Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hail To The Chief (Read Mod Warning In OP)

15152545657193

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    conorhal wrote: »
    Do you care to point out what aspect of the report is inaccurate?

    There is no report, it's a review of a CNN piece, then some twitter comments. Solid reporting by Daily Mail reporter.

    Kudos for getting a quote from

    Lemon Goat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,063 ✭✭✭conorhal


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    You don't read daily mail articles expecting accuracy. It's about the emotion. The feelings. They've never valued accuracy.

    So no, you don't care to read the article you criticise or comment on the subject of that criticism least you be trigged by it and yet you value accuracy over emotion..... yeah


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,858 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Thought Michelle was very rude to Melania when she gave her that gift, looked very dismissive of it and didn't acknowledge it whatsoever. She just wanted to put it down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Thought Michelle was very rude to Melania when she gave her that gift

    Bloody immigrants, taking my house!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Thought Michelle was very rude to Melania when she gave her that gift, looked very dismissive of it and didn't acknowledge it whatsoever. She just wanted to put it down.

    Was it ticking?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    conorhal wrote: »
    So no, you don't care to read the article you criticise or comment on the subject of that criticism least you be trigged by it and yet you value accuracy over emotion..... yeah

    It's not an article though. It's some tweets and an interpretation of a CNN piece.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    Michelle obama showing her class or lack off. Shes just jealous of ivanka being the hottest first lady ever


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    It's not an article though. It's some tweets and an interpretation of a CNN piece.

    It's exactly the same as taking quotes from here on today's events and doing a report on it.

    They even added screenshots of the text


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,063 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    It's not an article though. It's some tweets and an interpretation of a CNN piece.

    Do you have any thought on that CNN peice? Or will you be just sitting with your fingers in your ears shouting LALALALALAFAKENEWSLALALALA?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Lackey


    Melania brought Michelle a present. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,783 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    ricero wrote: »
    Michelle obama showing her class or lack off. Shes just jelous of ivanka being the hottest first lady ever

    Michelle is much warmer person with a husband that she has a normal love based marriage with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    My facebook is flooded with "Goodbye Obama we miss you" posts.

    I've changed my picture to Donald Trump as Pepe the frog.

    tumblr_ljh0puClWT1qfkt17.gif

    Let the trolling begin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    conorhal wrote: »
    Do you have any thought on that CNN peice? Or will you be just sitting with your fingers in your ears shouting LALALALALAFAKENEWSLALALALA?

    Bloody hell the irony.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    RasTa wrote: »
    There is no report, it's a review of a CNN piece, then some twitter comments. Solid reporting by Daily Mail reporter.

    Kudos for getting a quote from

    Lemon Goat

    Everyone seems to do that nowadays. Even respectable papers. Run a story and then include some twitter posts. It's so fcuking lazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    conorhal wrote: »
    InTheTrees wrote: »
    You don't read daily mail articles expecting accuracy. It's about the emotion. The feelings. They've never valued accuracy.

    So no, you don't care to read the article you criticise or comment on the subject of that criticism least you be trigged by it and yet you value accuracy over emotion..... yeah

    Huh? I didnt criticise the article i criticised the daily mail. I just said they don't really value accuracy. They like to go for the emotional impact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Lackey


    murpho999 wrote: »
    Michelle is much warmer person with a husband that she has a normal love based marriage with.

    That's a bit harsh she brought Michelle a gift:confused:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    ricero wrote: »
    Michelle obama showing her class or lack off. Shes just jealous of ivanka being the hottest first lady ever

    Yes that's right
    Michelle Obama is jealous of Melania Trump.
    Because Michelle Obama would LOVE to be married to the odious vile Trump (oh imagine those little hands grabbing you and waking up with a mouthful of that hair, shudder shudder shudder)
    instead of the guy she IS married to.
    And Mrs Obama would LOVE to have Melanias academic qualifications and earning potential
    Instead of the awesome qualifications and earning potential that Mrs Obama has
    And Mrs Obama would LOVE to have 2 ex wives and 4 step children treating her like something they trod in.
    The post I'm quoting must be a candidate for stupid post of the day.
    Please


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Lackey wrote: »
    That's a bit harsh she brought Michelle a gift:confused:

    We sure she didn't nick it from her first? Like her speech. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    conorhal wrote: »
    Well, I see CNN are covering themselves in glory again as they speculate that a Democrat might become president if somebody were to bomb the inauguration in what reads like a breathy libtard spank bank fantasy... stay classy CNN!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4137436/CNN-says-Trump-s-death-lead-Democrat-President.html

    And they wonder why Trump ignores questions from their reporters?

    Did you watch the CNN report?

    In order for an Obama appointee to be appointed president, pretty much everyone in Congress would have to be killed in an Inauguration attack - The designated cabinet member who is not allowed to attend the inauguration due to that exact reason would become president. That is what CNN portrayed in their report

    Even then, the Obama appointee would only be president for a very short time because his term in cabinet ends at noon today also. So he still doesn't get a 4 year term. It would likely be a presidency lasting days.

    Such an event at the inauguration would unavoidable result in the CNN reporters themselves getting killed. So The Mail saying such a thing is something that CNN are tying to incite in nonsense. It was in-fact a very interesting and educational report!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    ricero wrote: »
    Michelle obama showing her class or lack off. Shes just jealous of ivanka being the hottest first lady ever

    I know Trump wants to have sex with his daughter but I'm pretty certain she'll never be his wife.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,063 ✭✭✭conorhal


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Huh? I didnt criticise the article i criticised the daily mail. I just said they don't really value accuracy. They like to go for the emotional impact.

    You critisised the Mail to avoid commenting on the substance of what was reported. That's an emotional response that has little interest in substance or accuracy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Grayson wrote: »
    I know Trump wants to have sex with his daughter but I'm pretty certain she'll never be his wife.

    Typical crying libtard response! FAKE NEWS! FAKE NEWS!!! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,063 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    Did you watch the CNN report?

    In order for an Obama appointee to be appointed president, pretty much everyone in Congress would have to be killed in an Inauguration attack - The designated cabinet member who is not allowed to attend the inauguration due to that exact reason would become president. That is what CNN portrayed in their report

    Even then, the Obama appointee would only be president for a very short time because his term in cabinet ends at noon today also. So he still doesn't get a 4 year term. It would likely be a presidency lasting days.

    Such an event at the inauguration would unavoidable result in the CNN reporters themselves getting killed. So The Mail saying such a thing is something that CNN are tying to incite in nonsense. It was in-fact a very interesting and educational report!

    Ah here, why would you be running such a report in the first place? Did they wildly speculate about Obama's assination during his inauguration?


    There's just no denying that this is agitprop with a dash of really creepy wishful thinking. It reminds me of Channel4 Four's hysterical masturbatory fantasies like their 'alt history docu-dramas' such 'The Trial of Tony Blair', or 'Death of a President' about the assassination of George Bush or their laughable one on the 'first 100 days of a UKIP government that ended in Armageddon.
    You wouldn't question the mindset or motivations of people producing such a report, particularly one so elaborate that they kill everybody down to the first Democrat they can find to sit in the Oval office?
    It's at best weird, at worst incitement.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    conorhal wrote: »
    You critisised the Mail to avoid commenting on the substance of what was reported. That's an emotional response that has little interest in substance or accuracy.

    Christ almighty, why did I even look at that article? CNN were talking about what would happen if the events in 'Designated Survivor' actually took place. It's a current show on Netflix and there's an inauguration happening so it's topical. Most people probably didn't know there was a designated survivor before the show took place and CNN are pointing out that the current one would be a Democrat. Talk about scraping the barrel looking for hysteria…


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭velo.2010


    Looking a bit sparse in the mall in Washington compared to Obama in 2008!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    Did you watch the CNN report?

    In order for an Obama appointee to be appointed president, pretty much everyone in Congress would have to be killed in an Inauguration attack - The designated cabinet member who is not allowed to attend the inauguration due to that exact reason would become president. That is what CNN portrayed in their report

    Even then, the Obama appointee would only be president for a very short time because his term in cabinet ends at noon today also. So he still doesn't get a 4 year term. It would likely be a presidency lasting days.

    Such an event at the inauguration would unavoidable result in the CNN reporters themselves getting killed. So The Mail saying such a thing is something that CNN are tying to incite in nonsense. It was in-fact a very interesting and educational report!

    Not to mention that they probably also talked about it because there is a tv show with Kiefer Sutherland right now that is about this exact scenario.
    Thinking CNN want this to happen is just dumb as ****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,858 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    We all know it will be Michelle running in 4 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,063 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Christ almighty, why did I even look at that article? CNN were talking about what would happen if the events in 'Designated Survivor' actually took place. It's a current show on Netflix and there's an inauguration happening so it's topical. Most people probably didn't know there was a designated survivor before the show took place and CNN are pointing out that the current one would be a Democrat. Talk about scraping the barrel looking for hysteria…

    Well about that we're in agreement... oh wait, you mean me rather than CNN don't you? :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    I see the lefties expressing their anger at democracy through violence again.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement