Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Terrorist Attack in Manchester (Read MOD WARNING in OP Updated 24/05/2017))

12627293132112

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    Absolutely not true. Check any atrocity during the IRA campaign and then look up the next days newspaper to see immediate condemnations from the leading politicians of the day (both govt and opposition), religious leaders and others.

    The lack of similar condemnations from the leaders of Islam is deafening.

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/23/uk-muslim-leaders-condemn-cowardly-london-attack

    "The Muslim Council of Britain, which condemned the attack and offered prayers for the victims on Wednesday, issued a further statement on Thursday praising the Met police, the prime minister and the mayor of London.

    The group’s general secretary, Harun Khan, said: “This attack was cowardly and depraved. There is no justification for this act whatsoever. The best response to this outrage is to make sure we come together in solidarity and not allow the terrorists to divide us."

    http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2017/04/10/muslim_leaders_condemn_attacks_on_egypts_coptic_churches/1304748

    https://thinkprogress.org/heres-your-list-of-muslim-leaders-around-the-world-that-condemned-the-massacre-in-orlando-102457ade0aa[URL][/url]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    punk_one82 wrote: »
    Yes, back to the "every refugee is a terrorist" sentiment. Well done.

    I didn't say that. I am asking is it OK for these terrorists to even be given the slightest opportunity to get into Europe so they can eliminate our children?


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And I really hope the people defending this nonsense aren't caught up in it and all of their family are safe in the aftermath.

    Who is defending this attack?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,417 ✭✭✭chupacabra


    OhHiMark wrote: »
    Admit it, you've been delighted since this happened haven't you?

    You should be ashamed of yourself. Get some help.

    RIP to the victims.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,690 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    ffs give it a rest!!!

    both sides.

    Its Pathetic.

    Fair enough if want have a discussion, but the stupid digs surely can wait for another time.

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Erik Shin wrote: »
    Regardless of your views on Islam, I do have a horrid feeling that it's just a matter of time before we see an attack in Ireland.
    We have Facebook, Google etc in Dublin, American planes refuelling at Shannon....Any one of these could be used as an excuse for an attack....As someone who was in Paris on Nov 13th, it is a very, very scary thought

    Surely the thing to worry about is we have pop concerts in Dublin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭AnneFrank


    Discodog wrote: »
    Would there of been the same reaction here to the IRA bombing of Manchester ? Stop all Irish immigration, ban Catholicism etc ?

    Security at the arena made a huge mistake.

    I'm not sure that's fair, it happened outside the stadium, this sort of thing is very hard to police, that's the problem


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    "The best response to this outrage is to make sure we come together in solidarity and not allow the terrorists to divide us."

    Now where have I heard that before...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Syria where they can be with their like minded friends?

    Ah, my bad, I hadn't realised I was dealing with stupid.clearly gave you far too much credit. I'll leave it there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Who is defending this attack?

    Sorry, I should have clarified. The nonsense I was talking about is allowing refugees in without any sort of vetting. Of course nobody is defending the attack.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    You'd have to worry that an attack like this in ireland is extremely likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    AnneFrank wrote: »
    I'm not sure that's fair, it happened outside the stadium, this sort of thing is very hard to police, that's the problem

    No it didn't, it happened in the foyer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    You'd have to worry that an attack like this in ireland is extremely likely.

    No it is OK, all the refugees in our country are fine. None of them will want to cause any damage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭evil_seed


    when I saw the news this morning and it being reported as "a "terror" attack" I thought to myself, oh here we go. Terror is now the code word for Islam. Terrorist attacks are terrorist attacks regardless of the religiouls background of the perpetrator. The incident in Times square last week is also a terrorist attack in my view. Just because he is American, and local to NY does not detract from the definition. Why do the media have to use code words now? And what's worse is it subliminally changes your own view, so when I saw "Terror" I immediately thought Islam, then had to say "F*** you self".
    /rant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭Game Face MCGee


    So sad to see this happen to people just out for a night to enjoy themselves,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    I was watching Gogglebox last Friday, on it they showed the program about the real life story of the girls who were groomed to have sex with Asian Muslim men in Rochdale.
    The Siddiqui family who are Asian Muslim men on the show said it was hard to watch knowing people would associate them with these men due to where they came from. They were clearly sickened by what the men in Rochdale had done.

    The vast vast majority of Muslims will be absolutely sickened by what happened in Manchester last night.
    A minority will be delighted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    evil_seed wrote: »
    when I saw the news this morning and it being reported as "a "terror" attack" I thought to myself, oh here we go. Terror is now the code word for Islam. Terrorist attacks are terrorist attacks regardless of the religiouls background of the perpetrator. The incident in Times square last week is also a terrorist attack in my view. Just because he is American, and local to NY does not detract from the definition. Why do the media have to use code words now? And what's worse is it subliminally changes your own view, so when I saw "Terror" I immediately thought Islam, then had to say "F*** you self".
    /rant

    Let's be honest, at least 90% of these attacks are Islam related so don't be too hard on yourself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭Parchment


    RobertKK wrote: »
    I was watching Gogglebox last Friday, on it they showed the program about the real life story of the girls who were groomed to have sex with Asian Muslim men in Rochdale.
    The Siddiqui family who are Asian Muslim men on the show said it was hard to watch knowing people would associate them with these men due to where they came from. They were clearly sickened by what the men in Rochdale had done.

    The vast vast majority of Muslims will be absolutely sickened by what happened in Manchester last night.
    A minority will be delighted.


    Im sure many muslims are but where is the outcry from Muslim communities condemning this? I dont see it and i havent seen it since this rash of attacks started.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭bmwguy


    Good to see the Muslim leaders condemning it. Any chance they could come out and be honest? Until they do it won't stop.

    How about an open message to the extremists:

    Dont go blowing yourself up lads
    You won't go to heaven
    You will be just dead. Forever. Along with the little children you just killed.
    You won't have loads of virgins to ride
    There is no Allah
    We made it all up
    Jokes on you
    Sorry about that
    Leave the Christians alone there religion is made up too

    Shows the absurdity of what they believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    evil_seed wrote: »
    when I saw the news this morning and it being reported as "a "terror" attack" I thought to myself, oh here we go. Terror is now the code word for Islam. Terrorist attacks are terrorist attacks regardless of the religiouls background of the perpetrator. The incident in Times square last week is also a terrorist attack in my view. Just because he is American, and local to NY does not detract from the definition. Why do the media have to use code words now? And what's worse is it subliminally changes your own view, so when I saw "Terror" I immediately thought Islam, then had to say "F*** you self".
    /rant

    Was Times Square linked to a very misguided political aim?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I didn't say that. I am asking is it OK for these terrorists to even be given the slightest opportunity to get into Europe so they can eliminate our children?

    I don't believe anyone is saying let terrorists in?


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,742 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    You'd have to worry that an attack like this in ireland is extremely likely.
    We are on an ISIS list of potential targets so it's a possibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    bubblypop wrote: »
    I don't believe anyone is saying let terrorists in?

    It would take a really simple minded individual to think that terrorists haven't infiltrated the innocent refugee groups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,738 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    It did happen. Every killing of even one person attributed to republicans was condemned by the taoiseach, opposition leader, head of Catholic church etc.

    Big difference between Ireland and the entire muslim world. Would you expect Ireland, Finland, USA, Portugal etc to have all aspects of society coming out to condemn something done by a Bulgarian or when a western drone misses its target and kills innocents?
    Islam doesn't have a pope figure but there are always plenty of condemnations from muslim leaders when something like this happens.

    All besides the point anyhow, heart goes out to Manchester, England and the UK. So awful to think of such innocents killed. RIP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Sarz91


    And I really hope the people defending this nonsense aren't caught up in it and all of their family are safe in the aftermath.

    Who is defending "this nonsense" as you put it? Nobody in their right mind approves of this type of act. The point some of us are trying to make is that you cannot simply just deport people based on their religion or views.

    The idea that you would turn child refugees away and deport them back to a war torn country because "how would this child benefit us" or "he/she is Muslim, they're bound to blow something up" is beyond me. How do you go about dehumanising someone to that scale so that they're so inferior to you, you just don't care what happens to them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    evil_seed wrote: »
    when I saw the news this morning and it being reported as "a "terror" attack" I thought to myself, oh here we go. Terror is now the code word for Islam. Terrorist attacks are terrorist attacks regardless of the religiouls background of the perpetrator. The incident in Times square last week is also a terrorist attack in my view. Just because he is American, and local to NY does not detract from the definition. Why do the media have to use code words now? And what's worse is it subliminally changes your own view, so when I saw "Terror" I immediately thought Islam, then had to say "F*** you self".
    /rant

    Yeah, it sucks that way. I do it myself, and I think many people do. The main difference is when people allow their fear to change how they treat other ordinary people getting on with their lives because they are Muslim, a refugee, or look different. That is the coward's trap, imo.

    It's awful what happened there last night. I have friends there who are fans and I don't know if they were at the concert or were involved. But even if they're all fine (and I hope they are!), there's many people today that will be thinking the same thoughts and won't have the relief of everyone being okay.


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sorry, I should have clarified. The nonsense I was talking about is allowing refugees in without any sort of vetting. Of course nobody is defending the attack.

    Well thankfully no one is letting in refugees without vetting them first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭0ph0rce0


    Sarz91 wrote: »
    Who is defending "this nonsense" as you put it? Nobody in their right mind approves of this type of act. The point some of us are trying to make is that you cannot simply just deport people based on their religion or views.

    You should when they blow up your children.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement