Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Cannabis - It must be time for legality.

1235722

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭freddie1970


    suppose anything in moderation is grand but once you go full bore at it that is where the problems start

    people go full bore on food ..betting ...alcohol ..
    sex..training ...you shouldnt ban something solely for that reason


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Arrival wrote: »
    Which is why people that try to argue against legalisation by saying "I know someone who smoked cannabis everyday and they're zombies now" are the biggest cretins going. ANY drug when not enjoyed occasionally is going to have negative consequences. This is NOT a strong argument against legalisation as the majority of adults are good, responsible people who will be able to consume it without going overboard every single day just the same way many adults choose to have a few cans some evenings each week to unwind. We should all be made well educated on the topic of drugs and given the freedom to make our own choices with our bodies, not treated like children.
    Cretins? Nah. Wildly uninformed? Yes.

    However when they try to claim "it's completely different from alcohol, nobody would say to drink every day!" while trying to infer that is the case for all cannabis use, then they enter cretin territory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭Dramatik


    The problem with all these cases you hear of people going mad after smoking weed is that there is no guarantee in Ireland that the weed you are smoking is actually weed or if it is, the quality of it, unless you actually know the person who grew it. The reality in Ireland is that the majority of dealers won't know for definite what the exact strain that they are selling is or whether it's a indica or sativa, they'll just be told it's whatever is popular at the time, like kush, amnesia haze or cheese.

    There's a lot of things that can go wrong when growing weed such as fertilizer not being flushed out properly etc. do you think a dealer will honestly care? Of course not they are purely in it for the money. Weed can get moldy pretty easily and some of the places where this weed is being stored wouldn't be exactly clean or even dry. All this and many more variables can effect the weed, so I don't think it's really fair to 100% blame weed for these cases, it's like like saying ban alcohol because someone lost their mind but in reality it isn't known whether the person was drinking window cleaner or vodka.

    I believe it is mainly poor quality product or product that has been tampered with along the way, that causes th majority of these cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭LucyIrish06


    If you have never been to Amsterdam it is a must.
    Free ferry's, free trams, barely any cars as everyone cycles, no fighting on the streets outside the pub etc..
    It is genuinely such a lovely, relaxing place. Everyone is so happy and relaxed and you know what exactly your smoking unlike here in Ireland.
    When i first went over I got a gram for 9 euro, nearly passed out i couldn't believe it and of course the more expensive the bud is the better it is.
    Everyone is just so friendly and open and i genuinely think Ireland could be like this, it would be great, were sound as it is but could you imagine the irish been even more sound ?? Great bunch of lads.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 779 ✭✭✭Arrival


    When people talk about Ireland not being a country with the climate to grow cannabis in; it's very easy and possible to grow cannabis in any country since most grow operations are indoors using artificial lighting. If cannabis was legalised here it would be fantastic to allow it to create a national market which would employ people and generate income taxes, just as we have breweries employing thousands of people.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 779 ✭✭✭Arrival


    Dramatik wrote: »
    The problem with all these cases you hear of people going mad after smoking weed is that there is no guarantee in Ireland that the weed you are smoking is actually weed or if it is, the quality of it, unless you actually know the person who grew it. The reality in Ireland is that the majority of dealers won't know for definite what the exact strain that they are selling is or whether it's a indica or sativa, they'll just be told it's whatever is popular at the time, like kush, amnesia haze or cheese.

    There's a lot of things that can go wrong when growing weed such as fertilizer not being flushed out properly etc. do you think a dealer will honestly care? Of course not they are purely in it for the money. Weed can get moldy pretty easily and some of the places where this weed is being stored wouldn't be exactly clean or even dry. All this and many more variables can effect the weed, so I don't think it's really fair to 100% blame weed for these cases, it's like like saying ban alcohol because someone lost their mind but in reality it isn't known whether the person was drinking window cleaner or vodka.

    I believe it is mainly poor quality product or product that has been tampered with along the way, that causes th majority of these cases.


    You've almost hit the nail on the head. A massive contributor to the mental health issues people experience due to their cannabis consumption is the fact that there is absolutely no regulations surrounding the THC to CBD content. It's been found that strains high in THC with a decent quantity of CBD still allows for a comfortable high with very little negative effects whereas most strains of cannabis consumers would be able to get their hands on these days are specifically bred to maximise THC (this is what causes the high, by the way for anyone unaware). The illegal growers and dealers simply want the highest THC content to maximise the room they have available for smuggling. With legalisation and regulation, it would be far more easy to prevent people from getting harmfully strong strains of cannabis. As I've said in another post, it's the equivalent of having the option to have a few cans or downing har liquor; most people don't want to unwind by downing hard liquor and they can avoid this by simply going into their off license and reading the labels on the bottles/containers. This same process can, and must, be done with cannabis. There are some absolutely fantastic strains of cannabis out there and it's actually sad that people haven't been able to experience them instead of the disastrously potent strains that made them believe that cannabis isn't for them. I don't even smoke cannabis here in Ireland anymore because of this issue. America spoiled me and showed me just how bad the situation here is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,645 ✭✭✭RollieFingers


    Easy to spot the potheads from the posts on this thread.

    Easy to spot the alco's in every pub and off-licence up and down the country!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Arrival wrote: »
    You've almost hit the nail on the head. A massive contributor to the mental health issues people experience due to their cannabis consumption is the fact that there is absolutely no regulations surrounding the THC to CBD content. It's been found that strains high in THC with a decent quantity of CBD still allows for a comfortable high with very little negative effects whereas most strains of cannabis consumers would be able to get their hands on these days are specifically bred to maximise THC (this is what causes the high, by the way for anyone unaware). The illegal growers and dealers simply want the highest THC content to maximise the room they have available for smuggling.

    And from what I understand most of the medicinal benefits tend to be from CBD making most of the stuff currently on the streets especially ill suited to medicinal use.

    Although there seems to be a lot of uncertainty yet as to quite why it seems to have beneficial properties for some things.

    As I understand it it's a very complex plant, full of highly complex chemicals that so far have been very poorly studied.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Easy to spot the alco's in every pub and off-licence up and down the country!

    Well in fairness, your username is RollieFingers... :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭garbanzo


    Here’s a thought. Legalize it for say 3-5 years and take a view on the effects of that decision in the end. Decide then whether to continue or reintroduce the ban based on empirical evidence rather than the opinions of vested and other interests or people’s (albeit understandable) reticence around drug use.

    The “it’s been this way for years so change nothing” argument is redundant. The current approach is 100% not working. We need to be more creative in dealing with the realities.

    Personally I think it should be 100% legalised for medical use. There have been a number of very sad cases involving young kids with epilepsy in the media recently. Medicinal cannibis does apparently provide them with relief from seizures. Many of these cases would break your heart.

    G


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭Gorgeousgeorge


    xckjoo wrote: »
    Ah the post is pretty weak in fairness. Shows a distinct lack of understanding of the problem and peoples usage of intoxicants. Selling weed is not a gateway crime to burglary. Most dealers are small time and will just move on and live with the drop in income. I haven't looked it up, but I bet Colorado haven't seen an increase in other crimes since legalizing. That should give a fair comparison in terms of the effects of legalization on wider criminal activity. And the idea that people will suddenly turn into 24hr stoners if it was legalized is laughable. Anybody that wants to get it now can probably do so. If they don't drive and work while stoned now, they won't do it if it's legally available.

    There's also a pretty obvious benefit to society in legalization (whether you use it or not) in that it's a waste of police time and resources fighting its availability and is a massive source of income to criminal gangs.

    i agree it is weak, any dealers in my area are that are well know are spongers that are on benefits that wont work. how will they supplement the income lost after.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    i agree it is weak, any dealers in my area are that are well know are spongers that are on benefits that wont work. how will they supplement the income lost after.

    well....depending on what form legalization would take and what regulations that come with it....they could grow weed? :pac:

    If you look at a place like Colorado all kinds of new homegrown (:D) businesses have sprung up since they legalized


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭Gorgeousgeorge


    wexie wrote: »
    well....depending on what form legalization would take and what regulations that come with it....they could grow weed? :pac:

    If you look at a place like Colorado all kinds of new homegrown (:D) businesses have sprung up since they legalized

    but as said that would involve working and showing a bit of initiative!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    i agree it is weak, any dealers in my area are that are well know are spongers that are on benefits that wont work. how will they supplement the income lost after.

    If they're lazy spongers they're probably just have to live with the drop as I said. If they've more get-up-and-go they can evolve it into a legit business like Wexie said. Lazy spongers are unlikely to want to move into burglary or violent crime though. Wouldn't suit the lifestyle.

    garbanzo wrote: »
    Here’s a thought. Legalize it for say 3-5 years and take a view on the effects of that decision in the end. Decide then whether to continue or reintroduce the ban based on empirical evidence rather than the opinions of vested and other interests or people’s (albeit understandable) reticence around drug use.

    The “it’s been this way for years so change nothing” argument is redundant. The current approach is 100% not working. We need to be more creative in dealing with the realities.

    Personally I think it should be 100% legalised for medical use. There have been a number of very sad cases involving young kids with epilepsy in the media recently. Medicinal cannibis does apparently provide them with relief from seizures. Many of these cases would break your heart.

    G

    Completely disagree with it being legalized for medicinal purposes first. It needs to go through the same protocols as any other drug before being okay for medicinal use. Trying to shoehorn it in without that would just weaken our system for regulating the approval of drugs for medical use. Just legalize the whole thing and be done with it. If medicinal use is found down the road then people can get it through prescription for a reduced cost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Stab*City


    Stop policing my body full stop! Only tax the government will be getting outta me is the tax on the seeds and dirt i buy to grow my own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Lackey


    al87987 wrote: »
    i've never used any other drug except Mushroom shakes in Thailand so I don't think its a gateway drug at all.

    That's great for you
    But I don't know one addict that started off with heroine as their first drug.
    There's plenty of young people buried in my local graveyard, kids I went to school with, that lost their souls to that sh!t and every single one of them started off with 'just a joint'

    So to say its not a gateway drug is bullsh!t.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Lackey wrote: »
    So to say its not a gateway drug is bullsh!t.

    Yet there have been many many studies on this and it seems the outcome is the same every time, it's not a gateway drug.

    Alcohol and tobacco on the other hand do keep coming up as being gateway drugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,255 ✭✭✭The Bishop Basher


    I’ve always found the idea of the government banning a flower slightly amusing..

    It kinda sums up the futility of the war on drugs.

    We’ll grow up some day..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Lackey wrote: »
    That's great for you
    But I don't know one addict that started off with heroine as their first drug.

    There's plenty of young people buried in my local graveyard, kids I went to school with, that lost their souls to that sh!t and every single one of them started off with 'just a joint'

    So to say its not a gateway drug is bullsh!t.
    They never had coffee, stole one of mams cigarettes or got their hands on some of their parents booze before smoking their first joint? Especially considering the joint would have had tobacco in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Lackey wrote: »
    That's great for you
    But I don't know one addict that started off with heroine as their first drug.
    There's plenty of young people buried in my local graveyard, kids I went to school with, that lost their souls to that sh!t and every single one of them started off with 'just a joint'

    So to say its not a gateway drug is bullsh!t.

    But if cannabis didn't exist they'd have been getting high on something else. Solvents are always readily available.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    But would the gateway be via the dealer, starts selling them the reefer and then recommends heroin. If cannabis is legal then this scenario might not happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭freddie1970


    Lackey wrote: »
    That's great for you
    But I don't know one addict that started off with heroine as their first drug.
    There's plenty of young people buried in my local graveyard, kids I went to school with, that lost their souls to that sh!t and every single one of them started off with 'just a joint'

    So to say its not a gateway drug is bullsh!t.
    so what they skipped the alcohol and went straight from joint to heroin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,177 ✭✭✭masterboy123


    As a doctor working in mental health services and having acquired in depth knowledge and clinical experience around people using and abusing cannabis, I would be very much against it's use.

    Even a single joint can lead to psychosis in a susceptible person (& far too many susceptible person out there now). Not too mention risk of addiction, psychological and physical dependence. There is little evidence on use of cannabis oil in certain conditions, but inhalation and oral use cannabis is dangerous.

    In short, involved risks outweighs benefits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Benteke


    As a doctor working in mental health services and having acquired in depth knowledge and clinical experience around people using and abusing cannabis, I would be very much against it's use.

    Even a single joint can lead to psychosis in a susceptible person (& far too many susceptible person out there now). Not too mention risk of addiction, psychological and physical dependence. There is little evidence on use of cannabis oil in certain conditions, but inhalation and oral use cannabis is dangerous.

    In short, involved risks outweighs benefits.

    Your license should be took away if you think their is no evidence


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭freddie1970


    Benteke wrote: »
    Your license should be took away if you think their is no evidence
    fair enough keep it banned so as we know their are no mental health issues with our legitimate drugs.. alcohol ..and all the perscription drugs pushed down our throats 🀔


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,980 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Rennaws wrote: »
    I’ve always found the idea of the government banning a flower slightly amusing..

    It kinda sums up the futility of the war on drugs.

    We’ll grow up some day..

    The opium poppy is beautiful, it's unfair I can't plant it in my garden :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Benteke


    fair enough keep it banned so as we know their are no mental health issues with our legitimate drugs.. alcohol ..and all the perscription drugs pushed down our throats ��

    Funny how those who have legalised it are having quite some success with it, When people know what they're buying and not smoking contaminated cannabis from drug dealers then you realise all the reasons people who are for keeping it illegal the reasons they use are not as bad as been made out


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,308 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    I'm surprised to see Cannabis so high on that list (and laughing so hard that shrooms, LSD and MDMA are so low!). What was the 'harm' they're talking about in that picture?
    Inhaling it can do you harm. Although it causes less harm than tobacco, this is cancelled out because it's often held in the lungs for longer.
    There’s still a booming black market tobacco trade though.

    It’s not like drug dealers will simply stop selling cannabis when it becomes legally sold!
    The booming black market for tobacco is caused by high taxation of tobacco. Also, it's less risky to be caught importing tobacco than other drugs. If it's still profitable to sell it, it'll be sold. Dropping the price would eliminate small time dealers, and thus eliminate most peoples access to it.
    Even a single joint can lead to psychosis in a susceptible person (& far too many susceptible person out there now).
    Do you have any research on this, and would said people have not had any other drug, legal or otherwise, in their system at the time of having that "single joint"?
    Not too mention risk of addiction, psychological and physical dependence.
    There's a "risk of addiction, psychological and physical dependence" for pretty much any drug out there, especially alcohol.
    There is little evidence on use of cannabis oil in certain conditions, but inhalation and oral use cannabis is dangerous.
    Benteke wrote: »
    Your license should be took away if you think their is no evidence
    Their license should be taken away because there's "little evidence on use of cannabis oil in certain conditions"; in other words, there's sweet fcuk all research done, as it's near impossible to get grants to look into the positives of weed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Benteke


    the_syco wrote: »
    Their license should be taken away because there's "little evidence on use of cannabis oil in certain conditions"; in other words, there's sweet fcuk all research done, as it's near impossible to get grants to look into the positives of weed?

    Their has been plenty of research done all around the world to show it helps with certain conditions, Anyone who thinks otherwise live in cloud cuckoo


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement