Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off Duty Garda shoots man

13567

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,839 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Syphonax wrote: »
    If the guard was off-duty he shouldnt be carrying a gun and has no recourse to use it in force. Being off-duty means he is just a normal citizen and not a guard.

    Incorrect. All Gardaí maintain their statutory powers irrespective of whether they are on or off-duty.

    They are bound to their regulations 24/7 once they become attested members and remain so until they leave the service. In fact, Gardaí can face disciplinary action for not intervening in a situation while off-duty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    Allinall wrote: »
    100% factually incorrect.

    ...im still waiting...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    Incorrect. All Gardaí maintain their statutory powers irrespective of whether they are on or off-duty.

    They are bound to their regulations 24/7 once they become attested members and remain so until they leave the service. In fact, Gardaí can face disciplinary action for not intervening in a situation while off-duty.

    The courts might take another view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Thats toally avoiding my point, yes they can carry guns but this would have nothing to do with their job, it would be personal to them.
    No, many Gardai carry their garda-issued firearm while off-duty, legally. They're not wandering around doing their shopping on a Saturday with a gun inside their jacket, but there are plenty of circumstances where they are off duty and in possession of their Garda weapon. Legally.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,839 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Syphonax wrote: »
    The courts might take another view.

    It's specifically set out in legislation, so no, they won't take another view. In fact many people have been convicted by the courts after being arrested by off-duty Gardaí.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    seamus wrote: »
    No, many Gardai carry their garda-issued firearm while off-duty, legally. They're not wandering around doing their shopping on a Saturday with a gun inside their jacket, but there are plenty of circumstances where they are off duty and in possession of their Garda weapon. Legally.

    Seems quite contradictory your posts, im sure certain cops do do their shopping with gun in toe. Are you following armed guards around the place to confirm your supposition ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,667 ✭✭✭harr


    There are 5 or 6 units within the guards that carry firearms and a lot of those are not based at any one station so it's necessary bring his/her gun home.
    So a guard tackles 3 suspects and manages to take one down with a non fatal shot and people are calling for him to be fired, should be getting a medal in my opinion.
    Maybe she should have given him a hug and asked if he wanted to have a chat about anything....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    It's specifically set out in legislation, so no, they won't take another view. In fact many people have been convicted by the courts after being arrested by off-duty Gardaí.

    Ah legislation, yes never interrupted by courts in a different way !!!! I already said guards can affect arrests, SHOOTING people though im sure its not as plain as you make it out ot be


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Seems quite contradictory your posts, im sure certain cops do do their shopping with gun in toe. Are you following armed guards around the place to confirm your supposition ?
    Ah, I see you're just a spoofer and a timewaster. So you assert that it's illegal to carry off-duty, but you assert that they carry it while doing their shopping. And then accuse me of making things up.

    Welcome to my ignore list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    We need more of this.
    More armed units around the country and officers that can carry all the time.
    If you are doing nothing wrong you have nothing to worry about.
    Might make the scumbags think twice.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    Syphonax wrote: »
    im sure its not as plain as you make it out ot be

    And yet you already have this guy thrown out of his job and being arrested.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Barry Badrinath


    The worst thing about boards is the amount of people who have very little knowledge of a subject but bash the keyboard and convince themselves that they have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭George Sunsnow


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Seems quite contradictory your posts, im sure certain cops do do their shopping with gun in toe. Are you following armed guards around the place to confirm your supposition ?

    The bottom of the barrel of your argument need cleaning?
    Pardon the pun


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    seamus wrote: »
    Ah, I see you're just a spoofer and a timewaster. So you assert that it's illegal to carry off-duty, but you assert that they carry it while doing their shopping. And then accuse me of making things up.

    Welcome to my ignore list.

    Why are you name calling me? is that really necessary?

    You posts is not answering the questions I put to you, you're just going off on a tangent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Ah legislation, yes never interrupted by courts in a different way !!!! I already said guards can affect arrests, SHOOTING people though im sure its not as plain as you make it out ot be


    anything a garda can legally do on-duty they can legally do off-duty. If they are carrying an issued firearm off-duty they can use it as if they were on-duty. otherwise what would be the point of carrying it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Ah legislation, yes never interrupted by courts in a different way !!!! I already said guards can affect arrests, SHOOTING people though im sure its not as plain as you make it out ot be

    You haven't yet said what you are basing any of your incorrect claims on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    The bottom of the barrel of your argument need cleaning?
    Pardon the pun

    pfft the responses from so many 'knowledgeable' people on here is laughable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭begbysback


    The worst thing about boards is the amount of people who have very little knowledge of a subject but bash the keyboard and convince themselves that they have.

    Any facts to back this up?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    seamus wrote: »
    No, many Gardai carry their garda-issued firearm while off-duty, legally. They're not wandering around doing their shopping on a Saturday with a gun inside their jacket, but there are plenty of circumstances where they are off duty and in possession of their Garda weapon. Legally.

    Seems a bit pointless if they are not allowed use them and we have a separate armed response unit.

    This is on the basis of the incident in Sligo where they claimed the unit was 42km's away.

    Could they not call on a few detectives to go down armed and control the situation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    anything a garda can legally do on-duty they can legally do off-duty. If they are carrying an issued firearm off-duty they can use it as if they were on-duty. otherwise what would be the point of carrying it?

    OK so shooting someone without any backup while not on the clock will leave the inevitable court case open to no ridicule, yeah right


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭Rushden


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Ah legislation, yes never interrupted by courts in a different way !!!! I already said guards can affect arrests, SHOOTING people though im sure its not as plain as you make it out ot be

    With the way you phrase it you'd swear he walked up and just shot a random person, as if he was doing a hit on someone. I'd wait for more details but sounds like it was a shooting in the course of his duty. As others said there's numerous specialist units that have personal issue firearms that they carry off duty , if you did their job you would too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    RasTa wrote: »
    Seems a bit pointless if they are not allowed use them and we have a separate armed response unit.

    This is on the basis of the incident in Sligo where they claimed the unit was 42km's away.

    Could they not call on a few detectives to go down armed and control the situation?

    Control how? By shooting people?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    If he killed a terrorist on his way to commit an act would the usual whingers still be giving out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    anything a garda can legally do on-duty they can legally do off-duty. If they are carrying an issued firearm off-duty they can use it as if they were on-duty. otherwise what would be the point of carrying it?

    So armed guards are allowed to take the law into their own hands will not on duty??? hmmmm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    If he killed a terrorist on his way to commit an act would the usual whingers still be giving out?

    Same rules apply, even if he killed mother Teresa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Syphonax wrote: »
    OK so shooting someone without any backup while not on the clock will leave the inevitable court case open to no ridicule, yeah right

    i can only presume that you are trolling. no other excuse for the shoite you are posting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    Syphonax wrote: »
    So armed guards are allowed to take the law into their own hands will not on duty??? hmmmm

    That's their job.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    Syphonax wrote: »
    So armed guards are allowed to take the law into their own hands will not on duty??? hmmmm

    Eh, armed Gardai ARE law!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,880 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Syphonax wrote: »
    OK so shooting someone without any backup while not on the clock will leave the inevitable court case open to no ridicule, yeah right

    What if it was just 1 minute after his shift ended?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    Rushden wrote: »
    With the way you phrase it you'd swear he walked up and just shot a random person, as if he was doing a hit on someone. I'd wait for more details but sounds like it was a shooting in the course of his duty. As others said there's numerous specialist units that have personal issue firearms that they carry off duty , if you did their job you would too

    I havent phrased anything, ive little details of the incident, as do you. Cops are above reproach though yeah? and there is no way he would abuse his position and weapon, right?!


Advertisement
Advertisement