Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Nintendo Switch (Nintendo's next console)

1205206208210211320

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭hairball


    magnumbud wrote: »
    I can only assume a direct or a video demoing it will come in the next 2 weeks. Maybe even in the days before. Would be strange not to even for nintendo who seem a good bit more on the ball this time round

    The lads on that snake platformer really seem delighted at how easy it is to develop for the switch as are the binding of isaac guys. As a developer myself i know how frustrating a bad development environment can be. Something that nintie have been shoddy at the last few generations

    Snake pass is looking amazing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭Nollog


    Is anywhere selling the dual red joycons?

    Looks like all the red red blue blue sets aren't on any websites anymore. Just red blue and grey gray.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭MilesMorales1


    Were they selling matching colour joy con sets?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭hairball


    didn't think they were selling those in Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    hairball wrote: »
    Snake pass is looking amazing.

    I only watched the twitch to hear the devs talk about the switch and do like the look of. Cannot wait for yooka laylee too. Forgot to back it before it was too late.

    Could get it on pc but just feels right playing a "rare" game on nintendos system. They were my favourite devs back in the n64 era and i dreamed of working for them. Shame they haven't had that same magic since ms buying them


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭hairball


    magnumbud wrote: »
    I only watched the twitch to hear the devs talk about the switch and do like the look of. Cannot wait for yooka laylee too. Forgot to back it before it was too late.

    Could get it on pc but just feels right playing a "rare" game on nintendos system. They were my favourite devs back in the n64 era and i dreamed of working for them. Shame they haven't had that same magic since ms buying them

    had an interview with 'em once upon a time. Impressive place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    This has been going on for weeks now. Anything pointed at as a possible flaw in the Switch is automatically defended blindly by you guys. No launch lineup? Hey it happened before! No browser? Didn't want that anyway! 1-2 Switch laughable? Poor marketing and branding!

    Sometimes you just gotta call a spade a spade.

    No launch line-up? That's a bit hyperbolic, isn't it? True, it's got a small number of titles, and most of us will be getting the switch for Zelda primarily, and the games that will be coming further down the line, as anyone getting a newly launched console does.

    No browser I truly couldn't care less about, whether it has one or not. Tried the Wii U browser a couple of times in the early days of of novelty. Similarly with the browser on my PS3. then never used them again. Easier and quicker to use the phone browser.

    1 - 2 Switch is laughable I think. I agree with you on that. Initially the ads looked funny, like this could be some fun WarioWare type game, but since then, it looks shallower than WarioWare, less enjoyable with less replay value. Should have been a pack in to demonstrate the HD rumble. Think it was a mistake not doing so .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    This isn't being advertised as a console so it should come with a browser on day one, e reader feature would be decent too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    RasTa wrote: »
    This isn't being advertised as a console so it should come with a browser on day one, e reader feature would be decent too.
    tumblr_no9d35J0qA1rv5j9yo1_500.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    RasTa wrote: »
    This isn't being advertised as a console so it should come with a browser on day one, e reader feature would be decent too.

    It absolutely is being advertised as a console, in fact they're going to lengths to refer to it as their next home console, to keep it separate from the handheld line, with the 3DS. They don't refer to the main part as a tablet either, as such would infer access to app stores and other such functionality.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    a computer system specially made for playing video games by connecting it to a television or other display for video and sound.

    I'm never wrong.
    Star Lord wrote: »
    It absolutely is being advertised as a console, in fact they're going to lengths to refer to it as their next home console, to keep it separate from the handheld line, with the 3DS. They don't refer to the main part as a tablet either, as such would infer access to app stores and other such functionality.

    Even their superbowl ad has more time spent playing without the TV



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭johnpatrick81


    I was just using those as examples, but all 3 points are good examples.

    The fact you say "most of us are getting the Switch primarily for Zelda" speaks volumes about the lineup considering most of you have a Wii U and it's basically the same game as the Wii U version.

    The browser thing I actually couldn't care less, but here's the stickler, some people will. Hence why it's a valid negative in the grander scheme of things. Even more so based on the portable nature of the Switch.

    Glad we agree on the absolute tosh of 1-2 Switch at least!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    RasTa wrote: »
    I'm never wrong.

    emmmmm it connects to a tv and plays games, all it does at launch is play games im pretty sure your own quote is exactly describing what it is


    EDIT: to respond to your edit your quote says to "televisions or other display" what is that thing on the switch? its a screen or in other words a display for video or sound


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    RasTa wrote: »
    I'm never wrong.

    From their own switch site:
    Nintendo Switch is designed to go wherever you do, transforming from home console to portable system in a snap. So you get more time to play the games you love, however you like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    magnumbud wrote: »
    emmmmm it connects to a tv and plays games, all it does at launch is play games im pretty sure your own quote is exactly describing what it is
    Star Lord wrote: »
    From their own switch site:
    Nintendo Switch is designed to go wherever you do, transforming from home console to portable system in a snap. So you get more time to play the games you love, however you like.

    It's not a dedicated games console like the PS4, Snes etc.

    It's a portable gaming system with a dock that enlarges the image. They are only doing themselves a disservice from the start by not taking into account other features people might use when playing it on the go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    The fact you say "most of us are getting the Switch primarily for Zelda" speaks volumes about the lineup considering most of you have a Wii U and it's basically the same game as the Wii U version.
    It's not basically the same game, it is the same game. The number of titles is small, Zelda is the big title for launch. I'd bet it'll be like Twilight Princess, where in this case the Wii U version will be a relatively small number, the Switch is the focus for it now.
    The browser thing I actually couldn't care less, but here's the stickler, some people will. Hence why it's a valid negative in the grander scheme of things. Even more so based on the portable nature of the Switch.
    Given this portable nature, it'll have to be tethered be phone to get Internet access, which kinda only makes a browser even more irrelevant for me at least. I'm sure some people would like a browser included, but in also sure that they'd be in the vast minority of users.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    RasTa wrote: »
    It's not a dedicated games console like the PS4, Snes etc.

    It's a portable gaming system with a dock that enlarges the image. They are only doing themselves a disservice from the start by not taking into account other features people might use when playing it on the go.

    All their marketing is around it being a new home console that can also be portable. Not the other way round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    I was just using those as examples, but all 3 points are good examples.

    The fact you say "most of us are getting the Switch primarily for Zelda" speaks volumes about the lineup considering most of you have a Wii U and it's basically the same game as the Wii U version.
    while in sentiment i agree something i heard some reporter say about picking zelda up on wii u or switch "why buy a game as the last nail in the coffin of one console and not just buy it as a celebration to the start of a whole new library of games" i also plan to pickup bomberman as it looks fun and snipperclips, i know its not a launch game
    The browser thing I actually couldn't care less, but here's the stickler, some people will. Hence why it's a valid negative in the grander scheme of things. Even more so based on the portable nature of the Switch.
    i would 100% agree with you if they said one was never coming along with netflix and such but they have said they are coming so i am willing to wait.
    Glad we agree on the absolute tosh of 1-2 Switch at least!
    it probably will be, i got it for about 25 pounds and said for that i can afford to take the risk of only playing it a handful of times but there is a group of us im work going to get together and try it out and purely to try and freak each other out during the milking game. my missus also saw the clips from the presentation and thought it looked fun so i will play it with her too. i will likely end up trading it in but i'll at least get a few laughs out of it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    RasTa wrote: »
    It's not a dedicated games console like the PS4, Snes etc.

    It's a portable gaming system with a dock that enlarges the image. They are only doing themselves a disservice from the start by not taking into account other features people might use when playing it on the go.

    what were the gameboy and ds series? handheld dedicated games consoles. they are smartly in my opinion trying to fuse there dwindling home console and there successful handheld console markets into one.

    by its very nature of not currently having anything else on it at launch it is a dedicated gaming console. i like many others will probably play it mostly as a home console in the dock but i love that i can take it where i want and if there is a footie game on the telly that i want to watch but continue playing i can undock it and keep playing. if i ever need to get the train or a bus i will love being able to take it on the go and its ease to pack up and take over to someone elses place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭johnpatrick81


    magnumbud wrote: »
    "why buy a game as the last nail in the coffin of one console and not just buy it as a celebration to the start of a whole new library of games"

    I can think of around 350 reasons ;)

    A lot of you are buying the Switch on faith and loyalty. I'd rather wait a year or so and see how it fares.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    That's an absolutely fair way to approach it, and it's what most people do with new consoles. It makes sense to do so! There's always this trade off with buying in day 1 with any console launch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭johnpatrick81


    Very true. The problem with this one is that Nintendo seem to have lost third party support and don't seem to be getting it back based on the first year's release lineup

    I think they need to win back a lot of trust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭magnumbud


    I can think of around 350 reasons ;)

    A lot of you are buying the Switch on faith and loyalty. I'd rather wait a year or so and see how it fares.

    100% correct. i have bought the last 2 nintendo consoles at launch my brother bought the 2 previous ones on launch day, cant remember if the snes was near launch or not as i was about 6ish at the time, i loved playing the nes but it was the day i first played Link to the past on the snes that i fell in love with games.

    sure the wii u was a flop but it also had a lot of games i actually loved. im hoping that the switch fairs better but i fell its a much better bit of kit even the wii u was lost considering the only 2 nintendo games in launch year were new super mario bros and nintendoland but this time they have botw, splatoon 2, mario kart 8 deluxe and mario galaxy. e3 will be very important for them and it to hopefully showcase some 3rd party exclusives that will come out in the xmas period.

    EDIT: i also decided to buy it at launch while initially thinking of waiting as i was given 500 in one for all vouchers as part of my xmas bonus to save on tax so i decided sure i may as well put it on the switch. those 20 seconds of extra loading times will add up like :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,120 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    I dunno about that, seems like they've better third party support coming down the line than they actually did with the Wii U (which isn't saying much, but any improvement is good)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    I can think of around 350 reasons ;)

    A lot of you are buying the Switch on faith and loyalty. I'd rather wait a year or so and see how it fares.

    People are indeed buying it for those reasons, some are also buying it for Zelda and the upcoming games (Mario Kart, Splatoon, Arms etc), not to mention the portability function of using those games. Launches are often over judged and critiqued as some sort of barometer for a console when in almost all cases much later analysis is far more accurate as to what a consoles fate will be. A year is a good length of time though, Nintendo will need a steady stream of titles to have been introduced by then.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,808 CMod ✭✭✭✭CiDeRmAn


    RasTa wrote: »
    It's not a dedicated games console like the PS4, Snes etc.

    It's a portable gaming system with a dock that enlarges the image. They are only doing themselves a disservice from the start by not taking into account other features people might use when playing it on the go.

    Nope.
    The PS4 is certainly not a dedicated games system, nor is the XB1.
    Both are marketed as also being media hubs and capable of numerous functions in addition to their gaming capabilities.

    Unless you are getting confused that, in some way, a handheld gaming console isn't a gaming console, in which case you are mistaken.
    Of course they are, as was the PSP, Vita and Gameboy consoles.
    Mario Kart 8 deluxe , running at 60fps on both TV and handheld modes, with 1080p and 720p on each respectively.
    The system runs on the TV at full HD and then 720 on the handheld to save power, making the device more efficient.
    So, no, not enlarging the image, that's what the Super Gameboy and Gameboy Player do, that's not what's happening here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,636 ✭✭✭✭OwaynOTT


    Are we only allowed to play launch titles? Will we not be getting more?



    Anyway, yesterday was a big love in today is more
    giphy.gif


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,808 CMod ✭✭✭✭CiDeRmAn


    Every now and again it all goes a bit dark alright.
    I picked up Edge today and it is possibly the least positive I've seen them report on a console from Nintendo.
    And, for them, it boils down to lack of choice in launch titles and initial cost.
    I don't feel, for me at least, that cost is a major factor, but may be for some.
    I wonder if a home only Switch would have been a cheaper and more attractive format as a result.
    Or, alternatively, a portable only Switch.
    Or develop them both in parallel, using the same format at core.

    The lack of launch titles is balanced with the fact that one of them is Zelda, but the article made a good point that Mario is almost certainly ready to go but Nintendo are spreading their big property releases of across the calendar, which would a shame if true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    CiDeRmAn wrote: »
    Every now and again it all goes a bit dark alright.
    I picked up Edge today and it is possibly the least positive I've seen them report on a console from Nintendo.
    And, for them, it boils down to lack of choice in launch titles and initial cost.
    I don't feel, for me at least, that cost is a major factor, but may be for some.
    I wonder if a home only Switch would have been a cheaper and more attractive format as a result.
    Or, alternatively, a portable only Switch.
    Or develop them both in parallel, using the same format at core.

    The lack of launch titles is balanced with the fact that one of them is Zelda, but the article made a good point that Mario is almost certainly ready to go but Nintendo are spreading their big property releases of across the calendar, which would a shame if true.

    I think one of the producers of Mario has said it's pretty much finished alright. I can see the method of why they are doing that though, if Zelda came out now and Mario in May/June etc, the 2 big system sellers would be out with nothing as big for the big holiday season. After missing last years one, they'll have one of the biggest, most anticipated games for that period, and in itself a potential system seller in large amounts. I think E3 will be very interesting to see their first year strategy and what may be unannounced up their sleeve.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭MilesMorales1


    Seems like they would have made it portable only rather than home console only, if it had been a choice. But its a home console that can be played in portable mode, rather than the image just being enlarged like the gameboy player did. Good try though.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement