficult - I'd say almost impossible - to be in a psychotic state for several weeks, go on a family holiday, visit the in-laws etc and for no one to notice.

    It seems unlikely to me that this was the case here.

    His counsellor also apparently didn't pick up any red flags.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,152 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    The saddest thing is, that the four murders and the suicide would have faded off the radar if Clodagh's sister and mother had not been interviewed last night.

    Was there any comment from the murderer's family at all, anything or nothing? Those murdered were their relatives, daughter in law and nephews too.

    I suppose in fairness his family are not responsible for his actions. So I will leave it there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭tretorn


    I’m not posting specifically in relation to Hawe.

    I am saying mental illness could result in some people becoming dangerous and delusional so I don’t agree a person with good mental health is as likely to kill as someone with a deep rooted mental illness.

    The numbers of very young children being killed by parents is rising and in many of these cases the parent is mentally unwell.

    He may have gone to the counsellor and gave limited information. The family don’t know did he go to the counsellor after the incident in the school or was he caught viewing porn in the days leading up to the school opening. The Coll’s said he never brought the school laptop home so if he was addicted to porn he must have been on it a lot in school time, maybe his heavy use of porn became impossible to hide and how would he pay for it anyway, surely at some point he would have to use his credit card to pay for it.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The saddest thing is, that the four murders and the suicide would have faded off the radar if Clodagh's sister and mother had not been interviewed last night.

    Was there any comment from the murderer's family at all, anything or nothing? Those murdered were their relatives, daughter in law and nephews too.

    I suppose in fairness his family are not responsible for his actions. So I will leave it there.
    On a related note - and I'm sure it's not relevant here, because nobody should be disparaging the Hawe family - but it's ridiculous that, as the last surviving family member, the family's property and assets is now, presumably, the legal property of the Hawe family.

    I'm sure nobody wants the house, and it's not relevant to this case, but we rapidly need to change our legislation so that murderers cannot extend a benefit to themselves, or similar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    Can anyone tell me did the children attend the same school as the father or not ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,152 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    On a related note - and I'm sure it's not relevant here, because nobody should be disparaging the Hawe family - but it's ridiculous that, as the last surviving family member, the family's property and assets is now, presumably, the legal property of the Hawe family.

    I'm sure nobody wants the house, and it's not relevant to this case, but we rapidly need to change our legislation so that murderers cannot extend a benefit to themselves, or similar.

    Too late for me to figure this out, but I reckon you might have a good point there. So let us say that the house was held in joint names. Clodagh is murdered by the other joint holder, meaning he now has sole ownership. He dies and the house and maybe other assets can be distributed to his next of kin (if no will).

    Is that the way you are thinking?

    I apologise if my post appears insensitive, but it is worth exploring I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Too late for me to figure this out, but I reckon you might have a good point there. So let us say that the house was held in joint names. Clodagh is murdered by the other joint holder, meaning he now has sole ownership. He dies and the house and maybe other assets can be distributed to his next of kin (if no will).

    Is that the way you are thinking?

    I apologise if my post appears insensitive, but it is worth exploring I think.

    No you have it exactly right.

    After Clodagh Hawe died, her assets passed in law to Alan Hawe, and since he was the last person alive, I'm pretty sure no will can even supersede the statutory provisions. So everything should pass to his next of kin.

    He and his wife probably had a provision in their will that the kids should receive the assets but that's moot.


Advertisement