Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

proposed €19m tourist development of the HellFire Club

Options
13567

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    New visuals for the proposed project have been released

    Artists-impression-of-proposed-visitors-centre.jpg

    Aerial-view-of-model-of-proposed-visitors-centre.jpg

    View-of-proposed-visitors-centre-from-Hell-Fire-Wood.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    It might be a good idea to take some photos of the area now and compare them after the works.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Not being up in Dublin much these days I've only got to hear of this development recently and I just can't understand it. Why does everything have to be interpreted, have massive car parks, and somewhere to buy tea and pee? How did we manage before?

    There's no doubt that the Hell Fire Club building could do with a makeover but this... I heard an FF Councillor (?) on RTE this morning and the best he could come up with was 'there's nowhere to get a cup of coffee' . :rolleyes:

    How about we leave the countryside unspoilt for those who respect and enjoy it and the rest of the hoi polloi can go to Tayto Park or the Costa whatever - we'll all be happier then. As for the tourists, from my long experience of dealing with them first hand I find they aren't interested in being herded into these centres - as for treetop walkways.

    Instead of wasting millions wrecking the Dublin Mountains the money would be better spent on social housing and if there's anything left, the 'so-called' bird sanctuary at Booterstown could do with an interpretative centre/bird hide and a proper management plan for the place sorted out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    I have just visited the Round Tower Heritage Centre in Clondalkin. O.M.G!! If the Hellfire Interpretive Centre is designed in any way like Clondalkin, then I just shudder to think what tourists will think of it. The Clondalkin centre is just dreadful. Any one interested in history will be sorely disappointed as it is really only directed at (very young) children. Horrendous!


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,630 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Is this really the best use for €19m (or €15m as was said yesterday on the radio)? We're still in a homeless crisis, and we're spending €15m on a cafe in the mountains?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    €19m won't fix the housing problem. It's not a money problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,630 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    seamus wrote: »
    €19m won't fix the housing problem. It's not a money problem.

    Tell that to the 70 families that it would house.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    seamus wrote: »
    €19m won't fix the housing problem. It's not a money problem.

    So it's okay to squander the money on this nonsense? We had one of these all singing, all dancing Int.Centres here - opened in 1998 and closing this summer with the premises flogged on the quiet to some businessman.

    http://www.southeastradio.ie/2017/05/1798-centre-in-enniscorthy-to-close-after-nearly-20-years/


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    So it's okay to squander the money on this nonsense? We had one of these all singing, all dancing Int.Centres here - opened in 1998 and closing this summer with the premises flogged on the quiet to some businessman.
    Sure why build anything then? Don't they all fail? Why don't we just leave everything "unspoiled"? Leave Newgrange and the Hill of Tara wild and unkempt for people to discover for themselves. Leave the Book of Kells on some library shelf for anyone to take out when they want to look at it. Sure museums and visitors' centres, all a load of nonsense.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Newgrange is a bad joke and Knowth or Dowth are much better as they haven't been sanitised for moolah. Don't mention the Cliffs of Moher....grr. :mad:

    http://www.knowth.com/dowth.htm

    dowth-mound.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Here's another wonderful Int.Centre - The Corlea Trackway - which attracts virtually nobody and cost several million. it was one of CJ Haughey's wet dreams.

    10-Corlea-Bog-Trackway-1-e1377101253191.jpg?resize=460%2C308

    http://www.longfordtourism.ie/see-do/attractions/corlea-trackway-visitor-centre/

    It attracted a massive 5,331 visitors in 2015!
    http://www.opw.ie/en/pressreleases/2016/articleheading,36092,en.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,367 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    seamus wrote: »
    €19m won't fix the housing problem. It's not a money problem.

    Budgets allocate funding over different areas, you can pump 100% of the budget into housing , that's just daft and totally unfair to tax payers. The homeless get enough of a % off-the-budget.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,303 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    New visuals for the proposed project have been released

    Artists-impression-of-proposed-visitors-centre.jpg

    Aerial-view-of-model-of-proposed-visitors-centre.jpg

    View-of-proposed-visitors-centre-from-Hell-Fire-Wood.jpg

    As with the Lexicon in Dun Laoghaire, the CGI impressions aren't doing the proposal for the Hellfire Club any favors. Prior to when the Lexicon was being build, I was completely opposed to it. This is mainly because the CGI replica made it look more like the Irish Fisheries Board building (which is an absolute eyesore) and less like the impressive feat it has transpired to be. The actual buildings proposed for the Hellfire could do with being less boxy as they end up looking quite clinical in nature.

    The tree top walk way is a very welcome part of this plan as it provides a unique experience to those visiting. I see a lot of the usual objections on the grounds of it being man-made. If that's the case, why is there a roadway i.e. the Old Military Road slicing through the nearby Sally Gap? After all, that is also man-made.

    Next, there are the objections the cafe which is absolutely ridiculous. I doubt that there would be as many people visiting Powerscourt Garden Center if there wasn't a cafe and it was left to become dilapidated without landscaping and other reinvigorating measures.

    The whole point of broadening the purpose and function of the landmark is to attract more people to it. Unlike some of the failed example provided in this thread, the Hellfire Club has the advantage of being right next to the capital and one of Dublins most heavily populated postal districts, Dublin 24.

    Then again, many of the crusties won't stop until nature has completely reclaimed what man has built!
    SaveSave


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,367 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Why is there a need to attract more people to it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,303 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    ted1 wrote: »
    Why is there a need to attract more people to it?

    Why not?

    If there is untapped potential in a place, it should be exploited.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Is this really the best use for €19m (or €15m as was said yesterday on the radio)? We're still in a homeless crisis, and we're spending €15m on a cafe in the mountains?

    Why does every bit of tax payer's money have to go to the "housing crisis"?

    This is an attraction for tax payer's to bring their kids to or enjoy it themselves.

    Don't tax payer's deserve something in return too?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    ....... wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.
    And the important parts will remain undeveloped.

    Surely you're not saying that a car park and 200m of forest trail leading up from it are the things that bring you the Hellfire?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    ted1 wrote: »
    Why is there a need to attract more people to it?

    Because SDCC has amassed a large budget to develop a "tourism" product and has extremely limited opportunities to exploit develop the tourism potential of their demesne.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,307 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Why does every bit of tax payer's money have to go to the "housing crisis"?

    To be fair sometimes its hospitals that everyone shouts about or whatever is in the news that day


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    ted1 wrote: »
    Budgets allocate funding over different areas, you can pump 100% of the budget into housing , that's just daft and totally unfair to tax payers. The homeless get enough of a % off-the-budget.

    That has little to do with Dublin County Council wasting money and destroying a location such as the Hell Fire club; leave the wild areas of Ireland wild, look after them and the visitors will come.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,367 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    ted1 wrote: »
    Budgets allocate funding over different areas, you can pump 100% of the budget into housing , that's just daft and totally unfair to tax payers. The homeless get enough of a % off-the-budget.

    That has little to do with Dublin County Council wasting money and destroying a location such as the Hell Fire club; leave the wild areas of Ireland wild, look after them and the visitors will come.
    I agree , I was disagreeing with the poster who thinks that it shouldn't be built as the money should go towards housing.

    Is it not SDCC as opposed to Dublin City?


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    ....... wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.
    Care to explain what part doesn't make sense?

    You go to the hill for a hilly forest walk, to visit an old ruin and take in views of the surrounding area. The old ruin, the views, and the majority of the forest walk, will be completely untouched by this proposal.

    So what exactly is it that you fear?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    ....... wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.
    Right, we've been over it then. It's just NIMBYism. You oppose any kind of development, "unspoiled", "commercialising everything", "I like it as it is", and so forth, rather than having any sound rational basis for why this would be a bad thing.

    The "attraction" will be untouched, access to it will be improved and additional local amenities created. The cost is €19m and a small amount of unremarkable man-made trails and forests being altered.

    I don't see the problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


Advertisement