Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The rise of fascism in the 21st Century

Options
1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 431 ✭✭mammajamma


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A system which you have proved you haven't the faintest understanding of.

    We can stop there.

    Its an analogy. Heres a professional tip for you; the "system" is not real in this case, its an "example" to make a "point".

    You are literally arguing against something I didn't say, much less explain. That's fear of the unknown. Get a grip on yourself, because if youre that easily rattled you need to toughen up :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    RaichuMGS wrote: »
    The UN defines racism in part as an unfair attitude towards an ethnic group, however I find that nothing said has been unfair & has been entirely based on real life interaction with said group. So you, sir, are full of shít.

    "You find".

    Cheers for that.

    I guess I'll just throw out the UN definition and refer to the RaichuMGS definition in future, then.

    Although I had better get in quick before you try to shout me down again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭CinemaGuy45


    PapaOscar wrote: »
    Because its quicker than *. And you get my point.

    PapaOscar wrote: »
    Very few people give a fuk about travellers and rightly so. Peter Casey is a hero saying what 90% of the country thinks. Most travellers are con artists and thieves. They live happily on the fringes of society and refuse to integrate. Fuk them.

    Many people are very angry with the current situation with travellers and rightly so.
    Peter Casey was brave in saying what a massive percentage of the population was thinking.
    There are massive levels of crime and theft among the travelling community and little to no effort on their behalf to engage with and integrate with the settled community and the state.


    Get my point I said the same thing see how much nicer it looks?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    "You find".

    Cheers for that.

    I guess I'll just throw out the UN definition and refer to the RaichuMGS definition in future, then.

    Although I had better get in quick before you try to shout me down again.

    Yes, I find. I’m not in a position to nor will I ever be in one to speak for someone else. Refer it to however you wish, instead of whinging about being “shouted down” provide some evidence to support the claim travellers are not as they are described by posters here. To support the claim they’re somehow being subjected to an unfair attitude.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭CinemaGuy45


    RaichuMGS wrote: »
    Thought you were going to bed?


    :pac:

    Trying to stop the two of you getting bans for silly reasons but your right I should not have bothered. Goodnight.:)
    RaichuMGS wrote: »
    The UN defines racism in part as an unfair attitude towards an ethnic group, however I find that nothing said has been unfair & has been entirely based on real life interaction with said group. So you, sir, are full of shít.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 153 ✭✭Frunchy


    Political correctness is a just as oppressive as fascism when it comes to free sppech.
    I've got no respect for travellers and the country would be a better place without them. I'm not a big fan of gay people either, but whether they can marry or not has no effect on me personally.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Frunchy wrote: »
    Political correctness is a just as oppressive as fascism when it comes to free sppech.
    I've got no respect for travellers and the country would be a better place without them. I'm not a big fan of gay people either, but whether they can marry or not has no effect on me personally.

    Your post was fairly okay then you added that last part.


  • Registered Users Posts: 431 ✭✭mammajamma


    Goodshape wrote: »
    It has nothing much to do with being stupid. Group thinking
    and mob mentality just has a way of snowballing, and the methods used to manipulate opinion are highly sophisticated.




    Yes, people are unhappy. There's corruption in politics and business. The rich are unthinkably rich while the rest of us stagnate. And for that were blaming... The poor and the even less well off?



    The existence of "sides" as you put it is the fiction I'm referring to. We're fighting amongst ourselves for some scraps from the masters table.

    Group-think, of course, is an issue. But you cant simply fool people to that extent without some strong foundational evidence, usually of the kind that is seen day to day.

    While the argument of rich versus poor is true, and the divisions it causes are real, there are many more reasons at play here, from basic biological imperative to anti-science masqueraded as fact. The focus on rich-poor has been exaggerated too much, and presented as a cure-all.

    Perhaps one way to put it is in terms of progress. Progress is the single largest part of happiness. Whereas people before (the "good old times", SOMETIMES misplaced) could get married, get a stable job with security, buy a home and have children without undue stress, these fundamentals of life have been scuppered. In a word, globalisation has screwed everything. Tied to globalisation is immigration, wealth distribution from previously rapidly improving countries to now-developing countries (Europe and USA to China and india for example), the staunch dogma of "minority above majority".....it all boils down to a fundamental kick to balls of a progressing life, and therefore happiness. We are moving backwards in the most necessary ways. How long until tenements are back?!

    What is happening is a kickback against all of it, every single part, whether it be actual immigrants themselves, politicians almost deifying minorities, international mega corporrations, increasing costs.....they'll all be attacked together. Because they have been all lauded together! That's the target now, literally set-up by its proponents in the first place. Its too late to try and sort out the good bits from the bad bits, it has earned the reputation of all bad.

    Some billionaire spreading out his wealth isn't going to fix this. What happens next is not important, not as important as WHY it happened. A sincere lesson for the next cycle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 95 ✭✭PapaOscar


    RaichuMGS wrote: »
    Your post was fairly okay then you added that last part.

    Oh he went there.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 153 ✭✭Frunchy


    RaichuMGS wrote: »
    Your post was fairly okay then you added that last part.

    Lots of people have no time for gay people, they're just too scared to admit it publically. The situation is very similar to travellers in that regard. That's not to say I condone depriving them of basic human rights.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 153 ✭✭Frunchy


    PapaOscar wrote: »
    Oh he went there.

    Did you just presume my gender?


  • Registered Users Posts: 95 ✭✭PapaOscar


    Frunchy wrote: »
    Did you just presume my gender?

    Grease the guillotine quick.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Frunchy wrote: »
    Lots of people have no time for gay people, they're just too scared to admit it publically.

    If people had "no time" for gay people, same sex marriage wouldn't have passed so easily. Also, the vote is private so even if they were publicly afraid to express it, they would've had the anonymity of the ballot box.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,636 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    It was still 30-something percent though wasn't it? with a higher turnout too probably


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Mutant z


    Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean its fascist the term is used so loosely that its become completely meaningless and in any case its those largely on the left who seem to be most opposed to different views in society and in favour of shutting down freedom of speech.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,129 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Dunno what term people understand less around here - "fascism" or "Liberal".

    None of the leaders or people mentioned in the OP are fascist. There are no fascist leaders in the Western civilsation. And fascism doesn't mean "not liberal" in the same way "liberal" doesn't mean socialist, or Marxist or Communist.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,635 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    AFD gained more than any other party in Hesse. They are in second place in a couple of states. Bavaria was known as being a more challegning state, as most of the parties there are right wing to begin with (FW, CSU, FDP). They are polling at about 16% nationwide, which is more than the SPD, which would have been unthinkable a couple of years ago.

    Granted that the SPD is mostly losing support to the Greens, but the CDU is losing support to the AFD.

    Nobody is going into government with the AFD, but the AFD is helping to guarantee a hung parliament. They are the third largest party, and gaining. I think it would be foolish, and a piece arrogant to assume they are going anywhere in the near future. If the social causes which gave rise to them are cured, they will probably collapse in support, but that is unlikely to happen.

    Question, how are they doing that? They don't have enough % to be be able to exert any influence, no party will allign themselves with them and there will be a coalition with a comfortable majority. They can shout from the sidelines, but that is all. Now that they have a voice, they can expose themselves for what they are. A party that besides xenophobia has absolutely nothing of any value to offer.
    There still is a stable black/red coalition.
    They may stick around for a few cycles like sh*t to the bowl, but they'll be flushed eventually.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,934 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    At least moustaches will be in fashion again


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    Question, how are they doing that? They don't have enough % to be be able to exert any influence, no party will allign themselves with them and there will be a coalition with a comfortable majority. They can shout from the sidelines, but that is all. Now that they have a voice, they can expose themselves for what they are. A party that besides xenophobia has absolutely nothing of any value to offer.
    There still is a stable black/red coalition.
    They may stick around for a few cycles like sh*t to the bowl, but they'll be flushed eventually.

    German elections are designed to deliver multi party governments.

    I like your final analogy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    At least moustaches will be in fashion again

    Are they not currently?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,635 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    Try_harder wrote: »
    Are they not currently?

    He meant a very particular kind of 'tache...


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,894 ✭✭✭Triceratops Ballet


    Stephen15 wrote:
    Marriages tend to be between similar types of people in similar situations. Professionals will typically marry fellow professionals and low income earners will tend to marry other low income earners. It's fairly basic demographics. Fact of the matter is the HSE can't retain indigenous Irish staff due to poor pay and conditions and other factors such our high rents etc. When did I mention our generous welfare system is anything to do with forgeiners. I don't blame forgeiners I blame our government for not doing enough for our own. It also wouldn't surprise me if the qualifications held by persons coming from third world countries are of a lower standard than Irish/Western qualifications.
    I don't dispute that marriages tend to be between people from similar socio economic groups, what happens in practice though is one person I the marriage gets a critical skills permit, and the other doesn't, they find it hard to get interviews because of their stamp 3 status or their qualifications are non transferable and they have to take lower income work because they need to make ends meet
    Stephen15 wrote:
    The problem we can't be fully sure of these people's backgrounds particularly from migrants coming from countries whom our government dosen't have ties with but also ideologies and cultures coming into our country which aren't compatible particularly coming from the religion of Islam.
    People coming from middle Eastern countries go through a longer visa screening process than those coming from the likes of South America, most South Americans don't need a visa at all to enter the country.
    Do you think the government just throws open the gates for people from countries we don't have treaties with? Typically people from non treaty countries will have to wait 4-5 months and have secured a job offer paying more than the average wage to be allowed to come here.
    Stephen15 wrote:
    I didn't say these people could work in jobs that require qualifications they could however work in petrol stations, in shops and as taxi drivers. Fact most coming in with qualifications would be from first world countries which are easier to assimilate into our culture than those from those from the third world. Fact of the matter is it is easier for Pierre an IT developer from France to integrate than Ahmed with no qualifications from Bangladesh.

    Pierre is an EU citizen he can come here regardless of his job or qualification he could be homeless and if he arrives at the border we will let him in. Ahmed has to apply for a visa, in that he has to prove he has the means to support himself on arrival to Ireland. He also needs a work permit he needs to supply documentary evidence of his skills and qualifications, proof that he has secured a job offer and it pays more than x amount, if he arrives at the border without these he won't make it to the arrivals hall.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Certainly is worrying with the rise of populist. As said previously populist can be left and right. Think chaves and orban.

    The worry is populists are anti pluralists. The rhetoric of being the only way forward and any dissenting opinion should be considered illegitimate should concern any democracy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,934 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Certainly is worrying with the rise of populist. As said previously populist can be left and right. Think chaves and orban.

    The worry is populists are anti pluralists. The rhetoric of being the only way forward and any dissenting opinion should be considered illegitimate should concern any democracy.

    and casey has just proved that little old ireland is susceptible to this nonsense to, prepare for weird **** to occur


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Grrr...

    The anger and resentment is something else in this thread.

    Well done to the guys who own all the media and control world finance.

    While you all argue over outrage (on both sides) they just laugh it up, carry on paying f*ck all tax, hoarding land, buying up all the rental property.

    And you'll just blame each other for having less.


    minimum-wage.jpg[\IMG]


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Zorya


    Turtwig wrote: »

    All I've witnessed thus far is circle jerks with a majority consensus rapidly being reinforced; whatever it was. There was just a constant dismissive mocking of the concerns and points of the 'other' side that disagreed. Despite the fact that there is a broad spectrum to the 'other' side; it's not just, a, side. There are several but this is rarely if ever acknowledged nowadays. Nowadays it's just blame, complain, dismiss, mock and evade. There's no attempt to empathise, rationalise or even discuss a disagreeing viewpoint. It's just side snide backslapping, sometimes adjacent with a heavy persecution complex, that seeks to reinforce a group identity rather contribute to a better society.

    .
    This.

    I'll tell you what it does, it shuts people up. No one wants to be sbeered at by people who imagine they are their betters. So dissenters shut up and nurture their opinions in the dark, where they grow distorted. If there is one thing that Jordan Peterson got right, it was when he said we have to allow our ideas to emerge in public so that any of them that are stupid may die instead of us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    Zorya wrote: »
    This.

    I'll tell you what it does, it shuts people up. No one wants to be sbeered at by people who imagine they are their betters. So dissenters shut up and nurture their opinions in the dark, where they grow distorted. If there is one thing that Jordan Peterson got right, it was when he said we have to allow our ideas to emerge in public so that any of them that are stupid may die instead of us.

    You've actually just given away the far right's strategy.

    Forums such as this one are infested with people who are only too willing to defend the indefensible and utter endless inanities and debate-stoppers from the far right's cliche playbook, the old "snowflakes", "SJWs", "PC brigade gone mad", "liberalism is a mental disorder" and whatever you're having yourself.

    The far right have an online presence in Ireland far in excess of their real number, and they are inexhaustible.

    It would almost make you think they had no lives. Or are paid trolls. Probably a combination of both, actually. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 153 ✭✭Frunchy


    Omackeral wrote: »
    If people had "no time" for gay people, same sex marriage wouldn't have passed so easily. Also, the vote is private so even if they were publicly afraid to express it, they would've had the anonymity of the ballot box.


    I would consider 37.93% of the voting population to a be a lot of people. It's a large minority.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Zorya


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    You've actually just given away the far right's strategy.

    Forums such as this one are infested with people who are only too willing to defend the indefensible and utter endless inanities and debate-stoppers from the far right's cliche playbook, the old "snowflakes", "SJWs", "PC brigade gone mad", "liberalism is a mental disorder" and whatever you're having yourself.

    The far right have an online presence in Ireland far in excess of their real number, and they are inexhaustible.

    It would almost make you think they had no lives. Or are paid trolls. Probably a combination of both, actually. :D

    I don't find this to be so. There is generally a smattering of people with what one could call ''far right'' sentiments, and they do not tend to express themselves all that well. They are very recognisable - one would not like to be associated with people holding such terrible, regressive, bigoted views that barely conceal hatred. They are not representative of what one might call opposition, even if their brashness makes them very visible. There is another (I would say smallish) pool of what one could call posters who tend towards centrist or even conservative comment, where such people for example seek to debate boundless 'progressivism' - for example questioning unlimited immigration or unscientific gender ideology etc. - and these people are absolutely drowned out by sneering, condescension, and a large number of established voices on boards who seem to believe their every utterance is by virtue of its having left their lips the unassailable sound of reason and truth.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    Grrr...

    The anger and resentment is something else in this thread.

    Well done to the guys who own all the media and control world finance.

    While you all argue over outrage (on both sides) they just laugh it up, carry on paying f*ck all tax, hoarding land, buying up all the rental property.

    And you'll just blame each other for having less.


    minimum-wage.jpg[\IMG]

    It's incredible how easily people are distracted from how badly they are getting ****ed by a system that threw them overboard 30 or 40 years ago. .


Advertisement