Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Louise O Neill on rape culture.

17778798082

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Is Mullaley finally seeing some things are finally ridiculous
    That was a deleted post from a re-reg account that has since been banned.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Pat Kenny Tonight on tv3 you can watch it on 3 player all about. our rape culture in Ireland .people here could watch it . more of a platform to discuss Ireland and its rape culture 3 player Wednesday 22th march tv3 10.00pm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    I do remember the former DG of RTE was fired because he was harassing women-this was back in the day when Nuala Carey was first hired (albeit TV3 was just starting out-so coverage was sparce bar the papers). RTE had taken on a number of young, good looking people-Pamela Flood, a few male presenters who also dabbled in modelling, a number of former underwear models (not a joke), Nuala Carey and co (I'm not targeting her btw, this was just what happened at the time, I'm using her as a point of reference).

    Well, the claim made, at the time, was that RTE were trying to compete with TV3 by bringing these folks in (they also sacked a number of other employees, also women, such as Joan Blackburn, and Elaine Cusack (Elaine was brought back, by popular demand, Joan brought a case to court, and won, for unfair dismissal)).

    Well, it turns out that the DG (Director General) was quite a creep. He would make passes at the ladies, and be a general scumbag. RTE carried out an investigation, even going so far as undercover person wearing a wire, and found out that yes, he was a scumbag.
    He was fired. Folks don't hear from him anymore. (Come to think of it, I think the allegations probably harmed the presenter's careers too-much of the staff slowly petered out-maybe they were seen as 'hired for looks' not 'hired for talent'.)

    Guys careers can be ruined by accusations of impropriety and accosting women. To say such a thing is tripe. And that's what LoN does-but fame never seems to harm a person's career.
    Look at Schumer and Dunham-these are two ladies who continually 'appropriate' black culture-and steal jokes from better comdiens/ comediennes.

    I wouldn't listen to the Womens Council either-they were folks who said a woman is only a woman if she has a uterus-never mind those who were born without/ had a hysterectomy, 'don't count as women'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Pat Kenny Tonight on tv3 you can watch it on 3 player all about. our rape culture in Ireland .people here could watch it . more of a platform to discuss Ireland and its rape culture 3 player Wednesday 22th march tv3 10.00pm

    Just watching this now, cheers. I see though that it starts off with the 'Cup of Tea' consent analogy video.


    fpb.jpg


    Here's a link to it:

    http://www.tv3.ie/3player/show/1032/0/Pat-Kenny-Tonight


  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭seanvanseanvan


    Shower of charlatans are TV3, they made me watch the 4 adverts and then playback error and asked me reload page so I did, 4 more adverts and playback error. Gangsters!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Shower of charlatans are TV3, they made me watch the 4 adverts and then playback error and asked me reload page so I did, 4 more adverts and playback error. Gangsters!!!!

    Edge is the only browser that works for me with the 3Player.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Just watching this now, cheers. I see though that it starts off with the 'Cup of Tea' consent analogy video.


    fpb.jpg


    Here's a link to it:

    http://www.tv3.ie/3player/show/1032/0/Pat-Kenny-Tonight
    Just talking to a friend of mine in Kansas and he said all this Louise o Neill rape culture it is pure American Feminist stuff . but very dangerous thinking around the consent and around alcohol .should Women not go to pubs and be drinking alcohol around men ? . and that men should only meet women in alcohol free zones to be safe from women saying the raped them as the had sum alcohol.? the new laws come into effect in Ireland very soon around consent and alcohol this a very dangerous area now for all men drinking alcohol in pubs and clubs etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    I may be more optimisitic than others-but I most definitely did not see the same level of negativity or 'man' blaming that others did. I do believe there was not enough of a discussion on 'women raping men'. That was sort of brushed aside, and that did get annoying, tbh.
    But it did go into discussion on gay rape, lesbian rape and so on. As well as the discussion on 'orgies'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    JRant wrote: »
    The National Women's Council of Ireland should be ashamed of themselves for retweeting this nonsense

    https://twitter.com/nwci/status/843058871140794369

    Wow, I am certainly not surprised that Louise (friend to all men) O'Neill would believe and write that. A little surprised that the National Womens Council of Ireland would too! Shame on them!


  • Registered Users Posts: 868 ✭✭✭peking97


    Unbelieveable stuff!
    It's getting to the stage where you'd need to have your solicitor with you before you can have sexual relations with your own wife!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 832 ✭✭✭HamsterFace


    I would like to ask the so question of the council, and Louise and others who seem to hold the same opinion, do you think the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof should be removed when there are allegations of sexual assault against a woman by a man?

    And, if so, how would you reconcile that with the removing of constitutional rights from men such as right to due process, right to a good name, protection from false imprisonment etc (notwithstanding the astronomical changes required to the constitution, or as Louis referred to it as the "laws that need to change" to make it easier to convict)

    I have no doubt that the innocent men, who would most likely be a minority not that that should matter, would be seen as collateral damage.

    There's no doubt about it, sexual assault and rape trials should be made as easy as possible for the victims, and victims should feel 100% comfortable coming forward, but depriving another human of their liberty without all of the constitutional safeguards of a western democracy is abhorrent to the notion of civilisation and natural justice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Just talking to a friend of mine in Kansas and he said all this Louise o Neill rape culture it is pure American Feminist stuff . but very dangerous thinking around the consent and around alcohol .should Women not go to pubs and be drinking alcohol around men ? . and that men should only meet women in alcohol free zones to be safe from women saying the raped them as the had sum alcohol.? the new laws come into effect in Ireland very soon around consent and alcohol this a very dangerous area now for all men drinking alcohol in pubs and clubs etc.

    What will the new law actually mean?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 945 ✭✭✭red ears


    I would like to ask the so question of the council, and Louise and others who seem to hold the same opinion, do you think the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof should be removed when there are allegations of sexual assault against a woman by a man?

    And, if so, how would you reconcile that with the removing of constitutional rights from men such as right to due process, right to a good name, protection from false imprisonment etc (notwithstanding the astronomical changes required to the constitution, or as Louis referred to it as the "laws that need to change" to make it easier to convict)

    I have no doubt that the innocent men, who would most likely be a minority not that that should matter, would be seen as collateral damage.

    I think if you asked Louise she would say if the odd innocent man being convicted was the price to pay for convicting far more actual rapists she would have absolutely no problem with that. People like her are a danger to innocent men.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    py2006 wrote: »
    Wow, I am certainly not surprised that Louise (friend to all men) O'Neill would believe and write that. A little surprised that the National Womens Council of Ireland would too! Shame on them!
    Just read the link you put up.. from the Womens council lreland . Louise o Neill why the idea that sexual assault allegations can ruin a Mans career is a myth Womens council Ireland?????:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: . this is a insult to all victims of the crimes of all type of false accusations. and people who took there own lives by COMMITTING SUICIDE . .How many people have hanged themselves.? COMMITTED SUICIDE Jumping into rivers over false rape accusations.? and all other type of false accusations how many people Men /Women have taken there lives? an the Womens council Ireland promotes This on there website.:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    She'd want to have a look at the sentence disparity and the complete gender bias in sentencing between male and female teacher sexual offenders.
    Surely the disparity and lenience towards women is contributing to rape culture? Or is the man somehow to blame for that as well?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    What will the new law actually mean?
    The new laws coming in are around
    sexual consent and alcohol . this give more clarity in law so basically your having a few beers in a pub our nite club you meet a women/wife/girlfriend she has a few beers later on that nite you have Sexual Intercourse. this is now rape as the women can not give you consent with alcohol consumed. this like 1920s alcohol prohibition but the other way around you can not have Sexual Intercourse with your wife/girlfriend with a alcohol as you will be classed as a rapist from now on.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    The new laws coming in are around
    sexual consent and alcohol . this give more clarity in law so basically your having a few beers in a pub our nite club you meet a women she has a few beers later on that nite you have Sexual Intercourse. this is now rape as the women can not give you consent with alcohol consumed.
    This new Law around alcohol is very Dangerous to all Men . so who is Brings this New law in minister Frances Fitzgerald who is a Women. and who will this new law effect the most Man/Men of Ireland . So I am out in the pub/nightclub having a few beers with my wife/girlfriend and we have Sexual Intercourse later on that night this is now rape in the eyes of the law as she my wife/girlfriend can not give me consent for sexual intercourse as she has taken alcohol . . also Minister Frances Fitzgerald new sex bill in 2015 makes it a crime to pay prostitutes services. so with this new law you meet a prostitute bring her back to your luxury hotel have a bottle of the best champagne have sexual intercourse you are now a rapist in the eyes of this new law being clarified. plus you committed two crimes one you went with prostitute and the second you had sexual intercourse with a prostitute who has had consumed alcohol your are now a rapist in the eyes of law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Guys this is a bit of a disparity-completely. A few drinks is fine, absolutely-like, have a few beers, go on a date, ask her or him back to yours...that's no problem. The law will not be used or apply there. Lowered inhibitions vs 'cannot even spell their own name' are two different things.

    On the other hand, if the person is so drunk they can barely string a few sentences together...well, that is what the law will cover. Even those who should have been more biased on the Pat Kenny chat stated it just underlines what is already there. The problem arose, before, when it came to consent-like, people would look at the 'drunk' person-and say 'okay, did they have so much alcohol in them that they couldn't even sign their name...then if so, sex with them was rape'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    anna080 wrote: »
    She'd want to have a look at the sentence disparity and the complete gender bias in sentencing between male and female teacher sexual offenders.
    Surely the disparity and lenience towards women is contributing to rape culture? Or is the man somehow to blame for that as well?

    True-look at Desperate Housewives. The first season's main storyline involved a woman seducing a minor-but because she was 'hot' it didn't raise eyebrows. And it was definitely creepy in many ways.
    Ditto game of thrones-a minor has sex with a hot woman in her 30s, again, nothing said-tho the 'feminists' cried 'women suffer far worse' in that show. Bull.

    On the other hand-Coronation street features a storyline involving an adult seducing a teenaged girl (who's obviously in her 20s)-and that's meant to be scandalous...but reverse the genders, and nobody would blink an eye. It would be played as 'romantic', 'pure' etc.

    Hell, look at the independent-some crazy married teacher, having a relationship with a minor, was photographed 'smiling' as her photo was taken. And there is so much evidence now, she's been suspended from her job-we're seeing a greater deal of women sexual predators in news outlets-but I would argue they were always there, just not reported.
    http://www.independent.ie/world-news/north-america/married-teacher-smiles-in-mugshot-after-being-arrested-for-allegedly-having-sex-with-a-student-35557624.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭ Holland Helpful Pita


    Guys this is a bit of a disparity-completely. A few drinks is fine, absolutely-like, have a few beers, go on a date, ask her or him back to yours...that's no problem. The law will not be used or apply there. Lowered inhibitions vs 'cannot even spell their own name' are two different things.

    On the other hand, if the person is so drunk they can barely string a few sentences together...well, that is what the law will cover. Even those who should have been more biased on the Pat Kenny chat stated it just underlines what is already there. The problem arose, before, when it came to consent-like, people would look at the 'drunk' person-and say 'okay, did they have so much alcohol in them that they couldn't even sign their name...then if so, sex with them was rape'.

    That's what I think will happen, its basically if one of the parties is completely out of it ,,,,not two go home after a couple ...Once it doesn't go into, one changes their mind afterwards (sorta like the RMC article) or that Niall Boylan show (I think it was) example


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    That's what I think will happen, its basically if one of the parties is completely out of it ,,,,not two go home after a couple ...Once it doesn't go into, one changes their mind afterwards (sorta like the RMC article) or that Niall Boylan show (I think it was) example

    I'm familiar with the RMC thing-what was the Niall Boylan show?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭ Holland Helpful Pita


    I'm familiar with the RMC thing-what was the Niall Boylan show?

    I believe (think it was his show - might be something else) a girl called in to a show, went home with a fella, did the business, then I believe her husband/boyfriend found out amd then cried rape (I know these shows are to be taken with a grain of salt - but it wouldn't surprise me some would try this act if their partner found out)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    As many have probably heard, there has been another leak of images of female celebrities-I wonder if LoN and co will find a way to tie this into the 'rape culture' myth-though many have remained quiet on the subject, at the moment.

    I know the last time folks were decrying it as 'ownership of women's bodies'...never mind that those are images, not 'actual' bodies.

    The victim in this case is Emma Watson - the same person who has addressed the UN on the need for internet censorship and cyberpolicing on the grounds of misogyny. Whoever did this, as well as being a creepy asshole, is also an unimaginable idiot for giving fuel to that ideology. It's like shooting a gun control advocate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,609 ✭✭✭blue note


    Guys this is a bit of a disparity-completely. A few drinks is fine, absolutely-like, have a few beers, go on a date, ask her or him back to yours...that's no problem. The law will not be used or apply there. Lowered inhibitions vs 'cannot even spell their own name' are two different things.

    On the other hand, if the person is so drunk they can barely string a few sentences together...well, that is what the law will cover. Even those who should have been more biased on the Pat Kenny chat stated it just underlines what is already there. The problem arose, before, when it came to consent-like, people would look at the 'drunk' person-and say 'okay, did they have so much alcohol in them that they couldn't even sign their name...then if so, sex with them was rape'.

    Lets be honest - you've phrased this as if the law or the implementation of it will be gender neutral. We all know it won't. Whether or not the woman was drunk beyond being able to give consent will decide whether or not it is rape. The man's level of drunkenness will not be a factor.

    I fully agree that if someone is not able to give consent then it is rape. I would just like everyone to have the same rights and responsibilities on the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    blue note wrote: »
    Lets be honest - you've phrased this as if the law or the implementation of it will be gender neutral. We all know it won't. Whether or not the woman was drunk beyond being able to give consent will decide whether or not it is rape. The man's level of drunkenness will not be a factor.

    I fully agree that if someone is not able to give consent then it is rape. I would just like everyone to have the same rights and responsibilities on the issue.

    Oh guaranteed, I would argue it will very much require significant 'help' on the guy's part to prove he is innocent-and when I say help, I mean CCTV, eyewitness accounts, etc. We know it won't be gender neutral, sadly. And yeah, that is BS.But if one even raises an inkling of doubt in a jury, such as 'unable to'
    The victim in this case is Emma Watson - the same person who has addressed the UN on the need for internet censorship and cyberpolicing on the grounds of misogyny. Whoever did this, as well as being a creepy asshole, is also an unimaginable idiot for giving fuel to that ideology. It's like shooting a gun control advocate.

    Oh most definitely-tho I did chuckle listening to her speech, from a few months back, with her overly enthusiastic 'America don't let me down-vote for a woman president'-then months later, Trump.

    On a positive note-she just had 'clothed' images stolen-as in yeah, it's a physical hack, yes, images were taken-but no, nothing serious. On the other hand, the images of other women were far, far more explicit-and they had kept themselves to themselves-the stolen images are quite shocking, tbh.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/world/asia/us-soldiers-told-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys.html


    If LoN wants to go into talks about rape culture-she would be best served reading that disturbing article.

    Essentially, during US the army's deployment in Afghanistan (it dates from 2013-2015, more than likely further back), US soldiers were told to 'ignore the screams' of children, the majority being young boys, coming from the Afghan camps-the screams were of the children being raped and abused.
    It's not uncommon in Afghanistani 'lowlifes' to have a 'boy slave'-aka a boy who's sole service is to 'pleasure' a much older man. (And no, it's not Afghanistan I blame-just these scum, and scum exist everywhere).

    The practise is illegal-but like moonshine and poitin, it's totally ignored.

    Cannot imagine how painful that must have been for any soldier who was told they were helping...then told to 'carry on' as children were being raped in the camp besides them. (Some soldiers got angry, and threw punches-attacking those who they knew were carrying out the sexual abuse).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭Bambi985


    I do remember the former DG of RTE was fired because he was harassing women-this was back in the day when Nuala Carey was first hired (albeit TV3 was just starting out-so coverage was sparce bar the papers). RTE had taken on a number of young, good looking people-Pamela Flood, a few male presenters who also dabbled in modelling, a number of former underwear models (not a joke), Nuala Carey and co (I'm not targeting her btw, this was just what happened at the time, I'm using her as a point of reference).

    Well, the claim made, at the time, was that RTE were trying to compete with TV3 by bringing these folks in (they also sacked a number of other employees, also women, such as Joan Blackburn, and Elaine Cusack (Elaine was brought back, by popular demand, Joan brought a case to court, and won, for unfair dismissal)).

    Well, it turns out that the DG (Director General) was quite a creep. He would make passes at the ladies, and be a general scumbag. RTE carried out an investigation, even going so far as undercover person wearing a wire, and found out that yes, he was a scumbag.
    He was fired. Folks don't hear from him anymore. (Come to think of it, I think the allegations probably harmed the presenter's careers too-much of the staff slowly petered out-maybe they were seen as 'hired for looks' not 'hired for talent'.)

    Guys careers can be ruined by accusations of impropriety and accosting women. To say such a thing is tripe. And that's what LoN does-but fame never seems to harm a person's career.
    Look at Schumer and Dunham-these are two ladies who continually 'appropriate' black culture-and steal jokes from better comdiens/ comediennes.

    To be honest IME creepy men in positions of power are rife. Certainly anywhere I'e worked there's been those men at the top who think nothing of hitting on or leering at the younger female employees, often interns etc.

    Especially in newsrooms. my sister is a journalist and has told me some horror stories about senior management figures leering and passing crude remarks while watching showreels of potential female hires, those same guys sleeping with young reporters even though they're married, and tabloid newsrooms can be an absolute nightmare for the women that don't want to be demoted to the scrap heap of cat fashion shows and lifestyle features.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Now since all the well educated Women/ladies now know the law has been made clearer. around the law around sexual consent and alcohol now all the Women of Ireland have been put on notice and are fully aware. So if the Women/wife/ long term girlfriend who has had taken alcohol and she wants sexual intercourse with a Husband /long term boyfriend . the law says she cant not give sexual consent what does a Man/Husband/ long term boyfriend do there and say the women who is hes long term girlfriend/wife who wants sexual intercourse with him?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Bambi985 wrote: »
    To be honest IME creepy men in positions of power are rife. Certainly anywhere I'e worked there's been those men at the top who think nothing of hitting on or leering at the younger female employees, often interns etc.

    Especially in newsrooms. my sister is a journalist and has told me some horror stories about senior management figures leering and passing crude remarks while watching showreels of potential female hires, those same guys sleeping with young reporters even though they're married, and tabloid newsrooms can be an absolute nightmare for the women that don't want to be demoted to the scrap heap of cat fashion shows and lifestyle features.

    Oh yeah-even in college I met the 'creepy' fellows-like, seriously creepy. One was dating a student, despite him A) being her lecturer, B) being in a relationship, C) old enough to be her dad and D) being told to stop by her parents. Conflict of interest and all that. (Funnily enough, he had ALOT of female admirers-in the teenage category. I was jealous, if I'm honest-many of em were hawt).

    In short-Oh I well believe it-trust me. When it comes to positions of power, certain traits tend to get you to that position-but sometimes, there are 'additional' elements to those figures-the creepy kind of element. (not always, just sometimes-othertimes they are a 'take no crap' kind of person)-I've known some idiots who for some bizarre reason seem to think they are 'hot'-and yet give em advise-like 'that software program won't work on a pc, or a mac'-and they are oblivious...until tech support/ they try it, and discover that yeah-it's not possible (and said software program will cost a couple of grand, easy).

    On the other hand-I've heard stories of things like 'got a degree in journalism, operating the teleprompter so some numpty without his/ her Leaving Cert can read the text'...and yeah, it's not uncommon.

    I do know of one presenter, local radio station, who married a total douchebag-despite ALL warnings from her friends/ family, that this guy was a db. Well, she gets pregnant shortly after, has the kid...then finds out he has a girlfriend and a new born...the were barely together over a year. (He was not in radio). She always got the usual 'boy, you're hot' on the radio comments-maybe she believed her hype, but some folks in radio don't tend to be too bright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    anna080 wrote: »
    She'd want to have a look at the sentence disparity and the complete gender bias in sentencing between male and female teacher sexual offenders.
    Surely the disparity and lenience towards women is contributing to rape culture? Or is the man somehow to blame for that as well?


    Equal sentencing across the board for all crimes. To be served in similar conditions to men, no holiday camps like the Dochas Centre where prisoners are given the keys to their cells (known as 'rooms'). :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    Equal sentencing across the board for all crimes. To be served in similar conditions to men, no holiday camps like the Dochas Centre where prisoners are given the keys to their cells (known as 'rooms'). :rolleyes:

    Actually the women's section of Limerick Prison is pretty unpleasant


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Oh yeah-even in college I met the 'creepy' fellows-like, seriously creepy. One was dating a student, despite him A) being her lecturer, B) being in a relationship, C) old enough to be her dad and D) being told to stop by her parents. Conflict of interest and all that. (Funnily enough, he had ALOT of female admirers-in the teenage category. I was jealous, if I'm honest-many of em were hawt).

    In short-Oh I well believe it-trust me. When it comes to positions of power, certain traits tend to get you to that position-but sometimes, there are 'additional' elements to those figures-the creepy kind of element. (not always, just sometimes-othertimes they are a 'take no crap' kind of person)-I've known some idiots who for some bizarre reason seem to think they are 'hot'-and yet give em advise-like 'that software program won't work on a pc, or a mac'-and they are oblivious...until tech support/ they try it, and discover that yeah-it's not possible (and said software program will cost a couple of grand, easy).

    On the other hand-I've heard stories of things like 'got a degree in journalism, operating the teleprompter so some numpty without his/ her Leaving Cert can read the text'...and yeah, it's not uncommon.

    I do know of one presenter, local radio station, who married a total douchebag-despite ALL warnings from her friends/ family, that this guy was a db. Well, she gets pregnant shortly after, has the kid...then finds out he has a girlfriend and a new born...the were barely together over a year. (He was not in radio). She always got the usual 'boy, you're hot' on the radio comments-maybe she believed her hype, but some folks in radio don't tend to be too bright.

    I'm really confused about the last bit with the female radio presenter and her two timing boyfriend. Were people telling her she was hot, as in attractive, or good at her job? What does it have to do with the cheating boyfriend?:eek:


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    goose2005 wrote: »
    Actually the women's section of Limerick Prison is pretty unpleasant

    As are all men prisons. Hopefully the Dochas at Mountjoy can strive to match up to Limerick. Maybe we can create a national standard.

    A prisons function is to serve as a punishment and a deterrent to crime. It's not supposed to be a nice place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,913 ✭✭✭Absolam


    I always thought the goal was to rehabilitatie criminals rather than punish them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    I'm really confused about the last bit with the female radio presenter and her two timing boyfriend. Were people telling her she was hot, as in attractive, or good at her job? What does it have to do with the cheating boyfriend?:eek:

    Oh, sorry, total bizarre rant-I hadn't had my coffee.

    She, the presente, was often complimented on her looks-ie 'boy, you're hot' etc. And tbf, she was pretty. Just rather annoying tho.
    Anyways, my mentioning her looks was sort of down to a rather noticable trait I see sometimes with the 'wow, he/ she's hot' thing-ie they think that looks will sustain a relationship. She was much the same, even thinking a baby will keep him around.
    And it didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,966 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    Absolam wrote: »
    I always thought the goal was to rehabilitatie criminals rather than punish them.
    Pffft, ah come on now will you; pull the other one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Oh, sorry, total bizarre rant-I hadn't had my coffee.

    She, the presente, was often complimented on her looks-ie 'boy, you're hot' etc. And tbf, she was pretty. Just rather annoying tho.
    Anyways, my mentioning her looks was sort of down to a rather noticable trait I see sometimes with the 'wow, he/ she's hot' thing-ie they think that looks will sustain a relationship. She was much the same, even thinking a baby will keep him around.
    And it didn't.

    You should see what I write before coffee :D

    Yes, that makes sense.

    Sometimes on Boards threads, wen a woman with a problematic personality trait is being discussed, people ask ''but is she hot?' or ''how hot is she?''. It's not a great basis for a relationship. As someone's granny used to say ''looks fade, personality lasts forever''

    And there are a lot of people who are fortunate to have a good combination of both..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    And there are a lot of people who are fortunate to have a good combination of both..

    I disagree, we're a rarer breed than you'd think. :D


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Absolam wrote: »
    I always thought the goal was to rehabilitatie criminals rather than punish them.
    According to conservative estimates, nearly half will reoffend within three years of release (80% in the first 12 months after release). The rehabilitation side of things needs a bit more attention.


  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭Woodhenge


    Absolam wrote: »
    I always thought the goal was to rehabilitatie criminals rather than punish them.

    If that were the case then people in poverty with addictions or mental health issues who need rehabilitation would find the best way to access it is to commit serious crime.

    You have to ensure that the result of a life of crime is significantly worse than an honest life spent scraping the barrel or the whole system is in danger. Punishment is not only to prevent people from causing crime but also to demonstrate to those who don't commit crime that they made the better choice.

    They have actually run experiments that show that when people who cheat and steal are actively punished, co-operation and solidarity in the wider community increases. When crime is not punished effectively, people trust each other less and are less willing to make small sacrifices that make living among strangers tolerable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,913 ✭✭✭Absolam


    So is the general view that our justice system is supposed to be a punitive one then? It seems at odds with the fact that prisoners aren't being tortured or even given hard labour. Should we be agitating to dial up the unpleasantness in our prisons?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 832 ✭✭✭HamsterFace


    The justice system has three roles; to punish, to protect (citizens), and also to rehabilitate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,913 ✭✭✭Absolam


    Surely those are amongst the sanctions available to the justice system, rather than its purpose? Punishment, rehabilitation, incapacitation, deterrence, and reparation would all seem to be legitimate penalties that can be imposed on criminals.

    Is it possible that focussing on punishment as we're seeing on the thread feeds into the development of a rape culture narrative? Absent the prospect of revenge, would we see less spurious (or only by the most liberal of definitions) accusations of rape? Notwithstanding the absolute necessity to deter rape in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭oneilla


    Guys this is a bit of a disparity-completely. A few drinks is fine, absolutely-like, have a few beers, go on a date, ask her or him back to yours...that's no problem. The law will not be used or apply there. Lowered inhibitions vs 'cannot even spell their own name' are two different things.

    On the other hand, if the person is so drunk they can barely string a few sentences together...well, that is what the law will cover. Even those who should have been more biased on the Pat Kenny chat stated it just underlines what is already there. The problem arose, before, when it came to consent-like, people would look at the 'drunk' person-and say 'okay, did they have so much alcohol in them that they couldn't even sign their name...then if so, sex with them was rape'.

    How many drinks/how much alcohol consumed before I cannot give consent? What's the blood alcohol content limit?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    oneilla wrote: »
    How many drinks/how much alcohol consumed before I cannot give consent? What's the blood alcohol content limit?
    Some People get Drunk on less than a pint of beer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    oneilla wrote: »
    How many drinks/how much alcohol consumed before I cannot give consent? What's the blood alcohol content limit?

    There's no limit, but if the person is so clearly intoxicated she cannot stand, then that will mean no consent was given. Ditto if she is on drugs.
    The bill will also increase conviction for cases of incest, such as sexual abuse, or molestation, by a female so that they are in line with those of a male.

    That said, I would argue it doesn't go far enough. It doesn't cover things like rape of a man by a woman, it doesn't go into too much depth of the rape of a man by another man. If a guy is so drunk he doesn't remember, yeah, it causes issues there-but that is where CCTv comes in.
    So if it does go to court, the guy will have to do a lot of work to prove he was not involved in any sex crime.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    I know a Chinese Lady occasional has a few beers and she is so drunk afterwards just 3 bottles of beers .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Women taking drugs before the go out to the pub/nightclub and say the had two beers where does the Law stand here?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    I know a Chinese Lady occasional has a few beers and she is so drunk afterwards just 3 bottles of beers .

    Very true, it can go to your head that bit quicker if you're physically smaller built.

    It doesn't sound like the worst law in the world in some ways. In other ways it seems awful, and worrying for men.

    I would have been one who was too drunk to think straight and regretted an encounter afterwards, still do many years later, never felt it was rape or assault or anything like that, I have been through that also, but I do feel pi**ed off that I was taken advantage of, it wasn't exactly gentlemanly (he was sober as a judge and knew I was scuttered drunk, he was supporting me as we exited the building because I couldn't stay upright amongst other things).No protection used, I was very lucky there was no negative repercussions from it. Apart from the shame! :( Personally I never considered it rape but I guess under THIS definition it would be. There are probably worse situations than mine where the new law is appropriate, though.


    I was a teenager at that time and at least fifteen years younger than him


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Very true, it can go to your head that bit quicker if you're physically smaller built.

    It doesn't sound like the worst law in the world in some ways. In other ways it seems awful, and worrying for men.

    I would have been one who was too drunk to think straight and regretted an encounter afterwards, still do many years later, never felt it was rape or assault or anything like that, I have been through that also, but I do feel pi**ed off that I was taken advantage of, it wasn't exactly gentlemanly (he was sober as a judge and knew I was scuttered drunk, he was supporting me as we exited the building because I couldn't stay upright amongst other things).No protection used, I was very lucky there was no negative repercussions from it. Apart from the shame! :( Personally I never considered it rape but I guess under THIS definition it would be. There are probably worse situations than mine where the new law is appropriate, though.
    VERY True what you saying here this would be now be considered rape in the eyes of the law. but most Men/Women would have sex when they having be drinking drunk/ on Drugs now the way law is the Jails backed out with Men . who had sex with Women when they where drunk/Drugs. what is the Drink Industry saying about this I would love one of them to make a comment and have the done a Safety Campaign on this law like put up posters in pubs/nightclubs.?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Very true, it can go to your head that bit quicker if you're physically smaller built.

    It doesn't sound like the worst law in the world in some ways. In other ways it seems awful, and worrying for men.

    I would have been one who was too drunk to think straight and regretted an encounter afterwards, still do many years later, never felt it was rape or assault or anything like that, I have been through that also, but I do feel pi**ed off that I was taken advantage of, it wasn't exactly gentlemanly (he was sober as a judge and knew I was scuttered drunk, he was supporting me as we exited the building because I couldn't stay upright amongst other things).No protection used, I was very lucky there was no negative repercussions from it. Apart from the shame! :( Personally I never considered it rape but I guess under THIS definition it would be. There are probably worse situations than mine where the new law is appropriate, though.


    I was a teenager at that time and at least fifteen years younger than him

    Yeah, plus if, say, you drink on an empty stomach or some medicine interacts badly (even a panadol or aspirin, for example) you can get intoxicated after one or two drinks. I know in one situation a friend of mine got sick after nurofen and beer-and thus she was sick as a dog. Her friends were there tho, and they just walked it off with her.
    On the other hand, I've had a situation where I had a bad reaction to alcohol and lempsip-ended up puking everywhere after drinking. (both occasions, her and mine, we took those of our own accord). No spiking involved.

    It helps in some ways-ie incest and sexual abuse, but in others it doesn't at all. Also, if a guy is drunk and he gets assaulted, a particularly sinister woman who had done the assault, and had been drinking, could claim 'no, he raped me'. IT would be very difficult to disprove.

    (Very sorry to hear about your rape, the one that you said was rape I mean-I am sorry that happened to you.)
    As far as the guy being drunk-it could be statutory. But at the least, yeah, it was morally wrong on his part.
    I've seen girls really drunk-I think the most any one I know would do, with a girl with a few drinks in her, is snog em.
    But that's it-never anything else. Maybe get her phone number, nothing that would lead you to a crime.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement