Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

El Presidente Trump

1…210211213215216…276

Comments

  • #6362
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    So you're saying you can't say how that is an example of narcissism then?

    You broke an agreement we made, and I'm still waiting lol. That's what I'm referring to. Someone like yourself can recognize that?


  • #6363
    DEFTLEFTHAND
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    Zubeneschamali wrote: »
    Until recently, the Republicans were all Russia is really the same as the commies that Saint Reagan defeated single handed on the Berlin wall.

    It's extremely peculiar how they have suddenly decided that Russia is their friend and there should be no tensions with Russia about anything.

    What's the point in poking 'the Bear' and potentially getting into a global conflict with them.

    It's good for the world to have Russia and USA on good terms.


  • #6364
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    You broke an agreement we made, and I'm still waiting lol. That's what I'm referring to. Someone like yourself can recognize that?

    What agreement are you referring to? All I can see here is that no, you cannot show how your link is an example of narcissism? Do you know what that word means?

    narcissism
    ˈnɑːsɪsɪz(ə)m,nɑːˈsɪs-/Submit
    noun
    excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one's physical appearance.


    Or is this just the latest 'deflect, deflect, deflect, let's not talk about Trump' attempt?


  • #6365
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    What agreement are you referring to? All I can see here is that no, you cannot show how your link is an example of narcissism? Do you know what that word means?

    narcissism
    ˈnɑːsɪsɪz(ə)m,nɑːˈsɪs-/Submit
    noun
    excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one's physical appearance.


    Or is this just the latest 'deflect, deflect, deflect, let's not talk about Trump' attempt?

    We made a bet that if Trump won, you would donate 100 euro to a charity of my choice. Don't deny it cause I'll just link the posts up here for everyone to see. You made no effort to get back to me on this.

    Edit: eh **** it, it ain't worth it tbh.


  • #6366
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    We made a bet that if Trump won, you would donate 100 euro to a charity of my choice. Don't deny it cause I'll just link the posts up here for everyone to see. You made no effort to get back to me on this.

    Edit: eh **** it, it ain't worth it tbh.

    Yeah, and I made the donation and posted it for everyone to see. I even told you when I would be making the donation, if you were too lazy to check it that's on you. So just like your sad attempt to deflect that you can't back up... What are you on about?


  • Advertisement
  • #6367
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Yeah, and I made the donation and posted it for everyone to see. I even took you when I would be making the donation, if you were too lazy to check it that's on you. So just like your sad attempt to deflect that you can't back up... What are you on about?

    Link to it.


  • #6368
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    Link to it.

    Stop being lazy, go check the thread, three days after the election, exactly like I told you I would.


  • #6369
    ebbsy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,260 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    humanji wrote: »
    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/16/obama-retaliation-russia-hacking-us-election

    Narcissistic gobshìte.
    If the hacking allegations are true, should the US stand back and do nothing?

    They won't be doing anything. Just like when -

    1 Russia were shooting down planes
    2 Russia were invading other countries
    3 Russia was/is bombing the ****e out of Syria.

    Obama wont do anything. No testicular fortitude.


  • #6370
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Stop being lazy, go check the thread, three days after the election, exactly like I told you I would.

    You've a record of being snarky and being a liar to other users. You've been called out by others in this thread and other threads for it. So I don't believe you tbh.

    All you have to do is link it and I'll apologize, that I didn't see it and you were right.


  • #6371
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    You've a record of being snarky and being a liar to other users. You've been called out by others in this thread and other threads for it. So I don't believe you tbh.

    All you have to do is link it and I'll apologize, that I didn't see it and you were right.

    You really are playing up to the stereotype here.

    1. Get told when it will be posted. Ignore.
    2. Get quoted as I posted it. Ignore.
    3. Get told when I posted it when you tried to claim I didn't. Ignore.
    4. Get told again exactly when I posted it, claim it's a lie and go for personal attacks instead.

    Its all right there for you early hours of Friday morning the day after the election. Why are you too lazy to check, is it because you don't want to admit you can't back up the narcissist comment or is it because checking facts is just too much hard work?


  • Advertisement
  • #6372
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    You really are playing up to the stereotype here.

    1. Get told when it will be posted. Ignore.
    2. Get quoted as I posted it. Ignore.
    3. Get told when I posted it when you tried to claim I didn't. Ignore.
    4. Get told again exactly when I posted it, claim it's a lie.

    Its all right there for you early hours of Friday morning the day after the election. Why are you too lazy to check, is it because you don't want to admit you can't back up the narcissist comment or is it because checking facts is just too much hard work?

    Why didn't you message me directly? I'm only on boards during work times when things are a bit laxer. The message wouldn't have been lost then.

    Also I'm taking a look and I can't find it.


  • #6373
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    Why didn't you message me directly? I'm only on boards during work times when things are a bit laxer. The message wouldn't have been lost then.

    Because it would make sense for you to check the thread where the post was made. Same reason you didn't message me about which charity you wanted it donated to, I would assume.


  • #6374
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Because it would make sense for you to check the thread where the post was made. Same reason you didn't message me about which charity you wanted it donated to, I would assume.

    That makes no sense, it wouldn't have been lost then.

    Tbh, based on your post record, I honestly thought you would break the agreement, so I didn't follow it up.

    And I'm still looking in that thread and I still can't find it.


  • #6375
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    That makes no sense, it wouldn't have been lost then.

    Tbh, based on your post record, I honestly thought you would break the agreement, so I didn't follow it up.

    And I'm still looking in that thread and I still can't find it.
    So by this logic, you posting rather than messaging me about what charity you wanted donated to made no sense.


  • #6376
    pumpkin4life
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Billy86 wrote: »
    So by this logic, you posting what charity you wanted donated to makes no sense.

    And it's right there on the Friday morning.

    Ah, I found it.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057633800&page=546

    Fair ****s Billy86, I apologize for that.

    I honestly thought with your record and previous posts, you wouldn't do it.


  • #6377
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    pumpkin4life wrote: »
    Ah, I found it.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057633800&page=546

    Fair ****s Billy86, I apologize for that.

    I honestly thought with your record and previous posts, you wouldn't do it.

    No, I stick to my word - was very surprised Trump won (as were most Trump fans, fair play for being the only one willing to take me up on the 20/1 odds offer despite me repeatedly offering it to people). I just don't like people ignoring facts to suit their own agenda, not sure what in my posting history would make you think I wouldn't honour it. :)


  • #6378
    HellSquirrel
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    Hank Scorpio wrote: »
    The same thing is happening now with media in the UK along with the US. There's no proof provided in either case only contradictory statements from Intel agencies and both Countries are blaming Russia, the MSM is in overdrive, are we not seeing a pattern here? It was different before but now they're straight up calling Putin out.

    Wouldn't like to be the Wikileaks leaker right now! Unless it's revealed the media won't stop, they straight up ignored Assange yesterday and his interview denying the leaks came from Russia.

    Obv there's a chance the US and UK are saying is true too.

    Well, at the moment, it does appear to be large intelligence agencies against an unnamed source. Assange isn't going to say it's Russia anyway! I mean, who would approach him again if he did? As far as Assange is concerned, he -has- to say that it isn't whether it is or not. That's what happens when you're a whistleblower site, you can't reveal your sources.

    So, given that Assange's word logically can't be trusted (because if it was Russia, he couldn't possibly admit it, or he'd destroy his own site) and intelligence agencies of two countries, one of whom is presumably non-partisan (insofar as anyone is - and bear in mind, if anything, Trump is "good" for post-Brexit UK, so we should expect to see a "nope, definitely not Russia" if they were sucking up to him - I'm really inclined to go with that it probably was, unless something more concrete than Julian Assange's word comes out on it. Or Russia's word :P


  • #6379
    A Little Pony
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Just seen an article of Hillary Clinton whining about the election. Lost the election and it wasn't even close and she is still moaning about it. The Democrats need to move on now, blaming Russia for everything. You didn't lose because of Russia, believe me. It's because you suck ass, couldn't fill a phone box to listen to the sh*te you come out with.


  • #6380
    peasant
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Trump:

    That plays well before the election ....but now, we don't care



  • #6381
    Professor Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Chump has appointed David Friedman as ambassador to Israel. Good man, Chump, that'll help bring peace to the Middle East. You just can't fix stupid.


  • Advertisement
  • #6382
    A Little Pony
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Professor Moriarty wrote: »
    Chump has appointed David Friedman as ambassador to Israel. Good man, Chump, that'll help bring peace to the Middle East. You just can't fix stupid.
    Because no one has tried fixing that mess have they?


  • #6383
    Professor Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    A Little Pony wrote: »
    Because no one has tried fixing that mess have they?

    Yes, they have.


  • #6384
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »
    It's good for the world to have Russia and USA on good terms.

    It is certainly good for Russia to have the Republicans agreeing to Russian terms.


  • #6385
    A Little Pony
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Zubeneschamali wrote: »
    DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »
    It's good for the world to have Russia and USA on good terms.

    It is certainly good for Russia to have the Republicans agreeing to Russian terms.
    Do you want war with Russia? Putin isn't why Hillary lost, people should get that out of their head.


  • #6386
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    A Little Pony wrote: »
    Putin isn't why Hillary lost, people should get that out of their head.

    Yes, look over there! Much more interesting than Putin personally authorising hack attacks on Clinton campaign to help his buddy Trump.

    What's that? Trump publicly called on the Russians to hack Clinton emails, you say?

    I'm sure he was kidding! A coincidence!


  • #6387
    A Little Pony
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Zubeneschamali wrote: »
    DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »
    It's good for the world to have Russia and USA on good terms.

    It is certainly good for Russia to have the Republicans agreeing to Russian terms.
    Do you want war with Russia? Putin isn't why Hillary lost, people should get that out of their head.


  • #6388
    Christy42
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,107 ✭✭✭Christy42


    peasant wrote: »

    I like it. Ignore the bits aside from the Trump videos as they could be argued as biased. The Trump videos are his own words. You then get one of the few points Trump supporters disagree with Trump on. Trump supporters think he played the left to get elected. Trump tells his supporters he played them. "That went down well before the election now we don't care". I.e. I said it so people who believed the lock her up stuff would vote for me. I said it to trick ordinary voters. "Then I started saying it [drain the swamp] like I meant it [because it got a bit cheer]. It was popular and people liked it so I said it even though I didn't mean it. This last one can be seen by his ridiculously rich cabinet - stopping the lobbyists from lobbying as the only people they could lobby is themselves.


    One very dangerous thing from the Trump administration is how quickly they disregarded possible Russian hacks. I mean he doesn't know who it was. Nor does he care. As he said it could be China (though China would have had reason to go after Trump not Clinton) but again he doesn't care who made the hacks which are purportedly ongoing into government affairs. I mean I would expect at least a I don't believe it is Russia but we will find out who it is.


  • #6389
    ebbsy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,260 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    A Little Pony wrote: »
    Just seen an article of Hillary Clinton whining about the election. Lost the election and it wasn't even close and she is still moaning about it. The Democrats need to move on now, blaming Russia for everything. You didn't lose because of Russia, believe me. It's because you suck ass, couldn't fill a phone box to listen to the sh*te you come out with.

    Great post.


  • #6390
    scamalert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,732 ✭✭✭scamalert


    Christy42 wrote: »
    I like it. Ignore the bits aside from the Trump videos as they could be argued as biased. The Trump videos are his own words. You then get one of the few points Trump supporters disagree with Trump on. Trump supporters think he played the left to get elected. Trump tells his supporters he played them. "That went down well before the election now we don't care". I.e. I said it so people who believed the lock her up stuff would vote for me. I said it to trick ordinary voters. "Then I started saying it [drain the swamp] like I meant it [because it got a bit cheer]. It was popular and people liked it so I said it even though I didn't mean it. This last one can be seen by his ridiculously rich cabinet - stopping the lobbyists from lobbying as the only people they could lobby is themselves.


    One very dangerous thing from the Trump administration is how quickly they disregarded possible Russian hacks. I mean he doesn't know who it was. Nor does he care. As he said it could be China (though China would have had reason to go after Trump not Clinton) but again he doesn't care who made the hacks which are purportedly ongoing into government affairs. I mean I would expect at least a I don't believe it is Russia but we will find out who it is.
    love the vid,the hacks,wasnt trump annoucing early in his campaing how he went to speak about internet security or whatever it was with Bill Gates < you know the inventor of internet and all :D


  • Advertisement
  • #6391
    FA Hayek
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭FA Hayek


    humanji wrote: »
    All US politicians throw their toys out of the pram when they lose. Trump has previously called for the Electoral College to be abolished and for people to take to the streets because Obama won. In North Carolina the Republicans are removing powers from the Governorship as they lost an election there.

    And now, when you have a transitional team making suspicious requests like for all the names of climate change researchers for the government, and when all members of the proposed white house staff have conflicts of interest, then people should rightly be worried their democracy could be in danger.

    Instead of claiming to be victims and blaming the messenger, maybe they should listen to the message and find out if it's true or not.

    We hear the same thing all the time when an election comes around. When people treat politics like following a football team then we get the nonsense and pathetic stuff from celebrities and the like. Oh, the other side can be just as bad, the likes of Rush and Hannity for example. Yet, people on the progressive side are famous for wanting their cake and eating it.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement