Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Moderation of trans issue and terms

1242526272830»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,946 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    A quirke of the site rules prohibit pointing out who the anti-trans posters are, although it is plainly obvious.

    You can’t call a racist “a racist” either, same goes for a bigot etc. It’s seen as attacking the poster, not the post.

    I just don’t get why these people don’t just own it, why the charade and pretence? Are they ashamed of their views that they have to dress them up as fake concern and denial?

    “It matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be” - A. Dumbledore

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The site really is on its last operational legs. I don't think it's good enough if flame-baiting is only in some forum specific charters. I think it should be in the sitewide rules, which should be pinned to the main front page.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,901 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    A convenient quirk it would seem, let's you off the hook for providing any evidence of what you're saying.

    Kind of like the way nobody can provide any evidence of the anti trans posting that's supposedly rampant all over the site.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    More often than not, they just don't want to be seen as "the bad guy", from my experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    I mean we've aleady been told that the phrase 'men cannot give birth' is transphobic despite it being a factual statement.

    That's the level of allowable discourse some posters on this thread want, to imply that any reference to biology or truth is transphobic.

    Asking society to wholesale deny reality and demonise anyone who doesn't is not a workable strategy for trangender people. Sooner or later something in life will come along to remind them of their actual biology (say a transwoman with prostate cancer) and they will have to deal with that. Pretending and burying one's head in the sand is not a viable way to deal with dysphoria. Pretending that it is is unfair to transgender indivduals and unfair to people whose rights are being impinged upon in support of this false reality.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,350 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    So show us the transphobic posts then?

    This really is a complete farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The whole issue is that there is a separation between biology and gender. I honestly get the feeling you're so close to understanding the trans issues from a trans perspective.

    Not one trans person I know are blind to the fact that they are not the sex they were born, one reason being medical of course.

    But they are asked to be treated socially as if they were.

    One day I hope you can have a conversation with a trans individual about their life. I can see it completely opening your eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,350 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I think the site rules and forum specific rules are broad enough to cover all eventualities. Just look at the CA rules for example. It may not mention flamebaiting specifically but it's covers the types of posts you are talking about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Ok, have you a link to the site rules? I don't believe they do, which is why many posts disparaging minorities in general are allowed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    I couldn't believe it when Dr Upton described biological sex as a "nebulous term which doesn't really mean anything". I would not want to be treated by a doctor who takes that view.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gx07xdpw5o

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,851 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    'When it comes to moderating trans issues and posts in general, moderators should be free to use their judgement to weigh up the intent.'

    But they already are free to use their judgement to weigh up the intent. It's the whole point of a moderators job to do just that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,350 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I can't post a link for some reason on the device I am on, it just refreshes the page. Thee forum specific rules are pinned at the top of every forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    So then what you are saying is that I MUST refer to Isla Bryson as she, and to Lia Thomas as she, whilst also taking the Dr Upton side (in the Fife tribunal), because if I don't go along with it my posts would be seen as derogatory. I think that's what you're saying.

    In other words, I must comply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Here are the rules for CA:

    2: Do not post any material that you know or should know is hateful, abusive, harassing, false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, vulgar, obscene, profane, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or illegal.

    3: You are free to express your views in a forceful manner provided you remain civil. Hate speech, insults, and purposely inflammatory remarks (i.e., trolling) will not be tolerated. Do not post threats or state or imply that any individual or group is deserving of harm. If we tell you to refrain from behaviour that we regard as uncivil, or that in our view detracts from a productive discussion, do so or face revocation of your posting privileges.

    Are these what you're talking about? I should mention at this time, I am not discussing moderation of CA, but using this as an example given to me of rules that should already do the job.

    Do not post any material that you know or should know is hateful, abusive, harassing, false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, vulgar, obscene, profane, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or illegal.

    Seems simple enough. I would add in

    Do not post any material that you know or should know is hateful, abusive, harassing, false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, vulgar, obscene, profane, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, derogatory towards an individual or group of people or illegal.

    That's all.

    I can't find the site rules, which is never great for a site, tbf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    You said it was transphobic to say men cannot give birth. You didn't even couch it that to say it would be transphobic to go up to a pregnant transman and declare that with no good cause; that I could understand and agree with.

    You said that statement, in and of itself, was transphobic.

    That's a ridiculous statement. The entire underpinnning of sexual dimorphosm in humans (which evolved as a way to preserve viable mitochondria, the prerequisite for eukaryotic cells) is that one sex has motile gametes and the other large immobile gametes. Women as the sex that can give birth evolves from that distinction.

    No one should have to pretend otherwise for fear of offending someone who would like to live as the opposite sex to which they were born.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    What a mad idea.

    Having to play by a sites rules and standards!

    Everything we do, EVERYTHING, we must comply with the rules in place there.

    Play snooker? You must comply with the rules of the house.

    Drive? You must comply with the rules of the road.

    Bravo. This feels like a great breakthrough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Ok, I hear all of that, but...

    None of what you say negates the fact it is transphobic to say men cannot give birth when in fact they can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    To my knowledge it is currently not against the rules to post with the intent to be derogatory towards an individual or a minority grouping, which has led to many posts attacking or undermining minorites like trans people, travellers, Roma gypsys etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    Men cannot give birth. That is a biological function in humans that is unique to the female sex.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Ah, one day you'll have a chat with a trans man who's a father and they might change your mind. I believe you're close to opening it. For the record, I believe the statement, "Fathers can give birth" to be true.

    But I'll leave this part of the discussion. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand, moderation of trans issues and terms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Snooker & compliance, like female pool, where the two trans identifying "women" recently got permanently banned, why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,664 ✭✭✭archfi


    Oh that's part of the genocide dontchaknow, innit.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here
    👇️ 👇️
    Subscribe & Help Out If You Can


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    I'm a molecular biologist. I'm not going to believe impossible things that conflict with the entire underpinning of complex life on earth.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,350 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I would say point three in the existing rules covers it all.

    You could argue that rule isn't enforced in some situations, which is exactly what this thread is about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Well you and I may think that, but our belief is purely a biological belief which has been superseded by the rules of Transideology!!

    Apparently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,350 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    What is a man?



  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,577 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Thread closed.

    This is just going round in circles at this stage and honestly I'm not really sure what the point is other than to post somewhere the CA charter doesn't apply so people from both sides can spout whatever bile they want at each other.

    Go enjoy your bank holiday or something.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement