Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Gameweek 33 Transfers

13468912

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    CSF wrote: »
    Just so I know I'm not on some mad train of thought, Sigurdsson is the right person to replace for Zaha and not Son or King (I'm barely even considering this one to be fair but he is the other option), riiiiiiiight?

    Sigurdsson the main man in a misfiring team with a lot to play for vs Son who is in a great team and on form but whose position in the team will depend on them sticking with the formation from the Watford game.

    Yeah I think so.
    https://twitter.com/SpursOfficial/status/850716991002484737
    That would suggest that Son is starting next week. We'll have to wait and see what Poch says in the press conference though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭clairewithani


    elefant wrote: »
    I didn't see last night's game, but were Palace that good that a DGW with Liverpool and Spurs as fixtures is suddenly this attractive? I mean, in 16 gameweeks Benteke has only thrice scored over 2 points.
    + 1 on this. I definitely think buying DGW players can sometimed be counterproductive. Last one with Man City lost me points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,308 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    + 1 on this. I definitely think buying DGW players can sometimed be counterproductive. Last one with Man City lost me points.

    Yeah but Crystal Palace are one of the form teams in the league at the moment and have great fixtures either side of the double. I think Zaha is a must-have right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,472 ✭✭✭AdMMM


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    You do know Sakho has no DGW yeah? HE can't play the second fixture against Liverpool
    facepalm.jpg~c200

    And this is why I'm doing **** this year. Spending 5 minutes a week on the game and missing ridiculously simple things!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,883 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    AdMMM wrote: »
    facepalm.jpg~c200

    And this is why I'm doing **** this year. Spending 5 minutes a week on the game and missing ridiculously simple things!

    I nearly did the same thing and I spend far too much time on FF :o


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭clairewithani


    Middlesbrough's highest points scorers are Gibson (110) Valdés (102) and Negredo (102) not great choice really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Sanchez and Carroll to Kane and Zaha

    OR

    Carroll, Siggy and Alonso to Zaha, Kane and Holgate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,705 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Middlesbrough's highest points scorers are Gibson (110) Valdés (102) and Negredo (102) not great choice really.
    Yeah I'd be surprised if I ended up touching Middlesbrough at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,705 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Middlesbrough's highest points scorers are Gibson (110) Valdés (102) and Negredo (102) not great choice really.
    Yeah I'd be surprised if I ended up touching Middlesbrough at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭matthew the statue


    Gone for triple captain Lukaku , Erikson as my vice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 859 ✭✭✭mectavba


    Would you start King (tot) or Ward-Prowse (MCI) & Alonso (mun) or Rojo (CHE)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,842 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    mectavba wrote: »
    Would you start King (tot) or Ward-Prowse (MCI) & Alonso (mun) or Rojo (CHE)?
    King and Alonso


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,883 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    CSF wrote: »
    Yeah I'd be surprised if I ended up touching Middlesbrough at all.

    Apart from their game against Sunderland, 3 of their next four games are very difficult


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭shineon23


    Banking unless I fancy a flutter , and take out my sole survivor from GW1 Jonny Evans for a Palace defender (Schlupp more than likely in that case).

    It'd be a sad day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭Benimar


    naughtb4 wrote: »
    Sanchez and Carroll to Kane and Zaha

    OR

    Carroll, Siggy and Alonso to Zaha, Kane and Holgate?

    I'm looking at Sanchez and Origi to Zaha and Kane, so it's A for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭martin101


    Am i mad having Sanchez on my wildcard team?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,705 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    martin101 wrote: »
    Am i mad having Sanchez on my wildcard team?
    A bit yeah. I won't go as far as to use a valuable transfer to transfer him out, but I certainly wouldn't transfer him in either if I hadn't already committed to him for his 2 extra fixtures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,256 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    martin101 wrote: »
    Am i mad having Sanchez on my wildcard team?

    You'd be mad to have him in a wildcard team right now as he will be at least 0.1 if not 0.2 cheaper by Saturday morning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,705 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Can't shake this feeling that it should be Son out for Zaha and not Sigurdsson. Kane back now will mean a big change of dynamic for both Son and Alli. 6 of Son's 11 goals came when Kane wasn't in the team. Sigurdsson will be part of a Swansea team that will be fighting tooth and nail for their safety.

    Of course there is also Josh King but it is hard to make an argument for him going.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,530 ✭✭✭✭km79


    CSF wrote: »
    Can't shake this feeling that it should be Son out for Zaha and not Sigurdsson. Kane back now will mean a big change of dynamic for both Son and Alli. 6 of Son's 11 goals came when Kane wasn't in the team. Sigurdsson will be part of a Swansea team that will be fighting tooth and nail for their safety.

    Of course there is also Josh King but it is hard to make an argument for him going.
    I've king and siggy but I'm selling sterling as planned
    Will get sane in from 35 on


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    CSF wrote:
    Can't shake this feeling that it should be Son out for Zaha and not Sigurdsson. Kane back now will mean a big change of dynamic for both Son and Alli. 6 of Son's 11 goals came when Kane wasn't in the team. Sigurdsson will be part of a Swansea team that will be fighting tooth and nail for their safety.

    Of course there is also Josh King but it is hard to make an argument for him going.

    Do you need to get Zaha or could you just bank the transfer?
    I'd much rather Son than Zaha this week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    Who would you guys ditch first? Pedro, Siggy or Lanzini?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,705 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    spock. wrote: »
    Do you need to get Zaha or could you just bank the transfer?
    I'd much rather Son than Zaha this week.
    Zaha would be my first choice from Zaha, Son and Sigurdsson this week. He genuinely looked like Hazard or Sanchez at their best last night IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    iroced wrote: »
    Who would you guys ditch first? Pedro, Siggy or Lanzini?

    Lanzini


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭Chesty08


    Have done Walcott to Zaha.
    Looking at Carroll to Ibra. Thinking do I take a hit now for -4 or do it next week for the DGW. If I do next week I may end up taken a -4 anyway to get in another DGW player.

    Carroll has Sunderland away and Ibra has Chelsea at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,672 ✭✭✭ScummyMan


    Plan is to do Aguero > Ibra, and Vardy > Kane. Already have Lukaku. Would ye do it this week for a -4, or wait and do it next week for free? Need the money from Aguero to bring in Kane aswell, so can't just do Vardy > Kane this week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    ScummyMan wrote: »
    Plan is to do Aguero > Ibra, and Vardy > Kane. Already have Lukaku. Would ye do it this week for a -4, or wait and do it next week for free? Need the money from Aguero to bring in Kane aswell, so can't just do Vardy > Kane this week.

    Exact same boat with the same decision here. I currently have the exact budget to do the move, so not sure how long I'll be able to wait. I was advised by a few people here against it a few days ago, but I can't see other routes to bringing in Kane. The only other viable one is losing Sanchez, which is definitely worth thinking about but with two DGWs I'm reluctant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,883 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    callaway92 wrote: »
    Lanzini

    I second this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    Pretty sure I'll be doing:

    Barnes, Sanchez, Walker --> Kane, Zaha, Bailly for a -8

    Will be captaining Kane this week.
    I'll leave Sanchez for three weeks and bring him back for 36.
    This also sets up an AOA for GW34


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,842 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Thinking Mawson to Holgate or Bavies.

    Will get Valdes in for Foster then next week and hopefully Chambers will be back.


Advertisement