Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Season 6 Episode 8 "No One" - "Book readers"

123578

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,214 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    awec wrote: »
    Arya must be drinking plenty of milk for nice strong bones. All those falls and jumps and nothing broken.

    She doesn't pray to the Many-Faced God, she prays to Mr Skeltal. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Jaime is a totally different character in the books. As is Euron. Stannis would never have burned Shireen. Daario is very different in the books too.

    Theres been so much left out that its had a huge effect on some storylines. We now know that Mance was irrelevant, Mances baby was irrelevant, fAegon was irrelevant, Quentyn was irrelevant......

    PLus, we didn't get a a gander at Val or Dalla ffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,382 ✭✭✭Daith


    Brienne: Aren't your House words "Family, Duty, Honour"?
    Blackfish: " Yeah but we're tying up loose ends here"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,228 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Like others I'm not happy with Arya's unrealistically miraculous recovery. In an age without antibiotics, a perforated gut meant peritonitis and near-certain death. Unless Lady Crane opened her up and performed major surgery on her, or some kind of magic.

    As for Arya's behaviour leading up to the stabbing, I now have to think that she was trying to lure the waif in to her room, but was caught off-guard by the "old lady" disguise - perhaps not expecting the waif to do something that sneaky. The waif's orders were to "make it painless", after all, and disguisng yourself as old lady and stabbing someone in the gut is about as low and dishonourable as it gets. It's unprofessional behaviour from someone who's supposed to be a professional assassin, but then I may have read too many Terry Pratchett books and am imagining that Braavos has an Assassin's Guild like Ankh-Morpork's ...

    In its pure form, fascism is the sum total of all irrational reactions of the average human character.

    ― Wilhelm Reich



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,830 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Jaime is a totally different character in the books. As is Euron. Stannis would never have burned Shireen. Daario is very different in the books too.
    You're expecting a lot from the medium to be able to mirror what book readers see from Jaime's POV chapters in the books. His actions are not completely different, including how he gets Edmure to hand him Riverrun. Stannis was prepared to sacrifice young Storm for his King's blood and was very uncomfortable with Shireen's affliction. I see Daario as a composite character and tbh is not a mjaor character.
    Theres been so much left out that its had a huge effect on some storylines. We now know that Mance was irrelevant, Mances baby was irrelevant, fAegon was irrelevant, Quentyn was irrelevant......
    Many were irrelevant in the books too, including Quentyn. You originally said that it's a different story. I've just pointed out where much of the main story is untouched and although I agree that minor characters and others that we thought might have a bigger part to play have since been discarded, the main thrust of the story has continued in line with the books.

    Considering the size and scope of the books, it was inevitable that the filmed version would differ. To expect otherwise would mean we'd probably still be in the third book at this stage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    stankratz wrote: »
    Events in Bravos involving Arya this week completely broke my immersion in the story. In a show where I'll happily watch a thousand year old man-tree groom a teenage boy, where I won't bat an eye as skeletons pop up from the ground and elf-children shoot fireballs at them from the palms of their hands, where I cheer on a girl who owns three dragons and burns down a hut to murder 20 warriors but emerges from the flames unburnt herself - It was Arya's miraculous recovery from her gutting last week and subsequent impression of Trinity in the Matrix which made me finally go "Ahhh here..." while watching this show with material that didn't feature the Sand Snakes.

    The damage was done to Arya last week, yes, but it was also done to this story-line back then in my opinion. We've been watching Arya grow very slowly but surely in Bravos over the last two seasons. Most of that progression appeared to go out the window though when she went walking around Downtown Bravos like a tourist taking in the sights one last time in the daylight, while the Faceless Men had a contract out on her life. Her behaviour pre-stabbing was so off, so unArya-like that countless fans refused to believe it was her. "Arya is the Waif...Jacqen is the Waif....Arya is Jacqen testing the Waif", there are numerous theories of that substance over on the various ASOIAF sub-reddits. I read a few, and not one of them convinced me it was something worth doing beyond the initial shock factor, and something that wouldn't make any sense and the 'why?' was lacking in such theories. Pure shock, nothing more. Even at that though, I might have found it a little easier on the eye and the brain than what actually happened in this episode after Arya got stabbed to shít last week.

    The dragons, the magic, the White Walkers, I can buy all of that because as well as me choosing to watch a fantasy show, the show remains largely consistent in the parameters it sets when dealing with these supernatural elements. The show has never portrayed its human characters as super-human though. Yes there are certain exceptions to this - Jon, Beric, The Mountain - but Arya never belonged in that bracket and we've never been shown that she is anything but human and mortal. A potential hero, yes, but not a superhero.

    In the show universe so far, we have seen King Robert Baratheon succumb to the wounds he sustained after being gored by a bore. He got bad stomach injuries and a terrible infection funny enough which lead to his death, despite having the best medical treatment available and not jumping into a Bravosi shít-canal post-goring. We've seen The Hound get his ass handed to him, sustaining a few almost-fatal injuries in the process. The description of him by Ian McShane's Septon last week describes a man at death's door when they found him. We saw Ned Stark get sliced on the back of the leg by one of Jaime Lannisters guards and Ned was on the sidelines with that for a while. My point here is that our heroes, anti-heroes, and villains on this show are human, mortal and susceptible to the same biological dangers as us in the real world.

    Arya got shanked last week. The show went out of its way to show us the damage that the Waif was inflicting on Arya. Not only did she slash her, but she stabbed her at least twice deep in the stomach. On the second time while the knife was buried to the hilt, she twisted it around. That's a death sentence right there. Then the wounds are exposed to putrid canal water. I get that the show wanted to be brutal and shocking, but they can't have it both ways without something seeming amiss. They can't have our heroine take such heavy hits and then a day or two later be doing parkour around the city in epic fashion after a good night's rest and some milk of the poppy.

    At the beginning of the chase, Arya should have passed out from the pain right there after jumping from the balcony of the actress' house. Shortly after that, she slides under a cart along graveled steps on her front at speed. Her guts should have been left in a skid mark right there. Then she jumps down off a high ledge onto more steps, ruining a bunch of oranges and tipping the show's hat to the Godfather in the process, then proceeds to roll down these steps. It is now finally that she starts to show a bit of wear and tear, she should have been dead by this point though.

    It's only a fictional TV show and I'm writing a novel here, but it was quite disappointing. I've never really noticed plot-armour in the show, definitely not as glaring as this. As I said above, the damage had been done in the previous episode - Arya's behaviour out in the open before she got stabbed betrayed what she had learned about the Faceless Men and what she had learned from them, i.e. betrayed the last two seasons worth of character progression. Then the show went for an 'Oz scene' with the brutal gutting on the bridge. I'd argue that had they have just had Arya sustain a few superficial wounds, this week's episode wouldn't have suffered nearly as much. They would have gotten the ambush and step backwards for the protagonist, and they would have gotten the epic street chase this week without a million fans asking "How in Seven Hells?".

    I don't think Arya's time has been completely wasted in Bravos. Before she left Westeros, she had to leave. She wasn't capable of doing the things needed on her own in order to complete her list, and on her own she was going to get killed. Now though, she's leveled up a bit and her apprenticeship with the Faceless Men will stand to her. She can survive on her own now. It's just, it could have been much more and the conclusion of it was a mind-bender. Even Sexy Jesus looked confused as to what to do or say at the end, and not in a "Oh my Many-Faced God, you killed the Waif" sort of way.

    I don't have a problem with Arya luring the Waif to a spot where she could take out Needle and take a swipe at her in the dark. I don't even have a problem with the street chases, whether a girl draws on Robert Patrick's T-1000 for inspiration a little too heavily or not. It's that the show did this while Arya was in the early stages of recovering from fatal wounds. Wounds they didn't even need to give her. The stage was already set, the stakes high. We already knew Arya had a tough challenge given that the Waif had been making bits of her in one on one combat so far this season. The show went for short-term shock value and a cliffhanger finish with last week's stabbing, and ruined the conclusion of Arya's story in Bravos in the process.
    Perhaps Lady Crane had some flat 7-up?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,175 ✭✭✭intheclouds


    You originally said that it's a different story. I've just pointed out where much of the main story is untouched and although I agree that minor characters and others that we thought might have a bigger part to play have since been discarded, the main thrust of the story has continued in line with the books.

    No. Its moved so far from the books as to be a different story now.


  • Administrators Posts: 56,309 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think all along they said they will try to remain true to the books in all major story checkpoints, but how they get there might be different.

    The first two seasons they could stay very close to the books because the story wasn't as complex and the books were not as waffly as later ones.

    Now that they are ahead of the books in a few story arcs they have a lot more creative freedom. They can take input from Martin but they know nobody is going to be moaning that they are departing from the book storyline because nobody has read it yet. I would not be at all surprised if the future books differ significantly from what we'll have already watched on TV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Which would be great! Two bites at the cherry in terms of learning what is going to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,830 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    No. Its moved so far from the books as to be a different story now.
    That really depends on how you define 'story' doesn't it?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,305 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    No. Its moved so far from the books as to be a different story now.
    It hasnt moved that far. We are still within a few chapters of events that happened in AFFC for some characters. Obviously for others it has moved a lot further.
    In addition at this point we are in uncharted territory for many POV charactors, until we read TWOW we cant tell far they have altered the storylines. (Please be pre-season 7)

    I think you are over stating this "different story" opinion. You are entitled to it of course, I however disagree. I think it would take another TV season for it to fully diverge.

    Personally, so far I like how the books and the TV are differring. Different mediums have to use differents ways to show the story. I dont expect the TV series to have the same depth, bavkground and charactor development as the books.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,830 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Pter wrote: »
    Which would be great! Two bites at the cherry in terms of learning what is going to happen.
    I strongly believe that what will happen in the books will happen in the show. That's in terms of beginning, middle and end. The journey will be (and has been in some cases) different which is why the books will always have their place.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,305 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Yup. GRRM has always known the final destination for the story and the major characters. (Even if not all of them make it to the end) How they get there was the dilemma.
    He has previously confined in D&D this destination so that the show can end in the same place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,877 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    awec wrote: »
    Now that they are ahead of the books in a few story arcs they have a lot more creative freedom. They can take input from Martin but they know nobody is going to be moaning that they are departing from the book storyline because nobody has read it yet.
    No, instead we get to moan that the quality of the writing has dived off a cliff... :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,175 ✭✭✭intheclouds


    Tenger wrote: »
    It hasnt moved that far. We are still within a few chapters of events that happened in AFFC for some characters. Obviously for others it has moved a lot further.
    In addition at this point we are in uncharted territory for many POV charactors, until we read TWOW we cant tell far they have altered the storylines. (Please be pre-season 7)

    I think you are over stating this "different story" opinion. You are entitled to it of course, I however disagree. I think it would take another TV season for it to fully diverge.

    Personally, so far I like how the books and the TV are differring. Different mediums have to use differents ways to show the story. I dont expect the TV series to have the same depth, bavkground and charactor development as the books.

    Agree with most of your post.

    I find myself often speaking to non book readers lately and when they ask about things I am saying "yeah, thats not how they did it in the books, they did....." so lately I have been having more of a sense of it being a different story.

    I do agree the final destination will likely be much the same. But in terms of how they get there there are so many changes that I cant say its the same story anymore.

    Its stating the obvious that the tv show cannot have as much depth etc.. Thats not really the issue (for me), its more a combination of missing storylines, changed storylines, central characters with completely different personalities and frustratingly - things that simply arent believable (like stannis burning shireen or arya being shanked and then acrobatically bouncing through the streets).

    Im basically frothing at the mouth for the Tower of Joy reveal and they gave us Tyrion/Greyworm/Missandei filler that was awful!


  • Administrators Posts: 56,309 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I agree with most of the changes they have made for the TV series. My only disappointment is I would have liked to have seen LSH.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,175 ✭✭✭intheclouds


    awec wrote: »
    I agree with most of the changes they have made for the TV series. My only disappointment is I would have liked to have seen LSH.

    I like most of the changes too. The only point Im making is that we have "book story" and "tv story" and the two are different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭OhHiMark


    Can there not be a policy not to mention what's coming up in future episodes in here? I don't want to know what's in next week's preview, or which actors, and therefore characters, will be in which episodes.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,305 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Agree with most of your post.

    I find myself often speaking to non book readers lately and when they ask about things I am saying "yeah, thats not how they did it in the books, they did....." so lately I have been having more of a sense of it being a different story.

    I do agree the final destination will likely be much the same. But in terms of how they get there there are so many changes that I cant say its the same story anymore.......its more a combination of missing storylines, changed storylines, central characters with completely different personalities and frustratingly - things that simply arent believable (like stannis burning shireen or arya being shanked and then acrobatically bouncing through the streets)..........
    Had this conversation this morning with my son about the Dorne situaton. How I liked the long game that Doran had been playing in the books but how this story arc (and the Areo Hotah character) was completely overlooked in the TV series, most probably for brevity.
    The Arya scenes, I think were just bad TV, would have look better to have her wounded and still able to dodge and weave while playing very badly wounded.
    I also mentioned to him about the changing of timelines, Jaime being at the siege of Riverrun before Cersei gets locked up rather than after. Maybe not significant, maybe it will be later in the TV show.

    awec wrote: »
    I agree with most of the changes they have made for the TV series. My only disappointment is I would have liked to have seen LSH.
    Nope. Never liked that plotline from the books. And frankly at this point we need tighter editing for the TV show with only 10 episodes per series and only 2 more in this season with 1 pitched battle to take most of 1 of those.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,305 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    OhHiMark wrote: »
    Can there....be a policy not to mention what's coming up in future episodes in here? I don't want to know what's in next week's preview, or which actors, and therefore characters, will be in which episodes.
    This is for book readers, previously it was assumed you know what's coming. This has been the policy for 6 seasons. Obviously from now on the book readers are mostly in the dark but some people will have read chapters released on GRRM's blog.

    If you don't want to be surprised then don't go on to a discussion forum. I don't want to sound like an ass. Some guy came on here during the first episode 5 "The Door" ad break and had the ending spoiled, which I thought was a very foolish thing to do.
    I watch Got on a Monday night. So I stay away from facebook and boards.ie on Mondays when the show is airing. Works for me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,175 ✭✭✭intheclouds


    OhHiMark wrote: »
    Can there not be a policy not to mention what's coming up in future episodes in here? I don't want to know what's in next week's preview, or which actors, and therefore characters, will be in which episodes.

    Sorry I forgot I wasnt in a speculation thread. I will go back and spoiler my post.


  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tenger wrote: »
    This is for book readers, previously it was assumed you know what's coming. This has been the policy for 6 seasons. Obviously from now on the book readers are mostly in the dark but some people will have read chapters released on GRRM's blog.

    If you don't want to be surprised then don't go on to a discussion forum. I don't want to sound like an ass. Some guy came on here during the first episode 5 "The Door" ad break and had the ending spoiled, which I thought was a very foolish thing to do.
    I watch Got on a Monday night. So I stay away from facebook and boards.ie on Mondays when the show is airing. Works for me.

    Stating that the actor playing young Ned is coming in episode 10 is not book related


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭OhHiMark


    Tenger wrote: »
    This is for book readers, previously it was assumed you know what's coming. This has been the policy for 6 seasons. Obviously from now on the book readers are mostly in the dark but some people will have read chapters released on GRRM's blog.

    If you don't want to be surprised then don't go on to a discussion forum. I don't want to sound like an ass. Some guy came on here during the first episode 5 "The Door" ad break and had the ending spoiled, which I thought was a very foolish thing to do.
    I watch Got on a Monday night. So I stay away from facebook and boards.ie on Mondays when the show is airing. Works for me.

    That's fair enough for the current episode, but there are separate threads for speculation about future episodes. I'm not complaining about discussion on this episode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,877 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    It's also usually based on IMDB though so utterly worthless as a source. They've listed Michelle Fairley in the upcoming cast half a dozen times since the Red Wedding...


  • Administrators Posts: 56,309 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Tenger wrote: »
    Nope. Never liked that plotline from the books. And frankly at this point we need tighter editing for the TV show with only 10 episodes per series and only 2 more in this season with 1 pitched battle to take most of 1 of those.

    I am concerned that they said they only had 2 seasons left. It feels like we've spent a long time building up to something that they're going to rush through in comparison.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭Ben Gadot


    I have to say they sucked me in this season, as I really thought they were going to introduce LSH. With Brienne/Jaime converging on the Riverlands, the ramped up references to Cat (especially in the last 2 episodes), and introducing Lemoncloak, I really thought they were going to introduce her even though yes, it would have been far too late.

    I mean I don't even know why they bothered introducing Lemoncloak only to give him nothing.

    So when Beric turned to face the camera, I wasn't even mad. I just said to myself well played you ****ers for sucking me in. Nice touch having the Hound piss into the stream, what they did there wasn't lost on me. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭elekid


    I thought Jaime was sending Edmure in to take over and agree to honour Briennes letter from Sansa.


  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    elekid wrote: »
    I thought Jaime was sending Edmure in to take over and agree to honour Briennes letter from Sansa.

    Yeah, there is an entire army now without a castle and Sansa needs men. Was wondering that myself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    The castle would only have a few hundred at most inside it.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The castle would only have a few hundred at most inside it.

    Few hundred more than Bear Island could give.
    Tully declaring for house Stark and marching north would bolster the chances of recruiting more houses


Advertisement
Advertisement