Sherlock - A game of Werewolf!

Clodagh WW · 18-09-2018 03:57PM

I'm starting to come around to the idea that I may have tunneled myself but I just can't shake my distrust of Riona.

Desmond WW · 18-09-2018 04:04PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Assuming vig shot right, tegans a wolf who voted for clodagh in a chaotic lynch. Tegan was so wishy washy that I think she had to be a wolf. If she is that vote makes no sense

No, just no.

Assuming.
so wishy washy, has to be a wolf.
if so, vote makes no sense.

Why call it wagonomisc? that hurts more than the rest of the junk in this single post.

So, you have never seen a wolf vote for another wolf.
You think the vig always shoots a wolf.
you think because someone is wishy washy,(what does that mean) they have to be a wolf
and because they voted for clodagh, she can't be a wolf.

Clodagh WW · 18-09-2018 04:05PM

Also seeing as I'm gonna be pretty patchy with getting to follow this for the next few hours I'll post an #FFA2 now. If I get a chance to reread and revise before lynch I will.

1. Riona - Because of my posts today. I'm immediately wary of anyone encouraging any kind of reveals (NRVs or RV). Also the defensiveness followed by "what defensiveness" doesn't look good to me. However I'm willing to entertain the possibility that I'm tunnelled.

2. Abigail - In my eyes she was advocating against discussing who should be peaked etc. I don't see the danger in the group coming together to decide a peak.

3. Derry - I had him on my ffa yesterday. Still can't understand why he held off on sharing his puzzle results.

Derry WW · 18-09-2018 04:07PM

As of 15:29, I'm now out of hospital.

Orla WW wrote: »

IIRC Derry was pushing pretty hard for Katie late on last night.

Was I?

I put her with others as a No. 3 in my FFA (and in a way where some seemed to think I voted outside the names I gave), say with little time to go that I had no clue who to vote for and was open to influence, and then settled on Katie late in the day. I didn't "push" for her at all.

Derry WW · 18-09-2018 04:07PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Also seeing as I'm gonna be pretty patchy with getting to follow this for the next few hours I'll post an #FFA2 now. If I get a chance to reread and revise before lynch I will.

1. Riona - Because of my posts today. I'm immediately wary of anyone encouraging any kind of reveals (NRVs or RV). Also the defensiveness followed by "what defensiveness" doesn't look good to me. However I'm willing to entertain the possibility that I'm tunnelled.

2. Abigail - In my eyes she was advocating against discussing who should be peaked etc. I don't see the danger in the group coming together to decide a peak.

3. Derry - I had him on my ffa yesterday. Still can't understand why he held off on sharing his puzzle results.

hmmmmm

Riona WW · 18-09-2018 04:08PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I'm starting to come around to the idea that I may have tunneled myself but I just can't shake my distrust of Riona.

I love a good, long, never ending bit of tunnel myself

Barbara WW · 18-09-2018 04:11PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Definitely anit-paired.
And to expand on that, "In my opinion, its unlikely that gabriel & clodagh are on the same team.

Why not? What is your opinions on the pair of them?

Gabriel: mid village lean-pros: very active poster, looking to engage discussion from quieter players. Looking to play with structure. For the most part happy to challenge and be challenged

Cons. Calling for Watson to come out was well dodgy

Clodagh: slight village lean. Willing to engage, reasonably active. Willing to call players on stuff like Watson revealing. Again arguing for structured village play

Cons: post about the sk not knowing who was let out of hospital was odd. Too eager to double down and be defensive

Now, your turn to actually explain your thought processes

Conor WW · 18-09-2018 04:11PM

I'm back on for an hour so going to try to get my FFA2 done before I leave again. Is someone collating them this evening? I can't as I'll be out on mobile.

Riona WW · 18-09-2018 04:12PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Also seeing as I'm gonna be pretty patchy with getting to follow this for the next few hours I'll post an #FFA2 now. If I get a chance to reread and revise before lynch I will.

1. Riona - Because of my posts today. I'm immediately wary of anyone encouraging any kind of reveals (NRVs or RV). Also the defensiveness followed by "what defensiveness" doesn't look good to me. However I'm willing to entertain the possibility that I'm tunnelled.

2. Abigail - In my eyes she was advocating against discussing who should be peaked etc. I don't see the danger in the group coming together to decide a peak.

3. Derry - I had him on my ffa yesterday. Still can't understand why he held off on sharing his puzzle results.

Eva WW · 18-09-2018 04:13PM

I haven't disappeared btw, I'm doing an FFA in my notes here. But just want to throw something in while I'm doing that; I think the SK can hospitalise himself as part of his cover.

Those who are being hospitalised, we aren't ruling them out as wolves. Good. I don't think we should rule them out of being SK either.

If SK can't hospitalise himself and his power gets to run for 5+ days, eventually he narrows down the pool of SK suspects. I just can't see that happening.

Riona WW · 18-09-2018 04:14PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Clodagh: slight village lean. Willing to engage, reasonably active. Willing to call players on stuff like Watson revealing. Again arguing for structured village play

Derry WW · 18-09-2018 04:17PM

Riona, I wanna like you but that's making it tough....

Orla WW · 18-09-2018 04:18PM

I'll have my own FFA about 5pm. Just having something to eat at the moment.

Doris WW · 18-09-2018 04:20PM

Still very undecided

Riona WW · 18-09-2018 04:22PM

Derry WW wrote: »

Riona, I wanna like you but that's making it tough....

Ah don’t say that Derry, I’m really a good guy when you get to know me....

Conor WW · 18-09-2018 04:23PM

Reading back and there are a lot of posters who haven't really said anything but are posting just enough to seem engaged. While I'm sure there is at least one high-posting wolf, I'm going to be looking lower down the list for my FFA this evening.

Barbara WW · 18-09-2018 04:25PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

Heh, Can you expand on that for us morons who don't understand how you are getting to there.

Read the next post

Gabriel WW · 18-09-2018 04:25PM

Conor WW wrote:

Reading back and there are a lot of posters who haven't really said anything but are posting just enough to seem engaged. While I'm sure there is at least one high-posting wolf, I'm going to be looking lower down the list for my FFA this evening.

You get you are describing yourself in that first sentence, right?

Conor WW · 18-09-2018 04:27PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

You get you are describing yourself in that first sentence, right?

You get that you are totally tunneling me for no good reason right?

Barbara WW · 18-09-2018 04:30PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

No, just no.

Assuming.
so wishy washy, has to be a wolf.
if so, vote makes no sense.

Why call it wagonomisc? that hurts more than the rest of the junk in this single post.

So, you have never seen a wolf vote for another wolf.
You think the vig always shoots a wolf.
you think because someone is wishy washy,(what does that mean) they have to be a wolf
and because they voted for clodagh, she can't be a wolf.

Yes, just yes. In any universe that Tegans a wolf clodagh isn’t. Take a read back on tegan and tell me what you make of her?

It is wagonomics btw, trying to understand the wagons that form. Not my fault you limit how you apply that term

Now I’ve answered your questions, could you kindly actually answer mine

Properly

Gabriel WW · 18-09-2018 04:31PM

Conor WW wrote:

You get that you are totally tunneling me for no good reason right?

Give me a reason not to. Change my mind Conor. A good start would be to put in some work and not spout nothing statements that could apply to half of the village.

Derry WW · 18-09-2018 04:34PM

Riona WW wrote: »

Ah don’t say that Derry, I’m really a good guy when you get to know me....

Do me a favour. Putting aside the fact Clodagh FFA'd you, what do you make of him FFA'ing me?

I try not to go "Oh, Clodagh voted me, ergo I'm going to get pissy with Clodagh". But I do find that super flimsy FFA interesting....

Barbara WW · 18-09-2018 04:34PM

Riona WW wrote: »

You kind of love that gif don’t you :pac:

Conor WW · 18-09-2018 04:36PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Give me a reason not to. Change my mind Conor. A good start would be to put in some work and not spout nothing statements that could apply to half of the village.

WTF are you talking about? 'spout nothing'. I hate to be a feckin Katie about it but I did manage to solve an...oh...fairly important clue. I have explained and explained my *one* post that seemed to rub your fur the wrong way but you keep ignoring that explanation.

You are the one who was suggesting that the vig out himself, despite the fact that he has the ability to heal. :rolleyes:

Desmond WW · 18-09-2018 04:36PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Read the next post

oh yeah, i got to it ,

Riona WW · 18-09-2018 04:37PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

You kind of love that gif don’t you :pac:

Barbara WW · 18-09-2018 04:39PM

Desmond WW wrote: »

oh yeah, i got to it ,

Great, now care to answer the question I asked or just going to continue to be obnoxious?

Desmond WW · 18-09-2018 04:40PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Yes, just yes. In any universe that Tegans a wolf clodagh isn’t. Take a read back on tegan and tell me what you make of her?

It is wagonomics btw, trying to understand the wagons that form. Not my fault you limit how you apply that term

Now I’ve answered your questions, could you kindly actually answer mine

Properly

So, lets just say, for a sec, that tegan is a wolf.

Why does that mean that clodagh is not a wolf?

Have you never seen a wolf vote for another wolf, like ever?

Gabriel WW · 18-09-2018 04:44PM

Conor WW wrote:

You are the one who was suggesting that the vig out himself, despite the fact that he has the ability to heal.

A very very tenuous rebuttal. Scrambling a bit there Conor.

I put it out there and it was discussed. Even if the basis of what i put forward had an error, the village gained info from the discussion. What have you done to help?

Desmond WW · 18-09-2018 04:46PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Great, now care to answer the question I asked or just going to continue to be obnoxious?

What question? can you quote your question whenever you ask me to answer some mysterious question that you want answered, i hate that.

saying "so are you ever going to answer that question i asked?" without quoting said question is such a pain in the ass.

Sherlock - A game of Werewolf!

Comments