Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Werewolf XX - WWE: The Monday Night Wars

1…89111314…108

Comments

  • #302
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    No better place to start, but I feel there are no on thread tasks based on the OP. But we have no other leads, so Vernon Kay..... come on down!


  • #303
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    No better place to start, but I feel there are no on thread tasks based on the OP. But we have no other leads, so Vernon Kay..... come on down!

    This again????

    Christ on a bike.

    Tasks are specifically on-thread. it's in the OP numerous times...


  • #304
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    Why those 3 specifically? Not least because I've been named? The check in posts? That's even flimsier than my argument against you :pac::pac::pac:

    The plot thickens


  • #305
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    This again????

    Christ on a bike.

    Tasks are specifically on-thread. it's in the OP numerous times...

    Easy there Tiger.


  • #306
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    I honestly think people are being deliberately obtuse in stating the opposite of the OP. Ruddy freaking hell guys. If we can't even agree on that simple fact we are already screwed.


  • Advertisement
  • #307
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    Ruddy freaking hell guys.
    Language


  • #308
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    Why those 3 specifically? Not least because I've been named? The check in posts? That's even flimsier than my argument against you :pac::pac::pac:

    Yeah - Posts specifically checking in. Although for that to hold water you would have to be WCW, and you've drawn a lot of attention to yourself in a very confrontational way that's as liable to get you lynched as chomped, so like I said... Crazy notion.


  • #309
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    Well, if there's a task somewhere before 11am and one team won we could be looking for something 4 people did, i.e. the task was won before 5 people could complete it

    eg "first team to check in fully gets the chomp" would give us desmond, Isla and Vernon to chew on. If there's only 3, stands to reason both teams tried and ECW won, so 2 of those 3 are the ECW team. I mean, that's a crazy notion, it's far too early to accuse Vernon of being Paul Heyman. But we gots to chat about something, eh?

    I’m not quite sure I understand. There’s 3 on one team and 2 on the other that makes 5. So why are we looking at something 4 people did? Surely if it was a race, they’d all be competing regardless.

    The rest of your post confuses me even more.


  • #310
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Its funny, while I know its all random etc, I cant help but feel I have preconceived notions about players allegiances based on previous games.

    Steve is appears good and Nigel appears bad to me based on how previous games went down. I need to sort myself out


  • #311
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    No better place to start, but I feel there are no on thread tasks based on the OP. But we have no other leads, so Vernon Kay..... come on down!

    The OP explicitly says there was an on thread task for first munch.

    Game begins officially with a morning munch on Day 1, at 11:00AM. The munch will be chosen by the team who wins their on-thread task.


  • Advertisement
  • #312
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Seriously though, it clearly states that all tasks have to be completed on-thread (which I've come to realise probably rules out my theory about one team winning by default of nobody completes a task)

    I like the idea of Mary's post, even if I don't think she did a very god job of explaining it

    Not that your out of the woods yet :pac:


  • #313
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Mary, whats your thoughts on Isla calling you a wolf?


  • #314
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    I’m not quite sure I understand. There’s 3 on one team and 2 on the other that makes 5. So why are we looking at something 4 people did? Surely if it was a race, they’d all be competing regardless.

    The rest of your post confuses me even more.

    Well, if it's a race, with 3 v 2, and there are 3 'check in's (which was my criteria) then it's more likely to have been won by the 2 man team than 3 man team. Look, I admitted it was flimsy; I just wanted to take a pot shot at Isla :)


  • #315
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,026 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    REMEMBER .... LYNCH AT 9PM, Get your votes in via the link below

    https://goo.gl/forms/kpQcNeCZ2hSnCqWo2


  • #316
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    Well, if it's a race, with 3 v 2, and there are 3 'check in's (which was my criteria) then it's more likely to have been won by the 2 man team than 3 man team. Look, I admitted it was flimsy; I just wanted to take a pot shot at Isla :)

    ;) Knew it


  • #317
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Mary, whats your thoughts on Isla calling you a wolf?

    We're all looking for wolves, and we're all jumping at shadows. What's it to you? Hungry cause you missed breakfast?


  • #318
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Why are people making a confusing game even more confusing? Seriously, everyone go back and read the rules again.

    Questions about what the roles actually mean I can understand, I haven’t worked em out either. But stating the opposite of a clearly black and white rule is, in my opinion, a distraction method.


  • #319
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Honestly starting to come around to Mary's theory (even though it turns out Gabriel first mentioned it)

    Bear in mind this is all based on theory

    The people who used the phrase "checking" before 11am today were:

    Isla
    Vernon
    Desmond
    Mary
    Gabriel
    Orla

    Gabriel and Orla both used it referring to it being a potential task, and Mary also just used it now in the same context. She also said it during task time, but since she pointed it out now, it seems unlikely, if this were a task, that she was involved in it, and may have called it out coincidentally)

    So, in theory, if this were correct, Isla, Vernon and Desmond are either all WCW, or two ECW and one WCW


  • #320
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    And again, I'm not saying it's accurate, but besides the B&P thing which I started, I think it merits further discussion


  • #321
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    And again, I'm not saying it's accurate, but besides the B&P thing which I started, I think it merits further discussion

    Discuss away, I did it long before anyone else even mentioned it as I was out of town at a house show last night.

    As I will be again from 7.30pm. Nothing to hide here.


  • Advertisement
  • #322
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Isla WW wrote: »
    This again????

    Christ on a bike.

    Tasks are specifically on-thread. it's in the OP numerous times...

    I see the errors of my way clearly now. Ill be quiet


  • #323
    Vernon WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Vernon WW


    Can someone post the new lynch link on mobile atm and a bit busy to search


  • #324
    Vernon WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Vernon WW


    nevermind got it


  • #325
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    No one asked you to be quiet, Babs. In fact we need more people to speak up, and probably me to pipe down a little.


  • #326
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Fine, Im still not liking Nigel for the lynch. Cant shake the feeling that they want to get lynched. Maybe Im already too paranoid. I wont have him in my FFA

    But I will see how the FFAs go anyway.

    Right now Ill post my FFA

    Those new to the game, 2 of you at least, an FFA stands for Free For all.

    We all post 3 names we think are the most suspect. Those names are tallied up and we see whom everyone wants to lynch.

    Its a good tool.

    My top 3 names

    1.Desmond WW
    2. Liam WW
    3. Doris WW


  • #327
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Indeed more chat is needed

    Is an FFA on the roster


  • #328
    Steve WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Honestly starting to come around to Mary's theory (even though it turns out Gabriel first mentioned it)

    Bear in mind this is all based on theory

    The people who used the phrase "checking" before 11am today were:

    Isla
    Vernon
    Desmond
    Mary
    Gabriel
    Orla

    Gabriel and Orla both used it referring to it being a potential task, and Mary also just used it now in the same context. She also said it during task time, but since she pointed it out now, it seems unlikely, if this were a task, that she was involved in it, and may have called it out coincidentally)

    So, in theory, if this were correct, Isla, Vernon and Desmond are either all WCW, or two ECW and one WCW

    If the two bad teams were told to post the same word “checking” they would be outing each other from the beginning of the game. That would be a huge mistake by the mods.


  • #329
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Riona, I'm still awaiting your notes with bated breath.


    #FFA1

    1. Riona - Tasky smell off her first post. Since came on planning to post notes but... well...??

    2. Mary - Again, tasky smell off a post. I probably jumped the gun in outright calling her a wolf but my suspicions have not been dissuaded as of yet.

    3. Holly - one post about the OP and nothing since.
    Holly WW wrote: »
    Looks like Goldberg might have two kills and that Heyman can recruit people.

    Nothing since. Maybe she can at least respond to me FFAing her;)


  • #330
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Anyone wanting to do an FFA please have it in by 7pm if I'm compiling them. Thanks. :)


  • Advertisement
  • #331
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    If the two bad teams were told to post the same word “checking” they would be outing each other from the beginning of the game. That would be a huge mistake by the mods.
    True, so maybe that was only WCW's task, and ECW had a different one


Advertisement