Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Gameweek 34 Transfers.

13567…13

Comments

  • #62
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Benimar wrote: »
    Not making any decisions until Friday. I have 2FTs and the obvious moves are Siggy and Aguero/Lukaku to Zaha and Ibra.

    Ibra is the obvious choice for captain, but if Man U lose to Chelsea and beat Anderlecht, I'm not confident he plays both league games. Then Kane becomes a serious, Serious option.

    Results at LFC and Arsenal could also impact on his team selections.


  • #63
    dahat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,196 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    Vardy to Zlatan
    Chambers to PVA

    All.seems rather obvious to me even at this early stage..


  • #64
    spock.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    clairewithani wrote:
    I don't really know. Kane seems to be more in-form. But surely now Spurs have top 4 guaranteed. Utd still striving for it.


    Top 4 is not their target. Winning the league is.


  • #65
    FutureGuy
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    pimpmyhat wrote: »
    If your friend kloparama was here he would prob tell you to email the head office of fantasy football and ask for an in depth copy of the rules, read over it for 10-14 hours,
    Walk 10 miles in your bare feet and then ask our opinion on the matter

    MOD: pimpmyhat, I have asked for this to be dropped earlier in the week in the transfer thread. Won't ask again.


  • #66
    FutureGuy
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Not entirely true.

    I wouldn't have responded because the last time I tried to help he reported my post and I was warned for breaking the Boards rule of 'no sarcasm'.

    So I'll have to try and avoid responding to the easily offended, that will report my post, in case I receive another ban.

    In this instance though, seen as you have suggested what I may have done, I would have suggested that the tiniest modicum of effort on the FPL rules page would have cleared up his concerns. And I wouldn't have used any sarcasm.

    Wonder will you get warned or banned for using sarcasm too ?

    1. The user did not report you. This is false, and again, targeting the poster.
    2. You were not warned for breaking the "boards rule of no sarcasm". This is false. I explained to you in detail on the board and via pm why you were warned, and why you got a warning and not a card.
    3. You were warned to drop it in the other thread.
    4. You are questioning the moderation of the forum. Again, if you are unhappy, contact a category moderator.

    You can take a week off.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    FutureGuy
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    wanderer100 wrote: »
    Noobie question: If I transfer Sanchez out for Eriksen tonight, will I still have Sanchez for tomorrow's game?

    Hi Wanderer100, while you are welcome to post here, I would strongly advise you read the rules of FPL before asking questions about the basic fundamentals. It will improve your overall score and understanding.


  • #68
    eagle eye
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,397 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I have Ibra and De Roon. Only players that attract me for this DGW are Valdes and maybe Gibson. I'm not sure who else is worth bringing in.

    Palace have two very difficult games but maybe Spacecraft is an option.

    What are people's thoughts?


  • #69
    tailgunner
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,911 ✭✭✭tailgunner


    I was all set to get Ibra in this week, but it feels like a bad idea now, and it's hard to see a scenario where it'll seem like a good idea by the end of the week.

    Front line is Lukaku, Kane and Benteke so I'd have to take a hit anyway, barring favourable price changes. I also have Valencia and Zaha for the DGW, so I might just get a Middlesbrough defender in as well and leave it at that, captaining Benteke.


  • #70
    Trimm Trabb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Trimm Trabb


    FHFC wrote: »
    Correct answer i think. ðŸ‘

    Yeah I think so.

    However my gut is Utd won't stay in race for top 4 and thus Zlatan will end up as a cause of frustration in these last few weeks. I'm going be looking for reasons not to get him I think.

    I'm thinking about merits of captaining Zaha. First Palace game is a away at Liverpool in which you have to fancy their chances of scoring and the second game is home to Spurs who have been trying to buy him for the last year - may be extra motivation to impress. Still probably not attractive enough v 180 mins of Zlatan.


  • #71
    tailgunner
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,911 ✭✭✭tailgunner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I have Ibra and De Roon. Only players that attract me for this DGW are Valdes and maybe Gibson. I'm not sure who else is worth bringing in.

    Palace have two very difficult games but maybe Spacecraft is an option.

    What are people's thoughts?

    I think it's definitely worth getting in at least one Palace attacker. I don't think the Liverpool game will be particularly tough from a goal-scoring perspective.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    Jeju
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭Jeju


    Have de Roon for a good while now and just brought in Gibson. I have no Man Utd cover for this GW but feel I will do enough with my single GW players to give me a rise. I do not think Palace players are worth a punt for a -4 or -8 with the fixtures they have, I think the can secure safety by saving their performances for easier fixtures in GW 35 and 37.


  • #73
    Morzadec
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Is Stephens likely to keep his place?

    Would Yoshida warrant the extra 0.4 do we think?


  • #74
    Trimm Trabb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Trimm Trabb


    Morzadec wrote: »
    Is Stephens likely to keep his place?

    Would Yoshida warrant the extra 0.4 do we think?

    Yoshida went close to a goal again yesterday.

    The worry is that Cacares gets some game time before the end of the season, particularly during the DGWs. In that case Yoshida would seem more likely to keep his place as the senior player but you couldn't be sure.


  • #75
    Shanotheslayer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Likely going for:

    Aguero out. Ibra In
    Redmond out. Zaha In


  • #76
    CSF
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,701 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    If one hasn't already brought in Ibra, it is tough to justify doing so now.


  • #77
    dahat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,196 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    Yes, it's a problem alright.


  • #78
    CSF
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,701 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I'd say it's an even bigger problem if you're already an owner. Can you captain etc...


  • #79
    siblers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,881 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    I wonder is Rashford nailed in? Looking lively


  • #80
    Mike Ehrmantraut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,303 ✭✭✭Mike Ehrmantraut


    siblers wrote: »
    I wonder is Rashford nailed in? Looking lively

    If they win against Anderlect on Thursday night, I don't think there's any United player nailed on.


  • #81
    CSF
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,701 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Why is everyone I'd want to sign for the DGW uncertain? Even Van Aanholt.


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    Mike Ehrmantraut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,303 ✭✭✭Mike Ehrmantraut


    CSF wrote: »
    Why is everyone I'd want to sign for the DGW uncertain? Even Van Aanholt.

    Same, last seasons dgw worked brilliantly for me, but have my doubts about this seasons.
    Had hoped to have 4 or 5 dgw players for next week and maybe 12 or 13 for gw37. But between rotation fears, lose of form it's hard to see the value in most of the players had intended to get in. Might stick to just getting in players who are in form, even if they don't have dgw'.


  • #83
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    I reckon I'll do origi to rashford.


  • #84
    dahat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,196 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I reckon I'll do origi to rashford.

    Can see him playing out wide for both games.


  • #85
    the incredible pudding
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,369 ✭✭✭the incredible pudding


    I think I'll be getting a United defender in.
    Question is....
    Courtois for De Gea
    or
    Bailey/Rojo/ for Baines.

    I do hate having Baines but I'm also sick of Chelsea's new found habit of being porous. Is Bailey nailed on though? That's the annoying thing :/


  • #86
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    dahat wrote: »
    Can see him playing out wide for both games.
    I think he might play him through the middle against city . Similar set up to today. That team he picked today was nothing to do with tired legs or rotation IMO. It was purely tactical.


  • #87
    dahat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,196 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I think he might play him through the middle against city . Similar set up to today. That team he picked today was nothing to do with tired legs or rotation IMO. It was purely tactical.

    I agree, totally different team with pace in it and seems logocal to play same v City.

    Can't see myself getting Zlatan in now so may consider Vardy to Rashford if all ok after Thursday night.


  • #88
    FutureGuy
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    While I am not entertaining Rashford in, today's performance is also making me doubt Ibrahimovic in as they could be sharing minutes.

    I agree about the tactics - Rashford started over for Zlatan.


  • #89
    alchemist33
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Really glad I have three Spurs players as the title race is really on now and they have the momentum.


  • #90
    FHFC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,274 ✭✭✭✭FHFC


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I think he might play him through the middle against city . Similar set up to today. That team he picked today was nothing to do with tired legs or rotation IMO. It was purely tactical.

    You think Rashford likely to play 150+ in GW34??

    I'd very much consider him. He's on a wee run.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    FHFC wrote: »
    You think Rashford likely to play 150+ in GW34??

    I'd very much consider him. He's on a wee run.

    Ye on the wing against Burnley and potentially through the middle against city. Mourinho just confirmed it was tactics and not rotation. I'll be captaining benteke anyway.


Advertisement