Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

6n 2019 Ireland v England Build Up Thread

2456717

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    I think if Joe was worried about SOB being undercooked he'd have sent him out against the Scarlets along with McGrath and Kearney.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,201 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Predicted sides.
    3 headline grabbers. But in reality I don’t think these 3 players can play v Eng.
    Rob - Not match sharp. Or even close.
    SO’B - Old SO’B rules don’t apply any longer. Bench v Scot.
    Henshaw - Aki has been exceptional

    Addison; Earls, Ringrose, Aki, Stockdale; Sexton, Murray; Healy, Best, Furlong, Toner, Ryan, POM, VdF, CJ.
    Rep: Cronin, McGrath, Porter, Dillane, Murphy, Carbery, Cooney, Larmour.

    Daly; Cokanasiga, Slade, Tuilagi, May; Farrell, Youngs; Mako V, George, Sinckler, Itoje, Kruis, Shields/Wilson, Curry/Wilson, Billy V.
    Rep: Luke CD, Moon, Williams, Launchbury, Hughes, Robson, Ford, Ashton.

    Btw: long term weather forecast is for cold dry day and gentle breeze.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    molloyjh wrote: »
    I think either Henshaw starts or he doesn’t feature at all. He doesn’t offer the coverage across the back line that Addison and Larmour do. He hasn’t played anywhere other than centre in any meaningful way in years. Same with Aki.

    Henshaw is an excellent fullback. When he broke into the Connacht team there I was amazed how well he reads the game and how good his positioning was - especially for a guy just out of school. He doesn't have electric pace, but neither does Kearney - both read the game well enough to be in the right place when needed. It's been a while alright, but he has more experience there than Larmour or Addison, I'd have no qualms with him on the bench. If Kearney is dropped for either of those, Henshaw on the bench is a no-brainer, as he covers 12/13/15 and the starting 15 can move out and cover wing if a wing has to come off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 590 ✭✭✭baas baa


    He won't get through 6 months of rugby.

    He wasn't close to "dreadful" in his last 6 Nations. That's a ridiculous overstatement.

    The away match against Wales was easily his worst performance I can recall. He earned his place at being one of the undroppables but his performances had slipped massively, we were trying to play a more expansive game but his handling was a real issue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Zzippy wrote: »
    Henshaw is an excellent fullback. When he broke into the Connacht team there I was amazed how well he reads the game and how good his positioning was - especially for a guy just out of school. He doesn't have electric pace, but neither does Kearney - both read the game well enough to be in the right place when needed. It's been a while alright, but he has more experience there than Larmour or Addison, I'd have no qualms with him on the bench. If Kearney is dropped for either of those, Henshaw on the bench is a no-brainer, as he covers 12/13/15 and the starting 15 can move out and cover wing if a wing has to come off.

    Yes.
    More than his running, passing, kicking, or tackling, skills or speed, for me, Henshaw's strongest attribute that makes him the player he is, is his reading of the game.

    His peripheral vision, reading of his team mates intentions, positioning in attack and defence, and running lines, are terrific and stand to him in whatever position he is playing. Joe has never really been in the position with him of having ample centre options, and no fb options, to make it worth while playing him there. So it remains. Without some time at 15 he is unlikely to be a bench option.

    Full back is the most exposed position in this respect of getting reads wrong and be left looking silly. Its what makes Bobster a world class fb too even though the criticisms of his limitations in his counterattacking running are valid. Henshaw, did indeed seem to be a born 15 as you say, and at that time, I saw his future clearly as a fb, so natural did he seem to take to it.

    I think Ireland just needs him more in the centre these days, where even Kearney-less we have a variety of viable options for the one shirt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    My fantasy selection:

    Healy-Cronin-Furlong
    Ryan-Toner
    O’Mahony-Stander-Van der Flier
    Murray-Sexton
    Stockdale-Aki-Ringrose-Earls
    Larmour

    Scannell-Kilcoyne-Ryan-Dillane-Murphy-Cooney-Carbery-Addison

    Best, O’Brien, Henshaw, Kearney, McGrath, Porter, Roux, are all likely to play a part instead of my fantasy selection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    Y

    I think Ireland just needs him more in the centre these days, where even Kearney-less we have a variety of viable options for the one shirt.

    If Aki gets the nod at 12 and Larmour/Addison/Conway/Earls get the 15 shirt Henshaw is still a great bench option to cover both. He covers both better than any of the above.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Zzippy wrote: »
    If Aki gets the nod at 12 and Larmour/Addison/Conway/Earls get the 15 shirt Henshaw is still a great bench option to cover both. He covers both better than any of the above.

    I'm not really disagreeing. It just doesnt seem to be a Joe thing though.
    There is no way Earls is in the 15 thinking anymore btw.

    And a missing Rob would cement Henshaw starting. He will only not start if Rob is starting, or they are both injured.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've heard Henshaw has been training at 15


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    SOB off the bench just makes too much sense. He's clearly not entirely match fit. If you start him, then VdF probably drops out of the 23. Then you'll have Nordi on the bench.

    If Stander or POM go down in the first five minutes, do we really think SOB would be able to go the full 80 in what's bound to be a physical onslaught?

    No way. Bring him on as the most depressing impact sub any team could ever face.

    Aki starts over Henshaw. He's the incumbent and he's done nothing to lose the 12 jersey. Henshaw has to earn it back and I think it's a good signal to the rest of the team that you won't be dropped if you're playing well.

    There's an argument for an Aki/Henshaw midfield and Ringrose at 23.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,683 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    There's no argument for a centre pairing without Ringrose imo. He's the best 13 we have by miles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Clegg wrote: »
    There's no argument for a centre pairing without Ringrose imo. He's the best 13 we have by miles.

    He's the best 13, I agree.

    But horses for courses could come into play. Tuilagi has about 20kg on Ringrose.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    troyzer wrote: »
    He's the best 13, I agree.

    But horses for courses could come into play. Tuilagi has about 20kg on Ringrose.

    And Ringrose is a better player by a country mile. Size is not an issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Ringrose has incredible tackle technique and decision making for what to do when faced with a bigger man. I would have farmore worries about Aki and Henshaw defensively on the outside than with Ringrose. His defence is outstanding.

    He is also more capable than any other centre we have of making something out of nothing with either a run or a kick. He has quietly become a world class operator and should be close to first name on the teamsheet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    AdamD wrote: »
    And Ringrose is a better player by a country mile. Size is not an issue.

    It is if Tuilagi runs at Ringrose in a straight line repeatedly off first phase.

    He's a magnificent player but for some context, Tuilagi is exactly the same listed height and weight of Cian Healy.

    You can't realistically expect Ringrose to play 80 minutes without giving up a few line breaks in such an uneven physical match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    troyzer wrote: »
    It is if Tuilagi runs at Ringrose in a straight line repeatedly off first phase.

    He's a magnificent player but for some context, Tuilagi is exactly the same listed height and weight of Cian Healy.

    You can't realistically expect Ringrose to play 80 minutes without giving up a few line breaks in such an uneven physical match.

    Just to head off any accusations of trolling or favouritism, I only said the below thing a few weeks ago in the Leinster thread:
    troyzer wrote: »
    At what point can we realistically start talking about Ringrose as a superior player to BOD?

    He's already a better defender. He doesn't produce the highlight reel trickplays but he's still an elite running threat.

    I adore Ringrose. I just don't think he matches up well against an outside centre who is so much larger than him.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    troyzer wrote: »
    It is if Tuilagi runs at Ringrose in a straight line repeatedly off first phase.

    He's a magnificent player but for some context, Tuilagi is exactly the same listed height and weight of Cian Healy.

    You can't realistically expect Ringrose to play 80 minutes without giving up a few line breaks in such an uneven physical match.

    If England's tactics consist of repeatedly running in a straight line we'll have no worries come the end of the game.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    troyzer wrote: »
    It is if Tuilagi runs at Ringrose in a straight line repeatedly off first phase.

    Sounds ludicrously easy to defend to be honest.

    I think Ringrose is the first choice of all the centres, the only question is who partners him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,006 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    troyzer wrote: »
    There's an argument for an Aki/Henshaw midfield and Ringrose at 23.

    No there isn't!

    Ringrose is one of the first names on the teamsheet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    AdamD wrote: »
    If England's tactics consist of repeatedly running in a straight line we'll have no worries come the end of the game.
    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Sounds ludicrously easy to defend to be honest.

    I think Ringrose is the first choice of all the centres, the only question is who partners him.

    I hope you're both right.

    If it were up to me, I'd start him but have Henshaw wearing the 23 jersey just in case.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,006 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Tuilagi didn't exactly run over the top of Addison the other week and he isn't as good a defender as Ringrose


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,508 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    I've heard Henshaw has been training at 15

    Joe has said he wanted to see him there against the likes of Fiji, but injure stopped that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Wegians89 wrote: »
    Joe has said he wanted to see him there against the likes of Fiji, but injure stopped that

    I think he would be class there with a season under his belt. Like a bigger Rob Kearney and probably more resolute in the tackle. But he has to start at 12 for Leinster so it ends those plans. Bobby K passing the fullback mantle to Bobby H would be class


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,683 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Henshaw hasn't had a run of games at fullback in years. I think he got maybe 20 minutes there for Leisnter after an injury caused a backline reshuffle midgame. He looked decent, but that's not enough to throw him straight in for Ireland. It's not going to happen any time soon. He's a brilliant inside centre. That's his position now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    Clegg wrote: »
    Henshaw hasn't had a run of games at fullback in years. I think he got maybe 20 minutes there for Leisnter after an injury caused a backline reshuffle midgame. He looked decent, but that's not enough to throw him straight in for Ireland. It's not going to happen any time soon. He's a brilliant inside centre. That's his position now.

    He's a big, hard running, direct inside centre. His distribution is ok. His defence is brilliant. His kicking is decent but under-utilised. He doesn't make a lot of line breaks as he's not an elusive type of runner. 12 is his position now, but it's not his best position, nor would I consider him a brilliant centre. He's perfect for Leinster and Joe's gameplan, but if he was playing in NZ he would be playing 15 IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    I've heard Henshaw has been training at 15

    Was that just for when Eddie Jones had his drone flying overhead


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭troyzer


    TOH for fullback?

    UnsungFirsthandGoldenmantledgroundsquirrel-small.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,508 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    troyzer wrote: »
    TOH for fullback?

    UnsungFirsthandGoldenmantledgroundsquirrel-small.gif

    Wouldn’t start him there for Connacht atm never mind Ireland


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wegians89 wrote: »
    Wouldn’t start him there for Connacht atm never mind Ireland

    Sooooo Leader for fullback!! ;)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement