Near misses - mod warning 22/04 - see OP/post 822

mp31 · 21-04-2017 12:03PM

Annie get your Run wrote: »

Jesus that's beyond awful, I hope you're okay KS and here's hoping the motorist gets what they deserve. Glad to hear others stopped to help.

+1... and please report it via TrafficWatch

Tenzor07 · 21-04-2017 12:03PM

trente wrote: »

Cyclists, please stop breaking lights. Some of the near misses for pedestrians at red lights is also dangerous and too common

I don't see you going onto the Motors forums asking Car/van or Motorbike drivers to slow down and not break red lights etc, a far bigger cause of serious pedestrian(and cyclist) injuries and worse than a pedal cyclist!

Beasty · 21-04-2017 12:04PM

trente

Coming into a forum you've never been in before lecturing regulars on issues they've been lectured on hundreds of times before is not appreciated. Continuing to do so after this warning will be considered trolling

If you have any questions please PM me - do not respond to this warning in thread

Everyone else - there's no need to respond further to trente's posts

Thanks

BoardsMember · 21-04-2017 12:07PM

mr spuckler wrote: »

i've had numerous dangerous overtakes there, by cars overtaking me on the bridge and then turning left immediately onto Adelaide road. the fact that it's happened to me several times means i know it's coming as they skim past me and hence am ready to jump on the brakes but it still pisses me off no end.

kind of on the same point, has anyone ever gone to the gardaí and asked them to pay attention to a particular junction etc? like it really would be shooting fish in a barrel if they stood there during rush hour every morning. i'm thinking of doing it for a cycle lane in raheny that's constantly parked in during its hours of use / operation.

I did late last year. Cyclists (of which I am one) were routinely breaking the pedestrian lights in Terenure in the morning, lights outside the boys national school and Aldi. So a busy crossing with kids, buggies, parents crossing all the time from 8.30 to 9. I contacted the Gardai and the next day and the following days there was someone town-side of the lights pulling in cyclists. I also brought to their attention that the sequence for Green Man was very short, quickly going flashing amber, which cyclists took as a blast-through signal. Within a week they had remarked the crossing, changed the lights and changed the sequence so that it is a long Green Man now. So it is worth a shot.

V-man · 21-04-2017 12:12PM

RayCun wrote: »

How about

would you be happy if car drivers adopted a policy of rolling up, taking a look, and driving through when they thought it was safe?

Yes, cars are bigger and heavier, but if the roadway is clear and there are no pedestrians crossing, that's not a problem, is it?

That is exactly what I see motorists doing everyday, everywhere, multiple times.
But why people only complain about cyclists and turning a blind eye for the real problem, motorists?

RayCun · 21-04-2017 12:19PM

V-man wrote: »

That is exactly what I see motorists doing everyday, everywhere, multiple times.
But why people only complain about cyclists and turning a blind a day for the real problem, motorists?

What makes you think I turn a blind eye to motorists?

It's much more dangerous when a car goes through lights, or a driver is on the phone, or not paying attention to other road users. The gardai should crack down on it, I'd feel a lot safer if traffic laws were enforced.

But, as we all know, there is no clear division between cyclists and motorists. People cycle sometimes, they drive sometimes. And when I see cyclists ignoring traffic lights, for example, because they reckon it is safe, I wonder what they are like when they get behind the wheel.

Tombo2001 · 21-04-2017 12:25PM

RayCun wrote: »

What makes you think I turn a blind eye to motorists?

It's much more dangerous when a car goes through lights, or a driver is on the phone, or not paying attention to other road users. The gardai should crack down on it, I'd feel a lot safer if traffic laws were enforced.

But, as we all know, there is no clear division between cyclists and motorists. People cycle sometimes, they drive sometimes. And when I see cyclists ignoring traffic lights, for example, because they reckon it is safe, I wonder what they are like when they get behind the wheel.

My own view is that being both a cyclist and a motorist will make you better at both cycling and driving. You understand both perspectives.

You are right that a lot of cyclists are also motorists. A substantial portion aren't - especially teenagers and young foreign nationals.

However, most motorists are not also cyclists.

Tenzor07 · 21-04-2017 12:25PM

RayCun wrote: »

but, as we all know, there is no clear division between cyclists and motorists. People cycle sometimes, they drive sometimes. And when I see cyclists ignoring traffic lights, for example, because they reckon it is safe, I wonder what they are like when they get behind the wheel.

So what do you think cyclist to motorist and vice-versa are like when they switch modes of transport?

RayCun · 21-04-2017 12:30PM

Tenzor07 wrote: »

So what do you think cyclist to motorist and vice-versa are like when they switch modes of transport?

I'm unlikely to recognise another cyclist seeing them cycling again a week later. Chances of recognising them when they are driving a car are much lower. So I can't really tell.

I'm sure some are better drivers, because they are on the look-out for cyclists.

Perhaps some are terrible drivers, because it doesn't matter which mode of transport they are using, they ignore the rules of the road and do whatever is most convenient for them.

Tenzor07 · 21-04-2017 12:36PM

RayCun wrote: »

Perhaps some are terrible drivers, because it doesn't matter which mode of transport they are using, they ignore the rules of the road and do whatever is most convenient for them.

I think you answered your own question so, that people's behavior is not directly related to there mode of transport and more so to there own standards of morality...

RayCun · 21-04-2017 12:42PM

Tenzor07 wrote: »

I think you answered your own question so, that people's behavior is not directly related to there mode of transport and more so to there own standards of morality...

So you think that cyclists who break the rules are probably also drivers that break the rules?

BoardsMember · 21-04-2017 12:46PM

Speaking for myself, I would never break a light in a car, as a cyclist I would break a light in certain circumstances.

Obviously depends on the individual, but for me I am fairly sure I am more aware of, careful around & courteous to cyclists than I would be if I never cycled a bike.

Johnnio13 · 21-04-2017 12:50PM

+1 Kasir Sose on reporting it.

The majority of the stories here relate to Dublin junctions. I've been through most of them over 15 years of cycling around Dublin and the same ones are still big problems, all mentioned here. (Ranelagh, around the Barge in general, Dorset Street etc. )
Now I'm West the only time (touch wood) I encounter the aggressive driving behaviour is during the morning/evening commute and stupid driving to date has been due to complete lack of use of wing mirrors around Galway city and Salthill. They just don't expect cyclists.
My closest in Galway so far is being over taken by a van driver in Salthill on Monday who I could see in his wing mirror was looking right and immediately after passing me pulls into the curb in front of me. Hadn't seen me at all. I banged on the door and spoke out angrily that he needed to use his f$%king mirrors when making lefts and rights etc. And he just nodded from the safety of the cabin. He even locked the door.
It was only when I was cycling away, fuming, that I saw what spooked him. I had the garden sheers on my cross bar as I just had them sharpened!!

Tenzor07 · 21-04-2017 01:01PM

RayCun wrote: »

So you think that cyclists who break the rules are probably also drivers that break the rules?

Does it matter what I think? You'd have to conduct a survey or behavioral analysis of all road users to find that one out...

magicbastarder · 21-04-2017 01:07PM

BoardsMember wrote: »

Speaking for myself, I would never break a light in a car, as a cyclist I would break a light in certain circumstances.

i adhere to higher standards driving than i would cycling. i've even been known to do a u-turn on a one way road on a bike, a manouevre i'd consider lunatic in a car.

BoardsMember · 21-04-2017 01:27PM

magicbastarder wrote: »

i adhere to higher standards driving than i would cycling. i've even been known to do a u-turn on a one way road on a bike, a manouevre i'd consider lunatic in a car.

I think that's the case with a lot of cyclists, certainly is with any friends that I have cycled with anyhow.

RayCun · 21-04-2017 01:29PM

BoardsMember wrote: »

Speaking for myself, I would never break a light in a car, as a cyclist I would break a light in certain circumstances.

If it is okay to break a red light on a bike when it is safe, why is it not okay to break a red light in a car when it is safe?

BoardsMember · 21-04-2017 01:33PM

RayCun wrote: »

If it is okay to break a red light on a bike when it is safe, why is it not okay to break a red light in a car when it is safe?

Who said it was ok?

magicbastarder · 21-04-2017 01:33PM

ehh... because the consequences can be far worse if you do get it wrong?
is that a trick question?

Tombo2001 · 21-04-2017 01:36PM

magicbastarder wrote: »

ehh... because the consequences can be far worse if you do get it wrong?
is that a trick question?

If its ok to drive at 51k an hour in a 50k zone, is it ok to drive at 151k in a 50k zone.

its not ok to do either, by the law.

Lots of people drive at 51k an hour in a 50k zone.

Not many people reach 151k an hour.

V-man · 21-04-2017 01:38PM

"If a cyclist waits for green, and a bus or HGV or car wants to turn left … that’s how most cyclists in London are being killed"

Link:
Should cyclists be allowed to run red lights?

magicbastarder · 21-04-2017 01:44PM

Tombo2001 wrote: »

If its ok to drive at 51k an hour in a 50k zone, is it ok to drive at 151k in a 50k zone.

its not ok to do either, by the law.

if you want to argue that point; if you're caught doing 51km/h in a 50km/h zone, nothing will happen you.
if you're caught doing 70km/h, you'll be done for speeding.
if you're caught doing 151km/h, you'll be done for dangerous driving.

even the law (or its execution) sees various shades of seriousness in violating it.

RayCun · 21-04-2017 01:45PM

magicbastarder wrote: »

ehh... because the consequences can be far worse if you do get it wrong?

You might kill someone, directly or by causing others to crash, you might get killed.
I don't see much difference in the potential consequences.

(yes, yes, I know - the chances of a cyclist going through a red light resulting in someone's death are vanishingly small. Guess what? The chances of a car going through a pedestrian light and causing someone's death, or going through an it-was-amber-a-minute-ago light and causing someone's death, are also vanishingly small. Thousands of cars do it multiple times a day, and rarely do people die as a result. Does that make it okay?)

Tombo2001 · 21-04-2017 01:46PM

V-man wrote: »

"If a cyclist waits for green, and a bus or HGV or car wants to turn left … that’s how most cyclists in London are being killed"

Link:
Should cyclists be allowed to run red lights?

I think its a very fair point. You are sat at a pedestrian light on O'Connell St with 6 buses, a few vans and taxi drivers you can

(I) wait for the green light and wait for the ten heavy duty vehicles to take off around you, some will be pulling in 50 yards down the road, you'll be overtaking them into busy traffic.

or

(II) break the red light, (at little risk to pedestrians based on historic statistics of accidents reported) and you are in a completely empty road to the next minute or two.

V-man · 21-04-2017 01:47PM

Tombo2001 wrote: »

I think its a very fair point. You are sat at a pedestrian light on O'Connell St with 6 buses, a few vans and taxi drivers you can

(I) wait for the green light and wait for the ten heavy duty vehicles to take off around you, some will be pulling in 50 yards down the road, you'll be overtaking them into busy traffic.

or

(II) break the red light, (at little risk to pedestrians based on historic statistics of accidents reported) and you are in a completely empty road to the next minute or two.

Nail on the head

Lemming · 21-04-2017 01:47PM

BoardsMember wrote: »

Speaking for myself, I would never break a light in a car, as a cyclist I would break a light in certain circumstances.

RayCun wrote: »

If it is okay to break a red light on a bike when it is safe, why is it not okay to break a red light in a car when it is safe?

I would assume (and hope) that BoardsMember is referring to circumstances that are based on personal safety, not convenience RayCun. Such scenarios would be few and far between. But I shall cite you the Elephant & Castle in London as a glaringly obvious example. Seriously; go look at the cyclist death statistics for that junction over the last three years and why and then climb back into your box.

RayCun · 21-04-2017 01:48PM

V-man wrote: »

"If a cyclist waits for green, and a bus or HGV or car wants to turn left … that’s how most cyclists in London are being killed"

Evidence for this?

I know large vehicles turning left are a major cause of death, but are they killing cyclists who were sitting in front of them at a light, waiting for green, and were run over by a vehicle which took off quicker from the light?

Tombo2001 · 21-04-2017 01:48PM

RayCun wrote: »

You might kill someone, directly or by causing others to crash, you might get killed.
I don't see much difference in the potential consequences.

(yes, yes, I know - the chances of a cyclist going through a red light resulting in someone's death are vanishingly small. Guess what? The chances of a car going through a pedestrian light and causing someone's death, or going through an it-was-amber-a-minute-ago light and causing someone's death, are also vanishingly small. Thousands of cars do it multiple times a day, and rarely do people die as a result. Does that make it okay?)

I would disagree.

I can think in my own area of numerous examples of people being killed by cars as they walked through pedestrian lights.

Lemming · 21-04-2017 01:50PM

RayCun wrote: »

Evidence for this?

I know large vehicles turning left are a major cause of death, but are they killing cyclists who were sitting in front of them at a light, waiting for green, and were run over by a vehicle which took off quicker from the light?

Yes.

RayCun · 21-04-2017 01:51PM

Lemming wrote: »

But I shall cite you the Elephant & Castle in London as a glaringly obvious example. Seriously; go look at the cyclist death statistics for that junction over the last three years and why and then climb back into your box.

That's a roundabout?

Near misses - mod warning 22/04 - see OP/post 822

Comments