Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

NBP: National Broadband Plan Announced

1116117119121122334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭ussjtrunks


    So theres 1 company left in the bidding then why hasn't been awarded already, seems strange unless theres still mounds of paperwork left


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Still taking crap about all the fibre that's already been delivered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,084 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Yes, eir are legally obliged to give access to others to their infrastructure (poles) ........ but the problem might be how much they charge.

    Presently that is €20 per pole per year ...... which can be quite a lot outside built up areas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Redriddick


    In light of the fact there is now only one admissible tenderer the government can now negotiate the tender value and terms and conditions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭SkepticQuark


    So how feasible does everyone think it is for Enet to actually be able to deliver the goods? I imagine given their expertise they would maybe target a more wholesale approach to the plan? Provide the fibre to the locations and let the ISPs manage it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,729 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    roddy15 wrote: »
    So how feasible does everyone think it is for Enet to actually be able to deliver the goods? I imagine given their expertise they would maybe target a more wholesale approach to the plan? Provide the fibre to the locations and let the ISPs manage it?

    we have a MAN in the town run by enet installed 2003 never lit
    They reannounced a fibre roll out for businesses in the town last September. Emailed for details didn't even get a reply (I work for a software company in a rural town)
    my td can't get any response out of them I dont beleive they can deliver anything on my experience apartt from siphoning gov. Money.

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭SkepticQuark


    we have a MAN in the town run by enet installed 2003 never lit
    They reannounced a fibre roll out for businesses in the town last September. Emailed for details didn't even get a reply (I work for a software company in a rural town)
    my td can't get any response out of them I dont beleive they can deliver anything on my experience apartt from siphoning gov. Money.

    So basically Eir's partner in crime? How lovely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    roddy15 wrote: »
    So basically Eir's partner in crime? How lovely.

    No .. they're actually worse than eir. Because opposed to OpenEIR (which is regulated), the government nor Comreg is interested in regulating eNets pricing of government owned infrastructure, so they can charge whatever they want. (it's a bit more complicated, but you get the picture)

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭godskitchen


    Absolutely unbelievable. I imagine Eir have seen the true cost of running fibre as part of their extra 300k and now know the nbp won't have the funds.

    If the government can get me a trunk line to within 5km of my village myself and the neighbours will do the rest ala b4rn style.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    State needs to come down hard on eir now, both in respect of access to infrastructure and uso .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,252 ✭✭✭MBSnr


    Marlow wrote: »
    No .. they're actually worse than eir. Because opposed to OpenEIR (which is regulated), the government nor Comreg is interested in regulating eNets pricing of government owned infrastructure, so they can charge whatever they want. (it's a bit more complicated, but you get the picture)

    /M

    I was originally shocked at their pricing! My understanding is that the original fibre costs have been repaid 1000s of times over since 2003 by their massive yearly rental costs.

    Our company MAN costs only reduced because of increased VDSL competition and (I'd imagine Eir's fibre backbone) in the last few years. Although still any supplier has to use eNet in our business park and all quotes we get are within 50 Euro of each other....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,141 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I'm envisaging all the civil servants now frantically trying to come up with said Plan B...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭Strawberry HillBilly



    Surely they wont renege on this commitment ...or am I just really naive?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78 ✭✭I_HAVE_NO_NAME


    Are we really surprised though? Collectively at this stage we should b4n it. F*ck the government. NBP was always cursed. Naughton handed OpenEir a gold-mine in the form of the 300K. They are a shower and we know that but they still were best suited for the NBP. As for ESB state owned fibre network that’s where our millions should’ve gone. Now we are left with eNet who’s only exsisting infrastructure are the MAN’s. What a mess... I’d love to see a timeline of all the collective f*ck up’s of this NBP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,448 ✭✭✭billbond4


    Someone on the journal posted that with 5g around the corner, vodafone and eir will be able to roll out broadband services a lot quicker and cheaper to laying fiber and i think his right


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭tsue921i8wljb3


    billbond4 wrote: »
    Someone on the journal posted that with 5g around the corner, vodafone and eir will be able to roll out broadband services a lot quicker and cheaper to laying fiber and i think his right

    I would not be taking technical advice from the comments section of the Journal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭tsue921i8wljb3


    Surely they wont renege on this commitment ...or am I just really naive?

    Hopefully they will do as they say. We can only take them at their word.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,419 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    billbond4 wrote: »
    Someone on the journal posted that with 5g around the corner, vodafone and eir will be able to roll out broadband services a lot quicker and cheaper to laying fiber and i think his right

    5g will mostly likely just be a faster version of 4g but with the same problems as every other wireless standard. Line of Sight issues, distance from mast, limited bandwidth, contention, tight data caps.

    I've no faith in wireless as I have yet to see a wireless service in Ireland that works properly 24/7 and gives the customer a stable connection with more than enough data allowance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,448 ✭✭✭billbond4


    True, but as i work in a telecomms company thats developing 5G he made a valid point that the companies are thinking long term


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,820 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    So you have Open eir owning the existing infrastructure on behalf of the state.

    Enet will run the fibre cable along said poles and presumably will be responsible for its maintenance.

    Then will we see a 3rd company actually buying it wholesale and offering it to the customer.

    So your broadband will go down and 3 companies will be blaming each other.

    Was any plan put in place to gauge the cost of running fibre in different rural areas?

    You would think a state company should be set up to rollout and maintain the fibre and then sell it on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,448 ✭✭✭billbond4


    Gonzo wrote: »
    5g will mostly likely just be a faster version of 4g but with the same problems as every other wireless standard. Line of Sight issues, distance from mast, limited bandwidth, contention, tight data caps.

    I've no faith in wireless as I have yet to see a wireless service in Ireland that works properly 24/7 and gives the customer a stable connection with more than enough data allowance.
    5G wont have those issues (if provider buys the right equipment)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,160 ✭✭✭the whole year inn


    I would not be taking technical advice from the comments section of the Journal.

    Hahaha ,that gave me a good laugh.
    On the 5g what's is the point having it if only allowed to have 20 gigs download cap.Pointless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    billbond4 wrote: »
    True, but as i work in a telecomms company thats developing 5G he made a valid point that the companies are thinking long term



    The first NBS, used 3g, provided by 3irl, since then we have evolved to 4g, and now talk of evolving to 5g. The point is that all these evolutions are short term, fibre is not


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,213 ✭✭✭MajesticDonkey


    billbond4 wrote: »
    5G wont have those issues (if provider buys the right equipment)

    Of course it'll have those problems - it's wireless. 5G won't change the laws of physics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    billbond4 wrote: »
    Someone on the journal posted that with 5g around the corner, vodafone and eir will be able to roll out broadband services a lot quicker and cheaper to laying fiber and i think his right

    5G may be around the corner, but the corner is at least 3-5years away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,448 ✭✭✭billbond4


    Hahaha ,that gave me a good laugh.
    On the 5g what's is the point having it if only allowed to have 20 gigs download cap.Pointless.

    20gb might be fine for some customers.
    At a guess It will probably be sold more on speed packages than allowances


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭tsue921i8wljb3


    So you have Open eir owning the existing infrastructure on behalf of the state.

    Enet will run the fibre cable along said poles and presumably will be responsible for its maintenance.

    Then will we see a 3rd company actually buying it wholesale and offering it to the customer.

    So your broadband will go down and 3 companies will be blaming each other.

    Was any plan put in place to gauge the cost of running fibre in different rural areas?

    You would think a state company should be set up to rollout and maintain the fibre and then sell it on.

    There would be no 3rd company. enet will be the wholesaler selling capacity to the retail ISPs similar to how Openeir and SIRO currently operate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,448 ✭✭✭billbond4


    TomOnBoard wrote: »
    5G may be around the corner, but the corner is at least 3-5years away.

    Thats around the corner for infrastructure rollout s in this country


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    So you have Open eir owning the existing infrastructure on behalf of the state.

    Enet will run the fibre cable along said poles and presumably will be responsible for its maintenance.

    Then will we see a 3rd company actually buying it wholesale and offering it to the customer.

    So your broadband will go down and 3 companies will be blaming each other.

    Was any plan put in place to gauge the cost of running fibre in different rural areas?

    You would think a state company should be set up to rollout and maintain the fibre and then sell it on.

    OpenEir owns the existing infrastructure on behalf of itself (Eir) not on behalf of the State.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    billbond4 wrote: »
    20gb might be fine for some customers.
    At a guess It will probably be sold more on speed packages than allowances

    I'm working on mobile network design for nearly a quarter of a century, 2g,3g and 4g. Forget it, it's just not a viable solution


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement