Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Michael Street Development Granted

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »

    Great stuff, hopefully next stage moves along nicely too


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Hoffmans


    Nama & fine Gael politicians developing together , something stinks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Hoffmans wrote: »
    Nama & fine Gael politicians developing together , something stinks!

    I think what stinks is they are taking credit for getting to this stage. What they did in reality is very debatable. Sure if you even read the article it say “NAMA’s function is to realise the greatest return to the taxpayer”. Getting planning permission for the site increases the sites value, they are just doing their job and what they planned to do all along. So what exactly Cllr. Cummins did to deserve sticking his name on it I would love to know.

    Saying that it is great news and exactly what the city centre needs. Fingers crossed there will be no appeals.


  • Registered Users Posts: 424 ✭✭Bluezar


    Brendan McCann still around objecting to stuff? Hopefully he lets this one goes as the city needs these jobs badly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    BBM77 wrote: »
    I think what stinks is they are taking credit for getting to this stage. What they did in reality is very debatable. Sure if you even read the article it say “NAMA’s function is to realise the greatest return to the taxpayer”. Getting planning permission for the site increases the sites value, they are just doing their job and what they planned to do all along. So what exactly Cllr. Cummins did to deserve sticking his name on it I would love to know.

    Saying that it is great news and exactly what the city centre needs. Fingers crossed there will be no appeals.

    I think some being a bit too suspicious/cynical on this front, Cummins was mayor when this push kicked off..he is probably the councillor with his name closest to it, his name, not FG.my opinion would be the council did most the work to get to this stage and it is highly unlikely nama would have done this without council developing plans, pushing it, etc.so credit deserved primarily to council and some to Cummins.maybe we will find out exactly who did what but that is unlikely.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭MRnotlob606


    Lots of historical building remains are in the area. Should be preserved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,773 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Hopefully there will be some serious archaeology done in the area. Awaits with interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Bluezar wrote: »
    Brendan McCann still around objecting to stuff? Hopefully he lets this one goes as the city needs these jobs badly!

    Not heard a peep from him for years, presumably as nothing was being built! :p

    Anyway great news, the donuting of Waterford has been a massive strategic failure of the last 20 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,773 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Not heard a peep from him for years, presumably as nothing was being built! :p

    Anyway great news, the donuting of Waterford has been a massive strategic failure of the last 20 years.

    There is a verb 'to donut'? What does it mean?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    The city development has come around the edges - Williamstown/Ardkeen, Six Cross Roads, Ferrybank (cough) etc rather than in the middle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    The city development has come around the edges - Williamstown/Ardkeen, Six Cross Roads, Ferrybank (cough) etc rather than in the middle.

    IMO you are way off thinking there is a doughnut development effect in Waterford, there is very little or nothing in especially 6 cross roads or ferrybank which most would say shouldn't have happened there or should have happened only in city centre.obviously we all know ferrybank empty shopping centre should never have been allowed by kk co.co.having the likes of tesco/aldi etc and some hairdressers, chippers, betting shops do not constitute doughnut development in my opinion anyway.probably next in ardkeen should be in city..can't think anything else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Guess what?

    http://www.waterford-today.ie/waterford-today-news/9683-disappointment-for-waterford-again-as-michael-street-planning-deferred-9683.html
    There was big disappointment in Waterford city and county council circles at the decision by An Bord Pleanala to defer a decision on the granting of planning permission to a major commercial development in the Michael Street area of Waterford. The multi-million pound development was set to rejuvenate this part of the city which has a large derelict appearance in the middle of its location. The decision was appealed to An Board Pleanala when Waterford City and County Council granted planning permission subject to conditions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭mire


    It's a short delay, nothing to panic about imo. Usually, refusals are issued quite quickly; I would interpret a delay as a positive. I would put a large wager on this being granted. ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 OrlaMurf


    Hi everyone, I see there's a lot of work going on around the apple market, there are talks of roofing this area, does anyone have any update on this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭The_Shotz




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭TheQuietFella


    Lots of historical building remains are in the area. Should be preserved.

    Quite an amount of hysterical looking buildings in the area but for whom or what reason should they be preserved? I'm all for preservation but at what cost to the future of the city? I took a stroll around the town yesterday and it is tired and faded looking. It needs serious investment and it needs great care and thought before any sod is lifted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    I agree, the shoddy shop fronts are a genuine eye sore. Dunno how much is being spent on the Apple Market but the council could so worse than spent a couple of million on the application of paint, wood, slate and lentils


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭TheQuietFella


    I agree, the shoddy shop fronts are a genuine eye sore. Dunno how much is being spent on the Apple Market but the council could so worse than spent a couple of million on the application of paint, wood, slate and lentils

    Where specifically to Harry?

    I personally think that compulsory purchase orders should be placed on both business and residential properties. Ballybricken/Barrack Street to at least Morrissons Road should be levelled. It has every appearance of inner city and doesn't do the city any favours!

    New homes should be built and not like those built on the Manor!
    Let's try to construct something with a touch of class about it!
    Something in the style of the Edwardian/Georgian era.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Where to start? Well Ballybroken is in right state to my eyes esp the electrical retailer on the corner (forgotten it's name) - has anything happened with Besco?

    The whole of Johns Street/Michael Street needs work and you'd hope with the Apple market development they'll be a push on there anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Where specifically to Harry?

    I personally think that compulsory purchase orders should be placed on both business and residential properties. Ballybricken/Barrack Street to at least Morrissons Road should be levelled. It has every appearance of inner city and doesn't do the city any favours!

    New homes should be built and not like those built on the Manor!
    Let's try to construct something with a touch of class about it!
    Something in the style of the Edwardian/Georgian era.

    This thread has just turned bizarre!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    BBM77 wrote: »
    This thread has just turned bizarre!

    I know, some of the posts you'd read on here look like they were written by people born yesterday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭Jambo


    Fantastic News for the City An Bord Plenála has granted planning to the Michael Street Development !

    https://www.facebook.com/johncumminswaterford/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

    http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/247264.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Jambo wrote: »
    Fantastic News for the City An Bord Plenála has granted planning to the Michael Street Development !

    https://www.facebook.com/johncumminswaterford/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

    http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/247264.htm

    Great news and the only change was to add an additional pedestrian entrance. Shows the type of objections that were submitted. Credit to the city and county council for getting the planning correct from their end to speed things through.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,203 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Was this the objection the stall traders had yeah?

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Was this the objection the stall traders had yeah?

    No some guy from Kilkenny or Carlow I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Anyone who lives outside the location (say 5 KM) that is subject to PP should be told to **** off. Another reason to extend the City boundary!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭Jambo


    I seem to remember hearing or reading that once planning was secured the site with planning would be sold as a going concern to the highest bidder !

    Can anyone verify this or is it a case that NAMA are going to develop the site ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    Jambo wrote: »
    I seem to remember hearing or reading that once planning was secured the site with planning would be sold as a going concern to the highest bidder !

    Can anyone verify this or is it a case that NAMA are going to develop the site ?

    Think that about right , need private investment, don't know if nama would take on 100% of investment, they have done similar in past elsewhere but its unclear.still, if this was your investment style, its looking well, planning in bag, design, council and nama support,etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Pg 18 of the Inspector’s Report http://www.pleanala.ie/documents/reports/247/R247264.pdf
    The retail need for the development is questioned. International multiple stores would find other locations in Waterford if local retail spend and footfall warranted their arrival. Wages are lower in Waterford than in the rest of the country and unemployment is higher. There are several empty retail units in the nearby Railway Square development and in the City Square shopping centre. The Broad Street centre has been closed for several years and there are empty units at a centre in Patrick Street and the George Street shopping centre. There are two large unused shopping centres less than a mile away in the Ferrybank area. There are other locations close to Waterford city centre that would be more suitable for the proposed scheme, such as the SDZ at North Quays.

    I was having a quick look through the Inspector’s Report and the section above from the appeals submitted is just incredible, I mean WOW. Apparently the Broad Street centre has been closed for years!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    The piece from the submitted appeal as quoted by BBM77 is just about typical of the idiocy that has retarded the growth of the city over the past generation. Head banger and silly stuff. We had enough of that to last a life time from a WIT lecturer. But, vacant shopping centres in Ferrybank,where the planning folly of Kilkenny Co Co is obvious, as a rationale for not developing some of the most decrepit and obsolete areas in Waterford city? Lets use them and further undermine the city centre. You could not make it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,201 ✭✭✭ongarboy


    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/waterford-city-shopping-development-gets-green-light-1.2985311

    More from today's Irish Times. Regarding the inspectors observation that there were lots of existing units vacant the n Waterford, that makes no difference if they are not fit for purpose for modern retailing. Retailers like Zara and H&M need about 20,000 square feet minimum and poky units in Georges Arcade etc will not do. I imagine the developers already have had discussions with anchor traders to custom build the units to order.

    In fairness to City Square, they are attempting to address their dated and tired looking SC by merging units to attract the bigger retailers too. Seeing inner cities rejuvenated is great news which is why I can't understand why local groups object to this new vibrancy and elimination of decades old derelict and ugly buildings!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    ongarboy wrote: »
    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/waterford-city-shopping-development-gets-green-light-1.2985311

    More from today's Irish Times. Regarding the inspectors observation that there were lots of existing units vacant the n Waterford, that makes no difference if they are not fit for purpose for modern retailing.

    There may be a misinterpretation here. From what BBM77 says the comment about "lots of vacant units in Waterford" came from the person who made the appeal and not the Bord Pleanala inspector. That is also my understanding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    For clarity from the inspector's report, it was the third party who made the comments mentioned.

    Grounds of Third Party Appeals
    6.1.1. Two separate third party appeals have been submitted by local residents. The main
    points made may be summarised as follows:
    • The site is unsuitable for development due to its location close to several
    protected structures including the city wall and tower. Waterford city has a poor
    track record of preserving its heritage.
    • The scale, bulk, height and mass of the development would dominate the area,
    adverse visual impacts.
    • The local community includes 6 schools. Concerns about increased traffic
    volumes as a result of the development, including HGV and delivery vehicles.
    Associated impacts on local amenities due to noise, dust and vibration.
    • The retail need for the development is questioned. International multiple stores
    would find other locations in Waterford if local retail spend and footfall warranted
    their arrival. Wages are lower in Waterford than in the rest of the country and unemployment is higher. There are several empty retail units in the nearby Railway Square development and in the City Square shopping centre. The Broad Street centre has been closed for several years and there are empty units at a centre in Patrick Street and the George Street shopping centre. There are two large unused shopping centres less than a mile away in the Ferrybank area.
    There are other locations close to Waterford city centre that would be more
    suitable for the proposed scheme, such as the SDZ at North Quays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,203 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Local residents appears to me be more in line with the apple market traders rather someone from Carlow/Kilkenny

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    • The site is unsuitable for development due to its location close to several
    protected structures including the city wall and tower. Waterford city has a poor
    track record of preserving its heritage.

    http://www.wlrfm.com/news/local/88437-waterford-s-viking-triangle-wins-the-great-place-award.html
    The Viking Triangle in Waterford has been named "Great Place" winner at the 2017 Urbanism Awards in London.

    The Waterford City spot beat off competition from Greenwich Market in London and Leicester Market.

    The awards aim to recognise the best, most enduring or most improved cities, towns, streets and places.

    They are voted on by leading architects, planners and developers in Ireland and the UK.

    The assessors noted that Viking Triangle is more than a traditional physical regeneration initiative and has enhanced the quality of life and competitiveness of local business.

    While it's true that one can always do better, I think the City has done pretty well in this regard, the walls and various structures are all still standing and shall remain so.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Hoffmans


    http://www.wlrfm.com/news/local/88437-waterford-s-viking-triangle-wins-the-great-place-award.html



    While it's true that one can always do better, I think the City has done pretty well in this regard, the walls and various structures are all still standing and shall remain so.
    Local business's in the viking triangle ??
    Do they mean the motor tax office, or the parking tickets desk..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    They probably mean The Munster Bar, Andy Jordan's, The Reg, Jade Palace,The Olive Tree, Gallweys Cafe, Emilianos, Mcleary's,Kite Design, etc etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,393 ✭✭✭danjo-xx


    I see that its finally got the go ahead subject to a couple of non material alterations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    The Irish Times business section over the weekend referred to this development in a short piece about job creation around the country, and mentioned that 480 jobs would be created during construction.

    I know now that An Bord Pleanála has approved it, there are no further planning obstacles. However what has to happen next? I presume a developer needs to come up with the finance and then construction can start. How likely is funding for this though? Rightly or wrongly, any investor could point to vacant units about the place (plus the Ferrybank shopping centre) and simply on the basis of the numbers, decide that it's not a runner. Is there money out there now looking for a home in provincial Irish property?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    Aren't vacant units in the city centre really just small ones? Ones that major retailers missing from the city wouldn't be interested in. Like how it's taking a pretty big rejig of City Square to create a unit for H&M (if rumours are true) to move in.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    JohnC. wrote: »
    Aren't vacant units in the city centre really just small ones? Ones that major retailers missing from the city wouldn't be interested in. Like how it's taking a pretty big rejig of City Square to create a unit for H&M (if rumours are true) to move in.

    You're right, but I'm looking at this from the standpoint of investors in places like London wondering whether to invest their money in York, Inverness, Cardiff, St Albans, etc., and who wouldn't be able to point to Waterford on a map.

    Surely when they're running the rule over the figures, they'd just be looking at a report saying that we've X sq ft of vacant space here for a population of 50,000 10 minutes drivetime and 250,000 45 minutes drivetime. Then they go "no, we'll put our money in St Albans because there are a million people within 45 minutes of the place and half the vacant space of that place in Southern Ireland, what was it called again?".

    That's the sort of thing I'm wondering about, since these guys only care about yield, and how likely they are to get their money back. I just have the feeling that it's not an attractive investment for the big money, despite the fact that we all know and understand the factors locally why it would more than likely be quite a success.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    Retailers won't be looking to choose one location across two countries. They'll surely be looking at as many locations they can get a reasonable profit out of as they can? It's not Amazon looking where to build a datacentre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Hoffmans


    This elephant won't get to the circus
    Sure we will have the big empty one in ferrybank when we grab the few acres from the Kilkenniers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    fricatus wrote: »
    The Irish Times business section over the weekend referred to this development in a short piece about job creation around the country, and mentioned that 480 jobs would be created during construction.

    I know now that An Bord Pleanála has approved it, there are no further planning obstacles. However what has to happen next? I presume a developer needs to come up with the finance and then construction can start. How likely is funding for this though? Rightly or wrongly, any investor could point to vacant units about the place (plus the Ferrybank shopping centre) and simply on the basis of the numbers, decide that it's not a runner. Is there money out there now looking for a home in provincial Irish property?
    fricatus wrote: »
    You're right, but I'm looking at this from the standpoint of investors in places like London wondering whether to invest their money in York, Inverness, Cardiff, St Albans, etc., and who wouldn't be able to point to Waterford on a map.

    Surely when they're running the rule over the figures, they'd just be looking at a report saying that we've X sq ft of vacant space here for a population of 50,000 10 minutes drivetime and 250,000 45 minutes drivetime. Then they go "no, we'll put our money in St Albans because there are a million people within 45 minutes of the place and half the vacant space of that place in Southern Ireland, what was it called again?".

    That's the sort of thing I'm wondering about, since these guys only care about yield, and how likely they are to get their money back. I just have the feeling that it's not an attractive investment for the big money, despite the fact that we all know and understand the factors locally why it would more than likely be quite a success.

    Well this is just not the case. If it was then the New York based Marathon Asset Management company that bought city square and are spending millions on it right now would not be doing so. Also, for decades now the estate agents in the city have being saying that the chain stores want to open here but they just can’t find anywhere to open in. The fact that as soon as a unit of large size becomes available in the city it is taken shows this to be true.

    I really don’t think that the Ferrybank shopping centre will put anybody of. Anybody in the industry worth their salt would know that it was a ridiculous Celtic tiger project / rates grabbing exercise that should never have been built. Also, there is not actually that many vacant units in the city. And the ones that are it is because they are so small, the owners are hanging on to them hoping that their value will increase or they are awaiting redeveloped.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Any word on Marks and Sparks? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Any word on Marks and Sparks? :)

    Could be wrong but can’t see M&S coming. They are not going great in general according to reports so they are hardly going to open more stores.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,748 ✭✭✭Deiseen


    Any word on Marks and Sparks? :)

    A guy from City Square (think he manages the centre) was on WLR, he said M and S are looking for really large outlets none of which we have in Waterford or will have, even with the new developments.

    Also, M and S is overrated beyond belief. People are finally realising this because they are in big trouble.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Not shocked! :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭iseegirls


    Deiseen wrote: »
    A guy from City Square (think he manages the centre) was on WLR, he said M and S are looking for really large outlets none of which we have in Waterford or will have, even with the new developments.

    Their store in Clonmel is tiny. If they only opened up one with a supermarket, I'll be happy. The clothes aren't anything special.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭Gardner


    does anyone have a link to the Traffic Management Plan / Study that was submitted with the planning application. 
    be interesting to read the plan in regards to construction phase and to when the development becomes operational.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement