FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Lumi77 · 07-03-2017 12:26PM

makemecrazy wrote: »

Can anyone provide a short reason of the impact Denis O'Brien and Angela Keirns have had to Dail Privilege in Constitutional law please?

Someone wrote it yesterday.

Lumi77 · 07-03-2017 12:28PM

the great communicator wrote: »

Sexual Assault
Non Fatal Offences
Homicide
Offences v Property
Defences

Know a case or for each of the different aspects of the above.

Minor v Non Minor offences
Mens Rea
Actus Reus

Know enough to write an essay on each of the aspects of the above.

Had a look and you should do complicity inchoate offences trial in due course of law and bail arrest access to solicitor
Hope that helps

MurphyL · 07-03-2017 12:34PM

Lumi77 wrote: »

Someone wrote it yesterday.

What topic is this under?

Lumi77 · 07-03-2017 01:12PM

MurphyL wrote: »

What topic is this under?

Kerins v PAC you can find the case on baillii but it's basically about separation of powers and art 15.2
I'll send you later all I have I waslimited get for it yesterday myself

the great communicator · 07-03-2017 01:18PM

Does anyone know what the main 2015 cases would be for constitutional? I'm sure I have them covered but I haven't made a point in noting the years of anything that isn't 2016 and I'd like to hone in on them.

kevin125 · 07-03-2017 01:27PM

Hi all, what would be the main cases to focos in on, for the case note question in Constitution?? . Thanks

Lindyloo 1 · 07-03-2017 02:09PM

kevin125 wrote: »

Hi all, what would be the main cases to focos in on, for the case note question in Constitution?? . Thanks

About 2 weeks ago someone posted cases specifically mentioned in Dr Eoin O Carolan's UCD talk.

Lindyloo 1 · 07-03-2017 02:18PM

I did constitutional during last sitting but remember prep course lecturer mentioning a few cases of note that didn't come up in Oct - Bederev (non delegation doctrine), Judge Barry White case (livelihood), and Thomas Reid (property). Can't remember the rest.

FreeFallin94 · 07-03-2017 04:05PM

Would anyone be able to send me on October's contract law exam paper? Would highly appreciate it!

the great communicator · 07-03-2017 04:10PM

Bederev is a banker.

If it's not on the paper in some form I'll fly to Turkey on Monday morning, cross the southern border under cover of night and pledge my undying allegiance to the caliphate. And that's a promise.

HenryHodgson · 07-03-2017 05:22PM

Does anyone have an up to date exam grid for criminal??

I can offer sample answers and other grids in turn

Thanks!

BASHBAG · 07-03-2017 07:10PM

Hey guys,

Can anyone enlighten me as to the current law regarding acceptance and electronic communications?

Does Email follow the rules laid down in Entores/Brinkibon/Mondial Shipping or is it something completely different?

Cheers!

the great communicator · 07-03-2017 07:21PM

BASHBAG wrote: »

Hey guys,

Can anyone enlighten me as to the current law regarding acceptance and electronic communications?

Does Email follow the rules laid down in Entores/Brinkibon/Mondial Shipping or is it something completely different?

Cheers!

http://www.allenovery.com/publications/en-gb/Pages/Email-acceptance-of-offer--when-is-it-effective-.aspx

I use that as a recent case summarising the area

BASHBAG · 07-03-2017 07:30PM

the great communicator wrote: »

http://www.allenovery.com/publications/en-gb/Pages/Email-acceptance-of-offer--when-is-it-effective-.aspx

I use that as a recent case summarising the area

Thanks a million. That case would surely be worth a few brownie points, should it pop up in the exam.

Cheers!

angelicapickle · 07-03-2017 10:11PM

For the Constituional case notes question, can you strictly only write about the specified case? For instance if asked about Bederev could we discuss unconstitutional delegation of legislative power in a broader sense and bring in Cityview Press, Harvey v Minister for Social Welfare and Cooke v Walsh for example?

Lumi77 · 07-03-2017 10:30PM

angelicapickle wrote: »

For the Constituional case notes question, can you strictly only write about the specified case? For instance if asked about Bederev could we discuss unconstitutional delegation of legislative power in a broader sense and bring in Cityview Press, Harvey v Minister for Social Welfare and Cooke v Walsh for example?

I would but keep an eye on your time.

Yohnathan · 07-03-2017 10:33PM

Can anyone please provide a contract law grid containing the previous paper please? Desperately looking for this! Can try provide stuff in return

Dylan123 · 07-03-2017 11:32PM

Does anyone have an up to date examination grid for Constitutional law please?

I can offer other grids in return.

Thanks.

Yohnathan · 08-03-2017 12:32AM

Dylan123 wrote: »

Does anyone have an up to date examination grid for Constitutional law please?

I can offer other grids in return.

Thanks.

I think I have it, let me look. PM your email address. Do you have the up to date contract one please?

shellbm · 08-03-2017 01:47AM

Can anyone clear this up for me - sorry if it's obvious..

If a person is found to be an accessory after the fact under s 7 (2) of the CLA 1997, are they liable to be found guilty of the offence that the perpetrator has committed?

So if X helps Y after Y has murdered a person, would X be guilty of the same crime??

Yoop · 08-03-2017 02:01AM

shellbm wrote: »

Can anyone clear this up for me - sorry if it's obvious..

If a person is found to be an accessory after the fact under s 7 (2) of the CLA 1997, are they liable to be found guilty of the offence that the perpetrator has committed?

So if X helps Y after Y has murdered a person, would X be guilty of the same crime??

It's a while since I did Criminal but I'm almost certain you're just guilty of 'an offence' rather than the same offence as the principal offender. Your penalty is assessed having regard to the seriousness/culpability of your actions with regard also to the maximum sentence it is possible to give to the main offender.

Flaredmizuna · 08-03-2017 08:15AM

The tort 2017 night before notes are up! They seem to include most of the topics so not much help as a guide for what might come up. Good Luck everybody!!:)

ArthurDayne · 08-03-2017 10:23AM

Flaredmizuna wrote: »

The tort 2017 night before notes are up! They seem to include most of the topics so not much help as a guide for what might come up. Good Luck everybody!!:)

How does one go about getting those?

ArthurDayne · 08-03-2017 10:29AM

ArthurDayne wrote: »

How does one go about getting those?

Never mind, got 'em

google first, ask later it seems

the great communicator · 08-03-2017 10:46AM

Could someone very kind please summarise what Hanrahan v Merck Sharpe and Dohme adds/changes/or says about res ipsa loquiter.

I must have read it ten times now and I haven't a clue, I just need a line it's my absolute emergency topic.

graduate555 · 08-03-2017 10:54AM

Would someone mind clearing up whether you would apply scope or close connection test in a vicarious liability situation? My notes just say the court applies them interchangeably, and that scope applies for intentional wrongs - but the cases seem to show the opposite..

the great communicator · 08-03-2017 11:00AM

graduate555 wrote: »

Would someone mind clearing up whether you would apply scope or close connection test in a vicarious liability situation? My notes just say the court applies them interchangeably, and that scope applies for intentional wrongs - but the cases seem to show the opposite..

http://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/mohamud-v-wm-morrison-supermarkets-supreme-court-decision-on-vicarious-liab

I think that's a good summary and also a handy recent case.

kyliewyote7 · 08-03-2017 11:01AM

the great communicator wrote: »

Could someone very kind please summarise what Hanrahan v Merck Sharpe and Dohme adds/changes/or says about res ipsa loquiter.

I must have read it ten times now and I haven't a clue, I just need a line it's my absolute emergency topic.

My reading is it added that the matter to be proved was within the particular knowledge of the defendant. I don't have an in depth understanding of it as like you I just wanted a line about it so someone may correct me on that.

MurphyL · 08-03-2017 11:15AM

So this is a very stupid question but what is fair procedures? Is that essentially trial in due course of law? Manual doesn't refer to it

graduate555 · 08-03-2017 11:15AM

kyliewyote7 wrote: »

My reading is it added that the matter to be proved was within the particular knowledge of the defendant. I don't have an in depth understanding of it as like you I just wanted a line about it so someone may correct me on that.

I've understood the same - the evidence needed must be impossible for the plaintiff to come by because it is exclusively within the defendants knowledge, not just easier for the defendant to prove because of his skills, knowledge, etc

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments