Child refugees -majority to be males aged 17???

bubblypop wrote: »

They didn't do anything to make her job miserable, she was clearly paranoid.
Why she should think they were talking & laughing about her, is gas!.
Maybe she was so full of her own importance!

Paranoia seems to run in the family.

Mary63 wrote: »

I don't think its poor little snowflakes if someone actually dreads going into work because of their workmates behaviour and I posted this in relation to Timberrr saying how Poles were treated on the building site and how terrible the Irish were.This was an Irish person working on her own with maybe ten Poles and no one spoke to her all day.They laughed and joked among themselves in Polish even though a staff meeting had been called and they were told this was making their colleague miserable.This colleague now can't stand Polish people so another failed exercise in multiculturalism.

I don't think anyone could say the Poles bring a totally different culture to Ireland.
They are not that different to Irish people and they do fit in quiet well.
They are from primarily a catholic background, they like a few drinks, they are Europeans and they have a sad history of being conquered and screwed over by their neighbours.

Mulitculturalism seems to have been coined to basically sell the fact that integration, of in particular muslims, has failed.
Thus rather than one mono culture lets conceed that we have mulitple cultures in our society and some of these cultures basically wants nothing to do with the dominant indigenous culture.

Mulitculturalism basically admits fauilure of integration and twin or parallel societies.
Of course some would like to play it as meaning that immigrants can hang onto some of their old social customs, they can play their old games and sports from home, they can hang out together socially and celebrate their own holidays.
oh and they can eat their own foods and have their own restuarants, take aways and shops.

The Irish have done that in particular in the USA.
So have the Italians, Mexicans, Cubans, etc.

The thing is though they are American first and foremost and they didn't want to set up their own legal systems, their own parallel societies.
And they didn't detest the country that took them in, even when they weren't always very welcoming and not dishing out any handouts.

b_mac2 wrote: »

Ich persönlich glaube, dass es eine Lüge ist, dass du diese Sprachen fließend sprichst. Beweise mir das Gegenteil.

I don't care wether you believe me or not my friend I don't feel the need to validate myself to strangers on the Internet;)

b_mac2 wrote: »

Ganz wie ich gedacht hatte.

:rolleyes:

b_mac2 wrote: »

Ill speak English so, seeing as you obviously can't speak German.

Roll your eyes all you want, I've just called you out as being a liar.

You have asked me one question in German, I replied! Would you prefer I had replied in German? What would this prove? 20 seconds on Google translate could give anyone the answer to what you wrote and a reply. I could have replied in congolese or swahili if I wanted it wouldn't prove anything.

You have mistakenly called me a liar and I would like you to remind that accusation, The only way I could actually satisfy your question is if we were face to face.

gitzy16v wrote: »

Exactly.

So your silly little test proves nothing

Now please apologise for calling me a liar.

gitzy16v wrote: »

Refrain from getting frothy at the mouth with rage.
I called you nothing of the sort.

My apologies I has you mixed up with another poster.

b_mac2 wrote: »

There you go.

My call out still stands, you're a spoof.

Thing is - those posts are undeniably racist.

Re: Calais unaccompanied minors - no problem here with taking them in, nor with pulling such a percentage of our Syrian refugee numbers from Calais rather than Turkey/Jordan. My only query is on the costs mooted for this 20 - they seem entirely overblown and plucked out of the air.

Great cavalcade of knee jerk bile evident in this thread though. Doing the country proud.

alastair wrote: »

Thing is - those posts are undeniably racist.

Re: Calais unaccompanied minors - no problem here with taking them in, nor with pulling such a percentage of our Syrian refugee numbers from Calais rather than Turkey/Jordan. My only query is on the costs mooted for this 20 - they seem entirely overblown and plucked out of the air.

Great cavalcade of knee jerk bile evident in this thread though. Doing the country proud.

For a start a lot of the so called minors from Calais and indeed off the boats to Europe have been proven to be bogus and frauds.
Two prime examples are the Berlin truck attacker who claimed he was minor when he first arrived in Italy although he was 19.
The supposed 15 year old refugee who stabbed the aid worker to death in Sweden was deemed to be an adult by the state and this is roll over and take it Sweden we are talking about.
One of the lone wolf attacks in Germany by so called minor was proven to be an adult.
The list goes on and on.

Also there were "refugees" (not refugees but economic migrants) in Calais before Syria really kicked off and lets just say a lot of them are a little too African looking to be Syrian

You are basically buying into the media, political, celebrity driven drivel that every one is a Syrian.
It is heartstring tugging at it's very worst.
And the left then complain about false information from the right. :rolleyes:

Of course when that Syrian myth is challenged the go to remark is that they are not all Syrians, but nevertheless they are refugees as they are fleeing warzones.
That can work when they are from Eritrea, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Chad, Sudan, Mali, Somalia.
But what about when they are fleeing Nigeria, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Turkey, Pakistan, Iran, Kosovo ?

And after you look at the nationalities why not ask what is the gender breakdown and the age breakdown.
Compare these "refugees" to pictures of refugees from any other previous eras.
Hell why not compare it to Bosniac refugees.
They were also muslim, but yet they were primarily women, children and the old.

jmayo wrote: »

For a start a lot of the so called minors from Calais and indeed off the boats to Europe have been proven to be bogus and frauds.
Two prime examples are the Berlin truck attacker who claimed he was minor when he first arrived in Italy although he was 19.
The supposed 15 year old refugee who stabbed the aid worker to death in Sweden was deemed to be an adult by the state and this is roll over and take it Sweden we are talking about.
One of the lone wolf attacks in Germany by so called minor was proven to be an adult.
The list goes on and on.

Also there were "refugees" (not refugees but economic migrants) in Calais before Syria really kicked off and lets just say a lot of them are a little too African looking to be Syrian

You are basically buying into the media, political, celebrity driven drivel that every one is a Syrian.
It is heartstring tugging at it's very worst.
And the left then complain about false information from the right. :rolleyes:

Of course when that Syrian myth is challenged the go to remark is that they are not all Syrians, but nevertheless they are refugees as they are fleeing warzones.
That can work when they are from Eritrea, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Chad, Sudan, Mali, Somalia.
But what about when they are fleeing Nigeria, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Turkey, Pakistan, Iran, Kosovo ?

And after you look at the nationalities why not ask what is the gender breakdown and the age breakdown.
Compare these "refugees" to pictures of refugees from any other previous eras.
Hell why not compare it to Bosniac refugees.
They were also muslim, but yet they were primarily women, children and the old.

The gender of the minors is really not of any importance to me. Sorry about that. I'm also rather bemused by how you managed to determine how I form my views on refugees, but let's just say that you're not winning any prizes for special insights there.

AnGaelach wrote: »

Because the bleeding heart buffoons have been intentionally rewarding deceit and illegality since this crisis started. Encouraging hundreds of thousands of make a dangerous trip by refusing to bar them entry. Encouraging the human traffickers to continue operating by sending vessels to rescue migrants and then taking them to Europe instead of returning them back. By (in Sweden at least) telling police to just accept any claim of being a child so long as the man doesn't look older than 40. By covering up crimes committed by groups for fear of a "right-wing backlash".

You seem a little confused about the responsibilities and obligations involved in asylum law. It's not 'bleeding heart buffooons' that enforce the obligation to review asylum applications - it's the application of the law. It's not an option to return refugees to Libya - it's once again a matter of adhereing to the law. So in a choice of letting people drown, or bringing them to Italy, what's your call? Nobody is covering up any crimes btw.