Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Strokestown **Mod Note in Post #4461**

1757678808190

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 796 ✭✭✭Sycamore Tree


    gandalf wrote: »
    What I laugh about is how people have to be labelled right wing or left wing when they comment on a thread like this or on any social issue. Personally I have certain ideas and values that would be socialist in nature and at the same time I'd have other values that would be conservative. It's a very lazy mind that tries to classify people into neat little pigeon holes. It's too black and white for me.

    In this case it is very clear that the individual in question didn't bother his ass to pay back what he owed. His behaviour should be offensive to left leaning and right leaning people equally.

    Commie!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,294 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Seeing what happened with the security would instantly make me take the side of the defaulter but in reality how do you deal with this situation? Eviction is the only way I guess,?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,044 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Seeing what happened with the security would instantly make me take the side of the defaulter but in reality how do you deal with this situation? Eviction is the only way I guess,?

    Why would it make you take the side of the defaulter?

    people not paying for over 10 years rolling around on the ground looking for notice.

    They are taking ppl for Fools. Not sure why anyone with a bit of cop on would feel sorry for them in any way.

    There's ppl who fall on hard times a d then there's complete piss takers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,945 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Quite a reasonable assessment about the whole "To what extent does the difficulty in evicting people lead to higher mortgage interest rates" here:

    Is Ireland’s low rate of repossession the reason mortgage rates are so high?




    Personally, I'd be inclined to think it's very unfair to people who must go out and work for their mortgage if somebody can stay somewhere and simply not pay for it. This is particularly so when the person in question has a record of tax evasion. There are far, far too many of these parasitic buckos in Irish society. In this case justice is actually served by removing the person in question from what is, in fact, somebody else's property. On the other hand, there's a definite, unmistakable rightwing whiff of the spirit of landlordism and land agents off some of the people in this thread who are saying something similar so I'm conflicted.


    Interesting.

    If banks were behaving rationally, they might start to offer lower mortgage rates to investors with some capital equity than to new home buyers, as the ability to repay, the protection against falls in value and the ability to repossess in case of default would be better in the case of the investors, making them lesser risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭BBFAN


    anewme wrote: »
    Why would it make you take the side of the defaulter?

    people not paying for over 10 years rolling around on the ground looking for notice.

    They are taking ppl for Fools. Not sure why anyone with a bit of cop on would feel sorry for them in any way.

    There's ppl who fall on hard times a d then there's complete piss takers.

    Yes but not everyone who seen that video for the first time knew anything of this mans history so it does make sense to feel sorry for him if you didn't know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    BBFAN wrote: »
    Yes but not everyone who seen that video for the first time knew anything of this mans history so it does make sense to feel sorry for him if you didn't know.
    If you have no cop onto realise theres more to this story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,349 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    YOUR HOME IS AT RISK IF YOU DO NOT KEEP UP PAYMENTS ON A MORTGAGE OR ANY LOAN SECURED ON IT.

    This is the fundamental component of a mortgage and the main warning on mortgage documents. It has very little meaning in Ireland though where non payers are cheered on by irresponsible politicians and bleeding hearts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    YOUR HOME IS AT RISK IF YOU DO NOT KEEP UP PAYMENTS ON A MORTGAGE OR ANY LOAN SECURED ON IT.

    This is the fundamental component of a mortgage and the main warning on mortgage documents. It has very little meaning in Ireland though where non payers are cheered on by irresponsible politicians and bleeding hearts.

    YeAh BuT iTs ChRiStMaS!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,047 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    anewme wrote: »
    Why would it make you take the side of the defaulter?

    people not paying for over 10 years rolling around on the ground looking for notice.

    They are taking ppl for Fools. Not sure why anyone with a bit of cop on would feel sorry for them in any way.

    There's ppl who fall on hard times a d then there's complete piss takers.


    which is the mcgann in that video?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,294 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    anewme wrote: »
    Why would it make you take the side of the defaulter?

    people not paying for over 10 years rolling around on the ground looking for notice.

    They are taking ppl for Fools. Not sure why anyone with a bit of cop on would feel sorry for them in any way.

    There's ppl who fall on hard times a d then there's complete piss takers.
    I would never side with ex terrorist scum. There was a vat issue there too, the man could have quite legally been jailed for that and then the house could have taken easily.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 255 ✭✭PuppyMcPupFace


    I would never side with ex terrorist scum. There was a vat issue there too, the man could have quite legally been jailed for that and then the house could have taken easily.

    Yeah because the numbnuts protesting wouldn't have caused ructions outside the court and then the jail would they ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,294 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Yeah because the numbnuts protesting wouldn't have caused ructions outside the court and then the jail would they ???

    Shouldn't think so, for vat fraud?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 255 ✭✭PuppyMcPupFace


    Shouldn't think so, for vat fraud?

    One FB post from the morons in the AAA crowd about the falsely accused and yeah - there would be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,294 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    One FB post from the morons in the AAA crowd about the falsely accused and yeah - there would be.

    People get jailed everyday for vat can't see any issue there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭blueythebear


    People get jailed everyday for vat can't see any issue there


    The tax issue was resolved via a settlement as I understand it back in 2015. Plus, jailing the man for revenue issues is not something that the Bank has any control over nor any knowledge of so I don't see why the Bank should have to wait several years for the Revenue to prosecute, not knowing anything about the case that might be against the borrower.

    The Bank would have no insight even if the man was pending prosecution by revenue, as to the nature of the alleged crime and whether Mr McGann might have been jailed over the issue. The Bank cannot wait for the man to be possibly jailed over some revenue issue that they have no knowledge about.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The tax issue was resolved via a settlement as I understand it back in 2015. Plus, jailing the man for revenue issues is not something that the Bank has any control over nor any knowledge of so I don't see why the Bank should have to wait several years for the Revenue to prosecute, not knowing anything about the case that might be against the borrower.

    The Bank would have no insight even if the man was pending prosecution by revenue, as to the nature of the alleged crime and whether Mr McGann might have been jailed over the issue. The Bank cannot wait for the man to be possibly jailed over some revenue issue that they have no knowledge about.

    I thought that the VAT was still outstanding?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭blueythebear


    I thought that the VAT was still outstanding?

    Irish Times indicated that a settlement was entered into in 2015:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/roscommon-eviction-farmer-has-unpaid-debts-going-back-years-1.3734439


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 255 ✭✭PuppyMcPupFace



    That assumes he paid anything- he's entered into a fair few agreements the sponging wastee hsd zero intention of paying.

    No wonder the skanger class hail him as a hero.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    anewme wrote: »
    Anna Kavanagh, who gave publicity to the whole shambles, has disappeared off Facebook and all her videos gone. Anyone know why?

    Because she was brain-lamingly crap?

    Of all the attributes of a live-media journalist (as opposed to the print variety): fluency, articulacy, familiarity with subject matter, objectivity, insight, she had proficiency in.....well, none of them, to be honest.

    There is a Facebook page called "Where is Anna Kavanagh?" but it doesn't seem to be visited much. Just saying......;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Because she was brain-lamingly crap?

    Of all the attributes of a live-media journalist (as opposed to the print variety): fluency, articulacy, familiarity with subject matter, objectivity, insight, she had proficiency in.....well, none of them, to be honest.

    There is a Facebook page called "Where is Anna Kavanagh?" but it doesn't seem to be visited much. Just saying......;)

    No, everyone knows that Leo Varadkardashian had a face to face meeting with Zuck and told him to stop people from being able to view that page or he could no longer employ thousands of people in Ireland.

    Wake up sheeple!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭razor8



    Settlement agreed but never paid


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    razor8 wrote: »
    Settlement agreed but never paid

    That was my understanding too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,636 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Omackeral wrote: »
    YeAh BuT iTs ChRiStMaS!

    Could be Pancake Day for all I care about this defaulter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Because she was brain-lamingly crap?

    Of all the attributes of a live-media journalist (as opposed to the print variety): fluency, articulacy, familiarity with subject matter, objectivity, insight, she had proficiency in.....well, none of them, to be honest.

    There is a Facebook page called "Where is Anna Kavanagh?" but it doesn't seem to be visited much. Just saying......;)

    Her twitter and youtube pages were crazy. The woman is unhinged.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭blueythebear


    razor8 wrote: »
    Settlement agreed but never paid

    The media have said that he entered into a settlement in 2015 but there is no indication of whether he stuck to that agreement or not. Given his history, you would be forgiven for thinking he may have not stuck to the letter of that agreement!

    But, then Revenue would likely have moved against him again and there does not seem to be any evidence of this, in terms of a conviction or further proceedings. I presume that the Times or the Indo would have been able to dig this up if it existed.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Grayson wrote: »
    Her twitter and youtube pages were crazy. The woman is unhinged.

    I reckon that her family intervened and put a stop to her ramblings for her own safety.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    The media have said that he entered into a settlement in 2015 but there is no indication of whether he stuck to that agreement or not. Given his history, you would be forgiven for thinking he may have not stuck to the letter of that agreement!

    But, then Revenue would likely have moved against him again and there does not seem to be any evidence of this, in terms of a conviction or further proceedings. I presume that the Times or the Indo would have been able to dig this up if it existed.

    If they were aware of KBC's action against him they'd have waited in the wings for the repossession and sale as they would have first dibs on any cash raised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭blueythebear


    gandalf wrote: »
    If they were aware of KBC's action against him they'd have waited in the wings for the repossession and sale as they would have first dibs on any cash raised.

    KBC's claim based on a first legal charge will come before Revenues' claim, who don't even appear to have obtained a judgement. There appears to have been a settlement prior to Revenue issuing any proceedings anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭JCJCJC


    I reckon that her family intervened and put a stop to her ramblings for her own safety.

    Was she the originator of the idea that the McCanns were “pulled out by the ears”? That was repeated in the Dáil by Pearce the shinner, he won’t like it if he has to correct the record if he mislead the house.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭demanufactured


    So what's the latest, has McGann been jailed yet?
    He's a criminal after all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,860 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    YOUR HOME IS AT RISK IF YOU DO NOT KEEP UP PAYMENTS ON A MORTGAGE OR ANY LOAN SECURED ON IT.

    This is the fundamental component of a mortgage and the main warning on mortgage documents. It has very little meaning in Ireland though where non payers are cheered on by irresponsible politicians and bleeding hearts.

    Absolutely, it’s these people who should be in the spotlight.

    Local politicians ‘covering their ass’ and trying to be all things to all men.

    It’s way beyond the time these irresponsible folk were called out, and for once the side of the taxpayer was considered.

    If people ,as reported, like Fitzmaurice, had their way ,it would appear that it’s fine to not repay and not have the asset seized.

    Madness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,257 ✭✭✭orm0nd



    If people ,as reported, like Fitzmaurice, had their way ,it would appear that it’s fine to not repay and not have the asset seized.

    Madness.

    Can you post the link to where Fitzmaurice stated so.

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,860 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    orm0nd wrote: »
    Can you post the link to where Fitzmaurice stated so.

    Thanks


    Share to Facebook

    Share to Twitter

    Share to Email App


    Independent Roscommon TD Michael Fitzmaurice has denied that comments he made in the Dáil last week had incited violence.
    On Wednesday during a Dáil debate on the Anti-Evictions Bill he had warned that “Irish people need to wake up, especially if people are coming from the North. We must take them on and stop what is happening.”
    He said many people were receiving notice-to-quit letters from banks selling buy-to-let properties. “In my opinion many of the banks involved are scum.”
    On RTɒs Morning Ireland Mr Fitzmaurice rejected the suggestion that he was inciting violence in his comments about evictions.
    “Violence solves nothing. We have to sit down and work with people, including the banks.”

    Sorry having wi-fi break up I’m my area will try again later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭zimmermania


    P_1 wrote: »
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=521998308280272&id=433698377110266

    Context. KBC are trying to evict people from a property in Strokestown. On Tuesday a gang of people from north of the border who identify as British moved in on the property, assaulting people ( there are videos floating about online about this). Last night a large group of people seemingly took the property back, 2 dogs are dead and several northern registered vans have been burnt out.

    Several questions. Main one is what on earth were KBC thinking going down this road? Have they no idea of the historical context of doing this? Second question is how this is going to be framed by the national media.

    Context.KBC were trying to get people to leave a property that they own.The people they were trying to evict did not own the property and never did.

    You describe the security team as a "gang" and you describe the masked and armed gang who"took the property back" as a "group"

    Main question.What was the original owner doing putting up his house and land as security for a loan which he defaulted on?And why did he fail to engage with the bank over a period of many years.

    His actions and those of the gang of masked men who beat up the security guards and burned several vechicles have ensured that ordinary decent farmers wild find it difficult to borrow money using their houses and land as a guarantee against default and if they do manage to get get a loan will have to pay higher interest rates due to the events that you described in such a subjective manner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    Share to Facebook

    Share to Twitter

    Share to Email App


    Independent Roscommon TD Michael Fitzmaurice has denied that comments he made in the Dáil last week had incited violence.
    On Wednesday during a Dáil debate on the Anti-Evictions Bill he had warned that “Irish people need to wake up, especially if people are coming from the North. We must take them on and stop what is happening.”
    He said many people were receiving notice-to-quit letters from banks selling buy-to-let properties. “In my opinion many of the banks involved are scum.”
    On RTɒs Morning Ireland Mr Fitzmaurice rejected the suggestion that he was inciting violence in his comments about evictions.
    “Violence solves nothing. We have to sit down and work with people, including the banks.”

    Sorry having wi-fi break up I’m my area will try again later.
    were those his exact words


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,860 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    goat2 wrote: »
    were those his exact words
    Share to Facebook

    Share to Twitter

    Share to Email App


    Independent Roscommon TD Michael Fitzmaurice has denied that comments he made in the Dáil last week had incited violence.
    On Wednesday during a Dáil debate on the Anti-Evictions Bill he had warned that “Irish people need to wake up, especially if people are coming from the North. We must take them on and stop what is happening.”
    He said many people were receiving notice-to-quit letters from banks selling buy-to-let properties. “In my opinion many of the banks involved are scum.”
    On RTɒs Morning Ireland Mr Fitzmaurice rejected the suggestion that he was inciting violence in his comments about evictions.
    “Violence solves nothing. We have to sit down and work with people, including the banks.”

    Sorry having wi-fi break up I’m my area will try again later.


    I presume the passages quoted were....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    The problem with a certain cohort in Ireland is that every one of them know their “rights” but very few understand their responsibilities.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,860 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar



    This will be interesting Maryanne, especially the background of those arrested.

    More to come apparently, which is good .


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Hopefully justice will be done and those responsible for the crimes will be punished.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭liam7831


    Hopefully justice will be done and those responsible for the crimes will be punished.

    Be hard to convict as they were working for the bank


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    liam7831 wrote: »
    Be hard to convict as they were working for the bank

    I thought that they were a bunch of vigilantes “supporting” the family?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    liam7831 wrote: »
    Be hard to convict as they were working for the bank

    Na I'm talking about the scumbags that attacked the security guards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,860 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Na I'm talking about the scumbags that attacked the security guards.

    Polis will fillet those tossers Lesser, should kick off fairly soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    The problem with a certain cohort in Ireland is that every one of them know their “rights” but very few understand their responsibilities.

    That's true is all walks to be fair. I'd say most know their 'responsibilities' but it if ain't illegal, can't be bothered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭christy c


    liam7831 wrote: »
    Be hard to convict as they were working for the bank

    What crimes did they commit?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    christy c wrote: »
    What crimes did they commit?

    From the link in my post. “ three security guards were hospitalised, a dog was put down as a result of its injuries, and vehicles were burnt out”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭christy c


    From the link in my post. “ three security guards were hospitalised, a dog was put down as a result of its injuries, and vehicles were burnt out”

    By "they", I meant the people hired by the banks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭keavebm


    christy c wrote:
    By "they", I meant the people hired by the banks.


    Beat up innocent people while the guards looked on. If u read this thread from the start you would know.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    christy c wrote: »
    By "they", I meant the people hired by the banks.

    Do you mean people hired by the banks to carry out a legal eviction? You do know that people cannot stay forever in homes without paying for said home?


Advertisement